Open Access
21 January 2023 Technology update on patent and development trend of power over fiber: a critical review and future prospects
Eric Pradana Putra, Rayvathi Theivindran, Haziq Hasnul, Hui Jing Lee, Pin Jern Ker, MD Zaini Jamaludin, Ramlah Awang, Farah Aniza Mohd Yusof
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Conventional electricity distribution using copper wires is well established due to its high efficiency. However, recent research and development on power-over-fiber (PoF) has proposed optical fiber as an alternative to copper wire as the transmission medium for electricity distribution. The research and development on PoF technology have gained significant momentum over the past decade due to its advantage over copper cables in providing electrical isolation and reducing space in remote sites. The technological advances in laser diodes, fiber optic cable fabrications, and semiconductor manufacturing contribute to developing an efficient PoF system, making them more commercially viable. This paper reviews various PoF systems that imply different arrangements of high-power lasers, fiber optic cables, and photovoltaic power converters. The PoF systems are made available for various applications such as in-home applications, smart power management, and powering sensors with bidirectional communications. The comparison of the PoF composition, commercialized PoF systems, and patented PoF systems are also comprehensively discussed. Finally, the challenges in implementing PoF systems are highlighted, as well as future prospects for research and applications. The information reviewed in this paper aims to provide a roadmap for developing a future PoF system with improved power conversion efficiency.

1.

Introduction

Power-over-fiber (PoF) is not a relatively new term in photonics and has been studied since the 1970s.1 PoF, at its core, is a system in which a high-power laser source transmits a few watts of optical power on a single mode (SMF) or a multimode fiber (MMF). A photovoltaic (PV) converter converts the optical power into electrical power at the receiving end. The system has been studied in various applications such as Internet of Things (IoT),24 optical powering of remote antenna units,58 sensor monitoring systems,4,5 submarines,6,7 video camera systems,8,9 and high voltage applications.1012 PoF is also found to be a safer alternative in distributing power using optical fiber. Comparatively, copper wire possesses a much higher power transmission efficiency at more than 98% and it has the capacity of carrying high power, hence it is extensively used as a medium in transferring electrical power. However, optical fibers are preferable due to their robustness to electromagnetic interference (EMI), short circuit, and sparks.13 The fibers’ immunity to EMI is due to the fact that no radiation is emitted to cause an interference. Optical fibers are also less bulky, capable of operating over long distances, and impervious to moisture and corrosion.14

PoF systems provide several more benefits compared with conventional power transmission. Implementing the PoF system is able to improve the provision of power supply to harsh industrial environment, hazardous areas, and extreme weather.15 PoF is also an alternative to the batteries and long copper cables typically used in remote places.16 Moreover, optical fiber cable installation has minimal security risk in the power distribution system and is less susceptible to explosive and harsh industrial environment. This is because optical fiber only transmits light, which can avoid fire hazard and electric shock from a broken fiber.17 In addition, the fiber is safe from all kinds of virtual interferences such as lightning and corrosive area. In terms of data transmission, PoF has a larger bandwidth and can transmit higher volumes of data compared with copper cables.18 A single optical fiber that can simultaneously carry data signals for sensors and telecommunications is considered to be more advantageous.

The existing review papers on PoF have discussed replacing copper cables with fiber optic cables in critical applications such as powering data link and relay antennas.19 Although the analysis from the review papers has given a better understanding of applications of PoF through the various advancements within the years of studies up to 2021,20 there are still certain studies that were not analyzed, such as inability to transmit power over long distances, high cost, and low overall optical to electrical conversion efficiency. Furthermore, there was a lack of analysis on the ongoing research and development surrounding PoF systems, which will be dissected in this paper.

Research on PoF systems has received extensive attention especially in the past decade due to the vast range of applications that can implement the usage of the system. Matsuura20 studied the papers that were presented in 2019 to 2021, solely focusing on experimental results while in another paper,21 types of fibers especially double-clad fibers were discussed, introducing the PoF system to power remote antennae units (RAUs) in mobile applications. In another study by Rosolem,22 the PoF concept was analyzed in regards to access networks and smart grid developments. However, the research work has been limited to certain applications and not PoF system as a whole. Currently, there is no critical review and discussion on the technology update on the patent and development trend of PoF. Therefore, this review aims to fill in the gap by providing an in-depth analysis of PoF system.

This paper aims to summarize the research and development aspects of PoF systems such as the overview and advancement of the PoF system, parameters of laser diode (LD), types of optical fibers, and PPC materials. In addition, this paper provides a detailed analysis of PoF experimental setups and their output performances, applications, and patented PoF. The paper concludes with recommendations of different criteria needed to choose PoF components, mitigation actions to reduce loss in power transmission, and the prospects for future PoF applications.

2.

PoF System Overview

Figure 1 shows the overview of the system. Essentially, a PoF system consists of a transmitter, optical fiber, and receiver.23 The transmitter unit consists of a laser source that acts as the light source for PoF systems and thermoelectric cooler (TEC) controller that does the electrical-optical conversion. The optical fiber functions as the medium of transmission and there are several types of optical fiber such as MMF, SMF, and double-clad fiber (DCF). At the end of the system, the receiver unit consisting of a PPC and DC-DC converter, converts optical energy to electrical energy that will be supplied to an electrical load. The basic concept of PoF mechanism demonstrates that the optical energy from a high-power laser is transmitted via optical fiber and then converted into electrical energy by a PPC on the other end of the fiber.24 The crucial concern for a PoF mechanism is to transmit and supply the optimum power efficiency to a load at a maximum distance with the highest overall performance. The amount of power that the PoF mechanism can deliver is generally governed by its main components, which are laser, fiber, and PPC.25 The parameters that influence the amount of power produced by the PoF system are optical power output from laser, the maximum transmitted optical power in the optical fiber, optical power input to the PPC, the power loss of the fiber over optical connectors and distance of connection, and efficiency of laser, fiber and PPC.22

Fig. 1

Features of the PoF system that consists of laser source, temperature controller, optical fiber, PPC, DC–DC converter, and connected to an electrical load.

JPE_13_1_011001_f001.png

A previous study discussed the relationship between the efficiency of LDs in electrical-to-optical conversion to the ratio of optimized bandgap to voltage, Eg/V, efficiency of current injection, ηi, external differential quantum efficiency, ηd, and the threshold current, Ith.26 LDs with different materials and wavelength operations can have different sets of these parameters. The approximate representation of the electrical-to-optical conversion efficiency, ηeff(LD) is described as follows:

Eq. (1)

ηeff(LD)=ηiηdEgV(1IthI).

In the optical transmission part, the optical power transmitted throughout the optical fiber follows Lambert’s Law, which states that attenuation depends on the material length, and most commercial optical fibers have attenuation losses that are expressed in dB/km.27 The attenuation losses in dB/km ρdB/km, are expressed in terms of the amount of input light, αin, and the amount of output light, αout, in

Eq. (2)

ρdBkm=10log10(αinαout).

Most power losses in the optical-electrical conversion part occur in the PPC. It was explained in past work that the conversion efficiency of PPC, ηeff(PPC); depends on the density of current at maximum output power, Jm; the voltage at maximum output power, Vm; and the optical intensity, Lint.26 Similar to the LDs, these parameters in PPC are related to the material of the PPC. The equation that describes the relationship between the parameters is shown as

Eq. (3)

ηeff(PPC)=JmVmLint.

2.1.

Laser Diode

An LD is a semiconductor laser that is electrically pumped. A portion of the energy produced by the recombination of electrons and holes in the active region is released as photons. An LD behaves like mirrors with variable reflectivity when its end facets are coated or uncoated, producing an effective laser resonator. The feedback and ultimate gain of the radiation’s stimulated emission are advantageous to an LD. Besides that, LDs offer a wide range of wavelengths, ranging from ultraviolet (UV) to infrared (IR). LDs produce a stream of coherent and highly directional photons compared with another light source such as LED, which produces incoherent light that typically has a vast divergence.

In the PoF system, LDs act as an optical power transmitter, which is usually driven by a laser controller and coupled with an optical fiber. LD provides the most effective high-power supply of photons in converting electric power to optical power, generating optical conversion efficiency between 30% and 70%.28 This was demonstrated by Peters et al. in 2007 where high power 940 nm LDs with up to 76% electrical-to-optical power conversion efficiency.29 In addition, LDs provide more wavelength options in the PoF system spectrum, ranging from 780 to 1650 nm for connection with optical fiber compared with any other light sources such as LED. Additionally, fiber lasers are also used as a light source; however, degradation of the cladding caused by high /power or the power stability remains unsolved an issue.30

Other than that, the power of LDs is dependent on the wavelength choices of the laser.31 The operating temperatures of the laser are preferably monitored during full power operation of the laser. A TEC is used to keep a constant LD temperature in operation at 25°C. Temperature control is important to maintain the operating lifetime of the LD by protecting it from thermal aging.32 On another note, passive cooling can be engineered into the PoF system. Since thermal energy is transported conductively from a copper heat sink to the system baseplate without the use of a cooling liquid, passive cooling is less expensive and difficult. It is better to use passive cooling to reduce system costs.33

In terms of the wavelength, the semiconductor used as the active medium determines the operating wavelength of an LD. A suitable wavelength of the LD is required to improve the efficiency of the PoF systems.34 The most used wavelength in past research was 808 to 840 nm. This is because 808 nm is a suitable wavelength for minimal optical fiber loss for a transmission distance that is <1.3  km.24 While the optical fiber cables that have the distance of <1.3  km should use 808 to 840 nm, it has been recorded that a wavelength of 1480 nm should be used for optical fiber cables with longer distance to provide better efficiency of the PoF system.22

2.2.

Optical Fiber

The optical power produced by LDs is transmitted through an optical fiber. The light signals produced by LDs at one end of the cable are transmitted across the fiber optic backbone and reflected to the core as the light reaches the fiber optic cladding, thus preserving the light inside the core. SMF and MMF are two types of optical fiber cables that are commonly used. SMF has a small inner core (9/10  μm), which has only one direction of light and the MMF contains a larger inner core (50/62.5  μm).26 MMF has a greater core diameter than SMF. Therefore, it has more than one transmission mode. In comparison, MMF is typically used for short-distance transmission, whereas SMF is used for longer distances. SMF has smaller core regions resulting in smaller optical power transfer, which is not ideal for high power distribution. Although MMF has a larger core area compared with SMF, the disadvantage is that the transmission speed of the MMF is being delayed by the large core area and eventually leading to modal dispersion.35

In addition, the interference between optical power and transmission data arises in the same core.36 Another type of fiber that has potential and is being used in recent research to achieve higher power is DCF.37 To maximize the optical power of SMF, DCF has been made to transfer high power via the cladding of SMF fiber. DCF contains a small single-mode core and large inner cladding that wraps the single-mode core. Therefore the laser light will propagate in a single-mode core surrounded by an inner cladding with a large core effective area over 240 times larger than that of the SMF core.38 Consequently, unlike SMF and MMF, DCF is chosen for high optical power and simultaneously transmits optical data.39 There is also step-index plastic optical fiber (SI-POF) that has been recently used to integrate PoF in home networks with a data transmission speed of up to multiple Gbit/s.40 The experiments showed that several mW of optical power could be delivered without significantly degrading the signal quality and only produced 1×1010 bit error ratio. While various types of optical fiber cables are available, different types are selected based on the required applications. Table 1 summarizes the specifications of SMF, MMF, DCF, and SI-POF cables. The highest transmission distance was reported by López-Cardona et al.51 the PoF system was transmitted through SMF optic cable over 14.43 km with an optical loss of 3.89 dB.

Table 1

Characteristics of MMF, SMF, DCF, and other types of fiber cables that are commonly used during the optical transmission.

Ref No.Types of fiberCore diameter (μm)Transmission distance (m)Optical loss (dB)
41MMF optic cables501003.0
42MMF optic cables62.53001.0
43MMF optic cables62.540006.61
44MMF optic cables100100
45MMF optic cables2001000.3
46SMF optic cables8.21000∼0.7
47SMF optic cables9144303.89
12SMF optic cables9100
38DCF optic cables105100<1.0
21DCF optic cables1053001.45
48DCF optic cables1253001.8
49MCF optic cables
50MCF optic cables10,000
21Plastic optical cables0.5–1 mm2539

2.3.

Photovoltaic Power Converter

The receiver unit hosts PV cells where the optical power is converted to electrical power to supply the load. The most common semiconductor materials used are Gallium Arsenide (GaAs), Indium Gallium Arsenide (InGaAs),52 Gallium Antimonide (GaSb), and Silicon (Si).53 The conversion efficiency and the maximum electrical power output are the most important indicators of PV cell performance. There are also significant differences in energy gap and open-circuit voltage (Voc) between these materials, which affect the minimum electrical energy required for the semiconductors to conduct electricity. The energy gap of GaAs material is 1.4 eV and produces 1.1 V of output voltage,8 and Si material has 1.12 eV with 0.7 V of output voltage level, which are lower than those of GaAs. InGaAs and GaSb have the same energy gap and the output voltage level of 0.7 eV and 0.5 V, respectively.7 The efficiency of these materials for PoF mechanism in different experiments were reported; Si has a maximum efficiency of 42.9% at 980 nm,54 whereas InGaAs and GaSb have 45% and 49% peak efficiency at 1550 nm30 and 1680 nm55 respectively. GaAs is a good material for PV since it has a direct and large bandgap material and has high tolerance over a wide range of temperatures. GaAs PPC was reported to possess a maximum efficiency of more than 60% at 800-850 nm range56 and another paper by Helmers et al.57 reported a conversion efficiency of 68.9% for GaAs-based power converter under 858 nm monochromatic light. In another study by Fafard et al.,58 it was demonstrated that GaAs-based laser power converters at 808 nm at 150 K were found to have a conversion efficiency of 74.7% and 68.9% at a laser illumination of 858 nm in another research.59 The main limitation of GaAs is that it has a minimal spectral response. However, the transmission wavelength at 850 nm is still in the first minima attenuation window.54 To increase the efficiency of a GaAs PPC, it was reported that a heterostructure architecture can increase conversion efficiency up to 65%60 and allows for applications with larger output powers and new wavelengths.61 For InGaAs PPC, the highest performance is shown by heterojunction solar cell, which can be implemented in the application of PPC.62 The significance of high PPC efficiency was demonstrated in applications such as photonic boost converter and optically-isolated DC supply.63

Table 2 shows the measured performance of common PPC such as Si, GaAs, and InGaAs for high-intensity laser application in terms of open-circuit voltage, energy gap, bandgap type, sensitivity, operating wavelength, quantum efficiency, and conversion efficiency. The conversion efficiency is defined as how much electrical power can be produced for every 1 W of optical power. Based on the table below, Si’s indirect band gap makes it a less than perfect optical material. However, Si can still be a promising material for PPC applications, with a conversion efficiency of up to 40% at 850 nm wavelength, and apparently has low manufacturing cost. Besides that, different efficiency levels for GaAs cells have been reported mostly due to GaAs-based power converters’ output voltage can be increased by interconnecting converter segments or multijunction PV cells.30 While InGaAs and GaSb have output voltage levels lower than GaAs, 0.5 V, which is too low to supply power to any devices. These materials are not an option for the high performance of PoF systems. However, GaSb converters may benefit wireless applications since it has been used as a material to develop high-intensity laser power beaming55 that can be used for wireless power transmission.70 InGaAs is reported effective at 1550 nm while GaSb at 1315 nm.38 Another study reported that PPCs made of InGaAs materials have the capacity to transmit electrical energy over several kilometers.71 Fafard and Mason also demonstrated in their research that InGaAs/InP PPCs for 1470 nm may generate electrical output voltages of more than 4 to 5 V indicating the capability of long-wavelength converter.72 At 1520 nm InGaAs PPC, it was found that the maximum room temperature conversion efficiency was 36.9%.73 In most cases, PPC contributes most of the power loss in the PoF system since they do not generally have high conversion efficiency. A study on PPC material found that high bandgap material such as ZnS and 6H–SiC with bandgaps of 3.54 and 3 eV, respectively, contributed to a higher efficiency.74 However, the doping limitation remains a major challenge that would have to be addressed. Hence, each PPC has disadvantages and limitations that rely more on wavelength and materials. For example, GaAs PPCs have high efficiency, voltage per cell (>1  V), whereas Si PPCs are advantageous in terms of having a mature planar technology. InGaAs and GaSb, on the other hand, have a very low fiber attenuation compared with GaAs.

Table 2

Measured PV cell performances for high-intensity laser application according to material type, open circuit voltage, energy gap, bandgap type, sensitive wavelength, and experimental results of conversion efficiency.

Semiconductor materialOpen circuit voltage (V)Energy gap(eV)Band gap typeSensitive wavelength (nm)Experimental results of conversion efficiency(%)
Silicon
(Si)
0.59 (808 nm)261.1226Indirect26800–10002624.7026
3064,65
3666
Gallium
arsenide
(GaAs)
1.05
(808 nm)26
1.4267Direct67790–8506832.3026
800–900264069
780–980684168
5268
Indium
gallium
arsenide
(InGaAs)
0.48
(1480 nm)26
0.8326Direct671300–16002622.2026
256
0.74673467
4530
Gallium
antimonide
(GaSb)
0.5
(1315 nm)67
0.7367Direct674067
4955
Aluminium
gallium
arsenide
(AlGaAs)
1.26
(820 nm)55
5655
Indium
phosphide
(InP)
1.35671300–15506824.367
2668
Germanium
(Ge)
0.22
(1480 nm)26
0.66261300–1600269.2626
30.430

2.4.

Performance Improvements of PoF System

The efficiency of PoF systems can be improved by considering the specifications of the transmitter, optical fiber, and receiver in the PoF system. The main component of the transmitter unit is the LD, which is used to convert the electrical power to optical power and transmit to optical fiber. The limitation of optical fiber is a maximum power limit that can be used for a PoF system. This is due to the fiber-fuse effect, resulting in heat increases in the optical fiber.75 It is stated that the limitation power at 1467 nm for SMF is 1.5 W, and SMF with type 28 F is 1.0 W. On the other hand, it is recorded that the maximum power of MMF at 1060 nm is 4.0 W.22

The main component of the receiver unit is the PPC, which transforms the optical power to electrical power and delivers it to electronic devices. The maximum electrical power output and PV conversion efficiency are two of the most important limitations at the receiver unit. Among the PV cell listed in Table 2, the GaAs PV cell is reported to be the most commonly used PV cell with conversion efficiencies of 51% to 54%. Most experiments choose GaAs, due to their better responsivity to shorter wavelengths and high-temperature resistance.76 It can be concluded that the overall efficiency of PoF systems can be optimized if the suitable LD, optical fiber, and receiver are selected in an experiment. However, the efficiency of the overall system may need to be compromised if there are limited options for materials for a specific application.

3.

PoF System in the Laboratory and Commercial Applications

The PoF system is one of the major focal points in the photonics industry and has been demonstrated in several applications including power transmission, IoT, 5G networks, and, quite recently, energy management system. Most of the PoF systems consists of the same three components, namely the LD, optic fiber and PV converter. The efficiency and output power of each application vary according to the specifications of the components used.

3.1.

Experimental Setup and Applications

Figure 2 shows the summary of several applications that implement the usage of PoF technology. The PoF system in the laboratory and commercial applications are further discussed in terms of system efficiencies, types of LDs, optic fibers and PV converters, power loss, and limitations as well as improvements of the applications.

Fig. 2

The various applications of the PoF system in different industries and the power output range for each of the applications.

JPE_13_1_011001_f002.png

3.1.1.

Communication

Optical fiber has long been known to bridge gaps in the communication sector. PoF was developed in 1978 by Deloach et al.1 to power up the sound alerter of the telephone. The experiment generates a 3-mW power supply from 830 nm light transmitted on an optical fiber. A year later, PoF concept was implemented by Miller and Lawry77 by using optically powered two-way speech communication over fiber and generating sound alarm at the remote station. Later in 1982, bidirectional speech-television communication over a single fiber was demonstrated. In addition, a highly efficient PV converter based on GaAIAs has been used to supply electrical power for the remote station telephone during power outages.78 In recent studies, PoF has been applied in various communication applications such as transmission of 5G NR signal, video monitoring system, integrating PoF in a 10 km long multicore fiber link within a 5G fronthaul scenario. In a study by de Souza et al.44 it was reported that the implementation of an optically powered 5G new radio (5G NR) fiber-wireless (FiWi) system consisted of a fiber coupled HPLD with a wavelength of 975 nm, a 100 m long MMF with 100/140  μm core, and PPC with a conversion efficiency of 30%. With these specifications, the overall power transmission efficiency (PTE) of 23.5% is experimentally demonstrated in a real 5G NR system.

According to Wang et al.,79 a video monitoring system using PoF technique was introduced. The LD provided 1 W of optical power at 810 nm wavelength and MMF with a core diameter of 62.5  μm was used. The PPC generated up to 133 mW of power under a light illumination of 400 mW. However, the output power of the PPC was not high due to limitations of the core diameter of the used fiber. The implementation of PoF was also shown on the fronthaul of a 5G-NR network with an analog-radio-over-fiber on a 10-km long multicore fiber as demonstrated by López-Cardona et al.50 With an LD wavelength of 1480 nm, MMF was used alongside a PPC with a conversion efficiency of 30%. The power output recorded was the same as the previous study. Leaning onto these studies, it was found that the most prevalent issue involved the losses from each of the PoF components, with PV converters contributing to the highest amount of loss.

3.1.2.

Environment

In the environmental sector, the PoF system has been implemented in the coal mining industry. Chen et al.80 illustrated an optically powered gas monitoring system to measure four essential environmental gases for underground mines. The PoF system was set up at 1550 nm using a SMF at a length of 250 m. The PPC used was of InGaAs material and it yielded a conversion efficiency of 30%. The highest power output recorded was 120 mW demonstrating longer distance coverage, reduced optical cabling, and increased multiplexing possibilities and data throughput for better awareness of underground environment using one fiber for both power delivery and communication. The study has allowed for future potential commercial implementation but will require improvements in terms of the software and hardware such as repetition of a more advanced UI/UX targeting integration into the end-user supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system and a redesign of the gas monitoring station and accompanying remote terminal unit, respectively. With the rising issues of environmental hazards causing climate change, PoF systems should be pushed to be integrated with technological advancements, which can decrease the risks of environmental issues.

3.1.3.

Energy management

In principle, energy management system ensures the usage of energy in an efficient manner and PoF has played a sizable role in this sector. In 1991, small-size power by light systems was demonstrated. The system consists of improved high-power LDs, large numerical aperture (NA) of fibers, GaAs cell, and DC–DC converter. The output power obtained is about 0.3 W over 1 m of 200  μm core fiber, and the full system efficiency is 5.5% from an evaluation of power by light systems.52 Miyakawa et al.26 discussed fiber optic power and signal transmission to apply powering information equipment. The conversion efficiency of PV cells remains constant with heat radiation and enhanced with limited series resistance. In 2006 and 2008, the ability of light to provide a new way of delivering power over nonconductive fiber was introduced. PoF was used for delivering power in optical networks by using optical fiber to power low-power switches and actuators while resistant to harsh environmental effects. PoF is also used to supply backup power to the battery in power failures.17

PoF has also contributed to the energy management system where Li et al.69 showed that a novel multisensing functional system technique was developed. The PoF system consisted of 100 m MMF with 105  μm core diameter sourced by an 800 mW laser with 808-nm wavelength supplying power for remote module. The GaAs-clad PPC had a conversion efficiency of 40%. With the findings of this paper, the contradiction of high-power consumption and power supply can be balanced by an intelligent energy management system. Other than that, this paper further strengthens the notion of PoF being able to supply isolated power in harsh, noisy, and high-voltage environments. In Souza et al.,81 PoF was used to supply remote sensors while transmitting and processing RF signals. In this work, a bidirectional radio-over-fiber (RoF) system with PoF capabilities was introduced where the illumination power of LD was 5W and its wavelength 1480 nm. The PPC conversion efficiency was found to be 25%, and an optical power of up to 1 W was converted to electrical power. In the recent reported work, a breakthrough of conversion efficiency improvement up to 49% at 1466 nm has been demonstrated by Fafard and Masson,72 which could be further utilized for energy management system in the near future. It is important to note that although the PoF system is able to play a role in energy management system, there are still gaps within these studies that need to be addressed such as the overall system efficiency of PoF and high cost of PoF since high powered laser, PV power converters (PPC) and special optical fibers are used.

3.1.4.

Internet of Things (IoT)

Moving forward, in a study related to PoF in 2019, PoF was used for smart node fed on IoT applications. The system used 300 m MMF and obtained full system efficiency of around 10%.2 In a recent study in 2020, PoF was used for smart power management by Helmers et al.82 The electrical power obtained is 5.5 W. Other than that, recent study reported an output power of 14 W for drones application at 808 nm wavelength.83 In addition, Fafard and Masson56 have also reported on PPC conversion at 17.5 W output with 60% of efficiency for the same wavelength, which could be beneficial for the IoT application. There is also a recent study in 2021 that shows an optimized PoF system can remotely feed a smart remote node for low-power applications.84 A custom PV laser power converter was developed and successfully tested to power up a smart remote node system that consumes 15.5 mW. The customized converter achieved a maximum conversion efficiency of 56.5% at 808 nm, which helped improve the overall system efficiency.

In the same year, research was done about using PoF in 5G network applications.51 A SMF cable was used to transmit 226 mW of electrical power to remote radio heads for communication, battery charge, and control. According to Park et al.,85 the PoF system was used as the IoT sensor solution for the environmental monitoring of a set of submodules in MMC-HVDC systems. Laser modules of 1 W, 976 nm supplied focused light to an MMF with 62.5/125-μm core diameter, which was then converted at the PPC with a conversion power of 28% three PPCs with optical outputs up to 250 mW. Other than that, Mohammed et al.68 studied on the efficiency of the PoF system in distributing power for IoT applications and demonstrated the system in the short-haul distance as an alternative to copper cables. At 450 mA of laser driving current, the whole system efficiency reached a maximum of 12%. The data obtained clearly showed that system efficiency increases as laser driving current rises from 50 to 450 mA. The optical-to-electrical conversion module was chosen as the primary factor affecting the prototype’s overall system efficiency because it had a low power output. Although the PoF system allows for both power and data to be transmitted along the optic fiber, overall system efficiency is still not at its optimum.

3.1.5.

Power system

In conventional power systems, copper cables are the more favorable line of transmission. However, new studies have shown that PoF systems are capable of supplying power via optic fiber. In 2010, PoF was used for temperature and current monitoring systems for transmission lines. Silica optical fiber cables are used in communications and power supply connections, resulting in the assurance of insulation between the sensor head and the consumer site.5 According to Hualong et al.,86 high-power laser (HPL) over an SMF works for long-distance power supply in remote environments. 10 W fiber power is injected and transmitted through a 10 km SMF from a 1550-nm wavelength laser. In this study, the sensor receives 26 mW of converted power. The conversion occurs at the PPC where its chosen material is InGaAs. Guzowski et al.,30 on the other hand, proposed the efficiency evaluation of ultralow power (ULP) supply. At 1310 nm laser source, fiber power is transmitted along a 0.5 m long SMF and converted at the PPC. The conversion efficiency was found to be 26.2% and the efficiency of whole system reached 13%. The PoF system in this study provided 350  μW of electric energy to power the ULP devices. Although the reviewed state-of-the-art PoF system seems to have a bright future, more studies must be conducted to transmit power over a long distance with minimum power loss and optimum overall system efficiency.

3.1.6.

Sensors

PoF supply of microelectronic sensor devices is extremely useful in appliances working in harsh and remote environments. According to a paper presented by Zylka and Guzowski,87 a simple PoF system was constructed to deliver power required for remote supply of microprocessor- controlled low-power microelectronic sensing apparatus. A laser source of 10 mW with wavelength 654 nm was used in this experiment. The optical energy was transmitted along a multimode all-plastic fiber (APF) optical cable. In a study by Dimitriadou et al.,88 an optically powered board designed for seabed monitoring operations was constructed. The power supply is clearly visible as the prominent peak at 1480 nm. Following optic-electric conversion a maximum of 190 mW is available on the sensor side. Other than improving and enhancing PoF efficiency and transmission distance, future PoF design can be done using the same optical fiber for both power and data transfer, performed simultaneously but at different wavelengths.

3.1.7.

Others

PoF technology has also been implemented in various other applications. A combination of radio over fiber and remote optical powering over optical fiber was investigated by Wake et al.35 The system used a high-power LD with a maximum output of 2 W into 62.5  μm core diameter of MMF and 830 nm of wavelength. The optical power obtained from the laser is distributed over 300 m MMF, and the output power from PVC is regulated at 3.3 V. The system is designed for distributed antenna system application.42 According to Perhirin et al.,6 an optical prototype dedicated to low-power submarine sensors that use PoF technology was demonstrated. The LD used has a central wavelength 1500 to 1600 nm and the power is transmitted along 10 km of optical fiber. The optoelectric conversion that occurs at the PPC contributes to the overall system efficiency of 22.5%. In 2014, PoF using 100 m of DCF for radio over fiber systems was introduced by Matsuura and Sato.38 The optical power obtained is up to 4.0 W, and the electrical power output to powering the base stations for wireless local area network (WLAN) is more than 400 mW.38 In 2015, Sato et al.39 demonstrated PoF using DCF optically powered ROF systems with 40 W of optical feeding obtained. In the same year, Matsuura et al.89 presented 60 W optical power obtained over a 300 m DCF with improved system efficiency. In 2017, PoF was used for a fishing camera over MMF as the fishing line. The electrical power output obtained is 413 mW with 1.27 W of optical power required from high-power LDs.8 In 2018, Kamiyama et al.37 used PoF for multichannel data signals and power distribution using a DCF. The maximum optical power feed is 60 W, and the optical power delivered to a remote unit is then converted into electrical power by several PPC.

Table 3 shows a summary of the different PoF experiments conducted and their respective applications from 2008 to 2022. Most of the experiments that are listed in the table involved sending power and data simultaneously to low-power sensors and communication devices such as remote antenna units (RAU) and remote radio heads (RRH). The overall system efficiency stated in the experiments listed ranges from 9% to as high as 28.6%, which was achieved by Matsuura et al.3 The experiment used an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) and bandpass filters to increase the output power and reduce noise, respectively. The tapered fiber bundle combiner (TFBC) used in the research was also fabricated by tapering and fusing the bundles of fiber with the DCF they used to reduce connection loss. Apart from the overall system efficiency, it is also observed that the most frequently used wavelength operation is 808 nm due to its compatibility with most PV cells and power converter also its availability in the commercial market. Moreover, that 808 nm frequency can improve system energy efficiency for silica fibers and applications with a link length of <1.3  km.13

Table 3

A summary of the different PoF applications available and its values of power, types of fiber, efficiency, PV material, and loss.

JPE_13_1_011001_f003.pngJPE_13_1_011001_f004.pngJPE_13_1_011001_f005.png

3.2.

Commercialized PoF Systems

There are a range of commercial systems that can be observed at in-depth. There are several available commercialized PoF systems from companies that are able to deliver power to remote and inaccessible areas. One of the PoF systems that have been commercialized operates at 830 nm wavelength, which provides electrical distribution to remote locations.96 One of their novelties is that they have supercapacitors to ensure a smooth and constant voltage is supplied to the remotely powered devices. Since the PoF system uses MMF with a large core size, the electrical output power declines over a certain distance because of the modal dispersion inside the cable.49 Therefore, the PoF system is more suitable for short-distance applications. Another commercialized PoF system used a wavelength of 976 nm for smart monitoring system for electrical assets such as switchgears and busbars. The optical power of the transmitted light is converted into electrical power using the sensor modules.97 It provides power for sensors that continuously monitor temperature, humidity, and partial discharge. Other than that, at the wavelength of 750 to 850 nm and 900 to 1000 nm, a different PoF system allows different power inputs with a maximum power output of 1 W to be compatible with various laser sources. Fiber optic cable with core sizes of 62.5/100  μm is used to transmit power.98 The designed system provides electrical sources in remote, inaccessible, hazardous, electrically noisy, or exposed to extreme weather locations. The typical application of the system is to power up low wattage electronic devices such as sensors, actuators, data communication transceivers, GPS receivers, and gauges, with the limitation of 1 W output power. Overall, each commercialized PoF system has been designed to produce the necessary output power and voltage for their respective applications. However, all of them have their own set of limitations. The optimization of these systems can be explored more thoroughly by using numerical methods or techniques involving artificial intelligence, such as a genetic algorithm.

3.3.

Patented PoF Systems

Table 4 lists the commercial patents of PoF that focuses on the various methods of transmitting power and data simultaneously to sensors and communication devices. These patents initially started from designing the optical network that can transmit power and data. Since then, more patents have been created that contain methods for providing digital data services and power in an optical fiber-based distributed communication system. The keywords, power over fiber, was used for patent search on Espacenet118 and Patentscope.119 The keywords were entered into all fields/any field section of the databases in September 2022. The patents in Table 4 discuss industrial applications of PoF systems, such as controlling remote antenna units and acoustic sensing for a barrier.

Table 4

The summary of PoF systems that have been patented from the year 2008 to 2022.

Ref no.Patent application no.Applicant; publication date; countryStatus in September 2022 (family members)Summary
99US7359647B1NORTEL
NETWORKS
LTD;
April 15, 2008,
USA
NONEAn apparatus
for receiving power
and data signals using
an optical signal within a
predetermined
wavelength range
100US7813646B2RLH IND INC;
October 12, 2010;
USA
US2009016715A1A PoF system
is capable
of generating up
to 30 mA
(milliamps) of
electricity
at 24 volts
for use
with remotely
deployed
electrical equipment
101US8270838B2COX TERRY D;
CORNING CABLE
SYS LLC;
September 18, 2010;
USA
AU2010101508A4;
AU2010247971A1;
CN102428663A;
CN102428663B;
EP2430778A1;
US2010290787A1;
US2012163829A1;
US8155525B2;
WO2010132292A1
An interconnect
unit for a
distributed
wireless
communication system,
comprising: a plurality
of communication links
each configured
to carry
electrical RF signals
from a
head-end unit to a plurality
of remote units
102US8155525B2COX TERRY
D [US];
CORNING
CABLE SYS
LLC;
April 12, 2012;
USA
AU2010101508A4;
AU2010247971A1;
CN102428663A;
CN102428663B;
EP2430778A1;
US2010290787A1;
US2012163829A1;
US8270838B2;
WO2010132292A1
A power distribution
module
electrically coupled
between the one power supply
and the plurality
of power branches
and configured
to distribute power to
the plurality of
remote units
103WO2016070946PRYSMIAN
S.P.A;
May 12, 2016;
USA
BR112017009284A2;
CN107533194A;
CN107533194B;
DK3215876T3;
EP3215876A1;
EP3215876B1;
ES2909898T3;
US10197725B2;
US2018335563A1
A multimode optical
fiber for continuous
transmission
of electromagnetic
radiation at high power
104US20170039826A1OPTASENSE
HOLDINGS LTD;
February 9, 2017;
USA
WO2015159081A1A system for
monitoring a perimeter
having a
barrier comprising of a
sensing optical fiber
wherein the sensing
fiber is mechanically coupled
to at least one
vibration
transmitting element
which is mechanically
coupled to the barrier
105US9853732B2CORNING OPTICAL
COMMUNICATIONS
LLC;
December 26, 2017;
USA
US2011268452A1;
US2017099107A1;
US9525488B2
A method for
providing digital
data
services
and/or power in an optical
fiber based distributed
communications
system
106US9979491B2TELEDYNE
INSTRUMENTS
INC;
March 22, 2018;
USA
US2018083715A1A subsea
PoF control area
network (“CAN”)
bus converter system
107US20180198400TURNER
QIAN;
TABORISSKIY
YURIY;
July 12, 2018;
USA
US10363834B2A power over
fiber that receives
module at the low voltage
section of a vehicle
having an
electric traction
motor
108CN108398147MH GOPOWER
COMPANY LTD;
August 14, 2018;
China
TW201829984A;
US10608830B2;
US2018227133A1
A power over
fiber technology
that is able to
provide
power and
communication to
one or
more and
multiple sensors
through an optical fiber.
The invention
claims a sensing
system capable of
generating
power by using
a PPC and one sensor
109US10205538B2CORNING OPTICAL
COMMUNICATIONS LLC;
February 12, 2019;
USA
CN203504582U;
EP2678972A1;
EP2678972B1;
US2013330086A1;
US2016233960A1;
US2017041079A1;
US2018054260A1;
US9325429B2;
US9490913B2;
US9813164B2;
WO2012115843A1
A method for distributing power
in a
distributed
communication
system using a power unit
108US10608830B2MH GOPOWER COMPANY LTD;
March 31, 2020;
USA
CN108398147A;
TW201829984A;
US2018227133A1
PoF system
that is able to
detect lower intensity
PD events than traditional
acoustic, or UHF
PD sensors mounted on
compartment walls
instead of directly
on high voltage
areas like bus bars
110US10750442B2CORNING OPTICAL
COMMUNICATIONS LLC;
August 18, 2020
US10104610B2;
US10420025B2;
US2014308043A1;
US2015382293A1;
US2017273018A1;
US2019037492A1;
US2019364498A1;
US9160449B2;
US9699723B2
A method of managing the
power consumed at an
RAU in a distributed
antenna system;
the method comprises
determining an available
power budget
for at least one
powered port
configured to provide
power to at least one
external
power-consuming device
connected to the at
least one powered
port based on
power required
by at least
one power-consuming
RAU module
111US10911157B1KYOCERA
CORP;
February 2, 2021;
USA
CN112311473A;
EP3772194A1;
JP2021027656A;
US11223428B2;
US2021036784A1;
US2021111813A1
• A first data
communication device
including a
power sourcing
equipment device
including a semiconductor
laser
that oscillates
with electric power,
thereby
outputting feed light
• A second data
communication
device
including a powered
device including
a photoelectric
conversion element
that converts the feed
light into electric power,
the second
data communication device
performing optical
communication with the
first data
communication device
• An optical fiber cable
including a first end
connectable to the
first data
communication device and a
second end
connectable to the second
data communication
device to
transmit the feed
light and
signal light
112US20210247578KYOCERA
CORP;
August 12, 2021,
USA
CN112585891A;
CN112585891B;
EP3829085A1;
EP3829085A4;
JP2021002715A;
JP6814253B2;
US11137561B2;
WO2020255636A1
A power over
fiber system that
transmits feed light
and signal light
through an optical fiber including
a first transmission path being
a core or a cladding;
and a second
transmission path
being a cladding
located on a periphery of the
first transmission path
113WO2021186831A1KYOCERA
CORP;
September 23,
2021,
USA
JP2021150659A;An optical transmitter
that transmits
signal light modulated
by an electric signal and
feed light for
supplying power, a core
transmits the signal light,
and a core formed
around the core
JP7084441B2;
114US2021409116A1ROHDE & SCHWARZ;
December 30, 2021;
USA
NONEA PoF system,
comprising: a
measurement device,
wherein the
PoF system
powers a measurement
probe of the
measurement
device,
with the system
being
electrically isolated
from
the measurement
probe,
and the PoF system
115US2022094449A1KYOCERA CORP;
March 24, 2022;
USA
CN113544928A;
EP3930216A1;
EP3930216A4;
JP2020202423A;
JP6890631B2;
WO2020246375A1
An optical
connector of
a power
over fiber system,
comprising a shutter that
opens in conjunction
with a connection operation to
enable the connection
and closes in
conjunction
with a disconnection
operation to block feed
light from exiting
116US2022236490A1MACLEON LLC;
July 28, 2022;
USA
US2022234937A1;
US2022234938A1;
US2022236509A1;
WO2022159782A1
An overall power
over fiber
system
capable of
efficiently transporting
ultra-high
power across
great distances
with
significantly low loss
117EP4047838A1KYOCERA CORP;
August 24, 2022;
France
CN114556735A;
JP2021068937A;
JP2021193839A;
JP6952089B2;
JP7117435B2;
WO2021075087A1
A PoF system that includes
a temperature
sensor that detects
a temperature
in the power sourcing
equipment,
and a controller
that performs a process
of switching
electric power
input to
the semiconductor laser,
based on the temperature
detected by the
temperature sensor

There are two patents in 2010 that highlighted the methods of transmitting power through optical fiber. The first patent focused more on the method of transmitting power and data simultaneously to network equipment such as wireless access points using an optical network. The method uses the electrical signal that includes low- and high-frequency data signal to transmit power and data. A filter is used to separate the data and power signal before the data signal is processed. The inventor of the patent highlighted that the conversion efficiency and the amount of current produced depend on the equipment’s power rating that needs to be powered so that the method can have different performance based on the applications. The second patent also proposed a method of distributing power through an optical fiber that includes a receiver unit sending a feedback signal to the transmit unit to control and regulate laser sources. The patent improved the safety of the PoF system by first operating the transmit unit at low power levels until a feedback signal indicates that all safety and operational checks have been performed.

As the use of the PoF system increases in industrial applications, two patents were published later in 2012 that proposed providing power in radio frequency applications using converter pairs connected using optical fibers. The converter pair comprises of electrical-to-optical converters that include lasers and optical-to-electrical converters that include photodiodes. The same inventor published both patents, and the inventions helped provide alternatives to creating more picocells that can increase radio frequency network coverage. The widespread use of PoF systems became apparent in 2017 when two patents about providing digital data services in optical-fiber-based communication systems were published. The two patents proposed a more efficient method of supplying power to data service clients instead of providing a standalone power source for each data client.

There are also three patents in 2017 and 2020 that have made contributions to PoF system’s innovation. The patent in 2017 is about designing a perimeter monitoring system using fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing. The system used PoF because any acoustic disturbance will trigger an interrogator module consisting of a laser and photodetector to produce a series of optical pulses. One of the design advantages is that the burying of sensing fiber isolates them from environmental effects and produce better signal-to-noise ratio. The first patent in 2020 is an invention of a sensor system that can be enabled by PoF. One of the claims of the invention is that it can power up multiple sensors using one laser source. However, the patent inventor stated that the PPC within the sensor module might not provide enough continuous power to operate all sensors continuously. The patent of the invention that can solve the problem was published in the same year that proposed a power management system of remote units. Inventions that were patented in 2021 were found to revolve around communication and measurement devices while patents reported in 2022 were on the inventions of temperature sensors and an optical connector of power over fiber system. A patent published on the 28th of July 2022 claims that their overall power over fiber system capable of efficiently transporting ultrahigh power across great distances with significantly low loss was due to the unreliability of conventional power over fiber systems using silica-based fiber, which constrained transmission and distribution losses, conversion efficiencies at both the transmit and receive ends, and significant attenuation in the transport medium.116 The PoF patents published over the decade have shown how far PoF has progressed in research and the potential of PoF systems in the future.

4.

Challenges and Recommendations

The market penetration of the PoF system remains inconclusive due to the great challenges encountered throughout its technological development. In this section, the issues, and challenges in the PoF system are extensively discussed, together with the recommendations to overcome the challenges.

4.1.

System Efficiency

Several potential ways to increase the efficiency of the overall PoF system involve increasing the efficiency of the transmitter, optical fiber, and receiver. It has been discussed in previous work120 that variables such as absorption efficiency, quantum efficiency, storage efficiency, and extraction efficiency depend directly on the choice of laser material. The work concluded that Neodymium (Nd) type lasers were widely used for most applications such as laser delivery and high energy storage. One of the challenges that must be tackled by researchers is to choose what type of laser materials can give the best results for their projects where the performance requirements are different. It is recommended for researchers to consider the four variables mentioned when selecting a laser material for their transmitter.

For the optical fiber, one of the main aspects of selecting the suitable optical fiber cable is the amount of attenuation or loss of the transmitted power. There are low-cost options available such as plastic optical fiber, but one must consider their higher attenuation than conventional glass optical fiber cables.121 The attenuation loss can happen due to Rayleigh scattering, absorption of light by the optical fiber cable, geometrical interferences at cladding core interface, and attenuation within the optical cladding.76 In a study by Matsui et al.,122 it has been mentioned that SMF and MMF optic fiber cables have a fixed value of attenuation in dB/km for a given wavelength, which makes them most frequently used for PoF applications. Another important aspect in selecting the suitable optical fiber cable is their capacity on how much power they can withstand. For example, SMF might be unreliable in projects that require high power transmission due to limited power density of the small core effective area.3 Therefore, fiber cables that can withstand higher power, such as DCF and MMF, might be more compatible. After selecting an optical fiber cable based on these two important aspects, there are other challenges in working with optical fiber cables for PoF system, such as splicing losses and mismatching effects.5 Using the same type of cable with the same core size throughout the PoF system can increase the efficiency of the transmission medium.

The receiver in the PoF system is a power conversion module that converts optical power from optic fiber cable back to electrical power that can be transmitted to the load. The module consists of PPC devices that are made up of semiconductor materials. The most common semiconductor materials used are Si, GaA, InGaAs, and GaSb. The main differences between these materials can be found in an open-circuit voltage for a single-cell converter and their energy gap.76 The type of semiconductor materials needs to be selected by considering five aspects, which are the amount of dark current, sensitivity, wavelength, quantum efficiency, and conversion efficiency.26 The selection of the type of materials that needs to be used can also be different depending on the cost and performance requirement of the projects.

4.2.

Others

PoF systems have also shown some limitations in terms of only being able to supply continuous power to multiple devices from a single laser source.108 However, there have been inventions from the published patents that can solve the problem by using power management systems.123 In high-power laser application, there may also be a laser safety issue associated with several watts of optical power, leaving the fiber when it is broken. However, systems are already available that include engineering controls as a control measure to avoid the potential hazards.124 With more developing research and technology toward the PoF system, the cost of optical components can be reduced. There will be higher potential in terms of available power and conversion efficiency. Eventually, PoF technology can be implemented as a backup supply as an alternative to electrical conductors.

5.

Conclusion

PoF systems have shown their potential in research and industrial sectors throughout the decade. Research of PoF systems started with the implementation of PoF in temperature and current monitoring systems. It later expanded to the power distribution system of remote antenna units and radio over fiber systems. Recently, research is concentrated on the ability of the PoF system to facilitate simultaneous power and data transmission that can be essential in future communication devices. The commercial and patented PoF systems presented in this review also show that PoF systems have become essential in industrial applications. They are being used in digital data services and picocells production that makes up the coverage of radio frequency networks. However, more study needs to be done on optimizing the energy conversion in the PoF system to ensure the cost-effectiveness and commercial viability of PoF. This review discussed the components of PoF, commercial and patented PoF systems where their performance, development, and suitable applications were elaborated. The problems of the study were highlighted and concluded with the recommendations for future research. The overall review will hopefully serve as an extension to the current work of the PoF system and guideline to the future development of PoF.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the UNITEN BOLD2020 Grant (RJO10517844/042), UNITEN R&D and Tenaga Nasional Berhad Seeding Fund (Project No: U-TD-RD-20-02) for access to the laboratory equipment.

References

1. 

B. B. C. Deloach, R. C. Miller and S. Kaufman, “Sound alerter powered over an optical fiber,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., 57 (9), 3309 –3316 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1978.tb02205.x BSTJAN 0005-8580 (1978). Google Scholar

2. 

J. D. Lopez-Cardona, D. Sanchez Montero and C. Vazquez, “Smart remote nodes fed by power over fiber in internet of things applications,” IEEE Sens. J., 19 (17), 7328 –7334 https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2915613 ISJEAZ 1530-437X (2019). Google Scholar

3. 

M. Matsuura and J. Sato, “Bidirectional radio-over-fiber systems using double-clad fibers for optically powered remote antenna units,” IEEE Photonics J., 7 (1), 1 –9 https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2014.2381669 (2015). Google Scholar

4. 

J. B. Rosolem et al., “A fiber optic powered sensor designed for partial discharges monitoring on high voltage bushings,” in SBMO/IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Optoelectron. Conf. Proc., 1 –5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/IMOC.2015.7369072 Google Scholar

5. 

F. V. B. De Nazaré and M. M. Werneck, “Temperature and current monitoring system for transmission lines using power-over-fiber technology,” in IEEE Int. Instrum. and Meas. Technol. Conf., I2MTC – Proc., 779 –784 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.2010.5488198 Google Scholar

6. 

S. Perhirin et al., “A power-over-fiber system and its low consumption remote equipment for submarine applications,” in MTS/IEEE Bergen Challenges North. Dimens., 1 –6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS-Bergen.2013.6608175 Google Scholar

7. 

F. Audo et al., “Raman amplification in an optically high-powered data link dedicated to a 10 km long extension for submarine cabled observatories,” J. Opt., 15 (5), 055703 https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/15/5/055703 (2013). Google Scholar

8. 

H. J. Lee and G. S. Jung, “Experimental study of a power-over-fiber module and multimode optical fiber for a fishing camera system,” Curr. Opt. Photonics, 1 (5), 440 –455 https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2017.1.5.468 (2017). Google Scholar

9. 

G. Böttger et al., “An optically powered video camera link,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 20 (1), 39 –41 https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2007.912695 IPTLEL 1041-1135 (2008). Google Scholar

10. 

S. Heinig et al., “Single-fiber combined optical power and data transmission for high-voltage applications,” in IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc., (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON43393.2020.9255184 Google Scholar

11. 

J. G. Werthen, “Powering next generation networks by laser light over fiber,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Fiber Opt. Eng. Conf., 3 –5 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/OFC.2008.4528749 Google Scholar

12. 

F. M. A. Al-Zubaidi et al., “Optically powered radio-over-fiber systems in support of 5g cellular networks and IoT,” J. Lightwave Technol., 39 (13), 4262 –4269 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2021.3074193 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2021). Google Scholar

13. 

J. D. Lopez-Cardona et al., “Remote optical powering using fiber optics in hazardous environments,” J. Lightwave Technol., 36 (3), 748 –754 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2776399 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2018). Google Scholar

14. 

J. B. Rosolem et al., “Optical sensing in high voltage transmission lines using power over fiber and free space optics,” Opt. Fiber Technol., 26 180 –183 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2015.09.003 1068-5200 (2015). Google Scholar

15. 

C. Budelmann, “Opto-electronic sensor network powered over fiber for harsh industrial applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 65 (2), 1070 –1177 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2733479 (2017). Google Scholar

16. 

M. Haid et al., “5 W optical power link with generic voltage output and modulated data signal 5 w optical power link with generic voltage output and modulated data signal,” in 1st Opt. Wirel. Fiber Power Transm. Conf.(May), 7 –9 (2019). Google Scholar

17. 

J.-G. Werthen and M. Cohen, “Photonic power: delivering power over fiber for optical networks,” in Int. Conf. Photonics in Switching, Proc., 270 –272 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/PS.2006.4350205 Google Scholar

18. 

A. E. Willner, Optical fiber telecommunications VII, Academic Press( (2019). Google Scholar

19. 

J.-G. Werthen et al., “Power over fiber: a review of replacing copper by fiber in critical applications,” Proc. SPIE, 5871 58710C https://doi.org/10.1117/12.619753 PSISDG 0277-786X (2005). Google Scholar

20. 

M. Matsuura, “Recent advancement in power-over-fiber technologies,” Photonics, 8 (8), 335 https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8080335 (2021). Google Scholar

21. 

M. Matsuura, “Power-over-fiber using double-clad fibers,” J. Lightwave Technol., 40 (10), 3187 –3196 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2022.3164566 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2022). Google Scholar

22. 

J. B. Rosolem, “Power‐over‐fiber applications for telecommunications and for electric utilities,” in Opt. Fiber and Wireless Commun., 256 –278 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5772/68088 Google Scholar

23. 

W. Daum et al., POF—Polymer Optical Fibers for Data Communication, Springer( (2002). Google Scholar

24. 

C. Vázquez et al., “Integration of power over fiber on RoF systems in different scenarios,” Proc. SPIE, 10128 101280E https://doi.org/10.4302/plp.v12i1.919 PSISDG 0277-786X (2017). Google Scholar

25. 

J. Shikoski, R. Arnaudov and T. Eftimov, “Photonic powering of sensors with bidirectional communication along a single fiber,” Photonics Lett. Poland, 12 (1), 7 –9 https://doi.org/10.4302/plp.v12i1.919 (2020). Google Scholar

26. 

H. Miyakawa, Y. Tanaka and T. Kurokawa, “Design approaches to power-over-optical local-area-network systems,” Opt. Soc. Am., 43 (6), 1379 –1389 https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.43.001379 (2004). Google Scholar

27. 

M. Ari and M. C. Taplamacioglu, “Electrical power over fiber optics,” Int. J. Tech. Phys. Probl. Eng., 5 (4), 85 –91 (2010). Google Scholar

28. 

K. J. Linden, “Diode lasers, LEDs and detectors for consumer electronics,” Proc. SPIE, 10317 1031709 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2284055 PSISDG 0277-786X (2017). Google Scholar

29. 

C. Basu, M. Meinhardt-Wollweber and B. Roth, “Lighting with laser diodes,” Adv. Opt. Technol., 2 (4), 313 –321 https://doi.org/10.1515/aot-2013-0031 1687-6393 (2013). Google Scholar

30. 

B. Guzowski et al., “Efficiency evaluation of photovoltaic power converters for ultra-low power supply systems,” in Int. Conf. Perspect. Technol. Methods MEMS Des., 56 –60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMSTECH.2019.8817373 Google Scholar

31. 

B. L. Volodin et al., “Wavelength stabilization and spectrum narrowing of high-power multimode laser diodes and arrays by use of volume Bragg gratings,” Opt. Lett., 29 (16), 1891 –1893 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.001891 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2004). Google Scholar

32. 

S. Hashmi et al., Comprehensive Materials Processing, Elsevier( (2014). Google Scholar

33. 

R. Hülsewede and M. Zorn, “Efficient and high‐brightness broad area laser diodes designed for high‐temperature operation,” PhotonicsViews, 17 (2), 52 –56 https://doi.org/10.1002/phvs.202000016 (2020). Google Scholar

34. 

D. Wake et al., “An optically powered radio over fiber remote unit using wavelength division multiplexing,” in IEEE Int. Meet. Microw. Photonics jointly held with the 2008 Asia-Pacific Microw. Photonics Conf., 197 –200 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/MWP.2008.4666670 Google Scholar

35. 

D. Wake, A. Nkansah and N. Gomes, “Optical powering of remote units for radio over fiber links,” in MWP 2007 - IEEE Int. Top. Meet. Microw. Photonics, 29 –32 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/MWP.2007.4378127 Google Scholar

36. 

M. B. Shemirani and J. M. Kahn, “Higher-order modal dispersion in graded-index multimode fiber,” J. Lightwave Technol., 27 (23), 5461 –5468 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2009.2030146 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2009). Google Scholar

37. 

D. Kamiyama, A. Yoneyama and M. Matsuura, “Multichannel data signals and power transmission by power-over-fiber using a double-clad fiber,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 30 (7), 646 –649 https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2018.2810158 IPTLEL 1041-1135 (2018). Google Scholar

38. 

M. Matsuura and J. Sato, “Power-over-fiber using double-clad fibers for radio-over-fiber systems,” in 19th Eur. Conf. Netw. and Opt. Commun., NOC 2014, 126 –131 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/NOC.2014.6996840 Google Scholar

39. 

J. Sato, H. Furugori and M. Matsuura, “40-Watt power-over-fiber using a double-clad fiber for optically powered radio-over-fiber systems,” in Opt. Fiber Commun. Conf. OFC 2015(down LD), 6 –8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/ofc.2015.w3f.6 Google Scholar

40. 

F. M. A. Al-Zubaidi, D. Sanchez Montero and C. Vazquez, “SI-POF supporting power-over-fiber in multi-gbit/s transmission for in-home networks,” J. Lightwave Technol., 39 (1), 112 –121 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2020.3025444 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2020). Google Scholar

41. 

C. Lethien et al., “Energy-autonomous picocell remote antenna unit for radio-over-fiber system using the multiservices concept,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 24 (8), 649 –651 https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2012.2185224 IPTLEL 1041-1135 (2012). Google Scholar

42. 

D. Wake et al., “Optically powered remote units for radio-over-fiber systems,” J. Lightwave Technol., 26 (15), 2484 –2491 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2008.927171 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2008). Google Scholar

43. 

H. Kuboki and M. Matsuura, “Optically powered radio-over-fiber system based on center- and offset-launching techniques using a conventional multimode fiber,” Opt. Lett., 43 (5), 1067 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.43.001067 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2018). Google Scholar

44. 

L.C. de Souza, “Implementation of a full optically-powered,” (2022). Google Scholar

45. 

J. D. Lopez-Cardona et al., “Optically feeding 1.75 W with 100 m MMF in efficient C-RAN front-hauls with Sleep Modes,” J. Lightwave Technol., 39 (24), 7948 –7955 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2021.3078848 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2021). Google Scholar

46. 

H. Yang et al., “10-W power light co-transmission with optically carried 5G NR signal over standard single-mode fiber,” Opt. Lett., 46 (20), 5116 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.441940 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2021). Google Scholar

47. 

J. D. Lopez-Cardona et al., “Power over fiber in C-RAN with low power sleep mode remote nodes using SMF,” J. Lightwave Technol., 39 (15), 4951 –4957 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2021.3080631 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2021). Google Scholar

48. 

M. Matsuura et al., “Over 40-W electric power and optical data transmission using an optical fiber,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 36 (4), 4532 –4539 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2020.3027551 (2021). Google Scholar

49. 

T. Umezawa et al., “100-GHz radio and power over fiber transmission through multicore fiber using optical-to-radio converter,” J. Lightwave Technol., 36 (2), 617 –623 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2731991 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2018). Google Scholar

50. 

J. D. López-Cardona et al., “Power-over-fiber in a 10 km long multicore fiber link within a 5G fronthaul scenario,” Opt. Lett., 46 (21), 5348 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.439105 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2021). Google Scholar

51. 

J. D. Lopez-Cardona et al., “Power over fiber in C-RAN with low power sleep mode remote nodes using SMF,” J. Lightwave Technol., 39 (15), 4951 –4957 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2021.3080631 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2021). Google Scholar

52. 

M. J. Landry, J. W. Rupert and A. Mittas, “Power-by-light systems and their components: an evaluation,” Appl. Opt., 30 (9), 1052 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.30.001052 APOPAI 0003-6935 (1991). Google Scholar

53. 

M. Perales et al., “Characterization of high performance silicon-based VMJ PV cells for laser power transmission applications,” Proc. SPIE, 9733 97330U https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2213886 PSISDG 0277-786X (2016). Google Scholar

54. 

G. Allwood, G. Wild and S. Hinckley, “Power over fibre: material properties of homojunction photovoltaic micro-cells,” in Proc. - 2011 6th IEEE Int. Symp. Electron. Design, Test and Appl., 78 –82 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/DELTA.2011.66 Google Scholar

55. 

V. Andreev et al., “High current density GaAs and GaSb photovoltaic cells for laser power beaming,” in Proc. 3rd World Conf. Photovoltaic Energy Conversion A, 761 –764 (2003). Google Scholar

56. 

S. Fafard and D. P. Masson, “Perspective on photovoltaic optical power converters,” J. Appl. Phys., 130 (16), 160901 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0070860 JAPIAU 0021-8979 (2021). Google Scholar

57. 

H. Helmers et al., “68.9% efficient GaAs-based photonic power conversion enabled by photon recycling and optical resonance,” Phys. Status Solidi - Rapid Res. Lett., 15 (7), 1 –7 https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.202100113 (2021). Google Scholar

58. 

S. Fafard and D. P. Masson, “74.7% Efficient GaAs-based laser power converters at 808 nm at 150 K,” Photonics, 9 (8), 579 https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9080579 (2022). Google Scholar

59. 

C. Algora et al., “Beaming power: photovoltaic laser power converters for power-by-light,” Joule, 6 (2), 340 –368 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.11.014 (2022). Google Scholar

60. 

S. Fafard et al., “Ultrahigh efficiencies in vertical epitaxial heterostructure architectures,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 108 (7), 071101 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941240 APPLAB 0003-6951 (2016). Google Scholar

61. 

S. Fafard et al., “Power converters,” 1 –14 (2021). Google Scholar

62. 

F. Chancerel et al., “Comparison of various InGaAs-based solar cells for concentrated photovoltaics applications,” in AIP Conf. Proc., 020002 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0103648 Google Scholar

63. 

M. M. Wilkins et al., “Ripple-free boost-mode power supply using photonic power conversion,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 34 (2), 1054 –1064 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2018.2843158 (2019). Google Scholar

64. 

L. C. Souza et al., “Optically-powered wireless sensor nodes towards industrial internet of things,” Sensors, 22 (1), 57 https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010057 SNSRES 0746-9462 (2022). Google Scholar

65. 

T. Carley, L. Ketcham and B. Zimmer, “Photovoltaic power converter,” 25 (2012). Google Scholar

66. 

P. Zylka and M. Guzowski, “Making power over fiber supply of microelectronic sensor devices simpler,” in 15th Int. Sci. Conf. Optoelectron. Electron. Sensors, 20 –23 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/COE.2018.8435164 Google Scholar

67. 

R. Peña and C. Algora, “Semiconductor materials for photovoltaic converters applied to power-by-light systems,” in Spanish Conf. Electron. Devices, Proc. 2005, 291 –294 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/SCED.2005.1504383 Google Scholar

68. 

A. I. A. Mohammed et al., “Power over fiber for internet of things application,” in IEEE 8th Int. Conf. Photonics, ICP 2020, 101 –102 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICP46580.2020.9206501 Google Scholar

69. 

Y. Li et al., “A novel remote multi-sensing energy management system based on power-over-fiber transmission,” in 4th Int. Conf. Energy, Electr. Power Eng., 125 –129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/CEEPE51765.2021.9475697 Google Scholar

70. 

D. E. Raible, “High intensity laser power beaming for wireless power transmission,” (2008). Google Scholar

71. 

Y. Gou et al., “1064 nm InGaAs metamorphic laser power converts with over 44% efficiency,” Opt. Express, 30 (23), 42178 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.474693 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2022). Google Scholar

72. 

S. Fafard and D. P. Masson, “High‐efficiency and high‐power multijunction InGaAs/INP photovoltaic laser power converters for 1470 nm,” Photonics, 9 (7), 35 –37 https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9070438 (2022). Google Scholar

73. 

A. C. Wang et al., “Characteristics of 1520 nm InGaAs multijunction laser power converters,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 119 (24), 243902 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0073806 APPLAB 0003-6951 (2021). Google Scholar

74. 

E. F. Fernández et al., “Band-gap material selection for remote high-power laser transmission,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 235 111483 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111483 SEMCEQ 0927-0248 (2022). Google Scholar

75. 

Y. Shuto, “Heat conduction modeling of fiber fuse in single-mode optical fibers,” J. Photonics, 2014 645207 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/645207 (2014). Google Scholar

76. 

M. Dumke et al., “Power transmission by optical fibers for component inherent communication,” in WMSCI 2009 - 13th World Multi-Conf. Syst. Cybern. Inf., Jointly with 15th Int. Conf. Inf. Syst. Anal. Synth. ISAS 2009 - Proc., 230 –235 (2009). Google Scholar

77. 

R. C. Miller and R. B. Lawry, “Optically powered speech communication over a fiber lightguide,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., 58 (7), 1735 –1741 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1979.tb02280.x BSTJAN 0005-8580 (1979). Google Scholar

78. 

R. B. Miller et al., “The bell system communication with an optically powered,” Bell Syst. Technol. J., 61 1359 –1366 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1982.tb04349.x (1982). Google Scholar

79. 

J. Wang et al., “Video monitoring system based on power-over-fiber technique,” in 19th Int. Conf. Opt. Commun. Networks, 10 –12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOCN53177.2021.9563818 Google Scholar

80. 

Y. Chen et al., “Optically powered gas monitoring system using single-mode fibre for underground coal mines,” Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol., 9 (1), 1 –12 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-022-00496-y (2022). Google Scholar

81. 

R. H. Souza et al., “Performance of an optically powered radio-over-fiber system exploiting raman amplification,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., 34 (13), 667 –670 https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2022.3181899 IPTLEL 1041-1135 (2022). Google Scholar

82. 

H. Helmers et al., “6-W Optical power link with integrated optical data transmission,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 35 (8), 7904 –7909 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2020.2967475 (2020). Google Scholar

83. 

N. Shindo et al., “Optically powered and controlled drones using optical fibers for airborne base stations,” (2022). Google Scholar

84. 

J. D. Lopez-Cardona et al., “Optimized power-over-fiber system to remotely feed smart nodes for low-power consumption applications,” in 13th Spanish Conf. Electron. Devices (CDE), 41 –44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/cde52135.2021.9455753 Google Scholar

85. 

H. J. Park et al., “IoT sensor solution using a PoF module for the environmental monitoring of HVDC-MMC systems,” in ECCE Asia – 10th Int. Conf. Power Electron. – ECCE Asia, 2834 –2839 (2019). https://doi.org/10.23919/icpe2019-ecceasia42246.2019.8797016 Google Scholar

86. 

Y. Hualong, W. Shiyu and W. Jiachen, “Development of long-distance power supply system with high power laser over single mode fiber,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., 63 (7), 1995 –1998 https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.32863 MOTLEO 0895-2477 (2021). Google Scholar

87. 

P. Zylka and M. Guzowski, “Making power over fiber supply of microelectronic sensor devices simpler,” in 15th Int. Sci. Conf. Optoelectron. Electron. Sensors, 20 –23 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/COE.2018.8435164 Google Scholar

88. 

E. Dimitriadou et al., “Modeling of a 10-km optical link exploiting power-over-fiber for cabled submarine observatories,” Opt. Eng., 56 (11), 116108 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.11.116108 (2017). Google Scholar

89. 

M. Matsuura, H. Furugori and J. Sato, “60 W power-over-fiber feed using double-clad fibers for radio-over-fiber systems with optically powered remote antenna units,” Opt. Lett., 40 (23), 5598 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.005598 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2015). Google Scholar

90. 

J. Gong et al., “Design and realization of active infrared imaging system based on power-over-fiber technique,” Opt. Rev., 25 (4), 517 –522 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-018-0442-3 1340-6000 (2018). Google Scholar

91. 

M. Matsuura and Y. Minamoto, “Optically powered and controlled beam steering system for radio-over-fiber networks,” J. Lightwave Technol., 35 (4), 979 –988 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2016.2631251 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2017). Google Scholar

92. 

T. Shan and X. Qi, “Performance of series connected GaAs photovoltaic converters under multimode optical fiber illumination,” Adv. Optoelectron., 2014 824181 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/824181 AODPAO 1687-5648 (2014). Google Scholar

93. 

X. Xu et al., “Optically powered communication system with distributed amplifiers,” J. Lightwave Technol., 28 (21), 3062 –3069 https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2010.2076346 JLTEDG 0733-8724 (2010). Google Scholar

94. 

C. Vazquez et al., “Experiments on shared-and dedicated-power over fiber scenarios in multi-core fibers,” in Eur. Conf. Netw. and Commun., 412 –415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCNC.2019.8802042 Google Scholar

95. 

G. Otero et al., “SDN-based multi-core power-over-fiber (PoF) system for 5G Fronthaul: towards PoF pooling,” in Eur. Conf. Opt. Commun., 2 –4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ECOC.2018.8535543 Google Scholar

96. 

RLH Industries Inc., “Power over fiber system (PoF),” (2022). Google Scholar

97. 

M. G. Limited, “Power over fiber smart monitoring system,” (2021). Google Scholar

98. 

Laser-Technology.com, “Photonic power module,” (2006). Google Scholar

99. 

R. Faria et al, “Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving power over optical fiber,” (2010). Google Scholar

100. 

J. Furey, “Power over optical fiber system,” (2010). Google Scholar

101. 

T. D. Cox, “Power distribution devices, systems, and methods for radio-over-fiber (RoF) distributed communication,” (2012). Google Scholar

102. 

T. D. Cox, “Power distribution devices, systems, and methods for radio-over-fiber (RoF) distributed communication,” (2012). Google Scholar

103. 

J. C. Vieira Da Silva et al., “Multimode optical fiber for power-over-fiber applications,” (2016). Google Scholar

104. 

Constantin Cojocaur, “Fibre optic distributed sensing for perimeter monitoring,” (2017). Google Scholar

105. 

H. B. Beamon, C. A. Blackwell and B. G. Brower, “Digital data services and/or power distribution in optical fiber-based distributed communications systems providing digital data and radio frequency (RF) communications services, and related components and methods,” (2017). Google Scholar

106. 

M. Greene and H. Xi, “SUBSEA power-over-fiber can bus converter,” (2018). Google Scholar

107. 

Q. Turner and Y. Taborisskiy, “Electric vehicle with high voltage module having high and low voltage sections having a common ground,” (2018). Google Scholar

108. 

M.-H. Yang et al., “Power over fiber enabled sensor system,” (2018). Google Scholar

109. 

I. Berlin et al., “Providing digital data services as electrical signals and radio-frequency (RF) communications over optical fiber in distributed communications systems, and related components and methods,” (2017). Google Scholar

110. 

C. Heidler et al., “Local power management for remote antenna units in distributed antenna systems,” (2020). Google Scholar

111. 

T. Sugime, “Power over optical fiber system,” (2021). Google Scholar

112. 

S. Tamate, “Power over fiber system and data communication devices,” (2021). Google Scholar

113. 

T. Sugime, “Power supply device of fiber optic power supply system, and fiber optic power supply system,” (2021). Google Scholar

114. 

R. Krimmer and A. Ziegler, “Power-over-fiber system and method for operating a power-over-fiber system,” (2021). Google Scholar

115. 

T. Suyama, “Optical connector and power sourcing equipment of power over fiber system, and power over fiber system,” (2022). Google Scholar

116. 

E. McKenna and Jr. G. L. Wallace, “System and method of distributing ultra high power using optical fiber cable,” (2022). Google Scholar

117. 

M. Tatsuo, “Optical fiber power feeding system,” (2022). Google Scholar

118. 

“Espacenet,” https://worldwide.espacenet.com/ (15 October 2022). Google Scholar

119. 

“Patentscope,” https://www.wipo.int/patentscope/en/ (15 October 2022). Google Scholar

120. 

N. P. Barnes et al., “Efficiency of Nd laser materials with laser diode pumping,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 26 (3), 558 –569 https://doi.org/10.1109/3.52133 IEJQA7 0018-9197 (1990). Google Scholar

121. 

Y. Koike and M. Asai, “The future of plastic optical fiber,” NPG Asia Mater., 1 (1), 22 –28 https://doi.org/10.1038/asiamat.2009.2 1884-4057 (2009). Google Scholar

122. 

T. Matsui et al., “Optical fiber and optical device technology for innovative manufacturing,” NTT Tech. Rev., 17 (6), 41 –44 (2019). Google Scholar

123. 

C. Heidler et al., “Local power management for remote antenna units in distributed antenna systems,” (2019). Google Scholar

124. 

P. J. Smalley, “Laser safety: risks, hazards, and control measures,” Laser Ther., 20 (2), 95 –106 https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.20.95 LATHE5 0898-5901 (2011). Google Scholar

Biography

Eric Pradana Putra received his bachelor’s degree in electrical and electronics engineering from the Universiti Tenaga Nasional in 2020. He is a master’s degree student in the Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Institute of Sustainable Energy, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia. His area of focus for research is the development and optimization of Si-based power-over-fiber (PoF) systems.

Rayvathi Theivindran received the bachelor’s degree in electrical power engineering from the Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia, in 2022. She is currently working as an electrical engineer in the Department of Operation and Maintenance of 33KV Assets, Tenaga Nasional Berhad Malaysia.

Haziq Hasnul received his master’s degree in electrical engineering from the Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia and his bachelor’s degree in computer and communication system engineering from the Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Malaysia, in 2015. His major research direction is color measurement of transformer oil using single wavelength spectroscopy.

Hui Jing Lee received her bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from McGill University, Canada, in 2014, and her master’s degree in electrical engineering from the Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNIITEN), Malaysia, in 2016. She is currently pursuing her PhD at the UNITEN, Malaysia, which focuses on the development of III–V semiconductor materials for thermophotovoltaic application.

Pin Jern Ker received his PhD in engineering from The University of Sheffield in 2012. He is a senior lecturer and principal researcher in the Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Institute of Sustainable Energy, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia. His research interests include intelligent sensing systems and applied optics in the energy industry.

MD Zaini Jamaludin is a professor in the Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Institute of Power Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia. His research interests include photonics devices and sensors, optical network, secured remote data acquisition systems, RF radiation (GSM and mobile base station), and ethernet passive optical networks.

Ramlah Awang received her degree in electrical, electronic, and system engineering from Leeds Metropolitan University in 1998 and currently completing her master’s study in engineering technology at the University Tun Hussein Onn, Malaysia. She is an agile and experienced technical expert, specializing in supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA), serving more than a decade in various departments and divisions in Tenaga Nasional Berhad. She has more than 25 years of experience in SCADA and is passionate everything about SCADA.

Farah Aniza Mohd Yusof received her MS degree in electronic engineering from the Universiti Putra Malaysia in 2008. She is a senior engineer at TNB. She has more than 15 years of experience in SCADA. Her interest is in master system and SCADA protocol.

© 2023 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Eric Pradana Putra, Rayvathi Theivindran, Haziq Hasnul, Hui Jing Lee, Pin Jern Ker, MD Zaini Jamaludin, Ramlah Awang, and Farah Aniza Mohd Yusof "Technology update on patent and development trend of power over fiber: a critical review and future prospects," Journal of Photonics for Energy 13(1), 011001 (21 January 2023). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.13.011001
Received: 10 November 2022; Accepted: 3 January 2023; Published: 21 January 2023
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 5 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Phase only filters

Patents

Optical fibers

Fiber lasers

Telecommunications

Single mode fibers

Gallium arsenide

Back to Top