Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of base surface roughness, cutting depth and coating thickness on adhesion of inorganic repair materials for repairing concrete channels in the pre-survey and monitoring survey

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many open concrete channels in Japan have exceeded their standard service life and have decreased function due to deterioration. To maintain efficient drainage and transport and distribution of water to fields, it is necessary to extend the service life by repairing the channels. Inorganic repair material has been used for repairing concrete and has a number of performance requirements. For example, adhesion is an important performance requirement to ensure that repair material does not detach from the open concrete channel. It is evaluated by an adhesion strength test, which is performed in the pre-survey and the monitoring survey and has three main test standards. Because the test standards are intended to be performed in a laboratory, the monitoring survey can refer only to the test standards, and there is no standard for the monitoring survey. Furthermore, unlike the base surface in the test standards, the open channel surface is uneven before repair. Therefore, the pre-survey is not sufficient to evaluate the adhesion because it does not consider the construction environment. In this study, we proposed test methods for the monitoring survey and identified considerations for the pre-survey of base surface roughness, coating thickness, and cutting depth. Adhesion strength decreased as the cutting depth increased or the base surface roughness increased. Therefore, the base surface roughness should be measured in the pre-survey, and the monitoring survey should be conducted at points where the base surface roughness is the same. In addition, the cutting depth should be consistent in the monitoring survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akita H, Koide H, Mihashi H (2005) Four misunderstandings in uniaxial tension test concrete. Concr Res Tech 16(1):77–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asano I, Tokashiki M, Mori M, Nishihara M (2014) Development of erosion monitoring system on laser displacement meter for cementitious surface coating method. Irrig Drain Rural Eng 82(5):285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Asano J, Matsumoto T, Natsuka I, Ishii M, Sato S (2016) Method to measure detachment strength of surface covering technique, Proceedings of The 41st conference on our world in concrete & structures, 24–26

  • Bentz DP, De la Varga I, Muñoz JF, Spragg RP, Graybeal BA, Hussey DS, Jacobson DL, Jones SZ, LaManna JM (2018) Influence of substrate moisture state and roughness on interface microstructure and bond strength: slant shear vs. pull-off testing. Cement Concr Compos 87:63–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caliskan S, Karihaloo BL (2004) Effect of surface roughness, type and size of model aggregates on the bond strength of aggregate/mortar interface. Interf Sci 12:361–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Courard L, Piotrowski T, Garbacz A (2014) Near-to-surface properties affecting bond strength in concrete repair. Cement Concr Compos 46:73–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furuuchi H, Sakai R, Ueda T (2006) Effects of interface roughness and size of coarse aggregate on bond characteristics of PCM. Proceed Japan Concr Instit 28(2):1567–1572

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuuchi H, Kawasaki Y, Ueda T (2007) Bond strength of polymer cement mortar under fatigue loading. Proceed Japan Concr Instit 29(2):841–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangolu AR, Raghu Prasad BK (2002) Influence of the roughness of aggregate surface on the interface bond strength. Cem Concr Res 32(2):253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbacz A, Gorka ML, Courard L (2005) Effect of concrete surface treatment on adhesion in repair systems. Mag Concr Res 57(1):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Xiong Zhang RD, Hooton XZ (2017) Effects of interface roughness and interface adhesion on new-to-old concrete bonding. Constr Build Mater 151:582–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Li, Xianglin Gu, Lin F (2014) Influence of aggregate surface roughness on mechanical properties of interface and concrete. Constr Build Mater 65(29):338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jan JM, Cervenka C, Kishen E, Saouma VE (1998) Mixed mode fracture of cementitious bimaterial interfaces Part II Numericasimulation. Eng Fract Mech 60(1):95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JIS A 1171 (2021) Test methods for polymer - modified mortar. Japanese Industrial Standards Committee, Japan

  • JIS R 5201 (2019) Physical testing methods for cement. Japanese Industrial Standards Committee, Japan

  • JSCE K 531 (2018) Test method for bond strength of concrete surface coating materials. Society of Civil Engineers, Japan

  • JSCE K 561 2018 Test method of patching repair materials for concrete structures Japan. Society of Civil Engineers, Japan

  • Júlio ENBS, Branco FAB, Silva VD (2004) Concrete-to-concrete bond strength influence of the roughness of the substrate surface. Constr Build Mater 18(9):675–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato S, Yagisawa Y, Kawabe S, Ogata H (2020) Fundamental study on the test method for adhesion strength of inorganic repairing material using the circle fixture. Irrig Drain Rural Eng 88(2):193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawabe S, Asano I, Kanamori T, Takahashi R (2020) Importance of In-situ Monitoring on Inorganic Surface Coatings for Concrete Canal. J Jpn Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 88(6):471–474

  • Kawakami A, Asano I, Mori M, Kawabe S, Tokashiki M (2017) Abrasion measurement method using a profile gauge. J Jpn Soc Irrig Drain Reclam Eng 85(1):77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawakami A, Asano I, Tokashiki M, Mori M and Kawabe S (2015) The influence of the cut depth for the tensile strength tests. Irrig Drain Rural Eng, 690–691

  • Pedro MDS, Eduardo NBSJ, Vi’tor DS (2007) Correlation between concrete-to-concrete bond strength and the roughness of the substrate surface. Constr Build Mater 21(8):1688–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiji T, Katsumi K, Norihiko K, Kouichi S (2000) Bond properties of polymer cement mortar as repair and reinforcement material. Proceed Japan Concr Instit 22(1):319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Takase S, Kodama K, Sato KT (2000) Bond properties of polymer cement mortar as repair and reinforcement material. Proceed Japan Concr Instit 22(1):319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueno K, Asano J, Natsuka I, Ishii M, Nishiyama T (2019) Fundamental study on evaluation of shear bond strength between inorganic materials. Irrig Drain Rural Eng 87(1):17–25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Nikka Engineering Co.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Kato.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kato, S., Ueno, K., Hyodo, M. et al. Effect of base surface roughness, cutting depth and coating thickness on adhesion of inorganic repair materials for repairing concrete channels in the pre-survey and monitoring survey. Paddy Water Environ 21, 151–164 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-022-00914-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-022-00914-6

Keywords

Navigation