Abstract
In this essay I will suggest that part of what makes the young Jamaican poet Ishion Hutchinson so remarkable is the fact that much of his work – in this age of “anything goes” post-postmodernism – is clearly modernist poetry, in both structure and effect. This structure will be that explained in my expanded version of Michael Riffaterre’s semiotic theory of poetry, which deals with modernist work. I will suggest that one of the distinctive features of the latter is that a modern poetic text is distinguished by two underlying “matricial” propositions, each of which generates a set of variant images having the same underlying semantic structure. This paradigmatic method of signifying is unique to poetry. Each matrix is reassembled by the reader from a comparison of the images of each set. The matrices are linked syntagmatically in a variety of relations such as negation or difference of scale. This bimatricial relation (subject-sign) has an intertextual counterpart (object-sign) of similar structure but different lexicon. The interpretant of these two complex signs has a sociolectic counterpart of similar lexicon but different structure. The semantic contrast thus established produces innovation, which is the other distinctive feature of modern poetry. It turns out that much of Hutchinson’s innovative work is structured in this way.
References
Culler, Jonathan. 1975. Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics, and the study of literature. London/Ithaca: Routledge & Kegan Paul/Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. 1981. The pursuit of signs: Semiotics, literature, deconstruction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.2307/3684090Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1979. The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eliot, Thomas S. 1983 [1963]. Collected poems 1909–1962. London: Faber & Faber.Search in Google Scholar
Gavronsky, Serge. 1979. Francis Ponge: The power of language. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hopkins, Gerard Manley. 1985 [1953]. In William H. Gardner (ed.), Poems and prose of Gerard Manley Hopkins. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Hopkins, John A. F. 1994. Présentation et critique de la théorie sémiotique littéraire de Michael Riffaterre (Sophia Linguistica 36). Tokyo: Sophia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hopkins, John A. F. 2022 [2020]. The universal deep structure of modern poetry. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Search in Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Ishion. 2016. The house of lords and commons. New York: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Ishion. 2018. The old professor’s book. The New Yorker (Sept. 17).Search in Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Ishion. 2021a. Little music. Harper’s Magazine (Jan.), 58–59.Search in Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Ishion. 2021b. Spring: In memoriam, Adam Zagajewski. The New Yorker (May 31).Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1981. Linguistics and poetics. In Selected writings, vol. 3, 18–51. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri. 1973 [1970]. In Henri Meschonnic (ed.), La structure du texte artistique, Anne Fournier, Bernard Kreise, Eve Malleret & Joëlle Young (trans.). Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael. 1978. Semiotics of poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael. 1984. Intertextual representation: On mimesis as interpretive discourse. Critical Inquiry 11(1). 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1086/448279.Search in Google Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael. 1985. The interpretant in literary semiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics 3. 41–55. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs1985343.Search in Google Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael. 1990. Fictional truth. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801839337Search in Google Scholar
Tate, James. 1973. The wheelchair butterfly. In Richard Ellmann & Robert O’Clair (eds.), The Norton anthology of modern poetry, 1390–1391. New York & Toronto: Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Vallejo, César. 2008 [1938?]. Black stone on a white stone, Rebecca Seiferle (trans.). Poetry (April).Search in Google Scholar
Zagajewski, Adam. 1990. Anton Bruckner. The New Yorker (March 19), 46.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
