Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Calls to Action: The Dangers of Negative CSR Information and Stakeholder Punishments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to experimentally examine stakeholder punishments in response to poor CSR performance communicated through either internal or external channels. Across two experiments, we find that receiving negative CSR information communicated through internal channels (CSR reports) or external channels (news articles) causes individuals to punish a firm (less investment, lower employment interest, buy less, post negative comments on social media). Furthermore, we find sensitivity to a conflict of information from internal and external channels, which increased Calls to Action on social media. This is a concern for firms because such social media posts can elicit further punishments from stakeholders and inflict reputational costs on the firm. The findings of our studies suggest that firms should accurately report CSR performance, especially if external channels are likely to communicate negative CSR information regarding the firm because such conflicting information can elicit a strong online backlash.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguinis, Herman, and Kyle J. Bradley. 2014. Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies. Organizational Research Methods 17 (4): 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, Blake E., Mahendra Joshi, Vikas Anand, and Anne M. O’Leary-Kelly. 2013. Extending the Expanded Model of Organizational Identification to Occupations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43 (12): 2426–2448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, Philipp, and Diana Ingenhoff. 2016. Legitimacy Through CSR Disclosures? The Advantage Outweighs the Disadvantages. Public Relations Review 42 (3): 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael L. 2014. Why Stakeholders Ignore Firm Misconduct: A Cognitive View. Journal of Management 40 (3): 676–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael L. 2019. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critique and an Indirect Path Forward. Business and Society 58 (1): 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316660044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael L., and Robert M. Salomon. 2006. Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship Between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal 27 (11): 1101–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrend, Tara S., Becca A. Baker, and Lori Foster Thompson. 2009. Effects of Pro-Environmental Recruiting Messages: The Role of Organizational Reputation. Journal of Business and Psychology 24 (3): 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, Guido, Cees B.M.. Van Riel, and Johan Van Rekom. 2007. The CSR-Quality Trade-off: When Can Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Ability Compensate Each Other? Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3): 233–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Jonah, and Katherine L. Milkman. 2012. What Makes Online Content Viral? Journal of Marketing Research 49 (2): 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R.H., and F. Yeung. 2013. Are Investors Willing to Sacrifice Cash for Morality? Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3): 477–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besiou, Maria, Mark Lee Hunter, and Luk N. van Wassenhove. 2013. A Web of Watchdogs: Stakeholder Media Networks and Agenda-Setting in Response to Corporate Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 118 (4): 709–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, Forrest, and Abhinav Gupta. 2016. Social Activism in and Around Organizations. Academy of Management Annals 10 (1): 671–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1153261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, Forrest, Abhinav Gupta, and Mark S. Anner. 2015. Social Activism and Practice Diffusion. Administrative Science Quarterly 60 (2): 300–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Tom J., and Peter A. Dacin. 1997. The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing 61 (1): 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, Daniel M., and Daniel B. Turban. 2003. The Value of Organizational Reputation in the Recruitment Context: A Brand-Equity Perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33 (11): 2244–2266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, Marylyn, and Ahmad Attalla. 2001. The Myth of the Ethical Consumer—Do Ethics Matter in Purchase Behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing 18 (7): 560–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, Robert, and Andreas Chatzidakis. 2014. Consumer Social Responsibility (CnSR): Toward a Multi-Level, Multi-Agent Conceptualization of the ‘Other CSR.’ Journal of Business Ethics 121 (4): 577–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cretu, Anca E., and Roderick J. Brodie. 2007. The Influence of Brand Image and Company Reputation Where Manufacturers Market to Small Firms: A Customer Value Perspective. Industrial Marketing Management 36 (2): 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.08.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas, and Lee E. Preston. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, Kai, and Wu. Shing Jen. 2019. Does External Assurance Enhance the Credibility of CSR Reports? Evidence from CSR-Related Misconduct Events in Taiwan. Auditing 38 (4): 101–130. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-52418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, Jenifer, and Katrina Kimport. 2011. Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge: New Media & Society, MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eberle, David, Guido Berens, and Ting Li. 2013. The Impact of Interactive Corporate Social Responsibility Communication on Corporate Reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 118 (4): 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1957-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennis, Bob M., and Wolfgang Stroebe. 2014. Softening the Blow: Company Self-Disclosure of Negative Information Lessens Damaging Effects on Consumer Judgment and Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 120 (1): 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa, Alyssa. 2012. The Top Five Most Hypocritical Corporate Sponsors. Truthout. 2012. http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/10702-the-top-five-most-hypocritical-corporate-sponsors.

  • Glac, Katherina. 2009. Understanding Socially Responsible Investing: The Effect of Decision Frames and Trade-off Options. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (SUPPL. 1): 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavas, Ante, and Ken Kelley. 2014. The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes. Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (02): 165–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselt, Jordy F., Thomas van Rompay, and Laura Haske. 2019. Won’t Get Fooled Again: The Effects of Internal and External CSR ECO-Labeling. Journal of Business Ethics 155 (2): 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3512-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haji, Abdifatah Ahmed, Paul Coram, and Indrit Troshani. 2021. Effects of Integrating CSR Information in Financial Reports on Investors’ Firm Value Estimates. Accounting and Finance 61 (2): 3605–3647. https://doi.org/10.1111/ACFI.12713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, Sabrina. 2007. The Role of Corporate Reputation in Determining Investor Satisfaction and Loyalty. Corporate Reputation Review 10 (1): 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, David A., Chelsea R. Willness, and Sarah Madey. 2014. Why Are Job Seekers Attracted by Corporate Social Performance? Experimental and Field Tests of Three Signal-Based Mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal 57 (2): 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, Jillian J., Roseanna Sommers, Paul Bloom, and David G. Rand. 2017. Why Do We Hate Hypocrites? Evidence for a Theory of False Signaling. Psychological Science 28 (3): 356–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuokkanen, Henri, and William Sun. 2020. Companies, Meet Ethical Consumers: Strategic CSR Management to Impact Consumer Choice. Journal of Business Ethics 166 (2): 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-019-04145-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, Linchi, and Yu. Bei. 2016. Taxonomy of Facebook Messages in Business-to-Consumer Communications: What Really Works? Tourism and Hospitality Research 16 (4): 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jin Kyun, Shu-Yueh. Lee, and Sara Steffes Hansen. 2017. Source Credibility in Consumer-Generated Advertising in Youtube: The Moderating Role of Personality. Current Psychology 36 (4): 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9474-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Lisa D., Danielle E. Warren, and Mohammed AlSuwaidi. 2020. Does CSR Make Better Citizens? The Influence of Employee CSR Programs on Employee Societal Citizenship Behavior Outside of Work. Business and Society Review 125 (3): 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, Mary Hunter, and Brayden King. 2013. Keeping up Appearances: Reputational Threat and Impression Management after Social Movement Boycotts. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213500032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummolo, Jonathan, and Erik Peterson. 2019. Demand Effects in Survey Experiments: An Empirical Assessment. American Political Science Review 113 (2): 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath, Saheli. 2021. The Business of Virtue: Evidence from Socially Responsible Investing in Financial Markets. Journal of Business Ethics 169 (1): 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-019-04291-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu, Dean, Gregory Saxton, Jeffery Everett, and Abu Rahaman Shiraz. 2020. Speaking Truth to Power: Twitter Reactions to the Panama Papers. Journal of Business Ethics 162 (2): 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-018-3997-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen. 2015. Word-of-Mouth Recommendations Remain the Most Credible. Nielsen. 2015. http://www.nielsen.com/id/en/press-room/2015/WORD-OF-MOUTH-RECOMMENDATIONS-REMAIN-THE-MOST-CREDIBLE.html.

  • Nyilasy, Gergely, Harsha Gangadharbatla, and Angela Paladino. 2013. Perceived Greenwashing: The Interactive Effects of Green Advertising and Corporate Environmental Performance on Consumer Reactions. Journal of Business Ethics 125 (4): 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1944-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, Julie, and Marianne Eisenmann. 2017. An Examination of How Source Classification Impacts Credibility and Consumer Behavior. Public Relations Review 43 (2): 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perego, Paolo, and Ans Kolk. 2012. Multinationals’ Accountability on Sustainability: The Evolution of Third-Party Assurance of Sustainability Reports. Journal of Business Ethics 110 (2): 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomering, Alan, and Sara Dolnicar. 2009. Assessing the Prerequisite of Successful CSR Implementation: Are Consumers Aware of CSR Initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S2): 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, Gregory D., and Richard D. Waters. 2014. What Do Stakeholders Like on Facebook? Examining Public Reactions to Nonprofit Organizations’ Informational, Promotional, and Community-Building Messages. Journal of Public Relations Research 26 (3): 280–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Jie, and Hongru Zhang. 2019. Socially Responsible Human Resource Management and Employee Support for External CSR: Roles of Organizational CSR Climate and Perceived CSR Directed Toward Employees. Journal of Business Ethics 156 (3): 875–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-017-3544-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, Michael. 1999. Conflict Aversion: Preference for Ambiguity vs Conflict in Sources and Evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79 (3): 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2844.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sobande, Francesca. 2020. Woke-Washing: ‘Intersectional’ Femvertising and Branding ‘Woke’ Bravery. European Journal of Marketing 54 (11): 2723–2745. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, David, and Sarah A. Soule. 1998. Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Investing: The Millennial Investor. 2017.

  • Sweetin, Vernon H., Lynette L. Knowles, John H. Summey, and Kand S. McQueen. 2013. Willingness-to-Punish the Corporate Brand for Corporate Social Irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research 66 (10): 1822–1830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D.B., and D.W. Greening. 1997. Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, Gregory, David Kiron, Nina Kruschwitz, Martin Reeves, Holger Rubel, and Alexander Meyer zum Felde. 2016. Investing for a Sustainable Future. MIT Sloan Management Review.

  • USSIF Foundation. 2020. Sustainable and Impact Investing—Overview.

  • Valenzuela, Sebastián. 2013. Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior. American Behavioral Scientist 57 (7): 920–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasi, Ion Bogdan, Edward T. Walker, John S. Johnson, and Hui Fen Tan. 2015. ‘No Fracking Way!’ Documentary Film, Discursive Opportunity, and Local Opposition against Hydraulic Fracturing in the United States, 2010 to 2013. American Sociological Review 80 (5): 934–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415598534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollero, Agostino, Maria Palazzo, Alfonso Siano, and Pantea Foroudi. 2021. From CSR to CSI: Analysing Consumers’ Hostile Responses to Branding Initiatives in Social Media-Scape. Qualitative Market Research 24 (2): 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-12-2017-0184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vredenburg, Jessica, Sommer Kapitan, Amanda Spry, and Joya A. Kemper. 2020. Brands Taking a Stand: Authentic Brand Activism or Woke Washing? Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 39 (4): 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620947359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Tillmann, Daniel Korschun, and Cord Christian Troebs. 2020. Deconstructing Corporate Hypocrisy: A Delineation of Its Behavioral, Moral, and Attributional Facets. Journal of Business Research 114: 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Tillmann, Richard J. Lutz, and Barton A. Weitz. 2009. Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions. Journal of Marketing 73 (6): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Gianfranco, Vincent Wayne Mitchell, Paul R. Jackson, and Sharon E. Beatty. 2009. Examining the Antecedents and Consequences of Corporate Reputation: A Customer Perspective. British Journal of Management 20 (2): 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00557.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Rong Tsu. 2013. Modeling Corporate Social Performance and Job Pursuit Intention: Mediating Mechanisms of Corporate Reputation and Job Advancement Prospects. Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3): 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1538-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, James C., and Amy L. Ostrom. 2006. Complaining to the Masses: The Role of Protest Framing in Customer-Created Complaint Websites. Journal of Consumer Research 33 (2): 220–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Danielle E. 2022. ‘Woke’ Corporations and the Stigmatization of Corporate Social Initiatives. Business Ethics - Concepts and Cases 32 (1): 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Danielle E., Tobey K. Scharding, Lisa D. Lewin, and Ushma Pandya. 2020. Making Sure Corporate Social Innovations Do Social Good. Rutgers Business Review 5 (2): 166–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Eunsang, Hugh J. Guffey, and Valerie Kijewski. 1993. The Effects of Information and Company Reputation on Intentions to Buy a Business Service. Journal of Business Research 27 (3): 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(93)90027-M.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Yeosun, Zeynep Gurhan-Canli, and Norbert Schwarz. 2006. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies with Bad Reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16 (4): 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SUNY Old Westbury, Old Westbury, NY, USA

    Lisa D. Lewin

  2. Rutgers Business School - Newark & New Brunswick, Rutgers, The State University of NJ, Newark, NJ, USA

    Danielle E. Warren

Authors
  1. Lisa D. Lewin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danielle E. Warren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa D. Lewin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewin, L.D., Warren, D.E. Calls to Action: The Dangers of Negative CSR Information and Stakeholder Punishments. Corp Reputation Rev 27, 1–17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-023-00158-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-023-00158-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation