Abstract
As coral reefs decline, restoring lost coral populations has been hampered due to the paucity of genetic information available for many coral species. In the Caribbean, the symmetrical brain coral Pseudodiploria strigosa, a prominent framework builder of the reef, has experienced an accelerated decline due to stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD). Colonies of P. strigosa gene-banked in response to the threat of SCTLD in Florida, USA, were sampled to develop 148 novel single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). The observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He) ranged from 0.008 to 0.888 and 0.018 to 0.500, respectively. Deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium within populations, measured by the inbreeding coefficient index (Fis), ranged from − 0.799 to 0.923. In total, 96 SNPs were found to deviate significantly from Hardy–Weinberg (p < 0.05). These SNPs can be used for genetic population analysis to assist management and restoration of P. strigosa.
Coral reefs are in decline throughout the Caribbean and Western Atlantic, with significant reductions in live coral cover and diversity due to a combination of local and global impacts (Gardner et al. 2003; Sotka and Hay 2009; de Bakker et al. 2017). Originating in Southeast Florida in 2014, the stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) outbreak has hastened the demise of more than 30 species of coral in the Florida Reef Tract and the wider Caribbean (Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment 2021; Walton et al. 2018). In response, the Florida Coral Rescue Project was developed to collect whole colonies of coral species susceptible to SCTLD and gene bank them in land-based facilities for future propagation and restoration to the reef (Florida Coral Rescue 2021). A total of 20 species have been prioritized for genetic marker development within the Florida Coral Rescue Project, including the symmetrical brain coral Pseudodiploria strigosa, which is highly susceptible to the disease, and experiencing significant, whole-colony mortality on reefs impacted by SCTLD (Walton et al. 2018; Alvarez-Filip et al. 2019; Sharp et al. 2020; Brandt et al. 2021; Dahlgren et al. 2021; Kolodziej et al. 2021; Williams et al. 2021).
The development of standardized marker sets and common, cost-effective, efficient genotyping procedures for the prioritized suite of impacted coral species is critical to the objective of the Florida Coral Rescue Project. Corals reproduce both sexually and asexually; molecular-based clone (genet) identification is necessary to ensure genetic diversity preservation thresholds (50 genets per species) are met. Whereas more genets are secured where possible, the 50-genetic minimum is based on inbreeding avoidance (Jamieson and Allendorf 2012) and limiting large impacts of drift on natural selection (García-Dorado 2012), especially in situations where genetic-rescue interventions may become necessary (Hedrick and Garcia-Dorado 2016). Genet identifications and accompanying genotype data will also aid the curation of coral colonies within and between holding facilities, inform captive breeding efforts, and ultimately, facilitate restoration guidance and monitoring. To generate informative loci for P. strigosa, we used genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), which sequences targeted fractions of the genome, to develop and characterize single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers.
As part of the Florida Coral Rescue Project, 284 P. strigosa colonies were collected from 54 sites and placed into land-based aquaria. These colonies spanned a large area of the Florida Reef Tract (approximately 350 km), between Broward County in the north through the Dry Tortugas in the southwest. Sterile razor blades were used to collect 0.5 cm2 of live tissue from each of the 284 P. strigosa colonies. Total DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California) under a modified protocol (Baums and Kitchen 2020). Sixteen samples were screened for quality and eligibility for GBS. In total, 10 libraries (8 single samples, 2 pools of 4 samples each) were constructed following digestion with the restriction enzyme MslI. Libraries were submitted for 150 bp paired-end GBS on an Illumina NextSeq 550. Raw sequencing reads were demultiplexed, adapter trimmed, and screened for restriction-enzyme cut sites. Reads were further assessed for quality using FastQC (Andrews 2010) and filtered accordingly using Trimmomatic software (Bolger et al. 2014). To ensure that the final reads would contain only coral DNA and not that of the endosymbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinaceae), available genomes of the symbionts were used to filter out reads amplified from each of the genera Symbiodinium, Breviolum, Cladocopium, and Durusdinium (NCBI Accession GCA_003297005.1, GCA_000507305.1, GCA_003297045.1, and an unpublished D. trenchii genome provided by Mauricio Rodriguez-Lanetty, respectively) using BBDuk software (Decontamination Using Kmers) from the BBTools suite (Bushnell 2014). Raw total reads ranged from 1,455,624 to 4,561,912, with an average of 3,482,200 reads per sample. After all QC trimming, total reads ranged from 708,451 to 2,191,077, with an average of 1,671,189 reads per sample. Sequence clustering and SNP calling were performed in TASSEL using its reference-free UNEAK pipeline (Bradbury et al. 2007). A total of 28,016 raw SNPs were discovered, but after a minimum-call-rate filter of 80% and a minor-allele-frequency filter of 5% were applied, 8,913 SNPs remained. The remaining SNPs were further filtered to retain sites having a read depth between 45 and 250. Flanking sequences of the remaining SNPs were then examined to identify 64-mer sequences that contained the SNP site near their center, allowing adequate room for primer design. A total of 192 SNPs were selected to move to the next phase for KASP™ assay design (Biosearch Technologies, Petaluma, California). Screening of 284 samples via KASP™ assay genotyping resulted in the identification of 148 high-quality SNPs suitable for downstream analyses.
Using the 148 SNPs and all 284 P. strigosa samples, population genetic statistics were calculated for each locus (Table 1). The observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He), inbreeding coefficient index (Fis), and p value for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were calculated using the GenAlEx 6.5 software (Peakall and Smouse 2006, 2012). The observed and expected heterozygosity for each locus ranged from 0.008 to 0.888 and 0.018 to 0.500, respectively. Deviations from Hardy–Weinberg within populations, as measured by the Fis, ranged from − 0.799 to 0.923. In total, 96 SNPs were found to deviate significantly from Hardy–Weinberg (p < 0.05) (T1 Supplementary Material). Deviations could have resulted from inbreeding, population substructure, purifying selection, copy number variation, or genotyping error (Lee et al. 2008; Wang and Shete 2012; Graffelman et al. 2017).
These novel SNP markers in P. strigosa are a valuable tool for researchers studying the genetic structure of this species and for managers planning coral restoration in the Caribbean region.
References
Alvarez-Filip L, Estrada-Saldívar N, Pérez-Cervantes E, Molina-Hernández A, González-Barrios FJ (2019) A rapid spread of the stony coral tissue loss disease outbreak in the Mexican Caribbean. PeerJ 7:e8069. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8069
Andrews S (2010) FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Bioinformatics, Cambridge, United Kingdom. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (2021) https://www.agrra.org/coral-disease-outbreak/
Baums I, Kitchen S(2020) Acropora DNA extraction with Qiagen DNeasy tissue kit. protocols.io. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bekrjcv6
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina Sequence Data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23:2633–2635. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
Brandt ME, Ennis RS, Meiling SS, Townsend J, Cobleigh K, Glahn A, Quetel J, Brandtneris V, Henderson LM, Smith TB (2021) The emergence and initial impact of stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) in the United States Virgin Islands. Front Mar Sci 8:715329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.715329
Bushnell B(2014) BBMap, University of California, Berkely, California. https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/
Dahlgren C, Pizarro V, Sherman K, Greene W, Oliver J (2021) Spatial and temporal patterns of stony coral tissue loss disease outbreaks in the Bahamas. Front Mar Sci 8:682114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.682114
de Bakker DM, van Duyl FC, Bak RPM, Nugues MM, Nieuwland G, Meesters EH (2017) 40 years of benthic community change on the Caribbean reefs of Curaçao and Bonaire: the rise of slimy cyanobacterial mats. Coral Reefs 36:355–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-016-1534-9
Florida Coral Rescue (2021) Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/disease/rescue/
García-Dorado A (2012) Understanding and Predicting the Fitness Decline of Shrunk Populations: Inbreeding, Purging, Mutation, and Standard Selection. Genetics 190:1461–1476. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.135541
Gardner TA, Côté IM, Gill JA, Grant A, Watkinson AR(2003) Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals. Science 301:958–960. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1086050
Graffelman J, Jain D, Weir B (2017) A genome-wide study of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium with next generation sequence data. Hum Genet 136:727–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-017-1786-7
Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A (2016) Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 31:940–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.005
Jamieson IG, Allendorf FW (2012) How does the 50/500 rule apply to MVPs? Trends Ecol Evol 27:578–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.001
Kolodziej G, Studivan MS, Gleason ACR, Langdon C, Enochs IC, Manzello DP(2021) Impacts of stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) on coral community structure at an inshore patch reef of the Upper Florida Keys using photomosaics. Front Mar Sci 8:1027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.682163
Lee S, Kasif S, Weng Z, Cantor CR (2008) Quantitative analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms within copy number variation. PLoS ONE 3:e3906. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003906
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
Sharp WC, Shea CP, Maxwell KE, Muller EM, Hunt JH (2020) Evaluating the small-scale epidemiology of the stony-coral-tissue-loss-disease in the Middle Florida Keys. PLoS ONE 15:e0241871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241871
Sotka EE, Hay ME (2009) Effects of herbivores, nutrient enrichment, and their interactions on macroalgal proliferation and coral growth. Coral Reefs 28:555–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-009-0529-1
Walton CJ, Hayes NK, Gilliam DS (2018) Impacts of a regional, multi-year, multi-species coral disease outbreak in Southeast Florida. Front Mar Sci 5:00323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00323
Wang J, Shete S (2012) Testing departure from Hardy–Weinberg proportions. In: Elston RC, Satagopan JM, Sun S (eds) Statistical human genetics: methods and protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, pp 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-555-8_6
Williams SD, Walter CS, Muller EM (2021) Fine scale temporal and spatial dynamics of the stony coral tissue loss disease outbreak within the Lower Florida Keys. Front Mar Sci 8:631776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.631766
Acknowledgements
Financial supporters of this work include NOAA Hurricane Irma Fishery Disaster Recovery Grant (No. NA19NMF0220003), National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Project (No. 8006.19.064250), and the State of Florida Marine Resource Conservation Trust Funds. Samples were collected under permits #FKNMS-2017-100, #FKNMS-2018-139, #PEPC 88546, #PEPC 93250 and under the authority of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vollmer, A.A., Tringali, M.D. & Allen, M.S. Development and characterization of 148 SNP markers in the caribbean symmetrical brain coral Pseudodiploria strigosa. Conservation Genet Resour 14, 381–386 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-022-01294-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-022-01294-z