Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of different mapping functions on GPS network solutions

  • Original Study
  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In geodetic studies, Global Positioning System (GPS) is widely preferred since it can be operated day and night and in all weather conditions. Also, GPS is used especially in the studies which require high accuracy such as monitoring deformations and determining tectonic movements. However, GPS error sources must be eliminated to achieve precise positioning. The troposphere, one of the major error sources, causes signal delays due to its dry air and water vapor content. Due to the fact that composition of the troposphere changes heavily both temporally and spatially, tropospheric delay is determined in zenith direction although it occurs along the signal path. This relation between the zenith direction and signal path is provided by the mapping functions (MFs). For the tropospheric delays the zenith signal delays are mapped to satellites at a given ground-based stations using MFs. In this study, the effects of most preferred MFs in the literature such as the Niell Mapping Function, the Global Mapping Function and the Vienna Mapping Function 1 have been investigated to show their effects on GPS network solution. Three GPS networks that have different baseline lengths have been analyzed. According to the results, it can be stated that the differences between the MFs are negligible, especially in the horizontal component. Moreover, since the vertical coordinate differences are greater in the network that has largest baselines, the choice of MF can significantly affect the results of the studies which require larger baselines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Böhm J, Schuh H (2004) Vienna mapping functions in VLBI analyses. Geophys Res Lett 31(1):L01603

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm J, Werl B, Schuh H (2006a) Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts operational analysis data. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 111(B2):B02406

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm J, Niell A, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006b) Global Mapping Function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett 33(7):L07304

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm J, Mendes Cerveira PJ, Schuh H, Tregoning P (2007) The impact of tropospheric mapping functions based on numerical weather models on the determination of geodetic parameters. In: Dynamic planet: monitoring and understanding a dynamic planet with geodetic and oceanographic tools. Springer

  • Davis JL, Herring TA, Shapiro II, Rogers AEE, Elgered G (1985) Geodesy by radio interferometry: effects of atmospheric modeling errors on estimates of baseline length. Radio Sci 20(6):1593–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckl MC, Snay RA, Soler T, Cline MW, Mader GL (2001) Accuracy of GPS-derived relative positions as a function of interstation distance and observing-session duration. J Geod 75(12):633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampel FR, Ronchetti EM, Rousseeuw PJ, Stahel WA (2011) Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekimoglu S (2005) Do robust methods identify outliniers more reliably than conventional tests for outliniers? ZfV Mag Geod Geoinf Land Manag 3:174–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring TA (1992) Modeling atmospheric delays in the analysis of space geodetic data. In: De Munck JC, Spoelstra TA (eds) Proceedings of refraction of transatmospheric simals in geodesy. Netherlands Geodetic Commission Publications on Geodesy, vol 36, no 4

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Wasle E (2008) GNSS–global navigation satellite systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and more. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Landskron D, Böhm J (2018) VMF3/GPT3: refined discrete and empirical troposphere mapping functions. J Geod 92(4):349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leick A (1995) GPS satellite surveying, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, p 560

    Google Scholar 

  • Makabayi B, Hunegnaw A (2015) Analysis of the accuracy of GMF, NMF, and VMF1 mapping functions with GPT 50 a priori zenith constraint in tropospheric delay modelling

  • Manandhar S (2019) GPS signal derived precipitable water vapor and its applications in rainfall prediction. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

  • Marini JW (1972) Correction of satellite tracking data for an arbitrary tropospheric profile. Radio Sci 7(2):223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes VB (1999) Modeling the neutral-atmospheric propagation delay in radiometric space techniques. UNB, Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed AN, Abdelfatah MA, Mousa AEK, El-Fiky GS (2018) Regional Egypt tropospheric mapping function model. Alex Eng J 57(4):4157–4165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niell AE (1996) Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 101(B2):3227–3246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistor S, Norbert-Szabolcs SUBA, Aurelian-Stelian BUDA (2020) The impact of tropospheric mapping function on PPP determination for one-month period. Acta Geodyn Geromater 17(2):237–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizos C (1997) Principles and practice of GPS surveying. School of Geomatic Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld JH (2015) Encyclopedia of atmospheric sciences, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 182–187

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sezer G, Dogan AH, Erdogan B (2021) Investigation of the performance of the multi-GNSS analysis with web based trimble RTX service. J Geod Geoinf 8(1):30–40 (in Turkish)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler T, Michalak P, Weston ND, Snay RA, Foote RH (2006) Accuracy of OPUS solutions for 1-to 4-h observing sessions. GPS Solut 10(1):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souri AH, Sharifi MA (2013) Evaluation of symmetric neutral-atmosphere mapping functions using ray-tracing through radiosonde observations. Artif Satell 48(4):171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesmer V, Böhm J, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H (2007) Effect of different tropospheric mapping functions on the TRF, CRF and position time-series estimated from VLBI. J Geod 81(6):409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuka A, El-Mowafy A (2013) Performance evaluation of different troposphere delay models and mapping functions. Measurement 46(2):928–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tut I, Sanli DU, Erdogan B, Hekimoglu S (2013) Efficiency of BERNESE single baseline rapid static positioning solutions with search strategy. Surv Rev 45(331):296–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel P, Smith WH (1998) New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 79(47):579–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Xu X, Xu C, Peng W, Wan Y (2018) GGOS tropospheric delay forecast product performance evaluation and its application in real-time PPP. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 175:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre (TKGM), International GNSS Service (IGS) and Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) for GPS data and products. Also, the figures in this study were plotted using the public domain Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) software (Wessel and Smith 1998).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahattin Erdogan.

Ethics declarations

Confict of interest

The authors declare that they have no confict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sezer, G., Dogan, A.H. & Erdogan, B. Effects of different mapping functions on GPS network solutions. Acta Geod Geophys 57, 609–624 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-022-00393-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-022-00393-5

Keywords

Navigation