Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T02:13:53.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diversification Experiences and Firm Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Industries: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2023

Dhirendra Mani Shukla*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, India
Sushil Kumar
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, India
*
Corresponding author: Dhirendra Mani Shukla (dhirendra.mani.shukla@iiml.ac.in)

Abstract

In this study, we examine the moderation effect of absorptive capacity on the performance consequences of diversification experiences. We suggest that absorptive capacity positively moderates the performance effects of product and international diversification experiences and those of unrelatedness in product and international diversification experiences. An empirical analysis conducted using a longitudinal dataset of Indian firms, from knowledge-intensive manufacturing sectors, for the period 2008–2018, broadly supports our arguments. Findings imply that firms with superior absorptive capacity can acquire and leverage knowledge from their diversification experiences effectively and mitigate the risks of negative transfer associated with unrelatedness in diversification experiences. Findings contribute to the organizational learning literature by examining the role of absorptive capacity in enabling performance outcomes of diversification experiences.

摘要:

本研究检验组织的吸收能力如何影响企业多元化经验对绩效的的后果。我们认为,吸收能力越强,企业的产品多元化和国际多元化经验,以及那些与产品和国际化无关的多元化经验,都对其绩效产生越正面的影响。我们对知识密集型制造业的印度公司在2008-2018年期间的面板数据进行了分析,结果基本支持了我们的预测。具体而言,具有卓越吸收能力的公司能够从自己的多元化经验中有效地获得并利用这些知识来抵御来自不相关多元化经验可能造成的负面知识迁移的风险。本研究丰富了组织学习的文献。

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

ACCEPTED BY Senior Editor Dalhia Mani

References

REFERENCES

Ahuja, G., & Novelli, E. 2017. Redirecting research efforts on the diversification–performance linkage: The search for synergy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1): 342390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreou, P. C., Louca, C., & Petrou, A. P. 2016. Organizational learning and corporate diversification performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(9): 32703284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. 1998. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, C. 1975. Corporate growth and diversification. Princeton, NJ: Princetown University Press.Google Scholar
Camisón, C., & Forés, B. 2010. Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63(7): 707715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaliere, V., Lombardi, S., & Giustiniano, L. 2015. Knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive manufacturing firms. An empirical study of its enablers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(6): 11241145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarti, A., Singh, K., & Mahmood, I. 2007. Diversification and performance: Evidence from East Asian firms. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2): 101120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S.-C., & Wang, C.-F. 2007. The effect of product diversification strategies on the relationship between international diversification and firm performance. Journal of World Business, 42(1): 6179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: 18–74. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2008. The effectiveness of laws against bribery abroad. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 634651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, D. K., & Zickar, M. J. 2012. Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3): 339362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dastidar, P. 2009. International corporate diversification and performance: Does firm self-selection matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 7185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 1999. Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8): 711727.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2001. Survival and profitability: The roles of experience and intangible assets in foreign subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 10281038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. 2005. When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10): 947965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, K. M., Reus, T. H., Lamont, B. T., & Ranft, A. L. 2011. Transfer effects in large acquisitions: How size-specific experience matters. The Academy of Management Journal, 54(6): 12611276.Google Scholar
Fang, Y., Wade, M., Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. 2007. International diversification, subsidiary performance, and the mobility of knowledge resources. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10): 10531064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernhaber, S. A., & Patel, P. C. 2012. How do young firms manage product portfolio complexity? The role of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13): 15161539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Haleblian, J. 2002. Understanding acquisition performance: The role of transfer effects. Organization Science, 13(1): 3647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granstrand, O. 1998. Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy, 27(5): 465489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis. Delhi, India: Pearson Education India.Google Scholar
Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. 1999. The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1): 2956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. J. 1979. Statistical models for discrete panel data. Department of Economics and Graduate School of Business. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Tihanyi, L., Miller, T., & Connelly, B. 2006. International diversification: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 32(6): 831867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Y., Zhu, D. H., & Zhang, Y. A. 2020. Being extraordinary: How CEOS’ uncommon names explain strategic distinctiveness. Strategic Management Journal, 42(2): 462488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. The Journal of Finance, 55(2): 867891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H., Hoskisson, R. E., & Lee, S.-H. 2015. Why strategic factor markets matter: “New” multinationals’ geographic diversification and firm profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4): 518536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1): 319338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Massini, S., & Peeters, C. 2011. Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organization Science, 22(1): 8198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M. C. J., Stadler, C., & Hautz, J. 2014. The relationship between product and international diversification: The role of experience. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10): 14581468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, D. W. 2007. A modern resource based approach to unrelated diversification. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8): 14811502.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T., & Cai, C. X. 2016. Value-enhancing learning from industry-wide diversification experience. British Journal of Management, 27(2): 323337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieto, M., & Quevedo, P. 2005. Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort. Technovation, 25(10): 11411157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palepu, K. 1985. Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3): 239255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulic, A. 2000. VAIC – an accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5): 702714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. 2011. Knowledge organisation in R&D alliances: Its impact on product innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(10): 10471061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. 2009. Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3): 718804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelt, R. P. 1982. Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 3(4): 359369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, D. M., & Mital, A. 2016. Effect of firm's diverse experiences on its alliance portfolio diversity: Evidence from India. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(5): 125.Google Scholar
Tallman, S., & Li, J. 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(1): 179196.Google Scholar
Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 9961004.Google Scholar
Vachani, S. 1991. Distinguishing between related and unrelated international geographic diversification: A comprehensive measure of global diversification. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2): 307322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasudeva, G., & Anand, J. 2011. Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3): 611623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. 2001. Learning through acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 457476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wales, W. J., Parida, V., & Patel, P. C. 2013. Too much of a good thing? Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(5): 622633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., & Larimo, J. 2020. Survival of full versus partial acquisitions: The moderating role of firm's internationalization experience, cultural distance, and host country context characteristics. International Business Review, 29(1): 101605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4): 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yamakawa, Y., Yang, H., & Lin, Z(J). 2011. Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolio: Performance implications of organizational, strategic, and environmental fit. Research Policy, 40(2): 287296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., Narayanan, V. K., & De Carolis, D. M. 2014. The relationship between portfolio diversification and firm value: The evidence from corporate venture capital activity. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13): 19932011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, T., & Lavie, D. 2013. Intra-industry diversification and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8): 978998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & Hayton, J. C. 2008. The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2): 195220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Li, H., Li, Y., & Zhou, L.-A. 2010. FDI spillovers in an emerging market: The role of foreign firms’ country origin diversity and domestic firms’ absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9): 969989.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Shukla and Kumar supplementary material

Shukla and Kumar supplementary material

Download Shukla and Kumar supplementary material(File)
File 257 KB