Abstract
Against the backdrop of the expansion of the literacy curriculum to include multiliteracies in education systems around the world, we discuss how a design-based research approach can contribute to practical outcomes in building the participating teachers’ confidence and competence in their pedagogical practices, developing scalable lesson resources for other teachers to use and adapt, and distilling design principles that can inform the teaching of multiliteracies across contexts. In this paper, we introduce the research project we have implemented based on a design-based research (DBR) approach and describe the features of the project in relation to the characteristics of DBR. We highlight the focus in DBR to improve practice and discuss how the classroom practices of the participating teachers have improved. We also draw on the perceptions of the teachers from the interviews and reflections they have made and suggest that they have grown professionally in their confidence. Through the co-design sessions between the researchers and teachers, we have distilled design principles, that is the learning processes for the teaching and learning of multiliteracies. These learning processes are applied to guide the design of the lesson packages as resources for teachers. While it is well-recognized that teachers are critical in the implementation of curricular reforms, we are interested to understand how researchers and teachers can work together through a design-based research approach to fully implement the curricular reforms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.
Bomer, R., Zoch, M., & David, A. D. (2010). Redesigning memoir: A design-based investigation of materiality and new literacy practices in an elementary classroom’s writing workshop. In R. T. Jimenez, V. J. Risko, M. K. Hundley, & D. W. Rowe (Eds.), 59th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 216–229). National Reading Conference, Inc.
Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bull, G., & Anstey, M. (2019). Elaborating multiliteracies through multimodal texts changing classroom practices and developing teacher pedagogies. Routledge.
Chia, A., & Chan, C. (2017). Re-defining ‘reading’ in the 21st century. Beyond Words: A Journal on Applied Linguistics and Language Education, 5(2), 98–105.
Christie, F. (1993). Curriculum genres: Planning for effective teaching. Routledge.
Christie, F. (1997). Curriculum macrogenres as forms of initiation into a culture. Continuum.
Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. Continuum.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies, 4(3), 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kaantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design (pp. 1–36). Palgrave Macmillan.
Curriculum Planning Development Division. (2018). English language syllabus 2020: Primary & secondary (Express/Normal [Academic]). Ministry of Education.
English Language Institute of Singapore. (2016). 50 years of development in English language teaching and learning in Singapore.
Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education. Finnish National Agency for Education.
Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655–685.
Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100710–100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710
Ho, C. M. L. (2010). Multimodal meaning-making in the new media age: The case of a language-based design research intervention. NIE Research Brief No 11-005.
Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2003). Multimodal literacy. Peter Lang.
Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2006). Design-based research in science education: One step towards methodology. Nordina, 4, 54–68.
Juuti, T., Rattya, K., Lehtonen, T., & Kopra, M.-J. (2017). Pedagogical content knowledge in product development education [conference presentation]. Oslo, Norway, E&PDE Conference.
Kalantzis, M. (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 154–178). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Karatza, S. (2020). Developing primary school students’ multimodal literacy in digital environments. In N. Vasta & A. Baldry (Eds.), Multiliteracy advances and multimodal challenges in ELT environments (pp. 111–130). Forum.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kapoyannis, T. (2019). Literacy engagement in multilingual and multicultural learning spaces. TESL Canada Journal, 36(2), 1–25.
Kim, M. S. (2017). Multimodal modeling activities with special needs students in an informal learning context: Vygotsky revisited. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2133–2154.
Lim, F.V., & Tan, K.Y.S. (2017). Multimodal translational research: Teaching visual texts. In O. Seizov & J. Wildfeuer (Eds.), New studies in multimodality: Conceptual and methodological elaborations (pp. 175–200). London & New York: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350026544.0014.
Lim, F.V., & Tan, K.Y.S. (2018). Developing multimodal literacy through teaching the critical viewing of films in Singapore. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.882.
Lim, F.V., Weninger, C., Chia, A., Nguyen, T.T.H., Tan, J.M., Adams, J.L., Tan-Chia, L., Peters, C.M., Towndrow, P.A., & Unsworth, L. (2020). Multiliteracies in the Singapore English Language classroom: Perceptions and practices. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Lim, F.V. (2021). Designing learning with embodied teaching. Perspectives from multimodality. London & New York: Routledge.
Lim, F.V., & Nguyen, T.T.H. (2021). Design-based research approach for teacher learning: A case study from Singapore. ELT Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab035.
Lim, F.V., Weninger, C., & Nguyen, T.T.H. (2021). ‘I expect boredom’ – Students’ experiences and expectations of multiliteracies learning. Literacy, 55(2), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12243.
Lim, F.V., & Toh, W. (2022). Developing a metafunctional framework for understanding the design of educational apps. In S. Diamantopoulou & S. Ørevik (Eds.), Multimodality in English language learning, Routledge studies in multimodality. (pp. 117-130). London & New York: Routledge.
Lim, F.V., Chia, A., & Nguyen, T.T.H. (2022a). From the beginning, I think it was a stretch – teachers’ perceptions and practices in teaching multiliteracies, English Teaching: Practice & Critique. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-04-2021-0025
Lim, F. V., Chia, A., Weninger, C., Tan-Chia, L., Nguyen, T. T. H., Tan, J. M., Peters, C. M., Adams, J. L., Towndrow, P. A. & Unsworth, L. (2022b). Multiliteracies in the Singapore English Language Classroom: Designing Learning. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Lim, F.V., Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2022c). A metalanguage for learning: Rebalancing the cognitive with the sociomaterial. Frontiers in Communication. 7:830613. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.830613.
Lim, F.V. & Tan-Chia, L. (2023). Designing learning for multimodal literacy: Teaching viewing and representing. London & New York: Routledge.
Macken-Horarik, M., Love, K., Sandiford, C., & Unsworth, L. (2017). Functional grammatics. Routledge.
Menon, P. K. (2015). Multimodal tasks to support science learning in linguistically diverse classrooms: Three complementary perspectives. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of California, USA.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
O’Halloran, K. L. (1996). The discourse of secondary school mathematics. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Murdoch University, Australia.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2004). Discourse in secondary school Mathematics classrooms according to social class and gender. In J. A. Foley (Ed.), Language, education and discourse: Functional approaches (pp. 191–225). Continuum.
Rasi, P., Kangas, M., & Ruokamo, H. (2019). Promoting multiliteracy in the Finnish educational system. In M. Paksuniemi & P. Keskitalo (Eds.), Introduction to Finnish educational system (pp. 97–111). Brill/Sense Publishers.
Reeves, S. (2000). Community-based interprofessional education for medical, nursing and dental students. Health & Social Care in the Community, 8(4), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.2000.00251.x
Riazi, M., Shi, L., & Haggerty, J. (2018). Analysis of the empirical research in the journal of second language writing at its 25th year (1992–2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 41–54.
Roschelle, J., & Penuel, W. R. (2006). Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences, 606612.
Sharari, B.H. I., Lim, F.V., Hung, D., & Kwan, Y.M. (2018). Cultivating sustained professional learning within a centralised education system. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1366343
Talbert, J. E., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1999). Assessing the school environment: Embedded contexts and bottom-up research strategies. In S. L. Friedman & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span (pp. 197–227). American Psychological Association.
Tan, C. (2006). Creating thinking schools through ‘Knowledge and Inquiry’: The curriculum challenges for Singapore. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 89–105.
Towndrow, P. A., Brudvik, O. C., & Natarajan, U. (2009). Creating and interpreting multimodal representations of knowledge: Case studies from two Singapore classrooms. In C. H. Ng & P. Renshaw (Eds.), Reforming learning education in the Asia-Pacific region: Issues, concerns and prospects (pp. 129–158). Springer.
Tressou, E., Mitakidou, S., & Karagianni, P. (2015). Roma inclusion: International and Greek experience. Aristotle University.
Unsworth, L. (2014). Towards a metalanguage for multimedia narrative interpretation and authoring pedagogy. In L. Unsworth & A. Thomas (Eds.), English teaching and new literacies pedagogy: Interpreting and authoring digital multimedia narratives (pp. 1–22). Peter Lang Publishing.
van Leeuwen, T. (2017). Multimodal literacy. Metaphor, 4, 17–23.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press
Zammit, K. (2018). “We’re all real serious filmmakers”: Learning about and creating multimodal mini-documentaries. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 17(4), 371–386.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2021, August 24). Australian Curriculum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge the contributions of Dr Nguyen Thi Thu Ha, Dr Lydia Tan-Chia, and Tan Jia Min in the research project, and thank the schools, teachers, and students for their participation.
Funding
This study was funded by Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE) under the Education Research Funding Programme (DEV 01/18 VL) and administered by National Institute of Education (NIE), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Singapore MOE and NIE. This research has received clearance from the NTU-Institutional Review Board [IRB-2019-2-038].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lim, F.V. A Design-Based Research Approach to the Teaching and Learning of Multiliteracies. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 32, 641–653 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00683-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00683-0