No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The role of organizational language in gaining legitimacy from the perspective of new institutional theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2023
Abstract
This research addresses the role of organizational language in the establishment of legitimacy from the perspective of New Institutional Theory. Several conceptual and methodical contributions have been made. First, by pairing cultural-cognitive legitimacy with phenomenological institutionalism and socio-political legitimacy with social organizational institutionalism, we have proposed a new way of classifying legitimacy. Second, we made connections between language strategies of organizations and cultural-cognitive and socio-political legitimacy. Finally, by re-categorizing language strategies aimed at legitimacy, we have provided a framework that is applicable in studying the relationship between different language strategies and legitimacy. Using this framework, we conducted an empirical study in which we analyzed the press releases of five major Turkish business groups. It was found that their language strategies were generally similar and mostly aimed at socio-political legitimacy.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management
References
Ainsworth, S., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and identities. In Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C. & Putnam, L. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 153–173). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000a). Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: Challenges, responses, consequences. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(2), 136–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000b). Varieties of discourse: On study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, M. E. (2004). Between isomorphism and market partitioning: How organizational competencies and resources foster cultural and sociopolitical legitimacy and promote organizational survival. In Johnson, C. (Ed.), Legitimacy processes in organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations) (Vol. 22, pp. 171–211). Bingley: Emerald. Publishing Limitedç.Google Scholar
Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitektine, A., Hill, K., Song, F., & Vandenberghe, C. (2020). Organizational legitimacy, reputation and status: Insights from micro-level measurement. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(1), 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. (2000). Actional legitimacy: No crisis necessary. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4, 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N., & Mezias, S. J. (2012). The quest for cognitive legitimacy: Organizational identity crafting and internal stakeholder support. Journal Of Change Management, 12(2), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemente, M., & Roulet, T. J. (2015). Public opinion as a source of deinstitutionalization: A “spiral of silence” approach. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 96–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çolpan, A. M., & Hikino, T. (2008). Türkiye'nin büyük şirketler kesiminde işletme gruplarının iktisadi rolü ve çeşitlendirme stratejileri [Business groups in Turkey's large enterprise sector: Their economic role and diversification strategies]. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1–2), 23–58.Google Scholar
Colyvas, J. A., & Powell, W. W. (2006). Roads to institutionalization: The remaking of boundaries between public and private science. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 315–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coşkun, R., Taş, A., & Gürler, G. (in press). Macro institutions as impediments for the institutionalisation of family firms: Cases from Turkey. Middle East Journal of Management. doi: 10.1504/MEJM.2021.10043861Google Scholar
Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Plunkett, L., & Suchman, M. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B. & Meyer, R. E. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 27–54). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez-de Castro, E., Peris-Ortiz, M., & Diez-Martin, F. (2018) Criteria for evaluating the organizational legitimacy: A typology for legitimacy jungle. In Diez-de-Castro, E. & Peris-Ortiz, M. (Eds.), Organizational legitimacy (pp. 1–21). Cham-Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez-Martin, F., Blanco-Gonzalez, A., & Diez-de-Castro, E. (2021). Measuring a scientifically multifaceted concept: The jungle of organizational legitimacy. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez-Martin, F., Blanco-Gonzalez, A., & Prado-Roman, C. (2021). The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: A co-citation analysis in business journals. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 1007–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doğuş, Business Group. (2011-2017). Basın bültenleri [press releases]. Retrieved from https://www.dogusgrubu.com.tr/tr/basin-odasi, 11 January 2020.Google Scholar
Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21(5), 1092–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T., & Cooren, F. (2004). Organizational language in use: Interaction analysis, conversation analysis and speech act schematics. In Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C. & Putnam, L. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 131–152). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1173–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, M. A., & Navis, C. (2013). Categories, identities and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1124–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gökşen, N. S., & Üsdiken, B. (2001). Uniformity and diversity in Turkish business groups: Effects of scale and time of founding. British Journal of Management, 12(4), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golant, B. D., & Sillince, J. A. (2007). The constitution of organizational legitimacy: A narrative perspective. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1149–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. (2004) Introduction: Organizational discourse: Exploring the field. In Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C. & Putnam, L. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 1–36). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, D., Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C. (2001). Organizational discourse. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(3), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B., Purdy, J. M., & Ansari, S. (2015). From interactions to institutions: Microprocesses of framing and mechanisms for the structuring of institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, S. E. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, S. E., & Li, Y. (2011). Rhetorical institutionalism: Language, agency and structure in institutional theory since Alvesson 1993. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1662–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, P., Pfarrer, M. D., & Scherer, A. G. (2014). Legitimacy as feeling: How affect leads to vertical legitimacy spillovers in transnational governance. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 634–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, P., Schilke, O., & Zucker, L. (2021). Legitimacy revisited: Disentangling propriety, validity and consensus. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 749–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, P., & Sieweke, J. (2018). The legitimacy of inequality: Integrating the perspectives of system justification and social judgment. Journal of Management Studies, 55, 486–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, P., & Sieweke, J. (2020). Advancing the measurement of organizational legitimacy, reputation, and status: First-order judgments vs second-order judgments – commentary on “organizational legitimacy, reputation and status: Insights from micro-level management”. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(1), 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, D. J., Green, S. E., & Goodnight, G. T. (2015). A model of rhetorical legitimation: The structure of communication and cognition underlying institutional maintenance and change. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heracleous, L. T. (2004). Interpretivist approaches to organizational discourse. In Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C. & Putnam, L. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 175–192). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, P. M. (1997). Sociology without social structure: Neo-institutional theory meets brave new world. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1702–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossfeld, H. (2018). Legitimation and institutionalization of managerial practices: The role of organizational rhetoric. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobal, H. Y. (2022). Sosyal girişimlerin örgütsel kimlik yoluyla meşruiyet arayışları [Social enterprises' quest for legitimacy through organizational identity]. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(1), 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koç, Business Group. (2011-2017). Basın bültenleri [press releases]. Retrieved from https://www.koc.com.tr/medya-merkezi/basin-bultenleri, 11 January 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuruppu, S. C., Milne, M. J., & Tilt, C. A. (2019). Gaining, maintaining and repairing organisational legitimacy: When to report and when not to report. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(7), 2062–2087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamertz, K., & Baum, J. A. C. (1998). The legitimacy of organizational downsizing in Canada: An analysis of explanatory media accounts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 15(l), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. B. (1999). Institutional strategy. Journal of Management, 25(2), 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeuwen, T. V. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeuwen, T. V., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefsrud, L. M., Graves, H., & Phillips, N. (2019). Giant toxic lakes you can see from space: A theory of multimodal messages and emotion in legitimacy work. Organization Studies, 41(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Lefsrud, L. M., & Meyer, R. E. (2012). Science or science fiction? Professionals discursive construction of climate change. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1477–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, C., Giorgi, S., & Glynn, M. A. (2019). How to do things with words: Mechanisms bridging language and action in management research. Journal of Management, 45(1), 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, J., Ocasio, W., & Jones, C. (2012). Vocabularies and vocabulary structure: A new approach linking categories, practices and institutions. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 41–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luyckx, J., & Janssens, M. (2016). Discursive legitimation of a contested actor over time: The multinational corporation as a historical case (1964–2012). Organization Studies, 37(11), 1–25.Google Scholar
Massey, J. E. (2001). Managing organizational legitimacy: Communication strategies for organization in crisis. Journal of Business Communication, 38(2), 153–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayring, P. (2011). Nitel sosyal araştırmaya giriş [Einführung in die qualitative sozialforschung, 1990, Psychologie Verlags Union]. Ankara: Bilgesu Yayıncılık.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. (2017). Reflections on institutional theories of organizations. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B. & Meyer, R. E. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 831–852). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), New institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 439–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oswick, C., Putnam, L., & Keenoy, T. (2004). Tropes, discourse and organizing. In Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C. & Putnam, L. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 105–127). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özen, Ş, & Akkemik, K. A. (2012). Does illegitimate corporate behaviour follow the forms of polity? The Turkish experience. Journal of Management Studies, 49(3), 515–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özen, Ş, & Berkman, Ü. (2007). Cross-national reconstruction of managerial practices: TQM in Turkey. Organization Studies, 28(6), 825–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özen, Ş., & Önder, Ç. (2020). Distinctive context, divergent pattern: Diffusion of imported management practices in Turkey and implications for late-industrializing countries. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özen, Ş, & Önder, Ç. (2021). Diffusion of foreign management practices across Turkish business organizations: A contextualized theory. International Studies of Management & Organization, 51(1), 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patriotta, G., Gond, J. P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N., & Malhotra, N. (2008). Taking social construction seriously: Extending the discursive approach in institutional theory. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 702–720). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, N., & Malhotra, N. (2017). Language, cognition and institutions: Studying institutionalization using linguistic methods. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B. & Meyer, R. E. (Eds), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 392–417). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), New institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183–203). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, L., & Fairhurst, G. L. (2001). Discourse analysis in organizations. In Jablin, F. M. & Putnam, L. (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational communication (pp. 78–136). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Puyou, F. R., & Quattrone, P. (2018). The visual and material dimensions of legitimacy: Accounting and the search for societies. Organization Studies, 39, 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabancı, Business Group. (2011-2017). Basın bültenleri [press releases]. Retrieved from https://medyamerkezi.sabanci.com/tr/basin-bultenleri, 11 January 2020.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), New institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 164–182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory Sociology, 37, 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interest and identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., & Monin, P. (2010). A recursive perspective on discursive legitimation and organizational action in mergers and acquisitions. Organization Science, 21(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. (2008). A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 985–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. (2011). On the narrative construction of multinational corporations: An antenarrative analysis of legitimation and resistance in a cross-border merger. Organization Science, 22(2), 370–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 789–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wæraas, A. (2020). Public sector communication and organizational legitimacy. In Luoma-aho, V. & Canel, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook of public sector communication (pp. 45–58). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yıldız, Business Group. (2011-2017). Basın bültenleri [press releases]. Retrieved from https://www.medyamerkezi.yildizholding.com.tr/tr, 11 January 2020.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorlu, Business Group. (2011-2017). Basın bültenleri [press releases]. Retrieved from https://www.zorlu.com.tr/tr/medya-merkezi/basin-kiti-ve-kurumsal-kimlik/bultenler, 11 January 2020.Google Scholar