Abstract
Introduction
Odor perception can be achieved through ortho or retronasal routes, with the latter being an important component of flavor perception. There are significant olfactory differences that exist between rats and humans and by understanding the role of structural differences, further insight can be gained into the mechanism of odorant perception via ortho or retronasal routes.
Methods
3D human and rat (Sprague–Dawley) computational models were used to investigate nasal anatomy impact on ortho vs. retronasal odorant transport to the olfactory epithelium. The nasal pharynx region was modified for human and rat models to probe nasal structure impact on ortho vs. retro olfaction. Sixty-five odorant absorption rates to the olfactory epithelium were extracted from each model.
Results
The retronasal route provided higher peak odorant absorption compared to orthonasal route for human (left: 90% higher, right: 45% higher), but substantially lowered peak absorption for rat (medial: 97% lower, lateral: 75% lower). For both models, anatomical modification had minimal impact to orthonasal routes, but substantially modulated the retronasal route: decrease (left: − 41.4%, right: − 44.2%) for human, and increase to the medial (29.5%) but not to lateral (− 14.3%) for rat.
Conclusions
There exist key differences between humans and rats regarding retro/orthonasal odorant transport routes, which matched well with experimental olfactory bulb activity data in literature.
Implications
While humans have equivalent odorant delivery between routes, the difference in retro and orthonasal routes in rodents is substantial and changes to the transverse lamina above the nasopharynx can substantially modulate the retronasal route, but not enough to bridge the gap between the two routes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cowart BJ, Halpern BP, Varga EK (1999) A clinical test of retronasal olfaction [Abstract]. In: Twenty-first annual meeting of the association for chemoreception sciences; 1999 Apr 14–18, Sarasota, FL. Chem Senses 24 1999. Abstract nr 608
Cowart BJ, Halpern BP, Rosen D, Klock CT, Pribitkin EA (2003) Differential loss of retronasal relative to orthonasal olfaction in a clinical population [Abstract]. In: Twenty-fifth annual meeting of the association for chemoreception sciences; 2003 Apr 9-13; Sarasota, FL. Chem Senses 28, 2003. Abstract nr A65
Eiting TP, Smith TD, Perot JB, Dumont ER (2014) The role of the olfactory recess in olfactory airflow. J Exp Biol 217(10):1799–1803. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.097402
Eiting TP, Perot JB, Dumont ER (2015) How much does nasal cavity morphology matter? Patterns and rates of olfactory airflow in phyllostomid bats. Proc Biol Sci 282(1800):20142161. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2161
Féron F, Perry C, McGrath JJ, Mackay-Sim A (1998) New techniques for biopsy and culture of human olfactory epithelial neurons. Arch Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 124(8):861. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.124.8.861
Gautam SH, Verhagen JV (2012a) Retronasal odor representations in the dorsal olfactory bulb of rats. J Neurosci 32(23):7949–7959. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1413-12.2012
Gautam SH, Verhagen JV (2012b) Direct behavioral evidence for retronasal olfaction in rats. Schaefer A, ed. PLoS ONE 7(9):e44781. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044781
Hahn I, Scherer PW, Mozell MM (1993) Velocity profiles measured for airflow through a large-scale model of the human nasal cavity. J Appl Physiol 75(5):2273–2287. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.75.5.2273
Hannum M, Stegman MA, Fryer JA, Simons CT (2018) Different olfactory percepts evoked by orthonasal and retronasal odorant delivery. Chem Senses 43(7):515–521. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjy043
Heilmann S, Hummel T (2004) A new method for comparing orthonasal and retronasal olfaction. Behav Neurosci 118(2):412–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.118.2.412
Hummel T, Heilmann S, Landis BN et al (2006) Perceptual differences between chemical stimuli presented through the ortho- or retronasal route. Flavour Fragr J 21(1):42–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1700
Keyhani K, Scherer PW, Mozell MM (1995) Numerical simulation of airflow in the human nasal cavity. J Biomed Eng 117(4):429–441. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2794204
Keyhani K, Scherer PW, Mozell MM (1997) A numerical model of nasal odorant transport for the analysis of human olfaction. J Theor Biol 186(3):279–301. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1996.0347
Kurtz DB, Zhao K, Hornung DE, Scherer P (2004) Experimental and numerical determination of odorant solubility in nasal and olfactory mucosa. Chem Senses 29(9):763–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh079
Landis BN, Giger R, Ricchetti A et al (2003) Retronasal olfactory function in nasal polyposis. Laryngoscope 113(11):1993–1997. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200311000-00026
Landis BN, Frasnelli J, Reden J, Lacroix JS, Hummel T (2005) Differences between orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions in patients with loss of the sense of smell. Arch Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 131(11):977. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.11.977
Leopold DA (1988) The relationship between nasal anatomy and human olfaction. Laryngoscope 98(11):1232–1238. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198811000-00015
Mozell MM (1970) Evidence for a chromatographic model of olfaction. J Gen Physiol 56(1):46–63. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.56.1.46
Pierce AM, Simons CT (2018) Olfactory adaptation is dependent on route of delivery. Chem Senses 43(3):197–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjy007
Rebello MR, Kandukuru P, Verhagen JV. Direct behavioral and neurophysiological evidence for retronasal olfaction in mice. Hummel T, ed. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0117218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117218
Restrepo D, Okada Y, Teeter JH, Lowry LD, Cowart B, Brand JG (1993) Human olfactory neurons respond to odor stimuli with an increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+. Biophys J 64(6):1961–1966. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81565-0
Rozin P (1982) “Taste-smell confusions” and the duality of the olfactory sense. Percept Psychophys 31(4):397–401. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202667
Scott JW, Sherrill L, Jiang J, Zhao K (2014) Tuning to odor solubility and sorption pattern in olfactory epithelial responses. J Neurosci 34(6):2025–2036. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3736-13.2014
Scott-Johnson PE, Blakley D, Scott JW (2000) Effects of air flow on rat electroolfactogram. Chem Senses 25(6):761–768. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/25.6.761
Small DM, Gerber JC, Mak YE, Hummel T (2005) Differential neural responses evoked by orthonasal versus retronasal odorant perception in humans. Neuron 47(4):593–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.07.022
Smith TD, Rossie JB (2008) Nasal fossa of mouse and dwarf lemurs (primates, cheirogaleidae). Anat Rec (hoboken) 291(8):895–915. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20724
Sun BC, Halpern BP (2005) Identification of air phase retronasal and orthonasal odorant pairs. Chem Senses 30(8):693–706. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bji062
Zhao K, Scherer PW, Hajiloo SA, Dalton P (2004) Effect of anatomy on human nasal air flow and odorant transport patterns: implications for olfaction. Chem Senses 29(5):365–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh033
Zhao K, Dalton P, Yang GC, Scherer PW (2006) Numerical modeling of turbulent and laminar airflow and odorant transport during sniffing in the human and rat nose. Chem Senses 31(2):107–118
Funding
This research was supported by NIH NIDCD R01 DC020302 to Kai Zhao.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Approval for the procedures in this study was gained from the Ohio State University Institutional Review Board.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, K., Zhao, K. A Nasal Aerodynamics Perspective of Retronasal Olfaction: Rodents vs. Humans. Chem. Percept. 15, 124–134 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-022-09300-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-022-09300-2