Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial variation of in situ stress at shallow depth in South Korea

  • Article
  • Published:
Geosciences Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the characteristics of in situ stress at shallow depths (< 1 km) measured from borehole hydraulic fracturing tests in South Korea by comparing them with the deep tectonic stress field. We compile a large number of hydraulic fracturing test data (stress orientations and magnitudes) from 207 boreholes over the country. A hydraulic fracturing test yields a point measure at a borehole, which differs from the regional value estimated by the inversion of earthquake focal mechanical solution in various aspects including measurement technique, depth and covering area. We use a smoothing technique to derive stress trends from the individual hydraulic fracturing stress data and find some distinct patterns in shallow stress fields that are both consistent and inconsistent with the deep tectonic stress direction. Two main regions, the northeast and southeast, show differences between the shallow and deep stress orientations. In the northeast, the maximum horizontal principal stress is rotated by ∼60° from that of the deep-seated stress to the direction subparallel to the topography of the region’s mountain ridges. The southeast has heterogeneous stress orientations, so no representative stress orientations are resolved. This stress heterogeneity in southeast may have arisen owing to several possible factors including lithology variation, coastal lines, and numerous faults in this region. The magnitudes of the horizontal principal stress, despite their severe scattering, tend to be affected by lithology as a primary factor. Horizontal stresses measured in sedimentary rocks are shown to be slightly lower than those in crystalline rocks, indicating differentiated stress transfer depending on rigidity of rocks. The depth-wise variation of horizontal stresses with respect to vertical stress shows that the prevailing stress regime changes with depth from reverse-faulting (0–200 m depth), via transitional (200–500 m), to strike-slip faulting (below 500 m). Our study shows that the point-measurements of stress often capture locally perturbed stress due to the heterogeneity of geologic media, in contrast to the average tectonic stress field. Our study also suggests that depth-wise stress characterization may be necessary in addition to spatial characterization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amadei, B. and Stephansson, O., 1997, Rock Stress and Its Measurement. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 512 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aminu, M.D., Nabavi, S.A., Rochelle, C.A., and Manovic, V., 2017, A review of developments in carbon dioxide storage. Applied Energy, 208, 1389–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E.T. and Hoek, E., 1978, Trends in relationships between measured in-situ stresses and depth. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 15, 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C., 2017, Critical pore pressure assessment for CO2 geological storage in Gyeongsang Basin, Korea, from a geomechanics perspective. Geosciences Journal, 21, 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C., Jo, Y., Oh, Y., Lee, T.J., and Kim, K.-Y., 2014, Hydraulic fracturing in situ stress estimations in a potential geothermal site, Seokmo Island, South Korea. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 47, 1793–1808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. and Jo, Y., 2015, Heterogeneous in situ stress magnitudes due to the presence of weak natural discontinuities in granitic rocks. Tectonophysics, 664, 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C., Lee, J.B., and Kang, T.-S., 2010, Interaction between regional stress state and faults: complementary analysis of borehole in situ stress and earthquake focal mechanism in southeastern Korea. Tectonophysics, 485, 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornet, F.H. and Röckel, T., 2012, Vertical stress profiles and the significance of “stress decoupling”. Tectonophysics, 581, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K.F., Cornet, F.H., Hashida, T., Hayashi, K., Ito, T., Matsuki, K., and Wallroth, T., 1999, Stress and rock mechanics issues of relevance to HDR/HWR engineered geothermal systems: review of developments during the past 15 years. Geothermics, 28, 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Q. and Lees, J.M., 1998, Microseismicity, stress, and fracture in the Coso geothermal field, California. Tectonophysics, 289, 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geological Society of Korea, 2019, Summary report of the Korean Government Commission on relations between the 2017 Pohang earthquake and EGS project. The Geological Society of Korea, Seoul, Korea, 127 p. https://doi.org/10.22719/KETEP-20183010111860

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronseth, J. and Kry, P., 1982, Instantaneous shut-in pressure and its relationship to the minimum in-situ stress. In: Zoback, M. and Haimson, B. (eds.), Proceedings of Workshop XVII on Hydraulic Fracture Stress Measurement, U.S. Geological Survey, p. 147–166. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr821075

  • Haimson, B. and Cornet, F., 2003, ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation—Part 3: Hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF). International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 40, 1011–1020.

  • Haimson, B.C., Lee, M.Y., and Song, I., 2003, Shallow hydraulic fracturing measurements in Korea support tectonic and seismic indicators of regional stress. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 40, 1243–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, C. and Hamid, O., 2008, In-situ stress regime in the Viking Formation, Southwest Saskatchewan. 61st Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Edmonton, Canada, Sep. 21–24, p. 21–24.

  • Heidbach, O., Rajabi, M., Reiter, K., Ziegler, M., and WSM Team, 2016, World Stress Map Database Release 2016, V. 1.1. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/WSM.2016.001 [Accessed on 15 February].

  • Hudson, J. and Cooling, C., 1988, In situ rock stresses and their measurement in the UK—Part I. The current state of knowledge. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 25, 363–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T., Evans, K., Kawai, K., and Hayashi, K., 1999, Hydraulic fracture reopening pressure and the estimation of maximum horizontal stress. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 36, 811–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, Y., Chang, C., Ji, S.-H., and Park, K.-W., 2019, In situ stress states at KURT, an underground research laboratory in South Korea for the study of high-level radioactive waste disposal. Engineering Geology, 259, 105198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, W., Jiang, B., Miao, Q., Wang, J., Qu, Z., and Li, M., 2018, Variation of in situ stress regime in coal reservoirs, eastern Yunnan region, South China: implications for coalbed methane production. AAPG Bulletin, 102, 2283–2303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, W., Jiang, B., Qin, Y., Wu, C., Wang, G., Qu, Z., and Li, M., 2019, The present-day in-situ stress field within coalbed methane reservoirs, Yuwang Block, Laochang Basin, South China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 102, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Synn, J.H., Park, C., Song, W.K., Park, E.S., Jung, Y.B., Cheon, D.S., Bae, S., Choi, S.O., Chang, C., and Min, K.B., 2021, Korea stress map 2020 using hydraulic fracturing and overcoring data. Tunnel and Underground Space, 31, 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckshinrichs, W. and Hake, J.-F., 2015, Carbon Capture, Storage and Use: Technical, Economic, Environmental and Societal Perspectives. Springer International Publisher, Cham, Switzerland, 347 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari, W., Ranjith, P., Perera, M., Shao, S., Chen, B., Lashin, A., Al Arifi, N., and Rathnaweera, T., 2017, Mechanical behaviour of Australian Strathbogie granite under in-situ stress and temperature conditions: an application to geothermal energy extraction. Geothermics, 65, 44–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.Y. and Haimson, B.C., 1989, Statistical evaluation of hydraulic fracturing stress measurement parameters. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 26, 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F. and Qi, Y., 1990, Variation of crustal stresses with depth in China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 17, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Li, Q., Bai, B., Wei, N., and Yuan, W., 2016, The geomechanics of Shenhua carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) demonstration project in Ordos Basin, China. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 8, 948–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Tang, D., Xu, H., and Yu, T., 2014, In-situ stress distribution and its implication on coalbed methane development in Liulin area, eastern Ordos basin, China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 122, 488–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X. and Zoback, M.D., 2017, Lithology-controlled stress variations and pad-scale faults: a case study of hydraulic fracturing in the Woodford Shale, Oklahoma. Geophysics, 82, ID35–ID44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maerten, L., Gillespie, P., and Pollard, D.D., 2002, Effects of local stress perturbation on secondary fault development. Journal of Structural Geology, 24, 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K.V., 1975, Statistics of directional data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37, 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, S., Hangx, S., Juhlin, C., Kühn, M., and Kempka, T., 2017, Energy, resources and the environment: meeting the challenges of the future. Energy Procedia, 125, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. and Lanyon, G., 2003, Measurement of in-situ stress in weak rocks at Mont Terri Rock Laboratory, Switzerland. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 40, 1077–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning, Y., Tang, H., Smith, J.V., Zhang, B., Shen, P., and Zhang, G., 2021, Study of the in situ stress field in a deep valley and its influence on rock slope stability in Southwest China. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 80, 3331–3350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishiwaki, T., Lin, A., and Lin, W., 2018, Recovery of stress during the interseismic period around the seismogenic fault of the 1995 Mw 6.9 Kobe earthquake, Japan. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 12,814–12,820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, L., Volckaert, G., and Mallants, D., 2002, Gas generation and migration in Boom Clay, a potential host rock formation for nuclear waste storage. Engineering Geology, 64, 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., Ree, J.-H., and Yoo, S.-H., 2006, Fault slip analysis of Quaternary faults in southeastern Korea. Gondwana Research, 9, 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.-C., Kim, W., Chung, T.W., Baag, C.-E., and Ree, J.-H., 2007, Focal mechanisms of recent earthquakes in the Southern Korean Peninsula. Geophysical Journal International, 169, 1103–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, C., Chang, C., Jang, Y., Kutty, A., and Jeong, J., 2020, Effect of faults and rock physical properties on in situ stress within highly heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 185, 106601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusch, R., 2009, Geological Storage of Highly Radioactive Waste. Springer, Berlin, Germany 379 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ree, J.-H., Kim, K.-H., Lim, H., Seo, W., Kim, S., An, X., and Kim, Y., 2021, Fault reactivation and propagation during the 2017 Pohang earthquake sequence. Geothermics, 92, 102048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, K., 2021, Stress rotation - impact and interaction of rock stiffness and faults. Solid Earth, 12, 1287–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, K., Heidbach, O., Schmitt, D., Haug, K., Ziegler, M., and Moeck, I., 2014, A revised crustal stress orientation database for Canada. Tectonophysics, 636, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist, J., Tsang, C.-F., and Stephansson, O., 2000, Uncertainty in the maximum principal stress estimated from hydraulic fracturing measurements due to the presence of the induced fracture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 37, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, W.Z. and Swolfs, H.S., 1986, Tectonic and gravitational stress in long symmetric ridges and valleys. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 91, 3677–3685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, I., Chang, C., Lee, J., Hong, T.-K., and Park, E.-S., 2018, Tectonic stress orientations and magnitudes, and friction of faults, deduced from earthquake focal mechanism inversions over the Korean Peninsula. Geophysical Journal International, 213, 1360–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephansson, O. and Zang, A., 2012, ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation—Part 5: Establishing a model for the in situ stress at a given site. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 45, 955–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synn, J.-H., Park, C., and Lee, B.-J., 2013, Regional distribution pattern and geo-historical transition of in-situ stress fields in the Korean peninsula. Tunnel and Underground Space, 23, 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taherynia, M.H., Aghda, S.M.F., and Fahimifar, A., 2016, In-situ stress state and tectonic regime in different depths of earth crust. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 34, 679–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teufel, L.W., 1989, Influence of lithology and geologic structure on in situ stress: examples of stress heterogeneity in reservoirs. Report No. SAND-89-1435C; CONF-890620-1, Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, USA, 18 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-434066-4.50030-8

  • Vavryčuk, V., 2014, Iterative joint inversion for stress and fault orientations from focal mechanisms. Geophysical Journal International, 199, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yale, D.P., 2003, Fault and stress magnitude controls on variations in the orientation of in situ stress. In: Ameen, M.S. (ed.), Fracture and In-Situ Stress Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 209, p. 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, W., Zou, L., Li, H., Deng, J., Ge, H., and Wang, H., 2017, Investigation of casing deformation during hydraulic fracturing in high geostress shale gas play. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 150, 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zang, A. and Stephansson, O., 2009, Stress Field of the Earth’s Crust. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 324 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Basic Research Projects of the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea (GP2018-009). It was also supported by a grant funded by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP: No. 20212010200020). We appreciate constructive reviews from two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandong Chang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, M., Chang, C., Bae, S. et al. Spatial variation of in situ stress at shallow depth in South Korea. Geosci J 27, 321–335 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-023-0002-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-023-0002-0

Key words

Navigation