Abstract
In this paper, we provide an in-depth overview of key macroprudential policy framework instruments and borrower-based analytical tools in Kazakhstan. We estimate the debt service-to-income ratio (DSTI) for household sector in Kazakhstan for the period between 2013Q2 and 2022Q1. We use the actual remaining maturity and the interest rate for each loan available from the micro-level database (credit registry), and also assume gradual repayment of debt over the time of its remaining maturity. In addition, we specify four types of aggregate income in Kazakhstan. We conjecture, that measuring DSTI with household disposable income approach is likely to provide an upper bound estimate, while calculating debt service-to-income ratio adjusting for the average monthly nominal salary per one employee will likely provide a lower bound assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data available upon request from the authors.
Notes
2Joint Resolution of the Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market and the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated May 5, 2020 “On Approval of the Rules on Loans of Last Resort provided by the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan”.
References
Akinci, O., and J. Olmstead-Rumsey. 2018. How effective are macroprudential policies? An empirical investigation. Journal of Financial Intermediation 33: 33–57.
Allen, F., and D. Gale. 2000. Financial contagion. Journal of political economy 108(1): 1–33.
Allen, L. and A. Saunders. 2002. A survey of cyclical effects in credit risk measurement models.
Ampudia, M., M. Lo Duca, M. Farkas, G. Perez-Quiros, G. Ru¨nstler, and E. Tereanu. 2021. On the effectiveness of macroprudential policy.
Apergis, N. 2019. The role of the debt-service ratio as a leading indicator of households consumption. The Manchester School 87(6): 821–847.
Araujo, J.D., M. Patnam, M.A. Popescu, M.F. Valencia, and W. Yao. 2020. Effects of macroprudential policy: Evidence from over 6000 estimates. International Monetary Fund.
Atkinson, T., D. Luttrell, H. Rosenblum, et al. 2013. How bad was it? The costs and consequences of the 2007–09 financial crisis. Staff Papers.
Basel III, B. 2011. A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland.
Bebchuk, L.A., and I. Goldstein. 2011. Self-fulfilling credit market freezes. The Review of Financial Studies 24(11): 3519–3555.
Borio, C. 2003. Towards a macroprudential framework for financial supervision and regulation? CESifo Economic Studies 49(2): 181–215.
Borio, C., C. Furfine, P. Lowe, et al. 2001. Procyclicality of the financial system and financial stability: Issues and policy options. BIS Papers 1(3): 1–57.
Burova, A. et al. 2020. Measuring the debt service ratio in russia: Micro-level data approach. Technical report, Bank of Russia.
Caballero, R.J., and A. Krishnamurthy. 2001. International and domestic collateral constraints in a model of emerging market crises. Journal of Monetary Economics 48(3): 513–548.
Carreras, O., E.P. Davis, and R. Piggott. 2018. Assessing macroprudential tools in oecd countries within a cointegration framework. Journal of Financial Stability 37: 112–130.
Cerutti, E., S. Claessens, and L. Laeven. 2017. The use and effectiveness of macroprudential policies: New evidence. Journal of Financial Stability 28: 203–224.
Claessens, S., M.A. Kose, and M.E. Terrones. 2009. What happens during recessions, crunches and busts? Economic Policy 24(60): 653–700.
Constˆancio, V., I. Cabral, C. Detken, J. Fell, J. Henry, P. Hiebert, S. Kapadia, S.N. Altimar, F. Pires, and C. Salleo. 2019. Macroprudential policy at the ecb: Institutional framework, strategy, analytical tools and policies. ECB Occasional Paper (227).
Crockett, A. 2000. Marrying micro-and macro-prudential supervision. In Speech delivered at the eleventh international conference of banking supervisors, Basel.
De Nicolo, M.G., G. Favara, and M.L. Ratnovski. 2012. Externalities and macroprudential policy. International Monetary Fund.
Dell’Ariccia, G., and R. Marquez. 2006. Lending booms and lending standards. The Journal of Finance 61(5): 2511–2546.
Diamond, D.W., and R.G. Rajan. 2011. Fear of fire sales, illiquidity seeking, and credit freezes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(2): 557–591.
Drehmann, M. and M. Juselius. 2012. Do debt service costs affect macroeconomic and financial stability? BIS Quarterly Review.
FSB-IMF-BIS. 2011. Macroprudential tools and frameworks. Update to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors.
Gorton, G.B., and P. He. 2008. Bank credit cycles. The Review of Economic Studies 75(4): 1181–1214.
Jorda, O., M. Schularick, and A.M. Taylor. 2011. Financial crises, credit booms, and external imbalances: 140 years of lessons. IMF Economic Review 59(2): 340–378.
Kashyap, A.K., J.C. Stein, et al. 2004. Cyclical implications of the basel ii capital standards. Economic Perspectives-Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 28(1): 18–33.
Kuttner, K.N., and I. Shim. 2016. Can non-interest rate policies stabilize housing markets? Evidence from a panel of 57 economies. Journal of Financial Stability 26: 31–44.
Laeven, L., and F. Valencia. 2020. Systemic banking crises database II. IMF Economic Review 68(2): 307–361.
Lorenzoni, G. 2008. Inefficient credit booms. The Review of Economic Studies 75(3): 809–833.
Martin, A., C. Mendicino, and A. Van der Ghote. 2021. On the interaction between monetary and macroprudential policies.
McDonald, C. 2018. 11 When is macroprudential policy effective? Macroprudential Policy and Practice, 248.
Mian, A., A. Sufi, and E. Verner. 2017. Household debt and business cycles worldwide. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(4): 1755–1817.
Minsky, H.P. 1977. The financial instability hypothesis: An interpretation of keynes and an alternative to “standard” theory. Challenge 20(1): 20–27.
Mu¨ller, K. and E. Verner. 2021. Credit allocation and macroeconomic fluctuations. Available at SSRN 3781981.
Shahin, W.N. 1992. Money supply and deficit financing in economic development. Greenwood Press.
Singh, D., and J.R. LaBrosse. 2011. Developing a framework for effective financial crisis management. Financial Market Trends 2011: 2.
Statistics Canada (Statistique Canada). 2015. Household debt service ratio—Interest and principal. Statistics Canada (Statistique Canada).
Taehee, O., L. Gyu-hwan, N. Myoung-hun, and L.J. Un. 2022. Heterogeneous consumer spending pattern in rising interest rate environment. Band of Korea Issue Note No. 2022-45, Bank of Korea.
Tavasci, D., and J. Toporowski. 2010. Minsky, crisis and development. Springer.
Tunc, C. and M. Kilinc. 2022. Household debt and economic growth: Debt service matters. Open Economies Review, 1–22.
Vandenbussche, M.J., M.U. Vogel, and M.E. Detragiache. 2012. Macroprudential policies and housing price: A new database and empirical evidence for central, eastern, and southeastern Europe. International Monetary Fund.
Zhang, M.L. and M.E. Zoli. 2014. Leaning against the wind: macroprudential policy in asia.
Acknowledgements
The views expressed in this article and other content are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the National Bank of Kazakhstan. We acknowledge the feedback from the internal research workshop participants at the National Bank of Kazakhstan. We wish to separately thank Akylzhan Baimagambetov, Vitaliy Tutushkin, Sabit Khakimzhanov, Olzhas Kubenbayev, Dinara Tazetdinova, Ruslan Valinurov, Farkhad Alimbayev and all our colleagues from the Financial Stability and Research Department of the National Bank of Kazakhstan who made valuable comments and suggestions on the final version of the manuscript. All remaining errors are our own.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by YK and TZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ZY and AT and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The views expressed in this article and other content are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the National Bank of Kazakhstan.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ybrayev, Z., Talakin, A., Kairullayev, Y. et al. Household debt service ratio in a developing economy: borrower-based analytical tools and macroprudential policy overview in Kazakhstan. J Bank Regul 25, 58–72 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-023-00218-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-023-00218-7