Abstract
The main focus of this investigation is potential Granger causal relationships between the insurance market, Information and Communications Technology (ICT) infrastructure, and economic growth in a sample of high- and middle-income countries (H&MICs) from 1980 to 2019. We deployed a panel vector autoregressive model, and found that in the long run, the insurance market and ICT infrastructure Granger-cause economic growth. In the short run, we found robust causal links, but they vary in nature. The findings suggest that H&MICs should base ICT infrastructure planning on strategies that endorse economic growth and policies that may also promote insurance market development.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Insur-Tech is a set of new technologies which can potentially contribute to innovation in the insurance sector and alter the regulatory provisions regarding insurance markets (OECD, 2017).
Some of these studies link ICT infrastructure with financial development in particular, but coverage of the ICT-insurance market nexus is more limited.
Note that PCA is not intended to search for causal relationships; rather, it explores interdependence between variables, without identifying the nature of the causal relationships. We used it to reduce a large set of related variables into a smaller set of independent variables (Stock and Watson, 2002). Additionally, to remove the dynamic bias, we have used the time-demean approach of PCA by Bai and Ng (2013), and Bai and Li (2012). Hence, there is no possible bias in the formation of both CIN and CIC.
This is a common problem in the panel data, because the countries are interlinked at regional and global levels. If we do not control for this problem, then the estimators will be inconsistent and biased (Phillips and Sul, 2003).
We chose these panel unit root tests based on the CD test results, which reject the null hypothesis of no cross-sectional dependence at the 1% significance level (see Table 8), and confirm that cross-sectional dependence is present in the panel.
We do not report the estimates of IRFs here for the sake of brevity, but they may be obtained from the authors on request.
References
Ahmad, M., Majeed, A., Khan, M.A., Sohaib, M., and Shehzad, K. (2021). Digital financial inclusion and economic growth: provincial data analysis of china. China Economic Journal (forthcoming).
Alhassan, A. L., & Biekpe, N. (2016). Insurance market development and economic growth: Exploring causality in 8 selected African countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(3), 321–339.
Anargiridou, D. C., Anargiridis, S. C., & Papadopoulos, D. L. (2007). A critical examination of the advantages and disadvantages of the E-Insurance and how they explain its small penetration in the Greek market. Operational Research, 7(3), 465–480.
Apergis, N., & Poufinas, T. (2020). The role of insurance growth in economic growth: fresh evidence from a panel of OECD countries. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 53(C), 1–13.
Appiah-Otoo, I., & Song, N. (2021). The impact of ICT on economic growth – comparing rich and poor countries. Telecommunications Policy, 45, 1–15.
Arena, M. (2008). Does insurance market activity promote economic growth? A cross-country study for industrialized and developing countries. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 75(4), 921–946.
Arvin, M. B., Pradhan, R. P., & Nair, M. (2021). Uncovering interlinks among ICT connectivity and penetration, trade Openness, foreign direct investment, and economic growth: The case of the G-20 countries. Telematics and Informatics, 60, 1–25.
Asongu, S. A., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2019). Enhancing ICT for Insurance in Africa. MPRA, 102060, 1–21.
Asongu, S. A., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2020). Insurance policy thresholds for economic growth in Africa. European Journal of Development Research, 32, 672–689.
Bai, J., & Li, K. (2012). Statistical analysis of factor models of high dimension. Annals of Statistics, 40, 436–465.
Bai, J., & Ng, S. (2013). Principal Components Estimation and Identification of Static factors. Journal of Econometrics, 176, 18–29.
Balcilar, M., Gupta, R., Lee, C., & Olasehinde-Williams, G. (2020). Insurance and economic policy uncertainty. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 1–13.
Bazini, E., & Madani, F. (2015). ICT application in the insurance industry: its impact in customer relationship management. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(3), 307–311.
Benlagha, N., & Hemrit, W. (2020). Internet use and insurance growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Technology in Society, 62, 1–13.
Chang, T., Lee, C. C., & Chang, C. H. (2014). Does insurance activity promote economic growth? Further evidence based on bootstrap panel granger causality test. European Journal of Finance, 20(12), 1187–1210.
Chen, P. F., Lee, C. C., & Lee, C. F. (2012). How does the development of life insurance market affect economic growth? Some international evidence. Journal of International Development, 24(7), 865–889.
Cronin, F. J., Parker, E. B., Colleran, E. K., & Gold, M. A. (1991). Telecommunications infrastructure and economic growth: An analysis of causality. Telecommunications Policy, 15(6), 529–535.
Dash, S., Pradhan, R. P., Jayakumar, M., Maradana, R., Zaki, D., Chatterjee, D. (2017). Insurance market penetration and economic growth in eurozone countries: Time series evidence on causality. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 50–67.
Dash, S., Pradhan, R. P., Maradana, R. P., Gaurav, K., & Jayakumar, M. (2020). Impact of banking sector development on insurance market-growth nexus: The study of Eurozone countries. Empirica, 47(2), 205–243.
Din, S. M. U., Regupathi, A., & Abu-Bakar, A. (2017). Insurance effect on economic growth—among economies in various phases of development. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(4), 501–519.
Dutta, A. (2001). Telecommunications and economic activity: An analysis of granger causality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 71–95.
Gabor, D., & Brooks, S. (2017). The digital revolution in financial inclusion: International development in the Fintech era. New Political Economy, 22(4), 423–436.
Gonzalez, M.R., Wegener, C., and Basse, T. (2021). Re-investigating the insurance-growth nexus using common factors. Finance Research Letters (forthcoming).
Gupta, R., Lahiani, A., Lee, C. C., & Lee, C. C. (2019). Asymmetric dynamics of insurance premium: the impacts of output and economic policy uncertainty. Empirical Economics, 57, 1959–1978.
Haiss, P. R., & Sumegi, K. (2008). The relationship between insurance and economic growth in Europe: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Empirica, 35(4), 405–431.
Han, L., Li, D., Moshirian, F. and Tian, Y. (2010) Insurance development and economic growth. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 35(2), 183–199.
Ibrahim, M., Sare, Y. A., & Adam, I. O. (2021). An application of frequency domain approach to the causal nexus between information, communication and technology infrastructure and financial development in selected countries in Africa. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26, 1206–1235.
Lee, C. C., Chang, C. H., Arouri, M., & Lee, C. C. (2016). Economic growth and insurance development: the role of institutional environments. Economic Modelling, 59, 361–369.
Lee, C. C., Huang, W. L., & Yin, C. H. (2013a). The Dynamic Interactions among the Stock, Bond and Insurance Markets. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 26, 28–52Lee, C.C., and Lee, C.C. (2020). Insurance Activity, Real Output, and Geopolitical Risk: Fresh Evidence from BRICS. Economic Modelling, 92, 207–215.
Lee, C. C., & Lee, C. C. (2020). Insurance activity, real output, and geopolitical risk: fresh evidence from BRICS. Economic Modelling, 92(207), 215.
Lee, C. C., Lee, C. C., & Chiu, Y. B. (2013b). The link between life insurance activities and economic growth: Some new evidence. Journal of International Money and Finance, 32(3), 405–427.
Lee, S. T., Gholami, R., & Tong, T. Y. (2005). Time series analysis in the assessment of ICT impact at the aggregate level – lessons and implications for the new economy. Information & Management, 42(7), 1009–1022.
Lee, S. H., Levendis, J., & Gutierrez, L. (2012). Telecommunications and economic growth: An empirical analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa. Applied Economics, 44(4), 461–469.
Liu, G. C., Lee, C., & Lee, C. C. (2016). The nexus between insurance activity and economic growth: a bootstrap rolling window approach. International Review of Economics and Finance, 43, 299–319.
Mark, N., & Sul, D. (2003). Cointegration vector estimation by panel DOLS and long-run money demand. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(5), 655–680.
Mehmood, B., & Siddiqui, W. (2013). What causes what? Panel cointegration approach on investment in telecommunication and economic growth: Case of Asian countries. Romanian Economic Journal, 16(47), 3–16.
Nair, M., Pradhan, R. P., & Arvin, M. B. (2020). Endogenous Dynamics between R&D, ICT and economic growth: Empirical evidence from the OECD countries. Technology in Society, 62(C), 1–12.
OECD. (2017). Technology and Innovation in the Insurance Sector. OECD. Available at www.oecd.org/daf/fin/insurance.
Outreville, J. F. (2013). The relationship between insurance and economic development: 85 empirical papers for a review of the literature. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 16(1), 71–122.
Owusu-Agyei, S., Okafor, G., Chijoke-Mgbame, A. M., Ohalehi, P., & Hasan, F. (2020). Internet adoption and financial development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 1–13.
Peleckienė, V., Peleckis, K., Dudzevičiūtė, G., & Peleckis, K. K. (2019). The relationship between insurance and economic growth: Evidence from the European Union countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1138–1151.
Phillips, P., & Sul, D. (2003). Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. Econometrics Journal, 6, 217–259.
Pradhan, R.P., Bahmani, S., and Abraham, R. (2021b). Institutional quality, insurance markets, and economic growth: Evidence from pooled mean group estimation. Applied Economics Letters (forthcoming).
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., Bennett, S. E. and Bahmani, S. (2022b). Some determinants and mechanics of economic growth in middle-income countries: The role of ICT infrastructure development, taxation and other macroeconomic variables. Singapore Economic Review (forthcoming).
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Bahmani, S., & Bennett, S. E. (2017a). Broadband penetration, financial development, and economic growth nexus: Evidence from the Arab league countries. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 10(2), 151–171.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Hall, J. H., & Bennett, S. E. (2018a). Mobile telephony, economic growth, financial development, foreign direct investment, and imports of ICT goods: The case of the G-20 countries. Economia e Politica Industriale, 45, 279–310.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Hall, J. H., & Nair, M. (2016a). Insurance-growth nexus and macroeconomic determinants: evidence from middle-income countries. Empirical Economics, 52(4), 1337–1366.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., & Bennett, S. E. (2020). Unveiling the causal relationships among banking competition, stock and insurance market development, and economic growth in Europe. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 55, 74–87.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., Hall, J. H., & Bennett, S. E. (2021b). Sustainable economic development in India: The dynamics between financial inclusion, ICT development and economic growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 1–19.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., Hall, J., & Bennett, S. E. (2022a). Institutional development in an information-driven economy: Can ICTs enhance economic growth for low- and lower middle-income countries? Information Technology for Development, 28(3), 468–487.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., & Norman, N. R. (2015a). Insurance development and the finance-growth nexus: evidence from 34 OECD countries. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 31(1), 1–22.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., & Norman, N. R. (2015b). The dynamics of information and communications technologies infrastructure, economic growth, and financial development: Evidence from Asian countries. Technology in Society, 42(1), 135–149.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Norman, N. R., & Bele, S. K. (2014). Economic growth and the development of telecommunications infrastructure in the G-20 countries: A panel-VAR approach. Telecommunications Policy, 38(7), 634–649.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Norman, R. R., Nair, M., & Hall, J. H. (2016b). Insurance penetration and economic growth nexus: Cross-country evidence from ASEAN. Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 447–458.
Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., Maradana, R. P., Jayakumar, M., & Gaurav, K. (2017b). Insurance market density and economic growth in Eurozone countries: The granger causality approach. Financial Innovation, 3(17), 1–24.
Pradhan, R. P., Mallik, G., & Bagchi, T. P. (2017). Information communication technology (ICT) infrastructure and economic growth: A causality evinced by cross-country panel data. IIMB Management Review, 30(1), 1–14.
Pradhan, R. P., Mallik, G., & Bagchi, T. P. (2018b). Information communication technology (ICT) infrastructure and economic growth: A causality evinced by cross-country panel data. IIMB Management Review, 30, 91–103.
Pradhan, R. P., & Sahoo, P. P. (2020). are there links between financial inclusion, mobile telephony, and economic growth? Evidence from Indian states. Applied Economics Letters, 28(4), 310–314.
Rumson, A. G., & Hallett, S. H. (2019). Innovations in the use of data facilitating insurance as a resilience mechanism for coastal flood risk. Science of the Total Environment, 661, 598–612.
Salatin, P., Yadollahi, F., & Eslambolchi, S. (2014). The effect of ICT on insurance industry in selected countries. Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 9(1), 1–5.
Shiu, A., & Lam, P. L. (2008). Causal relationship between telecommunications and economic growth in China and its regions. Regional Studies, 42(5), 705–718.
Solomon, E. M., & van Klyton, A. (2020). The impact of digital technology usage on economic growth in Africa. Utilities Policy, 67, 1–12.
Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2002). Macroeconomic forecasting using diffusion indices. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20, 147–162.
Vu, K. M. (2011). ICT as a source of economic growth in the information age: Empirical evidence from the 1996–2005 period. Telecommunications Policy, 35(4), 357–372.
Vu, K., Hanafizadeh, P., & Bohlin, E. (2020). ICT as driver of economic growth: A survey of the literature and directions for future research. Telecommunications Policy, 44, 1–20.
Ward, D., & Zurbruegg, R. (2000). Does insurance promote economic growth? Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 67(4), 489–506.
Ward, D., & Zurbruegg, R. (2002). Law, politics and life insurance consumption in Asia. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 27(3), 395–412.
Weisbart, S. (2018). How insurance drives economic growth. Working Paper, Insurance Information Institute, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: The List of High- and Middle-Income Countries (H&MICs) in the Sample
1.1 Part A: High Income Countries
Australia, Austria, the Bahamas, Bahrain, Barbados, Belgium, Brunel Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan. Kuwait, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, the Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Uruguay.
1.2 Part B: Middle-Income Countries
Albania, Algeria, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Cote d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Djibouti, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Fiji, Gabon, Georgia, Ghana, Guatemala, Guyana, Herzegovina, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libya, Malaysia, the Maldives, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Namibia, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, the Philippines, Romania, the Russian Federation, Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, the Solomon Islands, Serbia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, the Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, and Zambia.
Appendix 2: Devising Composite Index of ICT Infrastructure: Using PCA
Table 5 (Part A) shows that the maximum eigen value of the CIC index is 3.514 for the first factor, and it is 0.957, 0.795 0.394, 0.251 and 0.089 for the remaining five factors, respectively. The proportionate variation of the first factor is 58.6%, and it is 16.0%, 13.3%, 6.56%, 4.18%, and 1.48% for the remaining factors, respectively. Table 5, Part B, shows the eigen vectors signifying the six PC loadings (PC1–PC6). That means that the ICT indicator corresponding to PC1 is the only factor with an eigenvalue above 1, and it describes about 59% of the total variance. The remaining PCs’ contributions are fairly small, with eigenvalues much smaller than 1. Additionally, factor loadings are all positive in PC1, but have some negative values for the rest of the PCs. Hence, we considered PC1 factor loadings in building the CIC index. This is well-supported by the loading plots (see Figs. 4,
5).
Appendix 3: Devising the Composite Index of Insurance Markets Development: Using PCA
From Table 6 (Part A), we find that the maximum eigen value of the CIN index is 2.682 for the first PC, and it is 0.895, 0.348, and 0.076, for the remaining factors respectively. The proportionate variation of the first factor is 67.1%, and it is 22.4%, 8.69%, and 1.69%, for the remaining factors respectively. From Table 6, Part B, we note the eigen vectors demonstrating the eight PC loadings (PC1-PC4), which imply that the insurance indicator corresponding to PC1 (the only one with an eigenvalue above 1), and elucidate about 67% of the total variance. The residual PCs are not considered, since their contributions are moderately to small, which means that the corresponding eigenvalues are much smaller than 1. Additionally, the factor loadings are all positive in PC1, but the factor loadings have some negative values for the rest of the PCs. We therefore considered only PC1 in building the CIN index, as is well supported by the loading plots (see Figs.
6 and
7).
Appendix 4: Technical Hypotheses Tested in this Study
See Table 7.
Appendix 5: Additional tables for results
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pradhan, R.P., Bahmani, S., Abraham, R. et al. Insurance Market and Economic Growth in an Information-Driven Economy: Evidence from a Panel of High- and Middle-Income Countries?. Asia-Pac Financ Markets 30, 587–620 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-022-09390-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-022-09390-8