Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 8, 2023

The Highest Good as the Ideal of Reason in the Canon of the first Critique

  • Luigi Filieri EMAIL logo
From the journal Kant-Studien

Abstract

In the Dialectic of the first Critique, Kant claims that a highest being is the transcendental ideal of speculative reason. However, the Canon of the Doctrine of Method presents the highest good as an ideal of both the speculative and the practical use of reason. In this paper, I argue (1) that the highest good is the ideal of the unity of reason – unlike the ideal in the Dialectic – insofar as (2) the highest good serves both the speculative and the practical employment of reason. Accordingly, I also argue that (3) these two employments are complementary, not alternative. Kant’s argument for the ideal of the highest good in the Canon shows that the unity of reason combines the two lawful employments of reason. In order to be reason’s highest ideal, this ideal cannot just mirror the demands of speculative reason – it must also involve the other fundamental employment of reason, i. e., the practical. This highest standpoint cannot be merely speculative but must be moral as well: not just a highest ideal, but also a good (the highest good).

References

All citations of Kant follow the Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant.

Bader, Ralf (2015): “Kant’s Theory of the Highest Good”. In: The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant. Ed. by J. Aufderheide, R. Bader. Oxford, 183–213.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714019.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Blöser, Claudia (2020): “Hope in Kant”. In: The Moral Psychology of Hope. Ed. by C. Blöser, T. Stahl London/New York, 57–74.Search in Google Scholar

Caimi, Mario (1996): “La función regulativa del ideal de la razón pura”. In: Diánoia 42, 61–79.10.22201/iifs.18704913e.1996.42.514Search in Google Scholar

Engstrom, Stephen (2016): “The Determination of the Concept of the Highest Good”. In: The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Ed. by T. Höwing. Berlin/Boston, 89–108.10.1515/9783110369007-009Search in Google Scholar

– (1992): “The Concept of the Highest Good in Kant’s Moral Theory”. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4), 747–780.10.2307/2107910Search in Google Scholar

Esser, Andrea M. (2016): “Applying the Concept of the Good: The Final End and the Highest Good in Kant’s Third Critique”. In: The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Ed. by T. Höwing. Berlin/Boston 245–262.10.1515/9783110369007-016Search in Google Scholar

Ferrarin, Alfredo (2015): The Powers of Pure Reason. Kant and the Idea of Cosmic Philosophy. Chicago/London.10.7208/chicago/9780226243290.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fonnesu, Luca (2013): “Entwicklung und Erweiterung der praktischen Absicht”. In: Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI Kant-Kongresses 2010. Hrsg. von M. Ruffing, C. La Rocca, A. Ferrarin, S. Bacin. Berlin/Boston, Bd. 1, 173–184.10.1515/9783110246490.2057Search in Google Scholar

Guéroult, Martial (1963): “Vom Kanon der Kritik der reinen Vernunft zur Kritik der praktischen Vernunft”. In: Kant-Studien 54, 432–444.10.1515/kant.1963.54.1-4.432Search in Google Scholar

Heidemann, Ingeborg (1981): “Das Ideal des höchsten Guts. Eine Interpretation des Zweiten Abschnittes im ‘Kanon der reinen Vernunft’”. In: Beiträge zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft 1781–1981. Hrsg. von I. Heidemann, W. Ritzel. Berlin/Boston, 233–305.10.1515/9783110865196-009Search in Google Scholar

Kleingeld, Pauline (1995): “What do the Virtuous Hope For? Re-reading Kant’s Doctrine of the Highest Good”. In: Proceedings of the Eight International Kant Congress. Ed. by H. Robinson. Milwaukee, Vol. 1, 91–112.10.5840/kant199519951Part17Search in Google Scholar

Mariña, Jacqueline (2000): “Making Sense of Kant’s Highest Good”. In: Kant-Studien 91 (3), 329–355.10.1515/kant.2000.91.3.329Search in Google Scholar

Marwede, Florian (2018): Das höchste Gut in Kants deontologischer Ethik. Berlin/Boston.10.1515/9783110599763Search in Google Scholar

Morais, Marceline (2014): “Le souverain bien et les fins dernières de la raison chez Kant: un problème de la raison pure spéculative”. In: Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Hrsg. von V. Gerhardt, R.-P. Horstmann, R. Schumacher. Berlin/Boston, Bd. 4, 212–219.Search in Google Scholar

Moran, Kate A. (2012): Community and Progress in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Washington DC.10.2307/j.ctt284v4fSearch in Google Scholar

Mudd, Sasha (2017): “The Demand for Systematicity and the Authority of Theoretical Reason in Kant”. In: Kantian Review 22 (1), 81–106.10.1017/S1369415416000388Search in Google Scholar

Nuzzo, Angelica (2005): Kant and the Unity of Reason. West Lafayette (IN).Search in Google Scholar

O’Connell, Eoin (2012): “Happiness Proportioned to Virtue: Kant and the Highest Good”. In: Kantian Review 17 (2), 257–279.10.1017/S1369415412000052Search in Google Scholar

Palatnik, Nataliya (2018): “The Ideal of the Highest Good and the Objectivity of Moral Judgment”, In: Kant Yearbook 10, 125–148.10.1515/kantyb-2018-0007Search in Google Scholar

Pasternak, Lawrence (2017): “Restoring Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good”. In: Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (3), 435–468.10.1353/hph.2017.0049Search in Google Scholar

Pollok, Konstantin (2017): Kant’s Theory of Normativity. Exploring the Space of Reason. Cambridge.10.1017/9781316412503Search in Google Scholar

Rauscher, Frederick (2010): “The Appendix to the Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason. The Positive Role of Reason”. In: The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. by P. Guyer. Cambridge, 290–309.10.1017/CCOL9780521883863.013Search in Google Scholar

Reath, Andrews (1988): “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant”. In: Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (4), 593–619.10.1353/hph.1988.0098Search in Google Scholar

Recki, Birgit (2016): “‘Mixtum Compositum’: On the Persistence of Kant’s Dualism in the Doctrine of the Highest Good”. In: The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Ed. by T. Höwing. Berlin/Boston, 71–88.10.1515/9783110369007-008Search in Google Scholar

Shuster, Martin (2014): Autonomy after Auschwitz. Adorno, German Idealism, and Modernity. Chicago/London.10.7208/chicago/9780226155517.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Silber, John R. (1959): “The Metaphysical Importance of the Highest Good as the Canon of Pure Reason in Kant Philosophy”. In: Texas Studies in Literature and Language 1 (2), 233–244.Search in Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens (2009): “The Unity of Reason – Kantian Perspectives”. In: Spheres of Reason. New Essays in the Philosophy of Normativity. Ed. by S. Robertson. Oxford, 183–198.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572939.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Zöller, Günter (2016): “‘The supersensible… in us, above us and after us’: The Critical Conception of the Highest Good in Kant’s Practico-Dogmatic Metaphysics”. In: The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Ed. by T. Höwing. Berlin/Boston, 263–279.10.1515/9783110369007-017Search in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2023-02-08
Erschienen im Druck: 2024-03-01

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2023-2009/html
Scroll to top button