Skip to main content
Log in

Contextual variation in beliefs about emotion and associated emotion regulation efforts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beliefs about emotion are clearly relevant for emotion regulation and psychopathology. Yet, understanding the dynamics of emotion beliefs (i.e., the situations and contexts in which beliefs may change over time) remains an important avenue of investigation. The current ecological momentary assessment study (n = 102) assessed nine different beliefs about emotion across a variety of contexts (location, activity, social context, consuming alcohol, eating food, drinking caffeine, subjective emotional experience, feeling invalidated, feeling tired, feeling creative). When participants reported feeling subjectively worse than usual, they also reported their emotion regulation strategies. Results revealed that all of the beliefs except beliefs about longevity (i.e., beliefs that emotions will last “forever”) were associated with at least one contextual factor. In addition, when people reported greater longevity beliefs, they also reported asking “why” (i.e., rumination), attempts to distract themselves, and escape behaviors. Results confirm that beliefs do vary by context, and within-person fluctuations in beliefs are associated with momentary emotion regulation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that we originally ran these models separately for (a) physical and consumption contexts (social, location, activity, eating food, drinking alcohol, and drinking caffeine) and (b) psychological contexts (affect, invalidation, creativity, tiredness) but ultimately the results were not different when combined into one model and for the sake of parsimony, we present the overall model.

  2. We thank one of the anonymous reviewers for raising this limitation.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer C. Veilleux.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veilleux, J.C., Warner, E.A., Chamberlain, K.D. et al. Contextual variation in beliefs about emotion and associated emotion regulation efforts. Motiv Emot 47, 308–322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09992-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09992-9

Keywords

Navigation