Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Owning Police Reform: The Path Forward for Practitioners and Researchers

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The integration of evidence-based policy into criminal justice reform – and into police reform specifically – is a daunting but necessary endeavor. In this essay, we examine police reform, including a review of the literature, which is summarized and guided by our experiences and thoughts into a broad conceptual framework for what we believe is needed to realize true change in the policing profession. This essay provides a brief review of the history of police reform and explores three primary reasons why it has failed so far: (1) the tendency to implement reactionary (i.e., knee-jerk) reforms; (2) the reliance on non-aspirational reforms; and (3) a lack of necessary evidence to guide reforms. We then provide what we believe to be the path forward – the co-ownership of evidence-based police reform by police executives and researchers. We encourage and advise police executives to be proactive, strategic, and courageous in owning reform, see greater value in being users and builders of evidence, and educate the public and their own officers. We also call on researchers to do better by creating the knowledge needed for the field and packaging it in a way that can be more easily consumed by practitioners, policymakers, and the community. We believe it is through this co-ownership that police reform efforts have the greatest potential for success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer, M. S., & Kirchner, J. (2020). Implementation science: What is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Research, 283, 112376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D., & Nixon, C. (2009). Ending the ‘dialogue of the deaf’: Evidence and policing policies and practices: An Australian case study. Police Practice and Research, 10, 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist, 22(3), 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBS News. (2019). We asked 155 police departments about their racial bias training. Here's what they told us. CBS News. Retrieved October 26, 2022, from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/racial-bias-training-de-escalation-training-policing-in-america/

  • Council on Criminal Justice (2021a). Policy assessment: Implicit bias training. Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://counciloncj.foleon.com/policing/assessing-the-evidence/vii-implicit-bias/

  • Council on Criminal Justice (2021b). Policy assessment: Chokeholds and other neck restraints. Task force on policing. Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://counciloncj.foleon.com/policing/assessing-the-evidence/i-chokeholds-and-other-neck-restraints/

  • Council on Criminal Justice (2021c). Policy assessment: No knock warrants and police raids. Task force on policing. Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://counciloncj.foleon.com/policing/assessing-the-evidence/iii-no-knock-warrants-and-police-raids/

  • Council on Criminal Justice (2021d). Policy assessment: Effectiveness of police training. Task force on policing. Retrieved November 2, 2022 from https://counciloncj.foleon.com/policing/assessing-the-evidence/iv-effectiveness-of-police-training/

  • Cullen, F. T. (2005). The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: How the science of criminology made a difference: The American Society of Criminology 2004 Presidential Address. Criminology, 43(1), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, M., & Mittman, B. (2006). Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science, 1(1), 1–3.

  • Eck, J. E., & Maguire, E. R. (2000). Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence. In A. Blumstein & J. Wallman (Eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 207–265). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E., & Rothman, J. (2006). Police-community conflict and crime prevention in Cincinnati, Ohio. In J. Bailey & L. Dammert (Eds.), Public Security and Police Reform in the Americas (pp. 225–244). University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisman, A. B., Kilbourne, A. M., Dopp, A. R., Saldana, L., & Eisenberg, D. (2020). Economic evaluation in implementation science: Making the business case for implementation strategies. Psychiatry Research, 283, 112433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R. S., & Whalen, J. L. (2010). Police–academic partnerships: Ending the dialogue of the deaf, the Cincinnati experience. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 11(2), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R. S., & Henderson, S. (2013). Beyond rhetoric: Establishing police-academic partnerships that work. In: Brown J. M. (Ed.) The Future of Policing. Routledge.

  • Engel, R. S., & Eck, J. E. (2015). Effectiveness vs. equity in policing: Is a tradeoff inevitable? Ideas in American Policing, 18(1), 1–12.

  • Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., & Isaza, G. T. (2020). Moving beyond “best practice”: Experiences in police reform and a call for evidence to reduce officer-involved shootings. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farringer, A. J., Duriez, S. A., Manchak, S. M., & Sullivan, C. C. (2021). Adherence to “what works”: Examining trends across 14 years of correctional program assessment. Corrections, 6(4), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, N. R., & Wilson, P. (2012). Knowledge exchange and police practice: Broadening and deepening the debate around researcher-practitioner collaborations. Police Practice and Research, 13(4), 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, A. J. (1991). Complaints against the police: The trend to external review. Clarendon Press.

  • Goldsmith, A. (2005). Police reform and the problem of trust. Theoretical Criminology, 9(4), 443–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, R., & Harman-Heath, S. (2022). The future of police reform. In E. Jeglic & C. Calkins (Eds.), Handbook of issues in criminal justice reform in the United States (pp. 97–112). Springer Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • den Heyer, G. (2022). Evidence-based policing: A review of its adoption and use by police agencies in the United States of America. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 69, 100532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herskind, M. & Roberts, T. (2022). The failure of police reform. New York Magazine. Retrieved November 4, 2022, from https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/01/atlanta-police-reform-failure.html

  • Herold, T. (2021, November 1-3). Why (and how) to address misguided reform proposal (Conference presentation). 2021 Axon Accelerate Conference, Phoenix, AZ, United States.

  • Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 451–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latessa, E. J., & Lowenkamp, C. (2005). What works in reducing recidivism. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 3, 521–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latessa, E. J., & Lovins, B. (2010). The role of offender risk assessment: A policy maker guide. Victims and Offenders, 5(3), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum, C. (2021). Perspectives on policing: Cynthia Lum. Annual Review of Criminology, 4, 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum, C., Koper, C. S., & Telep, C. W. (2011). The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum, C., Koper, C. S., Gill, C., Hibdon, J., Telep, C., & Robinson, L. (2016). An evidence- assessment of the recommendations of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing – Implementation and research priorities. George Mason University and International Association of Chiefs of Police.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lum, C, Nagin, D. S. (2017). Reinventing American policing. Crime and Justice, 46(1), 339–393.

  • Major Cities Chiefs Association. (2022). Violent crime survey – Agency totals. Midyear comparison –January 1 to June 30, 2022 and 2021. Major cities chiefs association. Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://majorcitieschiefs.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/MCCA-Violent-Crime-Report-2022-and-2021-Midyear.pdf

  • Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35(35), 22–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P. (2010). American criminal justice policy: An evaluation approach to increasing accountability and effectiveness. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, D. P. (2019). Creating systems that can improve safety and justice (and why piecemeal change won’t work). Justice Evaluation Journal, 2(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meares, T., & Tyler, T. (2017). Policing: A model for the 21st century. In A. J. Davis (Ed.), Policing the black man: Arrest, prosecution, and imprisonment (pp. 161–177). Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnay, T. (2022). States approved nearly 300 bills affecting policing in wake of George Floyd’s murder. The Howard Center for investigative journalism. Retrieved November 6, 2022, from https://cnsmaryland.org/2022/10/28/states-approved-nearly-300-bills-affecting-policing-in-wake-of-george-floyds-murder/

  • Police Executive Research Forum. (2015). Constitutional policing as a cornerstone of community policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Retrieved November 6, 2022, from https://cops.usdoj.gov/ric/Publications/cops-p324-pub.pdf

  • President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the president’s task force on 21st century policing. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

  • Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009). Implementation research in mental health services: An emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 36(1), 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. (2020). Five years after Ferguson: Reflecting on police reform and what’s ahead. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 228–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (2012). Applying action evaluation on a large scale: Cincinnati police-community relations collaborative – Successes, failures and lessons learned. In J. Rothman (Eds.) From Identity-Based Conflict to Identity-Based Cooperation. Springer.

  • Rushin, S. (2016). Competing case studies of structural reform litigation in American police departments. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 14, 113–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2010). Gold standard myths: Observations on the experimental turn in quantitative criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatmeier, E. (2013). Reforming Police Use-of-Force Practices: Case Study of the Cincinnati Police Department. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 46(4), 539–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W. (1998). Evidence-based policing. Ideas in American Policing. Police Foundation.

  • Sherman, L. W. (2013). The rise of evidence-based policing: Targeting, testing, and tracking. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 377–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W. (2015). A tipping point for “Totally evidenced policing”: Ten ideas for building an evidence-based police agency. International Criminal Justice Review, 25(1), 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W. (2018). Reducing fatal police shootings as system crashes: Research, theory, and practice. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1), 421–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W. (2022). Goldilocks and the three “Ts”: Targeting, testing, and tracking for “just right” democratic policing. Criminology & Public Policy, 21(1), 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising: A report to the United States Congress. University of Maryland, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice.

  • Telep, C. W. (2017). Police officer receptivity to research and evidence-based policing: Examining variability within and across agencies. Crime and Delinquency, 63(8), 976–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telep, C. W., & Lum, C. (2014). The receptivity of officers to empirical research and evidence based policing: An examination of survey data from three agencies. Police Quarterly, 17(4), 359–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telep, C. W., & Bottema, A. J. (2020). Adopt evidence-based policing. In E. Maguire & C. Katz (Eds.), Transforming the police: Thirteen key reforms (pp. 9–25). Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (2018). “Not dead yet”: The national police crisis, a new conversation about policing, and the prospects for accountability-related police reform. University of Illinois Law Review, 2018(5), 1777–1841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Braga, A. A. (2019). Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

  • Weisburd, D., & Majmundar, M. K. (Eds.). (2018). Proactive policing: Effects on crime and communities. National Academies Press.

  • White, M. D., Fradella, H. F., & Flippin, M. (2021). How can we achieve accountability in policing? The (not-so-secret) ingredients to effective police reform. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 25, 405–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. B., Bouffard, L. A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(2), 172–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden, R. E., McLean, S. J., Engel, R. S., Cochran, H., Corsaro, N., Reynolds, D., Najdowski, C. J., & Isaza, G. T. (2020). (rep.). The impacts of implicit bias awareness training in the NYPD. New York Police Department. Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/impacts-of-implicit-bias-awareness-training-in-%20the-nypd.pdf

  • Wowk, K., McKinney, L., Muller-Karger, F., Moll, R., Avery, S., Escobar-Briones, E., Yoskowitz, D., & McLaughlin, R. (2017). Evolving academic culture to meet societal needs. Palgrave Communications, 3(35), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yglesias, M. (2020). 8 can’t wait, explained. VOX. Retrieved November 8, 2022, from https://www.vox.com/2020/6/5/21280402/8-cant-wait-explained-policing-reforms

  • Zimring, F. E. (2007). The great American crime decline. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E. (2017). When police kill. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Policing Institute, 2550 S. Clark Street, Suite 1130, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA

    Robin S. Engel, Gabrielle T. Isaza & Hannah D. McManus

Authors
  1. Robin S. Engel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabrielle T. Isaza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hannah D. McManus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin S. Engel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Thoughts and opinions expressed in this article are from the authors and do not necessarily reflect the perspectives or official positions of the National Policing Institute.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Engel, R.S., Isaza, G.T. & McManus, H.D. Owning Police Reform: The Path Forward for Practitioners and Researchers. Am J Crim Just 47, 1225–1242 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09719-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09719-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation