Abstract
In this commentary, I respond to Cozzolino’s (URBAN Des Int 27(1):43–52, 2022) recent paper titled ‘On the spontaneous beauty of cities: neither design nor chaos’ published in URBAN DESIGN International. In the last few years, the concept of beauty has been used widely in urban planning and design. Cozzolino’s notable contribution is a call for more diverse processes of creating grown/spontaneous order in planning and designing cities. He proposes this as a definition of beauty that can enable people to better express themselves. Here, I use debates from cultural studies to situate the notion of beauty within a broader critical context. Reasons why urban design research must take into consideration the ways in which beauty disproportionately affects different groups of people (particularly marginalised groups) are then explained. The aim is to highlight the potential discriminatory consequences of seemingly apolitical approaches taken to create beauty. This is in line with broader movements of the decolonisation of knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adorno, T.W., ed. 2007. Aesthetics and politics. London: Verso.
Bhabha, H. 2014. The right to narrate. Harvard Design Magazine, 38.
Colebrook, C. 2006. Introduction. Feminist Theory 7 (2): 131–142.
Cozzolino, S. 2022. On the spontaneous beauty of cities: Neither design nor chaos. URBAN DESIGN International 27 (1): 43–52.
Craig, M.L., ed. 2021. The Routledge companion to beauty politics. London: Routledge.
Cuthbert, A. 2006. The form of cities: Political economy and urban design. Oxford: Blackwell.
Felski, R. 2006. ‘Because it is beautiful’: New feminist perspectives on beauty. Feminist Theory 7 (2): 273–282.
Foster, H., ed. 1983. The anti-aesthetic: Essays on postmodern culture. Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press.
Gow, L. 2021. A new theory of absence experience. European Journal of Philosophy 29 (1): 168–181.
Harris, W.V. 1997. Ruskin’s theoretic practicality and the Royal Academy’s aesthetic idealism. Nineteenth-Century Literature 52 (1): 80–102.
HM Government. 2022. Levelling up the United Kingdom white paper. HM Government.
hooks, b. 1995. An aesthetic of blackness: Strange and oppositional. Lenox Avenue 1: 65–72.
Inam, A. 2013. Designing urban transformation. New York: Routledge.
Jackson, Z.I. 2020. Becoming human: Matter and meaning in an antiblack world. New York: University Press.
Jacobs, J. 1961. Death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Jameson, F. 1998. The cultural turn: Selected writings on the postmodern, 1983–1998. London: Verso.
Lang, J. 1987. Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
MacDonald, E. 2012. Beauty. In The Oxford handbook of urban planning, ed. R. Crane and R. Weber, 104–119. New York: Oxford University Press.
Miles, M. 2015. Limits to culture: Urban regeneration vs. dissident art. London: Pluto Press.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. 2020. White paper: Planning for the future. London: MHCLG.
Moudon, A.V. 1992. A catholic approach to organizing what urban designers should know. Journal of Planning Literature 6 (4): 331–349.
Osborne, P. 2013. Anywhere or not at all: Philosophy of contemporary art. London: Verso.
Painter, N.I. 2006. Creating black Americans: African-American history and its meanings, 1619 to the present. New York: Oxford University Press.
Romano, M. 2008. La città come opera d’arte. Torino: Einaudi.
Rubin, B. 1979. Aesthetic ideology and urban design. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69 (3): 339–361.
Scarry, E. 2010. On beauty and being just. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Scruton, R. 1979. The Aesthetics of Architecture. London: Methuen.
Scruton, R. 2009. Beauty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sontag, S. 1990. A woman’s beauty: A put-down or power source? In Women’s voices: Visions and perspectives, ed. P. Hoy, E. Schor, and R. Diyanni, 359–361. New York: McGraw Hill.
Venturi, R. 1977. Complexity and contradiction in architecture, 2nd ed. New York: Museum of Modern Art, Distributed by New York Graphic Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Araabi, H.F. Commentary: beauty in urban design - oppression or emancipation?. Urban Des Int (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-022-00202-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-022-00202-z