Abstract
Prior research has shown negative relations between math anxiety and math performance. We posit that one potential pathway through which math anxiety influences performance of math equivalencies is through help seeking behavior during learning. Here, we examine whether middle school students’ behavior, specifically the frequency of hint requests, within educational technologies mediates the association between math anxiety and performance of math equivalence. Students completed a pretest measuring their performance of math equivalence and math anxiety prior to the intervention, and a posttest measuring their performance of math equivalence. We examine mediation in two online math learning technologies: From Here to There (FH2T) and ASSISTments. In both FH2T and ASSISTments, students can request hints that provide just-in-time support during problem solving. We examined whether the frequency of hint requests mediates the effects of math anxiety on performance in both conditions. Using multi-group mediation analyses, we found that math anxiety was not a predictor of hint usage in either condition when controlling for pretest performance. Further, we found that students with lower performance at the pretest used more hints in the problem set condition, and using more hints was associated with lower performance of math equivalence at the posttest. This relation was not significant in the FH2T condition, suggesting a fundamental difference in hint usage between the two technologies. These findings have implications for designing educational technologies that simultaneously promote math performance and productive help seeking behaviors in middle school students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help? Lecture notes in computer science (Including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics) (Vol. 1839, pp. 292–303). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45108-0_33
Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2001, May). Investigations into help seeking and learning with a cognitive tutor. Papers of the AIED-2001 workshop on help provision and help seeking in interactive learning environments.
Aleven, V., Elmar, S., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073003277
Anderson, J., Corbett, A., Koedinger, K., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207. https://www-jstor-org.ezpxy-web-p-u01.wpi.edu/stable/1466690?sid=primo&seq=4#metadata_info_tab_contents
Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196
Beilock, S. L., & Maloney, E. A. (2015). Math anxiety. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601438
Chan, J. Y. C., Lee, J. E., Mason, C., Sawrey, K. B., & Ottmar, E. R. (2021). From Here to There!: A digital algebraic notation system impacts understanding of equivalence in middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000596
Choe, K. W., Jenifer, J. B., Rozek, C. S., Berman, M. G., & Beilock, S. L. (2019). Calculated avoidance: Math anxiety predicts math avoidance in effort-based decision-making. Science Advances, 5(11), eaay1062. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay1062
Chou, C.-Y., & Chang, C.-H. (2021). developing adaptive help-seeking regulation mechanisms for different help-seeking tendencies. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 54–66.
Foley, A. E., Herts, J. B., Borgonovi, F., Guerriero, S., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2017). The math anxiety-performance link. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416672463
Ganley, C. M., & McGraw, A. L. (2016). The development and validation of a revised version of the math anxiety scale for young children. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01181
Heffernan, N. T., & Heffernan, C. L. (2014). The ASSISTments ecosystem: Building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 470–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0024-x
Hulse, T., Daigle, M., Manzo, D., Braith, L., Harrison, A., & Ottmar, E. (2019). From here to there! Elementary: A game-based approach to developing number sense and early algebraic understanding. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09653-8
Hung, C.-M., Huang, I., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). Effects of digital game-based learning on students’ self-efficacy, motivation, anxiety, and achievements in learning mathematics. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(2–3), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0008-8
Inventado, P. S., Scupelli, P., Ostrow, K., Heffernan, N., Ocumpaugh, J., Almeda, V., & Slater, S. (2018). Contextual factors affecting hint utility. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0107-6
Iossi, L. (2007). Strategies for reducing math anxiety in post-secondary students. In S. M. Nielsen & M. S. Plakhotnik (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth annual college of education research conference: urban and international education section (pp. 30–35).
Kaput, J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5–17). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Karabenick, S. A., & Berger, J.-L. (2013). Help seeking as a self-regulated learning strategy. In H. Bembenutty, T. J. Cleary, & A. Kitsantas (Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines: A tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman (pp. 237–261). IAP Information Age Publishing.
Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1988). Help seeking and the need for academic assistance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 406–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.406
Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1991). Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.221
Kazelskis, R., Reeves, C., Kersh, M. E., Bailey, G., Cole, K., Larmon, M., et al. (2000). Mathematics anxiety and test anxiety: Separate constructs? The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 137–146.
Kehrer, P., Kelly, K., & Heffernan, N. (2013). Does immediate feedback while doing homework improve learning? www.aaai.org
Kelly, K., Heffernan, N., Heffernan, C., Goldman, S., Pellegrino, J., & Soffer-Goldstein, D. (2013). Estimating the effect of web-based homework. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1009, 824–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_122
Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 297–312.
Lyons, I. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). When math hurts: Math anxiety predicts pain network activation in anticipation of doing math. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e48076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048076
Ma, X. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 520–540. https://doi.org/10.2307/749772
Maloney, E. A., Risko, E. F., Ansari, D., & Fugelsang, J. (2010). Mathematics anxiety affects counting but not subitizing during visual enumeration. Cognition, 114(2), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.013
Marwan, S., Dombe, A., & Price, T. W. (2020, June). Unproductive help-seeking in programming: What it is and how to address it. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 54–60). https://doi.org/10.1145/3341525.3387394
Newman, R. (2008). The motivational role of adaptive help seeking in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03967-013
Newman, R. S. (1990). Children’s help-seeking in the classroom: The role of motivational factors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 71–80.
Ottmar, E. R., Landy, D., Goldstone, R. L., & Weitnauer, E. (2015a). Getting from here to there: Testing the effectiveness of an interactive mathematics intervention embedding perceptual learning. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-seventh annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1793–1798). Pasadena, CA.
Ottmar, E., Landy, D., Weitnauer, E., & Goldstone, R. (2015b). Graspable mathematics: Using perceptual learning technology to discover algebraic notation. In M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, K. Mavrou & E. Paparistodemou (Eds.), Integrating touch-enabled and mobile devices into contemporary mathematics education (pp. 24–48). Pennsylvania: IGI Global
Peeters, A., Robinson, V., & Rubie-Davies, C. (2020). Theories in use that explain adolescent help seeking and avoidance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000423
Pizzie, R. G., & Kraemer, D. J. M. (2017). Avoiding math on a rapid timescale: Emotional responsivity and anxious attention in math anxiety. Brain and Cognition, 118, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2017.08.004
Pollack, C., Wilmot, D., Centanni, T. M., Halverson, K., Frosch, I., D’Mello, A. M., et al. (2021). Anxiety, motivation, and competence in mathematics and reading for children with and without learning difficulties. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704821
Price, T. W., Zhi, R., & Barnes, T. (2017). Hint generation under uncertainty: The effect of hint quality on help-seeking behavior. In E. André, R. Baker, X. Hu, M. Rodrigo, & B. Boulay (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education. AIED 2017. Lecture notes in computer science. (Vol. 10331). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_26
Ramirez, G., Shaw, S. T., & Maloney, E. A. (2018). Math anxiety: Past research, promising interventions, and a new interpretation framework. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1447384
Razzaq, L., & Heffernan, N. T. (2010). Hints: Is it better to give or wait to be asked? Lecture notes in computer science (Including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 6094 LNCS(PART 1) (pp. 349–358). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_39
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. In Learning and instruction (Vol. 12). www.elsevier.com/locate/learninstruc
Rittle-Johnson, B., Matthews, P. G., Taylor, R. S., & McEldoon, K. L. (2011). Assessing knowledge of mathematical equivalence: A construct-modeling approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021334
Roschelle, J., Feng, M., Murphy, R. F., & Mason, C. A. (2016). Online mathematics homework increases student achievement. AERA Open, 2(4), 233285841667396. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416673968
Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students’ academic efficacy, teachers’ social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.528
Singh, R., Saleem, M., Pradhan, P., Heffernan, C., Heffernan, N. T., Razzaq, L., Dailey, M. D., O’Connor, C., & Mulcahy, C. (2011). Feedback during web-based homework: The role of hints. Lecture notes in computer science (Including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), 6738 LNAI (pp. 328–336). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_43
Stamper, J., Barnes, T., & Croy, M. (2011). Enhancing the automatic generation of hints with expert seeding. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21, 153–167. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAI-2011-021
Star, J. R., Pollack, C., Durkin, K., Rittle-Johnson, B., Lynch, K., Newton, K., & Gogolen, C. (2015). Learning from comparison in algebra. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.005
Stowell, J., & Bennett, D. (2010). Effects of online testing on student exam performance and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.2.b
Szczygiel, M. (2020). Gender, general anxiety, math anxiety and math achievement in early school-age children. Issues in Educational Research, 30(3), 1126–1142.
Van Mier, H. I., Schleepen, T., & Van den Berg, F. (2019). Gender differences regarding the impact of math anxiety on arithmetic performance in second and fourth graders. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2690. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02690
Whitehill, J., & Seltzer, M. (2016). A crowdsourcing approach to collecting tutorial videos—Toward personalized learning-at-scale. In L@S 2017 - Proceedings of the 4th (2017) ACM conference on learning at scale (pp. 157–160). http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.09610
Wood, H., & Wood, D. (1999). Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers and Education, 33(2–3), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00030-5
Wu, S. S., Barth, M., Amin, H., Malcarne, V., & Menon, V. (2012). Math anxiety in second and third graders and its relation to mathematics achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(JUN), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00162
Acknowledgements
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A180401 to Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education. We would like to thank the teachers and students for their participation; the Summer Training in Arts and Sciences (STAR) Fellowship for funding our corresponding author for this research, David Brokaw and Graspable Inc. and Neil Heffernan and the ASSISTments Team for programming and data support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AI: Conceptualization, Writing, Project leader. EO: Conceptualization, Writing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. VN: Writing, Project coordination. CM: External Independent Evaluator, Formal data analysis, Writing, Visualization. JY-CC: Conceptualization, Writing, Visualization, Project administration. HS: Writing, Data analysis. KCD: Writing. STS: Conceptualization, Writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Erin Ottmar was a designer and co-developer of From Here to There! The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Students’ demographic information by condition, and their pretest scores.
All (N = 466) | FH2T (n = 225) | Problem set (n = 241) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | |
Gender | ||||||
Male | 255 | 54.7 | 125 | 55.6 | 130 | 53.9 |
Female | 211 | 45.3 | 100 | 44.4 | 111 | 46.1 |
Race | ||||||
White | 159 | 34.1 | 80 | 35.6 | 79 | 32.8 |
Asian | 259 | 55.6 | 119 | 52.9 | 140 | 58.1 |
Hispanic | 21 | 4.5 | 10 | 4.4 | 11 | 4.6 |
African American | 10 | 2.1 | 6 | 2.7 | 4 | 1.7 |
Native American | 5 | 1.1 | 1 | 0.4 | 4 | 1.7 |
Pacific Islander | 1 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 |
Multi-racial | 11 | 2.4 | 8 | 3.6 | 3 | 1.2 |
Grade | ||||||
Sixth | 445 | 95.5 | 215 | 95.6 | 230 | 95.4 |
Seventh | 21 | 4.5 | 10 | 4.4 | 11 | 4.6 |
Class | ||||||
Advanced | 392 | 84.1 | 190 | 84.4 | 202 | 83.8 |
On-level | 33 | 7.1 | 14 | 6.3 | 19 | 7.9 |
Support | 41 | 8.8 | 21 | 9.3 | 20 | 8.3 |
Gifted status | ||||||
Gifted | 243 | 52.1 | 118 | 52.4 | 125 | 51.9 |
Not gifted | 223 | 47.9 | 107 | 47.6 | 116 | 48.1 |
Pretest math scores (M, SD) | 3.82 | 1.61 | 3.87 | 1.59 | 3.76 | 1.63 |
Pretest math anxiety (M, SD) | 15.67 | 8.29 | 15.80 | 8.05 | 15.55 | 8.53 |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Iannacchione, A., Ottmar, E., Ngo, V. et al. Examining relations between math anxiety, prior knowledge, hint usage, and performance of math equivalence in two different online learning contexts. Instr Sci 51, 285–307 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09604-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09604-6