Abstract
Purpose
Using an abductive perspective, this study aims to review the scientific literature about the governance and management of the digital supply chain (DSC) in the context of the business organizations, providing an overview of the state of the art of the research and outlining a future research agenda with a knowledge management (KM) focus.
Design/methodology/approach
After investigating the Scopus database, 54 articles were identified as relevant and then subjected to an initial discernment. After this assessment, 34 articles focusing on operations management were further analyzed through both a bibliometric analysis and a content analysis.
Findings
The DSC represents a research area of increasing attention, with relevant contributions to several aspects of the field, as well as about KM. At the same time, the results show that the scientific literature on DSC models, solutions and applications is fragmented. Although the analysis has found a heterogeneous literature, two main streams of research seem to emerge: KM in the business culture development about DSC and KM in the business technological evolution about DSC.
Originality/value
Although there exists growing interest in the scientific community, or perhaps because of this, area of research remains fragmented and under-theorized, thus requiring more systematic studies considering both economic and social aspects of the DSC. This study aims to provide innovative insights about this evolution, especially highlighting the two main contributions of KM in DSCs that have been revealed (business culture development and business technological evolution).
Keywords
Citation
Gagliardi, A.R., Festa, G., Usai, A., Dell'Anno, D. and Rossi, M. (2023), "The impact of knowledge management on the digital supply chain – a bibliometric literature review", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 53 No. 5/6, pp. 612-627. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-07-2022-0206
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2023, Anna Roberta Gagliardi, Giuseppe Festa, Antonio Usai, Davide Dell'Anno and Matteo Rossi
License
Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
1. Introduction
Technological progress and subsequent digitalization are revolutionizing business environments, markets, models and, more specifically, the ways enterprises work (Xu et al., 2018; Rajput and Singh, 2019). The advent of innovative computer science applications, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), cloud computing (CC), blockchain (BC), big data analysis (BDA), artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and so on, drives business organizations to embrace digitalization even in the supply chain (SC) (Queiroz et al., 2019).
The adoption of SC digitalization will improve the entire organizational process, from numerous perspectives (information sharing, transparency, productivity, resilience, sustainability and so on), although naturally even negative consequences must be accurately considered, for example about the work experience (Orhan et al., 2022); more generally, in a supply chain management (SCM) context, business organizations will enhance customer support by building better business relationships and generating more revenue opportunities (Ageron et al., 2020; Preindl et al., 2020). Digital supply chain (DSC) has thus become a standard term within a generic business scenario, with the intent to transform the SC processes by adopting digital technologies (MacCarthy et al., 2016; Legner et al., 2017).
In the scientific literature, the potential definitions of DSC have been discussed from several perspectives, with related focus on the new digital technologies that have each characterized all the types and activities of the SC; these always provide evidence that the use of digitalization in the SC is no longer simply a choice but a requirement for companies to remain competitive in the market. In this respect, the change from traditional SC to DSC, therefore, is fundamental for the survival of business organizations (Hartley and Sawaya, 2019; Agrawal et al., 2020).
In addition, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has provoked significant disruptions across the globe in the integrated SCM, such as border closures, social distancing and trade restrictions (Belhadi et al., 2021; Narayanan et al., 2021). However, the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis has increasingly highlighted the importance of digital technologies and the subsequent SCM digitalization by simultaneously providing innovation and sustainability to the business models in the vast field of SC (Chatterjee et al., 2022).
For all these reasons, this study aims to provide support and guidance in evaluating the adoption of the DSC, its design, implementation and valorization, assuming knowledge management (KM) as the fundamental focus of the investigation, due to the increasing success of the knowledge era, society and economy, both in the SC context (Desouza et al., 2003; Anand et al., 2022) and the DSC context (Dhaigude et al., 2021; Sanderson et al., 2022). Starting from these considerations, this study elaborates on a bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature in the field to determine the main trends in this direction, with subsequent considerations in terms of theoretical and practical implications, highlighting the possible limits of the investigation and suggesting potential future research developments.
2. Theoretical background
Since the current research is based on a bibliometric literature review (BLR), an analysis of the previous scientific literature in the field, upon which an investigation is based. This may not appear to be strictly indispensable, because the precise aim of a BLR is to ascertain (and not to move from) existing patterns of research. However, a general introduction to the theme of SCM in terms of the potential impact of the digitalization is vital to comprehensively outline the issue under analysis (Seyedghorban et al., 2020; Hennelly et al., 2020; Bigliardi et al., 2022).
In truth, the increasing success currently interesting the SC world is not recent, meaning that the governance of the overall system of the operators involved in the integration of the manufacturing and of the distribution streaming is not a necessity/opportunity that regards only the ongoing digital disruption; above all, this starts with more general sensitivity about the managerial perspective of the context (Bendavid et al., 2010; Klaas Jagersma, 2011; Dehghan-Bonari et al., 2021). At the same time, however, the literature must admit that, although the concept of SC is undoubtedly connected to an organizational point of view, it was only with the adoption of ever more interconnected technologies, from the Electronic Data Interchange to the internet, that the success of the SCM has become unstoppable (Fabbe-Costes and Lechaptois, 2022).
In addition, this continuous growth and development has been hugely expanded with the advent of Industry 4.0, which focuses on increasing the efficiency, productivity and resilience of the operator performance of those involved in the manufacturing and distribution flow (Chauhan and Singh, 2020). Furthermore, a new approach is emerging, i.e. Industry 5.0, which combines Industry 4.0's orientation with a more human-centered vision (Nayeri et al., 2022) and which has been officially adopted as the main trajectory of development by the European Union, being a declared policy of the European Commission more specifically (research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/industrial-research-and-innovation/industry-50_en).
Therefore, the theme of digitalization in connection to the SCM is physiological and relevant, most of all considering that the technological evolution is expected to be increasingly fast, sophisticated and impactful (Solís-Quinteros et al., 2022); in this vein, the opportunity to investigate the potential relationships and interactions with the KM sphere is very attractive, more specifically if adopting a BLR. In fact, a search on Scopus, operated in April 2022, on “TITLE” OR “ABSTRACT” OR “KEYWORDS”, using the following query:
And it returned no result, thus revealing a theoretical gap in the field. Accordingly, the following investigation has been conducted.
3. Research design
This study has been conceived in the form of a BLR to investigate and determine the potential main research areas that interest the world of digitalization in the SCM, aiming to recognize trends, progress and potentialities in the field (Tranfield et al., 2003; Petticrew and Roberts, 2006; Massaro et al., 2016; Ardito et al., 2019; Kraus et al., 2020; Durach et al., 2021). More specifically, as previously mentioned, the focus concerns the role of knowledge in these contexts; in this respect, the main research questions of this study are.
How has the scientific SC literature been developed according to the prominent adoption of knowledge in digitalization?
What are the main focuses of the scientific literature investigating the adoption of knowledge in digitalization for SCM?
A specific protocol for the document search, the article selection and the data analysis has been engineered. First, it has been deliberated to investigate the Scopus database, one of the most relevant at the international level and preferred to Scholar (which is larger, but even vaguer) and to Web-Of-Science (which is more severe in including publications, but consequently even smaller) (Waltman, 2016; Mishra et al., 2017; Thelwall, 2018); the Scopus database, detailing research focused on knowledge, was initially enlarged to include socio-economic areas (and related fields).
Regarding the survey perimeter, the query has investigated the following fields: “Title” OR “Keywords” OR “Abstract”. Each of these fields has been investigated adopting the following syntax: “supply chain” AND “digitalization” AND “knowledge”.
The initial outcome of the research provided a total of 92 documents published in the period from 2005 to 2022, because 2005 is the year in which the first paper respecting the query criteria was published. All the data were collected in April 2022.
Subsequently, the 92 documents were initially investigated to detect papers suitable for further analysis. In this discernment, the following steps were implemented.
92 documents were extracted from the Scopus database as results of the query.
23 documents were excluded as not specifically pertinent to the fields of Business, Management and Accounting (considering the vast impact of knowledge in other scientific fields) (thus, 92–23 = 69).
15 documents were excluded after investigating their titles and abstracts, because they did not show correspondence with DSC, with the terms “supply chain” and “digitalization” not being mentioned in combination, but only as terms in the text (thus, 69–15 = 54).
54 documents were finally detected as properly in line with the focus of the research, i.e. to investigate the knowledge role in the DSC.
The dataset under investigation includes case studies and empirical studies, developed both qualitatively and quantitatively. All these documents have been subjected to a bibliometric investigation.
4. The analysis
The investigation on the 54 documents/papers/articles has been implemented using VOSviewer, specific software for visualizing and constructing bibliometric networks and clusters (Van Eck and Waltman, 2014). This application allows researchers to aggregate and analyze the relationships among articles through a bibliographic coupling analysis, i.e. evaluating the relationships of the articles in the sample under analysis (Kessler, 1963). This technique occurs when a paper is cited by two other papers (Li et al., 2017) to appraise the overlapping literature between/among the studies.
The starting point of the clustering process (Waltman et al., 2010) is to consider the distances between nodes; therefore, the groups are determined by minimizing such distances. The fractional counting is used for all the analyses performed with VOSviewer (Leydesdorff and Opthof, 2010).
4.1 The bibliometric study: the descriptive analysis
As illustrated by Figure 1, which examines the time interval of the publications, the research area under consideration appears rather recent. Indeed, as mentioned in Section 3, the first article was published in 2005. However, the BLR shows that no other papers were published until 2016, with subsequent increasing interest by the scientific community commencing in 2018, highlighting that the topic remains in the early stages of its development.
When providing a time comparison of the number of published papers in relation to the number of citations, Figure 2 shows consistent growth from 2019 to 2021. This evidence confirms the recent interest of the scientific community towards the theme of DSC when focused on knowledge.
As concerns the journals that have been retrieved from the inquiry, Table 1 lists the 15 most relevant journals based on the number of scientific publications. Based on this investigation, the International Journal of Production Research is the journal with the highest values, both for the number of published articles (3) and the number of citations (588).
Table 2 provides the ranking of the first ten articles and, therefore, their authors, according to the number of Citations Per Year (CPY) of the articles under investigation. The CPY is a measure of the scientific influence on the academic community and Ivanov et al.'s (2019) article is the most cited in general and the most cited per year.
In summary, the descriptive analysis of the bibliometric study seems to provide the following two answers to RQ1 (“How has the scientific SC literature been developed according to the prominent adoption of knowledge in digitalization?”). First, publications in the field commenced in 2005, but it was only in 2019 that a significant number of studies began to enter the scientific debate (and this is true even for related citations), demonstrating that this research topic is undoubtedly a novelty. Second, the journal with the highest number of citations (overall; other journals do feature on the list) is the same as the journal publishing the articles with the highest number of citations per article, showing some concentration of the scientific community on some specific scopes.
4.2 The bibliometric study: bibliographic mapping
To identify the key issues that may link the concept of SCM with that of digitalization, another technique belonging to the bibliometric analysis process has been adopted: bibliographic mapping. The mapping methodology allows researchers to extract information about the most influential research, with a double advantage: on the one hand, scholars may turn their scientific interest towards both more or less frequently investigated topics; on the other hand, managers may be provided with an exhaustive, more comprehensible and up-to-date perspective of the topic in question, intending to rapidly translate theoretical knowledge into best practices (Börner et al., 2005; Mital et al., 2018).
Of the overall 54 scientific articles, 34 have been selected through a bibliometric clustering process (cf. Table 3 and Figure 3), because they are the “only” articles that possess themes in common. These 34 articles were subsequently subjected to a content analysis, adopting the technique of the affinity diagrams to identify the potential main aggregations with scientific interest. In this respect, two primary Research Areas (RAs) were finally identified: KM in the business culture development in the DSC and KM in the business technological evolution in the DSC. These constitute the two main answers of the bibliographic mapping within the bibliometric study, specifically concerning RQ2 (“What are the main focuses of the scientific literature investigating the adoption of knowledge in digitalization for SCM?”).
4.3 RA no. 1. knowledge management in the business culture development in the DSC
Knowledge transfer seems to emerge as the most prominent area of specialization of the debate. Several contributions have been identified in this area focusing on models of knowledge transfer from theory to practice.
The most relevant articles belonging to this first perspective are: Pal (2016), Khan et al. (2019), Martinelli and Tunisini (2019) and Khan et al. (2021). When aggregating the different contributions, there is a substantial proposal for the implementation of an integrated knowledge-based system to assess the impact of the DSC on business organizations.
The survey contexts were different, from manufacturing to textiles. Through the development of such knowledge systems, there is a significant expectation about the managerial potentiality to better monitor and coordinate company performance when adopting a DSC, with improvements in the transparency of the processes and greater collaboration in the creation of business value.
4.4 RA no. 2. knowledge management in the business technological evolution in the DSC
This aggregation includes all the studies that have qualitatively and quantitatively described the importance of technology maturity in the development of the DSC. For example, a relevant topic in the field is connected to the adoption of BC: Qian and Papadonikolaki (2021) highlight just how applying the BC technology to the SCM could provide mechanisms of protection to avoid possible risks and, therefore, to render the global process of SCM more robust. Similarly, Yang et al. (2021) conducted an experimental study and stressed the validity of the BC technology to govern and manage the problems of knowledge sharing among the several SC stakeholders.
Other studies are highly relevant to the literature, because they provide an overview of the current state of the art about DSC from different points of view. For example, Yevu et al. (2021) suggest that in the construction industry the integration between Building Information Modeling systems and Industry 4.0 solutions is essential for future research opportunities, with the goal of advancing the DSC technology in a sustainable environment. By contrast, Lammers et al. (2019) and Dolgui et al. (2020) both provide useful contributions to business managers for deciphering opportunities and especially barriers in the transformation from the traditional SC to the DSC, suggesting practical achievements at the organizational, technological and managerial levels in terms of decision support systems to incentivize progress towards the DSC.
5. Theoretical and practical implications
From a scientific perspective, one of the most relevant outcomes seems to regard the RAs (both RA1 and RA2) that emerged from the analysis. In other words, knowledge and consequent KM (in the form of knowledge accumulation, sharing, enhancement and so on) are vital in facilitating and valorizing the digitalization of the SCM processes, with particular reference to the BC technology, as concluded by several studies (Hennelly et al., 2020; ElRefae and Nuseir, 2021; Kwon and Ahn, 2021), ensuring greater transparency and trust for the various stakeholders, even in terms of the sustainability of the global SC (Chin et al., 2022).
However, the literature must observe that this role is evident, attracting increasing interest from the scientific community, but there does not yet exist a mature vision about the KM in the DSCs, with a blatant fragmentation not only as concerns the different themes of research, but also as concerns the different contexts of the case studies analyzed so far. Thus, the current state of the art, the most relevant implication of the research, in addition to RA1 and RA2 as potential avenues to continuously explore, is the necessity and/or opportunity of finding conceptual aggregations that could provide major stability to this undoubtedly innovative theme of study.
Furthermore, from a managerial point of view, the development of KM in DSCs is fundamental, through guidelines, protocols, platforms and projects, inevitably respecting the different contexts of action. In fact, through the operational application of KM methodologies, techniques and tools in the DSC it will be possible to move from an initial stage to a more consolidated and even more advanced phase of this phenomenon, particularly emphasizing the contributions of RA1, i.e. in terms of business culture development.
Secondly, with specific reference to RA2, i.e. in terms of business technological evolution, it is to highlight the significant contribution that KM may provide in terms of professional competences when evolving to increasingly advanced digital solutions. In this respect, above all, the “traditional” operations of knowledge sharing (i.e. socialization, interiorization, exteriorization and combination) should coherently evolve with the progress of the technological level of the overall SC, remembering, as previously described, that SCM, before being an integrated computer science architecture, was an integrated managerial platform.
6. Research limits
The main limitation of the study is still the small number of articles in the dataset under investigation, due to the innovative and still mostly unexplored research theme in the scientific literature. In the future, a comparative analysis, including Scholar and Web-Of-Science, with all the relating limits, could provide a different overview of the phenomenon, but this potential enlargement should be managed very carefully, considering the specific characteristics of these databases that have been mentioned.
Another limitation likely concerns the shortness of the time interval, i.e. from 2005 (and then 2016 and 2018) onwards. However, this limit is structural and cannot be solved by adopting a different research methodology; this thus requires major production in the field to expand the validity of similar research in the future.
7. Conclusion
To understand the state of the art and to outline the potential research agenda about the role of KM in the context of DSC, a complete review of the scientific literature of this topic has been considered appropriate. More specifically, in this study a BLR has been conducted, examining the evolution over time of the most relevant studies in the field. In addition, a bibliographic mapping has helped to determine the main themes of the extant literature, essentially resumable in RA1 (KM in the business culture development in the DSC) and RA2 (KM in the business technological evolution in the DSC).
These two RAs are the most promising in the evolution of the studies in the field, also because the research production is very fragmented and only 34 papers of the 54 under analysis have potential themes in common, emphasizing the role of RA1 and RA2 as stable aggregations of scientific interest; this is true at least at the forefront and for the foreseeable future, even considering the relative newness of the topic (as shown by the descriptive analysis of the BLR). However, the limited sample of studies emerging from the literature review, together with the unstoppable diffusion of KM, suggests that this is a field of research with very limited investigation, providing huge opportunities for development at the scientific and managerial levels.
Figures
Top 15 journals as concerns number of records (articles/citations)
| Journal | Articles | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| International Journal of Production Research | 3 | 588 |
| International Journal of Production Economics | 1 | 57 |
| International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management | 1 | 55 |
| Production Planning and Control | 1 | 46 |
| Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management | 1 | 39 |
| Journal of Cleaner Production | 3 | 31 |
| Supply Chain Management | 3 | 28 |
| Industrial Management and Data Systems | 2 | 17 |
| Industrial Marketing Management | 2 | 17 |
| Proceedings of the IEEE | 1 | 17 |
| Journal of Risk Research | 2 | 17 |
| Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management | 1 | 17 |
| Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing | 2 | 15 |
| Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review | 1 | 13 |
| International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research | 1 | 7 |
Source(s): Authors' elaboration
Top ten author and article per citation and citation per year (CPY)
| Authors | Title | Year | Source title | Cited | CPY | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivanov Dolgui and Sokolov | The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics | 2019 | International Journal of Production Research | 475 | 158.3 | 1 |
| Dolgui Ivanov and Sokolov | Reconfigurable supply chain: the X-network | 2020 | International Journal of Production Research | 111 | 55.5 | 2 |
| Cai and Lo | Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: A systematic review and future research agenda | 2020 | International Journal of Production Economics | 57 | 28.5 | 4 |
| Jocevski Arvidsson Miragliotta Ghezzi and Mangiaracina | Transitions towards omni-channel retailing strategies: a business model perspective | 2019 | International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management | 55 | 18.3 | 6 |
| Zangiacomi Pessot Fornasiero Bertetti and Sacco | Moving towards digitalization: a multiple case study in manufacturing | 2020 | Production Planning and Control | 46 | 23 | 5 |
| Qian and Papadonikolaki | Shifting trust in construction supply chains through blockchain technology | 2021 | Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management | 39 | 39 | 3 |
| Khan Chaabane and Dweiri | A knowledge-based system for overall supply chain performance evaluation: a multi-criteria decision making approach | 2019 | Supply Chain Management | 19 | 6.3 | 9 |
| Bressanelli Pigosso Saccani and Perona | Enablers, levers and benefits of Circular Economy in the Electrical and Electronic Equipment supply chain: a literature review | 2021 | Journal of Cleaner Production | 17 | 17 | 7 |
| Martinelli and Tunisini | Customer integration into supply chains: literature review and research propositions | 2019 | Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing | 15 | 5 | 10 |
| Sarkis Kouhizadeh and Zhu | Digitalization and the greening of supply chains | 2021 | Industrial Management and Data Systems | 15 | 15 | 8 |
Source(s): Authors' elaboration
Clusters emerging from the bibliometric coupling
| Cluster | Author | Citations | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1 (10 items - red) | Agnihotri et al. (2022) | 1 | Utilizing social media in a supply chain B2B setting: A knowledge perspective |
| Alhawari et al. (2021) | 1 | Supply chain emerging aspects and future directions in the age of covid-19: A systematic review | |
| Cai and Lo (2020) | 57 | Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: A systematic review and future research agenda | |
| Gustafsson et al. (2019) | 7 | Digital product fitting in retail supply chains: maturity levels and potential outcomes | |
| Hänninen et al. (2021) | 7 | From the store to omni-channel retail: looking back over three decades of research | |
| Jocevski et al. (2019) | 55 | Transitions towards omni-channel retailing strategies: a business model perspective | |
| Kumar et al. (2022) | 3 | Implementation barriers of smart technology in Indian sustainable warehouse by using a Delphi-ISM-ANP approach | |
| Muñoz-Leiva et al. (2021) | 3 | Past, present and future research on self-service merchandising: a co-word and text mining approach | |
| Nitsche et al. (2021) | 1 | Application areas and antecedents of automation in logistics and supply chain management: a conceptual framework | |
| Song et al. (2021) | 2 | Linking digitalization and human capital to shape supply chain integration in omni-channel retailing | |
| Cluster 2 (8 items - green) | Hallikas et al. (2021) | 2 | Digitalizing procurement: the impact of data analytics on supply chain performance |
| Lomakina et al. (2021) | 1 | Redistribution of economic resources in the digital society | |
| Mahlamäki et al. (2020) | 11 | Adoption of digital sales force automation tools in supply chain: Customers' acceptance of sales configurators | |
| Maryniak and Bulhakova (2020) | 2 | Benefits of the Technology 4.0 Used in the Supply Chain - Bibliometric Analysis and Aspects Deferring Digitization | |
| Rossini et al. (2022) | 2 | Lean Production and Industry 4.0 integration: how Lean Automation is emerging in manufacturing industry | |
| Sarkis et al. (2021) | 15 | Digitalization and the greening of supply chains | |
| Simões et al. (2019) | 2 | Environmental Factors Influencing the Adoption of Digitalization Technologies in Automotive Supply Chains | |
| Zeng et al. (2020) | 13 | The adoption of open platform for container bookings in the maritime supply chain | |
| Cluster 3 (6 items - blue) | Aspara et al. (2021) | 6 | Consumer involvement in supply networks: A cubic typology of C2B2C and C2B2B business models |
| Khan et al. (2019) | 19 | A knowledge-based system for overall supply chain performance evaluation: a multi-criteria decision making approach | |
| Khan et al. (2021) | 3 | A knowledge-based experts' system for evaluation of digital supply chain readiness | |
| Lammers et al. (2019) | 5 | Towards a novel framework of barriers and drivers for digital transformation in industrial supply chains | |
| Martinelli and Tunisini (2019) | 15 | Customer integration into supply chains: literature review and research propositions | |
| Zighan (2022) | 1 | Managing the great bullwhip effects caused by COVID-19 | |
| Cluster 4 (4 items - yellow) | Bressanelli et al. (2021) | 17 | Enablers, levers and benefits of Circular Economy in the Electrical and Electronic Equipment supply chain: a literature review |
| Pal (2016) | 17 | Extended responsibility through servitization in PSS: An exploratory study of used-clothing sector | |
| Zangiacomi et al. (2018) | 4 | A Perspective for the Implementation of a Path Towards the Factory of the Future: The Italian Case | |
| Zangiacomi et al. (2020) | 46 | Moving towards digitalization: a multiple case study in manufacturing | |
| Cluster 5 (3 items - violet) | Dolgui et al. (2020) | 111 | Reconfigurable supply chain: the X-network |
| Ivanov et al. (2019) | 475 | The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics | |
| Schlüter (2019) | 5 | Procedure Model for Supply Chain Digitalization Scenarios for a Data-Driven Supply Chain Risk Management | |
| Cluster 6 (3 items – light blue) | Qian and Papadonikolaki (2021) | 39 | Shifting trust in construction supply chains through blockchain technology |
| Yang et al. (2021) | 2 | Blockchain for supply chain performance and logistics management | |
| Yevu et al. (2021) | 2 | Digitalization of construction supply chain and procurement in the built environment: Emerging technologies and opportunities for sustainable processes |
Source(s): Authors' elaboration
References
Ageron, B., Bentahar, O. and Gunasekaran, A. (2020), “Digital supply chain: challenges and future directions”, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 133-138.
Agnihotri, R., Kalra, A., Chen, H. and Daugherty, P.J. (2022), “Utilizing social media in a supply chain B2B setting: a knowledge perspective”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 189-208.
Agrawal, P., Narain, R. and Ullah, I. (2020), “Analysis of barriers in implementation of digital transformation of supply chain using interpretive structural modelling approach”, Journal of Modelling in Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 297-317.
Alhawari, O., Bhutta, K. and Muzzafar, A. (2021), “Supply chain emerging aspects and future directions in the age of covid-19: a systematic review”, Uncertain Supply Chain Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 429-446.
Anand, A., Shantakumar, V.P., Muskat, B., Singh, S.K., Dumazert, J.-P. and Riahi, Y. (2022), “The role of knowledge management in the tourism sector: a synthesis and way forward”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, doi: 10.1108/JKM-02-2022-0083.
Ardito, L., Scuotto, V., Del Giudice, M. and Petruzzelli, A.M. (2019), “A bibliometricanalysis of research on Big Data analytics for business and management”, Management Decision, Vol. 57 No. 8, pp. 1993-2009.
Aspara, J., Grant, D.B. and Holmlund, M. (2021), “Consumer involvement in supply networks: a cubic typology of C2B2C and C2B2B business models”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 93 No. 2021, pp. 356-369.
Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Jabbour, C.J.C., Gunasekaran, A., Ndubisi, N.O. and Venkatesh, M. (2021), “Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 163 No. 2021, pp. 1-19, (p. 120447 as starting page).
Bendavid, Y., Boeck, H. and Philippe, R. (2010), “Redesigning the replenishment process of medical supplies in hospitals with RFID”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 991-1013.
Bigliardi, B., Filippelli, S., Petroni, A. and Tagliente, L. (2022), “The digitalization of supply chain: a review”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 200 No. 2022, pp. 1806-1815.
Börner, K., Chen, C. and Boyack, K.W. (2005), “Visualizing knowledge domains”, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Information Today, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 179-255.
Bressanelli, G., Pigosso, D.C.A., Saccani, N. and Perona, M. (2021), “Enablers, levers and benefits of circular economy in the electrical and electronic equipment supply chain: a literature review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 298 No. 2021, p. 126819.
Cai, Y.-J. and Lo, C.K.Y. (2020), “Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: a systematic review and future research agenda”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 229 No. 2020, p. 107729.
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Izquierdo González, V., Kumar, A. and Singh, S.K. (2022), “Resource integration and dynamic capability of frontline employee during COVID-19 pandemic: from value creation and engineering management perspectives”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 176 No. 2022, pp. 1-13, (p. 121446 as starting page).
Chauhan, C. and Singh, A. (2020), “A review of Industry 4.0 in supply chain management studies”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 863-886.
Chin, T., Shi, Y., Singh, S.K., Agbanyo, G.K. and Ferraris, A. (2022), “Leveraging blockchain technology for green innovation in ecosystem-based business models: a dynamic capability of values appropriation”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 183 No. 2022, pp. 1-11, (p. 121908 as starting page).
Dehghan-Bonari, M., Bakhshi, A., Aghsami, A. and Jolai, F. (2021), “Green supply chain management through call option contract and revenue-sharing contract to cope with demand uncertainty”, Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, Vol. 2 No. 2021, pp. 1-12, (p. 100010 as starting page).
Desouza, K.C., Chattaraj, A. and Kraft, G. (2003), “Supply chain perspectives to knowledge management: research propositions”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 129-138.
Dhaigude, A.S., Kapoor, R., Gupta, N. and Padhi, S.S. (2021), “Linking supply chain integration to supply chain orientation and performance – a knowledge integration perspective from Indian manufacturing industries”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 25 No. 9, pp. 2293-2315.
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D. and Sokolov, B. (2020), “Reconfigurable supply chain: the X-network”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 58 No. 13, pp. 4138-4163.
Durach, C.F., Kembro, J.H. and Wieland, A. (2021), “How to advance theory through literature reviews in logistics and supply chain management”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 51 No. 10, pp. 1090-1107.
ElRefae, G. and Nuseir, M. (2021), “The relationship among digital business strategy, knowledge sharing and supply chain: exploring mediating effect of blockchain adoption”, Uncertain Supply Chain Management, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 1027-1036.
Fabbe-Costes, N. and Lechaptois, L. (2022), “Chapter 17 - automotive supply chain digitalization: lessons and perspectives”, in MacCarthy, B.L. and Ivanov, D. (Eds), The Digital Supply Chain, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, pp. 289-308.
Gustafsson, E., Jonsson, P. and Holmström, J. (2019), “Digital product fitting in retail supply chains: maturity levels and potential outcomes”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 574-589.
Hallikas, J., Immonen, M. and Brax, S. (2021), “Digitalizing procurement: the impact of data analytics on supply chain performance”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 629-646.
Hänninen, M., Kwan, S.K. and Mitronen, L. (2021), “From the store to omnichannel retail: looking back over three decades of research”, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 1-35.
Hartley, J.L. and Sawaya, W.J. (2019), “Tortoise, not the hare: digital transformation of supply chain business processes”, Business Horizons, Vol. 62 No. 6, pp. 707-715.
Hennelly, P.A., Singh Srai, J., Graham, G. and Wamba, S.F. (2020), “Rethinking supply chains in the age of digitalization”, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 31 Nos 2-3, pp. 93-95.
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A. and Sokolov, B. (2019), “The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 829-846.
Jocevski, M., Arvidsson, N., Miragliotta, G., Ghezzi, A. and Mangiaracina, R. (2019), “Transitions towards omni-channel retailing strategies: a business model perspective”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 78-93.
Kessler, M.M. (1963), “Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers”, American Documentation, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 10-25.
Khan, S.A., Chaabane, A. and Dweiri, F. (2019), “A knowledge-based system for overall supply chain performance evaluation: a multi-criteria decision making approach”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 377-396.
Khan, S.A., Naim, I., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gupta, H. and Idrisi, A.R. (2021), “A knowledge-based experts' system for evaluation of digital supply chain readiness”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 228 No. 2021, pp. 1-19, (p. 107262 as starting page).
Klaas Jagersma, P. (2011), “Competitive information logistics”, Business Strategy Series, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 136-145.
Kraus, S., Breier, M. and Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020), “The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 1023-1042.
Kumar, S., Raut, R.D., Narwane, V.S., Narkhede, B.E. and Muduli, K. (2022), “Implementation barriers of smart technology in Indian sustainable warehouse by using a Delphi-ISM-ANP approach”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 71 No. 3, pp. 696-721.
Kwon, Y. and Ahn, H. (2021), “A study on the determinants of blockchain-oriented supply chain management (SCM) services”, Knowledge Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 119-144.
Lammers, T., Tomidei, L. and Trianni, A. (2019), "Towards a novel framework of barriers and drivers for digital transformation in industrial supply chains", Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 25-29 August, Portland, OR, USA, pp. 1-6.
Legner, C., Eymann, T., Hess, T., Matt, C., Böhmann, T., Drews, P. and Ahlemann, F. (2017), “Digitalization: opportunity and challenge for the business and information systems engineering community”, Business and Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 59 No. 4, pp. 301-308.
Leydesdorff, L. and Opthof, T. (2010), “Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 61 No. 11, pp. 2365-2369.
Li, X., Wu, P., Shen, G.Q., Wang, X. and Teng, Y. (2017), “Mapping the knowledge domains of Building Information Modeling (BIM): a bibliometric approach”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 84 No. 2017, pp. 195-206.
Lomakina, O., Kookueva, V. and Makarenko, A. (2021), “Redistribution of economic resources in the digital society”, Business and Society Review, Vol. 126 No. 1, pp. 25-35.
MacCarthy, B., Blome, C., Olhager, J., Srai, J. and Zhao, X. (2016), “Supply chain evolution–theory, concepts, science”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 36 No. 12, pp. 1696-1718.
Mahlamäki, T., Storbacka, K., Pylkkönen, S. and Ojala, M. (2020), “Adoption of digital sales force automation tools in supply chain: customers’ acceptance of sales configurators”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 91 No. 2020, pp. 162-173.
Martinelli, E.M. and Tunisini, A. (2019), “Customer integration into supply chains: literature review and research propositions”, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 24-38.
Maryniak, A. and Bulhakova, Y. (2020), “Benefits of the technology 4.0 used in the supply chain - bibliometric analysis and aspects deferring digitization”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Information Systems, BIS 2020: Business Information Systems Workshops, 8-10 June, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, pp. 173-183.
Massaro, M., Handley, K., Bagnoli, C. and Dumay, J. (2016), “Knowledge management in small and medium enterprises: a structured literature review”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 258-291.
Mishra, D., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T. and Hazen, B. (2017), “Green supply chain performance measures: a review and bibliometric analysis”, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol. 10 No. 2017, pp. 85-99.
Mital, M., Del Giudice, M. and Papa, A. (2018), “Comparing supply chain risks for multiple product categories with cognitive mapping and analytic hierarchy process”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 131 No. 2018, pp. 159-170.
Muñoz-Leiva, F., Rodríguez López, M.E., Liebana-Cabanillas, F. and Moro, S. (2021), “Past, present, and future research on self-service merchandising: a co-word and text mining approach”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55 No. 8, pp. 2269-2307.
Narayanan, A., Mackelprang, A.W. and Malhotra, M.K. (2021), “System performance implications ofcapacity and flexibility constraints on bullwhip effect in supply chains”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 783-801.
Nayeri, S., Sazvar, Z. and Heydari, J. (2022), “Towards a responsive supply chain based on the Industry 5.0 dimensions: a novel decision-making method”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 213 No. Part C, pp. 1-35, (p. 119267 as starting page).
Nitsche, B., Straube, F. and Wirth, M. (2021), “Application areas and antecedents of automation in logistics and supply chain management: a conceptual framework”, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 223-239.
Orhan, M.A., Khelladi, I., Castellano, S. and Singh, S.K. (2022), “Work experience on algorithm-based platforms: the bright and dark sides of turking”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 183 No. 2022, pp. 1-10, (p. 121907 as starting page).
Pal, R. (2016), “Extended responsibility through servitization in PSS: an exploratory study of used-clothing sector”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 453-470.
Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H. (2006), Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide, Blackwell, Oxford.
Preindl, R., Nikolopoulos, K. and Litsiou, K. (2020), “Transformation strategies for the supply chain: the impact of Industry 4.0 and digital transformation”, Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 26-34.
Qian, X.A. and Papadonikolaki, E. (2021), “Shifting trust in construction supply chains through blockchain technology”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 584-602.
Queiroz, M.M., Pereira, S.C.F., Telles, R. and Machado, M.C. (2019), “Industry 4.0 and digital supply chain capabilities”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 1761-1782.
Rajput, S. and Singh, S.P. (2019), “Identifying Industry 4.0 IoT enablers by integrated PCA-ISM-DEMATEL approach”, Management Decision, Vol. 57 No. 8, pp. 1784-1817.
Rossini, M., Costa, F., Tortorella, G.L., Valvo, A. and Portioli-Staudacher, A. (2022), “Lean production and industry 4.0 integration: how lean automation is emerging in manufacturing industry”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 60 No. 21, pp. 6430-6450.
Sanderson, J., Esfahbodi, A. and Lonsdale, C. (2022), “The effect of team-member knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) and a common learning experience on sourcing teamwork effectiveness”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 52 Nos 5/6, pp. 393-413.
Sarkis, J., Kouhizadeh, M. and Zhu, Q.S. (2021), “Digitalization and the greening of supply chains”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 121 No. 1, pp. 65-85.
Schlüter, F. (2019), “Procedure model for supply chain digitalization scenarios for a data-driven supply chain risk management”, in Zsidisin, G. and Henke, M. (Eds), Revisiting Supply Chain Risk. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, Springer, Cham, Vol. 7, pp. 137-154.
Seyedghorban, Z., Tahernejad, H., Meriton, R. and Graham, G. (2020), “Supply chain digitalization: past, present and future”, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 31 Nos 2-3, pp. 96-114.
Simões, A., Oliveira, L., Rodrigues, J.C., Simas, O., Dalmarco, G. and Barros, A.C. (2019), “Environmental factors influencing the adoption of digitalization technologies in automotive supply chains”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 17-19 June, Valbonne Sophia-Antipolis, France, pp. 1-7.
Solís-Quinteros, M.M., Ávila-López, L.A., Zayas-Márquez, C. and Arredondo-Soto, K.C. (2022), “Digital evolution in supply chain management with industry 4.0”, in García Alcaraz, J.L. and Realyvásquez Vargas, A. (Eds), Algorithms and Computational Techniques Applied to Industry. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, Springer, Cham, Vol. 435, pp. 65-85.
Song, S., Shi, X., Song, G. and Huq, F.A. (2021), “Linking digitalization and human capital to shape supply chain integration in omni-channel retailing”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 121 No. 11, pp. 2298-2317.
Thelwall, M. (2018), “Dimensions: a competitor to Scopus and the web of science?”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 430-435.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003), “Towards a methodology for developing evidence informed management knowledge by means of systematic review”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 207-222.
Van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2014), “Visualizing bibliometric networks”, in Rousseau, R., Ding, Y. and Wolfram, D. (Eds), Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice, Springer, Cham, pp. 285-320.
Waltman, L. (2016), “A review of the literature on citation impact indicators”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 365-391.
Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J. and Noyons, E.C. (2010), “A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 629-635.
Xu, L.D., Xu, E.L. and Li, L. (2018), “Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 56 No. 8, pp. 2941-2962.
Yang, J., Ma, X., Crespo, R.G. and Martínez, O.S. (2021), “Blockchain for supply chain performance and logistics management”, Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 429-441.
Yevu, S.K., Yu, A.T.W. and Darko, A. (2021), “Digitalization of construction supply chain and procurement in the built environment: emerging technologies and opportunities for sustainable processes”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 322 No. 2021, pp. 1-14, (p. 129093 as starting page).
Zangiacomi, A., Pessot, E., Fornasiero, R., Bertetti, M. and Sacco, M. (2020), “Moving towards digitalization: a multiple case study in manufacturing”, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 31 No. 2-3, pp. 143-157.
Zangiacomi, A., Sacco, M., Pessot, E., De Zan, A. and Bertetti, M. (2018), “A perspective for the implementation of a path towards the factory of the future: the italian case”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 17-20 June, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 1-9.
Zeng, F., Chan, H.K and Pawar, K. (2020), “The adoption of open platform for container bookings in the maritime supply chain”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 141 No. (2020), pp. 1-16 (p. 102019 as starting page).
Zighan, S. (2022), “Managing the great bullwhip effects caused by COVID-19”, Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 28-47.
Corresponding author
About the authors
Anna Roberta Gagliardi is PhD Candidate at the Department of Economics of the University of Foggia (Italy). She is Clinical Engineer. Her scientific research is characterized by cross-disciplinary focus, with specific interest on clinical risk management, patient safety, clinical reorganization, digital health and digital transformation in healthcare. She has also investigated the application of operations management in various technological aspects of the production (from process organization to process management), presenting her studies in international conferences and publishing at international level.
Giuseppe Festa is Associate Professor of Management at the Department of Economics and Statistics of the University of Salerno (Italy). He holds a PhD in Economics and Management of Public Organizations from the University of Salerno, where he is the Scientific Director of the Laboratory on “Food and Wine Communication and Reputation Management” and the Scientific Director of the Postgraduate Course in “Wine Business.” He is also the Chairman of the Euromed Research Interest Committee on “Wine Business.” His research interests focus mainly on wine business, information systems, corporate venture capital and healthcare management.
Antonio Usai is Associate Professor of Management. He teaches Strategic Marketing for Tourism and Innovation Management at the Department of Economics and Business of the University of Sassari (Italy). He is Member of the Academic Board of the PhD program in Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods of the University of Sassari and his major research interests include innovation management, strategic management and consumer behavior. He is the founder of Tourism Plus (Spin-Off of the University of Sassari), which is specialized in innovation, research and development in the tourist sector.
Davide Dell'Anno is Associate Professor of Management at the Department of Economics of the University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli,” where he teaches Sector Analysis and Business Planning in the Master's Degree Course in “Economics and Management.” Since March 2014 he has been an Adjunct Professor at the College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. His current research interests are about academic entrepreneurship, business absorptive capacity and local development and knowledge transfer from University to Industry. In recent years he has been team leader and consultant for numerous research groups of “future entrepreneurs” and he is co-inventor of a registered patent. Since January 2020 he is the Rector's Delegate for the Master's Degree Courses of the University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli.”
Matteo Rossi is Associate Professor of Corporate Finance at the University of Sannio (Benevento, Italy), where he received the Ph.D. degree in Management. He is also an Adjunct Professor of Advanced Corporate Finance at LUISS Guido Carli - Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali (Rome, Italy). He is the Editor-in-Chief for the International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting and for the International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance.