Abstract
Worries about Artificial Intelligence are no longer just the province or science fiction (SF) or speculative futurism. Sober appraisals list potential dangers arising from predatory resource consumption to AI harnessed into destructive competition between human nations and institutions. Many SF tales and films about AI dangers distill down to one fear, that new, powerful beings will recreate the oppression that our ancestors suffered, in feudal regimes. Perspective on these dangers—and potential solutions—can begin with a description of the six major categories or types of augmented intelligence that are currently under development. Will it be possible to program-in a suite of ethical imperatives, like Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics? Or will a form of evolution take its course, with AI finding their own path, beyond human control? We conclude with a comparison of systems-of-control, comparing the top-down authority model of most human societies to the relatively flat structures seen in most ecosystems and in the most successful nations. We show that systems that are relatively flat have always been—in Nature—far healthier and more creative and productive. This fact, across 4 billion years of life on Earth, may be more compelling to nascent AI beings than anything we say.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a sneak peek at how such a situation might play out in more detail see “Quantum Tuesday” on page XX.
Recent science has revealed how very many other species on our planet share what might be called pre-sapience: basic semantic ability, some problem-solving ability and basic tool use. Only slightly below dolphins and apes are elephants, corvids, parrots, sea lions, and many others, all apparently stuck beneath a glass ceiling that humanity crashed through by exponential leaps, a million years ago. No one knows why Nature and Darwin are so generous up to a certain point and so stingy about going beyond.
References
Alang, N. (2016). Life in the age of algorithms: As society becomes more wedded to technology, it’s important to consider the formulas that govern our data. New Republic, 13 May https://newrepublic.com/article/133472/lifeagealgorithms
Allen, C. (2011). The future of moral machines. The Opinion Pages, The New York Times, 25 December.
Asimov, I. (1942). Runaround. Astounding Science Fiction, March.
Barrat, J. (2015). Our final invention: Artificial intelligence and the end of the human era. St. Martin’s Griffin.
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
Brin, D. (1980–1999). Worlds of UPLIFT. https://www.davidbrin.com/uplift.html
Brin, D. (1998). The transparent society, will technology force us to choose between privacy and freedom? Perseus Books.
Brin, D. (1999). Foundation’s triumph. Orbit Books.
Brin, D. (2012). Existence. Orbit Books.
Byford, S. (2016). Sony is working on a robot that can “form an emotional bond” with people. The Verge, 29 June http://www.theverge.com/2016/6/29/12057408/sony-robot-emotion-vr-sensors
Cramer, J. (2022). The alternate view: You can’t believe those lyin’ AIs. Analog Science Fictionand Fact 142(3–4).
Dijkraaf, R. (2021). The uselessness of useful knowledge. Quanta Magazine. www.quantamagazine.org/science-has-entered-a-new-era-of-alchemy-good-20211020
European Parliament draft report, with recommendations to the commission on civil law rules on robotics. 20142019, Committee on Legal Affairs, 31 May 2016.
Hall, J. S. (2007). Beyond AI: Creating the conscience of the machine. Prometheus Books.
Hanson, R. (2016b). Future fears: Overcoming bias. 17 June 2016b http://www.overcomingbias.com/2016b/06/future-fears.html (last Accessed 4 July 2016b).
Hanson, R. (2016a). The age of Em: Work, love, and life when robots rule the Earth. Oxford University Press.
Hanson, R., & Yudkowsky, E. (2013). The Hanson-Yudkowsky AI-foom debate. Machine Intelligence Research Institute.
Havens, J. (2016). Heartificial intelligence: Embracing our humanity to maximize machines. TarcherPerigee.
Hutter, M. (2004). Universal artificial intelligence, sequential decisions based on algorithmic probability. Springer.
Kelly, K. (2016). The inevitable: Understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our future. Viking.
Kurzeil, R. (2000). The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. Penguin Books.
Kurzweil, R. (2006). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Penguin Books.
Leonhard, G. (2015). Humanity versus technology. A short film by Gerd Leonhard, August 2015 https://youtu.be/DL99deFJYaI
Lewis, M. (2014). Flash boys: A wall street revolt. W. W. Norton & Company.
Lin, S., Hilton J., & Evans O. (2021). Truthful QA: Measuring how models mimic human falsehoods. Preprint arXiv:2109.07958 [cs.CL], https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07958 [cs.CL],
Markoff, J. (2015). Machines of loving grace: The quest for common ground between humans and robots. Ecco.
Metz, C. (2015). Elon Musk’s billion-dollar AI plan is about far more than saving the world. Wired, 15 December. https://www.wired.com/2015/12/elon-musks-billion-dollar-ai-plan-is-about-far-more-than-saving-the-world/
Nadella, S. (2016). The partnership of the future: microsoft’s CEO explores how humans and AI can work together to solve society’s greatest challenges. Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2016/06/microsoft_ceo_satya_nadella_humans_and_a_i_can_work_together_to_solve_society.html (last accessed 04 July 2016).
Norvig, P., & Russel, S. (2009). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Global.
Welsh, J. (2015). Researchers say this is the most impressive act of artificial intelligence they’ve ever seen. Business Insider, 13 November http://www.businessinsider.com/artificial-intelligence-playing-video-games-2015-11
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Brin, D. Essential (mostly neglected) questions and answers about artificial intelligence. Neohelicon 49, 429–449 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-022-00656-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-022-00656-8