Skip to main content
Log in

An ISM and MICMAC Approach for Modelling the Contributors of Multibagger Stocks

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Asia-Pacific Financial Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the factors affecting the selection of multibagger stocks in the securities market. Further, the study aims to develop a model using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Thereafter, the driving and dependence power of factors was found using matriced impact croises multiplication appliquee a un classement (MICMAC). A group of financial analysts and academic experts having experience in dealing in the Indian securities market were consulted and interpretive structural modelling (ISM) is adopted to develop the contextual relationship among various factors for each dimension of multibagger stocks selection. Further, to identify the driving and the dependence power of factors, the results of the ISM are used as an input to MICMAC analysis. The results of the study indicate the large potential market (C11), visionary leader (C13), unique business model (C6), understanding of the sector (C1), and promoter and management capability (C2) are the dominant factors. MICMAC analysis indicates that driving, dependent and linkage factors are 4, 5, and 4 respectively. The factors obtained for ISM model development and MICMAC analysis are based on the experts’ opinions. As it is a subjective judgment, there are chances of biasness on basis of personal opinions. A questionnaire survey can be conducted to gather viewpoints on these factors from more financial experts and portfolio consultants. The study has been executed in discussion with financial analysts and academic experts having experience in dealing in the securities market. Hence, derived results have practical validity. The securities market is quite volatile in nature and the right choice of multibaggers may prove to be wealth creators for the general public. Investors may look for the derived factors for investing their savings into profitable channels by picking up those stocks which may prove to be multibaggers in near future. The development of a model for the identification of factors affecting the choice of multibaggers in the securities market is the original contribution of the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. RETURNS, I. Value Investing in Growth Companies.

  2. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/markets/identifying-multibaggers-how-to-pick-stocks-that-can-double-your-wealth-3343091.html.

  3. Groww, Multibagger stocks Retrieved from https://groww.in/p/multibagger-stocks.

  4. https://top10stockbroker.com/share-market-education/multibagger-stocks/.

  5. https://www.equitymaster.com/timeless-reading/33/pick-the-best-multibagger-stocks-in-2021.

  6. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/markets/identifying-multibaggers-how-to-pick-stocks-that-can-double-your-wealth-3343091.html.

  7. https://www.lehnerinvestments.com/en/multibagger-stocks-appreciate-multiple-times-over-time/.

  8. https://www.researchandranking.com/blog/how-does-fundamental-research-help-to-find-multibagger-stocks (Feb, 2019).

  9. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/joel-greenblatts-magic-formula-to-spot-multibagger-stocks-for-long-term%20profits/articleshow/77430326.cms?from=mdr.

  10. https://www.samco.in/knowledge-center/articles/best-multibagger-stocks-to-buy-now-in-india/.

  11. https://tavaga.com/blog/multibagger-stocks/ (april, 2021).

  12. https://tavaga.com/blog/multibagger-stocks/ (april, 2021).

References

  • Adityabirlacapital. (2020). What are multibagger stocks? Retrieved from https://www.adityabirlacapital.com/abc-of-money/what-are-multibagger-stocks.

  • Agarwal, S. (2017). Retail investors and expert’s disposition towards equity selection. In S. Agarwal (Ed.), Portfolio selection using multi-objective optimisation (pp. 101–123). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Angel Broking. (2020). What is a multibagger stock? Retrieved from https://www.angelbroking.com/knowledge-center/share-market/what-is-multibagger-stocks.

  • Bag, S., & Anand, N. (2014). Modeling green supply chain management framework using ISM and MICMAC analysis. African Journal of Business Management, 8(22), 1053–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battisti, E., Miglietta, N., Salvi, A., & Creta, F. (2019). Strategic approaches to value investing: A systematic literature review of international studies. Review of International Business and Strategy, 29(3), 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, S., Kim, M., & Rao, H. R. (2011). Firms’ information security investment decisions: Stock market evidence of investors’ behavior. Decision Support Systems, 50(4), 651–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J., Tu, W., Yu, C., & Qin, C. (2021). Assessing dynamic qualities of investor sentiments for stock recommendation. Information Processing & Management, 58(2), 102452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary. (2020). https://getmoneyrich.com/concept-of-multibagger-stocks/.

  • Churet, C., & Eccles, R. G. (2014). Integrated reporting, quality of management, and financial performance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 26(1), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2021). It’s the product-market fit, stupid! Commentary on “early indicators of very long-term venture performance: A 20-year panel study” by Eli Gimmon and Jonathan Levie. Academy of Management Discoveries, 7(2), 317–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewangan, D. K., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2015). Enablers for competitiveness of Indian manufacturing sector: An ISM-fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 416–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, N., Krause, M., Neukirchen, D., & Posch, P. N. (2021). Trust and stock market volatility during the COVID-19 crisis. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazlzadeh, A., Hendi, A. T., & Mahboubi, K. (2011). The examination of the effect of ownership structure on firm performance in listed firms of Tehran stock exchange based on the type of the industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(3), 249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. A. (2003). Common stocks and uncommon profits and other writings (Vol. 40). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godet, M. (1986). Introduction to la prospective: Seven key ideas and one scenario method. Futures, 18, 134–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, B., Dodd, D. L. F., & Cottle, S. (1934). Security analysis (Vol. 452). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, B. C., Kahn, J., Bellissimo, E., Cooper, M. A., & Santos, T. (2020). Value investing: From Graham to Buffett and beyond. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K., Dhillon, V. S., Singh, P. L., & Sindhwani, R. (2019). Modeling and analysis for barriers in healthcare services by ISM and MICMAC analysis. In M. Kumar, R. K. Pandey, & V. Kumar (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary engineering (pp. 501–510). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2013). Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: some empirical findings from India. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 13(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701311302431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1541–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, V., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2016). Impediments to social sustainability adoption in the supply chain: An ISM and MICMAC analysis in Indian manufacturing industries. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(2), 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, D. (2020). How to identify multibagger stocks in India. Retrieved from https://groww.in/blog/how-to-identify-multibagger-stocks-in-india/.

  • Monergise. (2020). How to identify multibagger stocks for investment? Retrieved from https://monergise.com/how-to-identify-multibagger-stocks-for-investment/.

  • Murry, J. W., Jr., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novakowski, N., & Wellar, B. (2008). Using the Delphi technique in normative planning research: Methodological design considerations. Environment and Planning A, 40(6), 1485–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paule-Vianez, J., Gomez-Martinez, R., & Prado-Román, C. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of behavioural finance with mapping analysis tools. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 26(2), 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, F. (2019). Stock analysis and support in quick decision-making process for individual investors and institutions.

  • Raj, T., Shankar, R., & Suhaib, M. (2009). An ISM approach to analyse interaction between barriers of transition to flexible manufacturing system. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 16(4), 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2019). Five thumb rules to follow while picking multibagger stocks. Retrieved from https://www.businesstoday.in/markets/stocks/multibagger-stocks-large-cap-stocks-mid-cap-small-cap-stocks/story/330712.html.

  • Ruben, R. B., Vinodh, S., & Asokan, P. (2018). ISM and fuzzy MICMAC application for analysis of lean Six Sigma barriers with environmental considerations. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9(1), 64–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saif Ul Islam, M., Meo, M. S., & Usman, M. (2020). The relationship between corporate investment decision and firm performance: Moderating role of cash flows. Journal of Public Affairs, 22, e2445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, K., & Soh, J. (2019). Asset-light business model: An examination of investment-cash flow sensitivities and return on invested capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R. (2020). Best multibagger stocks to buy now in India. Retrieved from https://www.samco.in/knowledge-center/articles/best-multibagger-stocks-to-buy-now-in-india/.

  • Sharma, S. (1995). Applied multivariate techniques. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiaui, S. S., & Patil, V. A. (2018). Stock market valuation using Monte Carlo simulation. In 2018 International conference on current trends towards converging technologies (ICCTCT) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.

  • Singh, R. K., Garg, S. K., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2007). Interpretive structural modelling of factors for improving competitiveness of SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 2(4), 423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardy, J. (2018). Valuation factors of multi-bagger companies compared to the market. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria.

  • Warfield, J. N. (1973). Intent structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3(2), 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactionsons on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 4(1), 81–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.

Table 3 SSIM—structural self-interaction matrix
Table 4 Initial reachability matrix
Table 5 Final reachability matrix
Table 6 First iteration (partition of reachability matrix)
Table 7 Second iteration (partition of reachability matrix)
Table 8 Third iteration (partition of reachability matrix)
Table 9 Fourth iteration (partition of reachability matrix)
Table 10 Fifth iteration (partition of reachability matrix)
Table 11 Sixth iteration (partition of reachability matrix)
Table 12 Seventh iteration (partition of reachability matrix)
Table 13 Eighth iteration (partition of reachability matrix)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chauhan, A., Gupta, S. & Gupta, S. An ISM and MICMAC Approach for Modelling the Contributors of Multibagger Stocks. Asia-Pac Financ Markets 30, 677–699 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-022-09394-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-022-09394-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation