Abstract
For geophysical inversion problems, deterministic inversion methods can easily fall into local optimal solutions, while stochastic optimization methods can theoretically converge to global optimal solutions. These problems have always been a concern for researchers. Among many stochastic optimization methods, particle swarm optimization (PSO) has been applied to solve geophysical inversion problems due to its simple principle and the fact that only a few parameters require adjustment. To overcome the nonuniqueness of inversion, model constraints can be added to PSO optimization. However, using fixed regularization parameters in PSO iteration is equivalent to keeping the default model constraint at a certain level, yielding an inversion result that is considerably aff ected by the model constraint. This study proposes a hybrid method that combines the regularized least squares method(RLSM) with the PSO method. The RLSM is used to improve the global optimal particle and accelerate convergence, while the adaptive regularization strategy is used to update the regularization parameters to avoid the influence of model constraints on the inversion results. Further, the inversion results of the RLSM and hybrid algorithm are compared and analyzed by considering the audio magnetotelluric synthesis and field data as examples. Experiments show that the proposed hybrid method is superior to the RLSM. Furthermore, compared with the standard PSO algorithm, the hybrid algorithm needs a broader model space but a smaller particle swarm and fewer iteration steps, thus reducing the prior conditions and the computational cost used in the inversion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abril, J.L., Vasconcelos, M.A., Barboza, F.M., Mojica, O.F., 2022. A parallel improved PSO algorithm with genetic operators for 2D inversion of resistivity data. Acta Geophys. 70, 1137–1154.
Aleardi, M., 2019. Using orthogonal Legendre polynomials to parameterize global geophysical optimizations: Applications to seismic-petrophysical inversion and 1D elastic full-waveform inversion: Legendre polynomials to parameterize geophysical optimizations. Geophysical Prospecting 67, 331–348.
Aster, R.C., Borchers, B., Thurber, C.H., 2019. Nonlinear Inverse Problems, in: Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems. Elsevier, pp. 257–278.
Avdeev, D. B. (2005). Three-Dimensional Electromagnetic Modelling and Inversion from Theory to Application. Surveys in Geophysics, 26(6), 767–799.
Cheng, J., Li, F., Peng, S., Sun, X., Zheng, J., Jia, J., 2015. Joint inversion of TEM and DC in roadway advanced detection based on particle swarm optimization. Journal of Applied Geophysics 123, 30–35.
Constable, S.C., Parker, R.L., Constable, C.G., 1987. Occam’s inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52, 289–300.
Cui, Y., Zhang, L., Zhu, X., Liu, J., Guo, Z., 2020. Inversion for magnetotelluric data using the particle swarm optimization and regularized least squares. Journal of Applied Geophysics 181, 104156.
deGroot-Hedlin, C. Constable, S., 1990. Occam’s inversion to generate smooth,two-dimensional models for magnetotelluric data, Geophysics, 55, 1613–1624.
Dong, Y., Cheng, J., Xie, H., Li, F., Xue, J., Wen, L., Chen, Z., Jiao, J., 2022. Joint Inversion and Application of DC and Full-Domain TEM with Particle Swarm Optimization. Pure Appl. Geophys. 179, 371–383.
Everett, M.E., Schultz, A., 1993. Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Magnetotelluric Inversion Using a Genetic Algorithm. J. geomagn. geoelec 45, 1013–1026.
Fernández-Martínez, J.L., Mukerji, T., García Gonzalo, E., Suman, A., 2012. Reservoir characterization and inversion uncertainty via a family of particle swarm optimizers. GEOPHYSICS 77, M1–M16.
Godio, A., Santilano, A., 2018. On the optimization of electromagnetic geophysical data: Application of the PSO algorithm. Journal of Applied Geophysics 148, 163–174.
HOU Zheng, XIONG Sheng-qing, YANG Jin, et al. 2015. Application of artificial bee colony algorithm in electrical-seismic nonlinear joint inversion. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 30(6):2666–2675, doi: https://doi.org/10.6038/pg20150626.
Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95—international conference on neural networks. IEEE, Perth, WA, Australia, pp 1942–1948
Key, K. (2009). 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers. GEOPHYSICS, 74(2), F9–F20. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3058434
Kim, J.-H., Supper, R., Tsourlos, P., Yi, M.-J., 2013. Four-dimensional inversion of resistivity monitoring data through Lp norm minimizations. Geophysical Journal International 195, 1640–1656.
Li, R.Y, Yu, N., Li, R.H, et al, 2021. Transient electromagnetic inversion based on particle swarm optimization and differential evolution algorithm. Near Surface Geophysics 19, 59–71.
Menke, W., 2018. Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory, Fourth edition. ed. Elsevier Ltd.: Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
Paasche, H., Tronicke, J., 2014. Nonlinear joint inversion of tomographic data using swarm intelligence. GEOPHYSICS 79, R133–R149.
Pace, F., Santilano, A., Godio, A., 2019. Particle swarm optimization of 2D magnetotelluric data. GEOPHYSICS 84, E125–E141.
Pace, F., Santilano, A., Godio, A., 2021. A Review of Geophysical Modeling Based on Particle Swarm Optimization. Surv Geophys 42, 505–549.
Pallero JLG, Fernández-Martínez JL, Bonvalot S, Fudym O (2015) Gravity inversion and uncertainty assessment of basement relief via Particle Swarm Optimization. J Appl Geophys 116:180–191.
Parker, R.L., Booker, J.R., 1996. Optimal one-dimensional inversion and bounding of magnetotelluric apparent resistivity and phase measurements. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 98, 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(96)03191-3
Perez, R.E., Behdinan, K., 2007. Particle swarm approach for structural design optimization. Computers & Structures 85, 1579–1588.
Santilano, A., Godio, A., Manzella, A., 2018. Particle swarm optimization for simultaneous analysis of magnetotelluric and time-domain electromagnetic data. GEOPHYSICS 83, E151–E159.
Sen, M.K., Bhattacharya, B.B., Stoffa, P.L., 1993. Nonlinear inversion of resistivity sounding data. GEOPHYSICS 58, 496–507.
Sen, M.K., Stoffa, P.L., 2013. Global Optimization Methods in Geophysical Inversion, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, R., Srivastava, S., 2007. Particle swarm optimization: A new tool to invert geophysical data. GEOPHYSICS 72, F75–F83.
Shi, X.M, Xiao M, Fan J K, et al, 2009. The damped PSO algorithm and its application for magnetotelluric sounding data inversion. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 52(4):1114∼1120.
Shi, Y., Eberhart, R., 1998. A modified particle swarm optimizer, in: 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360). IEEE, Anchorage, AK, USA, pp. 69–73.
Smith, J.T., Booker, J.R., 1988. Magnetotelluric inversion for minimum structure. GEOPHYSICS 53, 1565–1576.
Tikhonov, A.N., Goncharsky, A.V., Stepanov, V.V., Yagola, A.G., 1995. Regularization methods, in: Numerical Methods for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 7–63.
WANG TianYi, HOU Zheng, HE YuanXun, et al., 2022. Magnetotelluric inversion based on the improved differential evolution algorithm. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 37(4):1605–1612, doi: https://doi.org/10.6038/pg2022FF0083.
Xu, L.Y., Jin, S., Yin, Y.T., et al., 2022. Multi-scale 3-D imaging of the crustal electrical structure beneath the Caosiyao porphyry Mo deposit, North China. Geophysical Journal International, 231(3): 1880–1897.
Zhang X, Li D Q, Li J, Li Y., 2022. Grey wolf optimization-based variational mode decomposition for magnetotelluric data combined with detrended fluctuation analysis[J]. Acta Geophysica, 70(1): 111–120.
Zhdanov, M.S., 2002. Chapter 5 — Nonlinear Inversion Technique, in: Methods in Geochemistry and Geophysics, Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems. Elsevier, pp. 121–165.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [grant number 41374133]. We would like to thank Editage (u]www.editage.cn) for English language editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The work has not been published elsewhere, either completely, in part, or in another form, and the manuscript has not been submitted to another journal. During the writing process, this article was carefully reviewed and revised by the Editorial Department of Applied Geophysics and anonymous reviewers. They put forward a lot of useful comments and suggestions on this article, so we hereby express our sincere gratitude.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Su Peng is a Ph.D. candidate majoring in geophysics at China University of Geosciences (Beijing). He graduated from China University of Geosciences (Beijing) with a master’s degree in Geodetection and Information Technology in 2019. His main research interests are geophysical electromagnetic forward and inversion.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Su, P., Yang, J. & Xu, L. 1D regularization inversion combining particle swarm optimization and least squares method. Appl. Geophys. 20, 77–87 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-022-0950-6
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-022-0950-6