Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Escaping the Sisyphean Trap: Systemic Criminal Justice System Reform

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When calls for reforming criminal justice arise, they frequently target particular—rather than systems-level—problems. This approach can be effective when only a few such problems exist. But it risks worsening rather than improving crime and justice by ignoring many other problems, including system-level issues that undermine efforts to promote safety and justice and to do so cost-efficiently. At the same time, this approach can contribute to continued investment in micro-level changes that ultimately achieve little or fail, in part because they do not address systemic problems. By contrast, systemic change—focused on changes throughout criminal justice and on criminal justice as a system—holds the potential to escape from this Sisyphean vicious cycle and to create greater public safety and justice at less cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akers, R. L., Sellers, C. S., & Jennings, W. G. (2021). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application (8th ed.). Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpert, G. P., & Moore, M. H. (1993). Measuring police performance in the new paradigm of policing. In U.S. Department of Justice, Performance measures for the criminal justice system (pp. 109–142). Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Auerhahn, K. (2008). Dynamic systems simulation analysis: A planning tool for the new century. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(4), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartos, B. J., & Kubrin, C. E. (2018). Can we downsize our prisons and jails without compromising public safety? Findings from California’s Prop 47. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(3), 693–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, K. (2018). The politics, promise, and peril of criminal justice reform in the context of mass incarceration. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, K., Reosti, A., & Knaphus, E. (2016). The end of an era? Understanding the contradictions of criminal justice reform. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 664(1), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215598973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeman, M. (2018). National indicators of quality indigent defense. National Legal Aid and Defender Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, T. J., Paoline, E. A., III., & Pare, P. P. (2005). General systems theory and criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasko, B. L., Souza, K. A., Via, B., Del Principe, S., & Taxman, F. S. (2016). Performance measures in community corrections: Measuring effective supervision practices with existing agency data. Federal Probation, 80, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, T. G., Brancale, J. M., Beaver, K. M., & Bales, W. D. (Eds.). (2016). Advancing criminology and criminal justice policy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., & Larson, R. C. (1972). Analysis of a total criminal justice system. In A. W. Drake, R. L. Keeney, & P. M. Morse (Eds.), Analysis of public systems (pp. 317–355). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., & Petersilia, J. (1995). Investing in criminal justice research. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime (pp. 465–487). Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. (1981). Measuring prison results: Ways to monitor and evaluate corrections performance. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus, and other essays. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, S. D. (2021). The Mississippi model: Dangers of prison reform in the context of fiscal austerity. Punishment & Society (forthcoming).https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211006176

  • Chettiar, I., & Waldman, M. (Eds.). (2015). Solutions: American leaders speak out on criminal justice. Brennan Center for Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clear, T. R. (2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, G. F. (1993). Performance measures for the trial courts, prosecution, and public defense. Performance measures for the criminal justice system (pp. 87–108). Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., & Mears, D. P. (2017). Reinventing community corrections. Crime and Justice, 46(1), 27–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. C., Ortiz, C. W., Euler, S., & Kuykendall, L. (2015). Revisiting “measuring what matters”: Developing a suite of standardized performance measures for policing. Police Quarterly, 18(4), 469–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611115598990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiIulio, J. J. (1993). Rethinking the criminal justice system: Toward a new paradigm. Performance measures for the criminal justice system (pp. 1–18). Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Duffee, D. E. (2015). Why is criminal justice theory important? In E. R. Maguire & D. E. Duffee (Eds.), Criminal justice theory: Explaining the nature and behavior of criminal justice (pp. 5–26). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, A. (2022). Arguing for criminal justice reform: Examining the effects of message framing on policy preferences.Justice Quarterly (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2038243

  • Eisen, L. B., & Krinsky, M. A. (2021). The necessity of performance measures for prosecutors. In R. F. Wright, K. L. Levine, & R. M. Gold (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prosecutors and prosecution (pp. 227–257). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader, J. J., VanZant, S. W., & Henson, A. R. (2020). Crime and justice framing in an era of reform: How the local matters. Justice Quarterly, 37(6), 1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1589555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of crime prevention. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N., & Innes, M. (2006). Reassurance policing, community policing and measuring police performance. Policing & Society, 16(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460600662122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichtelberg, A. (2020). Criminal (in)justice: A critical introduction. Sage.

  • Forst, B. (2003). Errors of justice: Nature, sources, and remedies. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, K. R., Hu, C., & Jannetta, J. (2021). Racial equity and criminal justice risk assessment. The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaes, G. G., Camp, S. D., Nelson, J. B., & Saylor, W. G. (2004). Measuring prison performance: Government privatization and accountability (Vol. 2). Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gau, J. M. (2018). Criminal justice policy: Origins and effectiveness. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, A. (2018). You get what you measure: New performance indicators needed to gauge progress of criminal justice reform. The executive session on community corrections (pp. 1–8). National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorby, D. M. (2013). The failure of traditional measures of police performance and the rise of broader measures of performance. Policing, 7(4), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pat023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J. (1989). Why is there so little criminal justice theory? Neglected macro- and micro-level links between organization and power. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26(2), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427889026002002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, E. (1940). Mythology: Timeless tales of gods and heroes. Little, Brown, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatry, H. P. (2006). Performance measurement: Getting results (2nd ed.). The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner, D. (1990). Rough justice: Days and nights of a young D.A. Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, N. (2019). The First Step Act of 2018: An overview. Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeglic, E., & Calkins, C. (Eds.). (2022). Handbook of issues in criminal justice reform in the United States. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. D. (Ed.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of crime and criminal justice. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, P. (2022). Republicans, after years of pushing for softer criminal sentences, return to the party’s law-and-order posture in Jackson’s confirmation hearing. The Washington Post, March 23. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/23/grassley-crime/

  • Kelly, W. R. (2021). The crisis in America’s criminal courts: Improving criminal justice outcomes by transforming decision-making. Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, W. R. (2015). Criminal justice at the crossroads: Transforming crime and punishment. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kraska, P. B. (2006). Criminal justice theory: Toward legitimacy and an infrastructure. Justice Quarterly, 23(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820600688735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N., Soskice, D., Cheliotis, L., & Xenakis, S. (Eds.). (2021). Tracing the relationship between inequality, crime and punishment. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latessa, E. J., Listwan, S. J., & Koetzle, D. (2014). What works (and doesn’t) in reducing recidivism. Anderson Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, P. K., Tueller, S., Levin-Rector, A., & Witwer, A. (2020). The prevalence of local criminal justice practices. Federal Probation, 83, 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H. (2021). Moving the National Institute of Justice forward: July 2010 through December 2012. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 37(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986221999857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., Hulley, S., & Crewe, B. (2012). Conceptualizing and measuring the quality of prison life. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt, & S. F. Messner (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of criminological research methods (pp. 358–372). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., Maruna, S., & McAra, L. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of criminology. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., & Ball, R. A. (2019). Criminological theory: Context and consequences (7th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C. (1993). Criminal justice performance measures for prisons. In Performance measures for the criminal justice system (pp. 15–59). Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Lum, C. M., & Koper, C. S. (2017). Evidence-based policing: Translating research into practice. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lum, C. M., & Nagin, D. (2017). Reinventing American policing: A seven-point blueprint for the 21st century. Crime and Justice, 46(1), 339–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maayan, E., Ronen, B., & Coman, A. (2012). Assessing the performance of a court system: A comprehensive performance measures approach. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(11), 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.670844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P. (2022). Bridging the research-policy divide to advance science and policy: The 2022 Bruce Smith, Sr. Award Address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Evaluation Journal (forthcoming).

  • Mears, D. P. (2019). Creating systems that can improve safety and justice (and why piecemeal change won’t work). Justice Evaluation Journal, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2019.1569475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P. (2018). The Sisyphean dilemma in criminal justice reform: How systems research can help to illuminate and fix systems problems. The Criminologist, 43(5), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P. (2017). Out-of-control criminal justice: The systems improvement solution for more safety, justice, accountability, and efficiency. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P. (2010). American criminal justice policy: An evaluation approach to increasing accountability and effectiveness. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P., & Bacon, S. (2009). Improving criminal justice through better decision making: Lessons from the medical system. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P., & Barnes, J. C. (2010). Toward a systematic foundation for identifying evidence-based criminal justice sanctions and their relative effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(4), 702–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P., & J. C. Cochran. (2022). Mass evidence-based policy (EBP) as an alternative to mass incarceration. In B. C. Welsh, S. N. Zane, & D. P. Mears (Eds.), Oxford handbook of evidence-based crime and justice policy. Oxford University Press. (Forthcoming.)

  • Mears, D. P., & Cochran, J. C. (2015). Prisoner reentry in the era of mass incarceration. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P., Cochran, J. C., Bales, W. D., & Bhati, A. S. (2016a). Recidivism and time served in prison. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 106(1), 83–124. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26402868

  • Mears, D. P., Cochran, J. C., & Lindsey, A. M. (2016b). Offending and racial and ethnic disparities in criminal justice: A conceptual framework for guiding theory and research and informing policy. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(1), 78–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986215607252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miofsky, K. T., & Byrne, J. M. (2012). Evaluation research and probation: How to distinguish high performance from low performance programmes. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt, & S. F. Messner (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of criminological research methods (pp. 336–357). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for State Courts. (1990). Trial court performance standards. National Center for State Courts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, B. J., & Hanson, R. A. (2007). Implement and use court performance measures. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 799–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (1993). Measuring the performance of community corrections. In Performance measures for the criminal justice system (pp. 61–86). Bureau of Justice Statistics.

  • Petersilia, J., & Reitz, K. R. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of sentencing and corrections. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisig, M. D., & Kane, R. J. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of police and policing. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., Freeman, H., & E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabol, W. J., & Baumann, M. L. (2020). Justice reinvestment: Vision and practice. Annual Review of Criminology, 3, 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. W. (2005). Recidivism of public and private state prison inmates in Florida: Issues and unanswered questions. Criminology & Public Policy, 4, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. (2011). The Oxford handbook of crime and criminal justice. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, S. (2018). Sentence length and recidivism: Evidence and the challenges of criminal justice reform in the carceral state. Criminology & Public Policy, 17, 771–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, V. M., & Geller, A. (2019). De-policing America’s youth: Disrupting criminal justice policy feedbacks that distort power and derail prospects. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 685(1), 190–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219871899

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida State University, Eppes Hall, 112 South Copeland Street, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-1273, USA

    Daniel P. Mears

Authors
  1. Daniel P. Mears
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel P. Mears.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mears, D.P. Escaping the Sisyphean Trap: Systemic Criminal Justice System Reform. Am J Crim Just 47, 1030–1049 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09711-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09711-7

Keyword

Search

Navigation