Skip to main content
Log in

Household debt service ratio in a developing economy: borrower-based analytical tools and macroprudential policy overview in Kazakhstan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Banking Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an in-depth overview of key macroprudential policy framework instruments and borrower-based analytical tools in Kazakhstan. We estimate the debt service-to-income ratio (DSTI) for household sector in Kazakhstan for the period between 2013Q2 and 2022Q1. We use the actual remaining maturity and the interest rate for each loan available from the micro-level database (credit registry), and also assume gradual repayment of debt over the time of its remaining maturity. In addition, we specify four types of aggregate income in Kazakhstan. We conjecture, that measuring DSTI with household disposable income approach is likely to provide an upper bound estimate, while calculating debt service-to-income ratio adjusting for the average monthly nominal salary per one employee will likely provide a lower bound assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Author’s adaptation

Fig. 2

Source: Author’s adaptation

Fig. 3

Source: Authors adaptation

Fig. 4

Source: Authors adaptation

Fig. 5

Source: Authors adaptation

Fig. 6

Source: Authors adaptation

Fig. 7

Source: Authors adaptation

Fig. 8

Source: Authors adaptation

Fig. 9

Source: Authors calculation

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available upon request from the authors.

Notes

  1. https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/bernanke20070328a.htm.

  2. 2Joint Resolution of the Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market and the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated May 5, 2020 “On Approval of the Rules on Loans of Last Resort provided by the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan”.

References

  1. Akinci, O., and J. Olmstead-Rumsey. 2018. How effective are macroprudential policies? An empirical investigation. Journal of Financial Intermediation 33: 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, F., and D. Gale. 2000. Financial contagion. Journal of political economy 108(1): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, L. and A. Saunders. 2002. A survey of cyclical effects in credit risk measurement models.

  4. Ampudia, M., M. Lo Duca, M. Farkas, G. Perez-Quiros, G. Ru¨nstler, and E. Tereanu. 2021. On the effectiveness of macroprudential policy.

  5. Apergis, N. 2019. The role of the debt-service ratio as a leading indicator of households consumption. The Manchester School 87(6): 821–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Araujo, J.D., M. Patnam, M.A. Popescu, M.F. Valencia, and W. Yao. 2020. Effects of macroprudential policy: Evidence from over 6000 estimates. International Monetary Fund.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Atkinson, T., D. Luttrell, H. Rosenblum, et al. 2013. How bad was it? The costs and consequences of the 2007–09 financial crisis. Staff Papers.

  8. Basel III, B. 2011. A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems. Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland.

  9. Bebchuk, L.A., and I. Goldstein. 2011. Self-fulfilling credit market freezes. The Review of Financial Studies 24(11): 3519–3555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Borio, C. 2003. Towards a macroprudential framework for financial supervision and regulation? CESifo Economic Studies 49(2): 181–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Borio, C., C. Furfine, P. Lowe, et al. 2001. Procyclicality of the financial system and financial stability: Issues and policy options. BIS Papers 1(3): 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burova, A. et al. 2020. Measuring the debt service ratio in russia: Micro-level data approach. Technical report, Bank of Russia.

  13. Caballero, R.J., and A. Krishnamurthy. 2001. International and domestic collateral constraints in a model of emerging market crises. Journal of Monetary Economics 48(3): 513–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carreras, O., E.P. Davis, and R. Piggott. 2018. Assessing macroprudential tools in oecd countries within a cointegration framework. Journal of Financial Stability 37: 112–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cerutti, E., S. Claessens, and L. Laeven. 2017. The use and effectiveness of macroprudential policies: New evidence. Journal of Financial Stability 28: 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Claessens, S., M.A. Kose, and M.E. Terrones. 2009. What happens during recessions, crunches and busts? Economic Policy 24(60): 653–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Constˆancio, V., I. Cabral, C. Detken, J. Fell, J. Henry, P. Hiebert, S. Kapadia, S.N. Altimar, F. Pires, and C. Salleo. 2019. Macroprudential policy at the ecb: Institutional framework, strategy, analytical tools and policies. ECB Occasional Paper (227).

  18. Crockett, A. 2000. Marrying micro-and macro-prudential supervision. In Speech delivered at the eleventh international conference of banking supervisors, Basel.

  19. De Nicolo, M.G., G. Favara, and M.L. Ratnovski. 2012. Externalities and macroprudential policy. International Monetary Fund.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Dell’Ariccia, G., and R. Marquez. 2006. Lending booms and lending standards. The Journal of Finance 61(5): 2511–2546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Diamond, D.W., and R.G. Rajan. 2011. Fear of fire sales, illiquidity seeking, and credit freezes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(2): 557–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Drehmann, M. and M. Juselius. 2012. Do debt service costs affect macroeconomic and financial stability? BIS Quarterly Review.

  23. FSB-IMF-BIS. 2011. Macroprudential tools and frameworks. Update to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors.

  24. Gorton, G.B., and P. He. 2008. Bank credit cycles. The Review of Economic Studies 75(4): 1181–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jorda, O., M. Schularick, and A.M. Taylor. 2011. Financial crises, credit booms, and external imbalances: 140 years of lessons. IMF Economic Review 59(2): 340–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kashyap, A.K., J.C. Stein, et al. 2004. Cyclical implications of the basel ii capital standards. Economic Perspectives-Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 28(1): 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kuttner, K.N., and I. Shim. 2016. Can non-interest rate policies stabilize housing markets? Evidence from a panel of 57 economies. Journal of Financial Stability 26: 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Laeven, L., and F. Valencia. 2020. Systemic banking crises database II. IMF Economic Review 68(2): 307–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lorenzoni, G. 2008. Inefficient credit booms. The Review of Economic Studies 75(3): 809–833.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin, A., C. Mendicino, and A. Van der Ghote. 2021. On the interaction between monetary and macroprudential policies.

  31. McDonald, C. 2018. 11 When is macroprudential policy effective? Macroprudential Policy and Practice, 248.

  32. Mian, A., A. Sufi, and E. Verner. 2017. Household debt and business cycles worldwide. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(4): 1755–1817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Minsky, H.P. 1977. The financial instability hypothesis: An interpretation of keynes and an alternative to “standard” theory. Challenge 20(1): 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mu¨ller, K. and E. Verner. 2021. Credit allocation and macroeconomic fluctuations. Available at SSRN 3781981.

  35. Shahin, W.N. 1992. Money supply and deficit financing in economic development. Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Singh, D., and J.R. LaBrosse. 2011. Developing a framework for effective financial crisis management. Financial Market Trends 2011: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Statistics Canada (Statistique Canada). 2015. Household debt service ratio—Interest and principal. Statistics Canada (Statistique Canada).

  38. Taehee, O., L. Gyu-hwan, N. Myoung-hun, and L.J. Un. 2022. Heterogeneous consumer spending pattern in rising interest rate environment. Band of Korea Issue Note No. 2022-45, Bank of Korea.

  39. Tavasci, D., and J. Toporowski. 2010. Minsky, crisis and development. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Tunc, C. and M. Kilinc. 2022. Household debt and economic growth: Debt service matters. Open Economies Review, 1–22.

  41. Vandenbussche, M.J., M.U. Vogel, and M.E. Detragiache. 2012. Macroprudential policies and housing price: A new database and empirical evidence for central, eastern, and southeastern Europe. International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, M.L. and M.E. Zoli. 2014. Leaning against the wind: macroprudential policy in asia.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The views expressed in this article and other content are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the National Bank of Kazakhstan. We acknowledge the feedback from the internal research workshop participants at the National Bank of Kazakhstan. We wish to separately thank Akylzhan Baimagambetov, Vitaliy Tutushkin, Sabit Khakimzhanov, Olzhas Kubenbayev, Dinara Tazetdinova, Ruslan Valinurov, Farkhad Alimbayev and all our colleagues from the Financial Stability and Research Department of the National Bank of Kazakhstan who made valuable comments and suggestions on the final version of the manuscript. All remaining errors are our own.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by YK and TZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ZY and AT and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhandos Ybrayev.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The views expressed in this article and other content are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the National Bank of Kazakhstan.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ybrayev, Z., Talakin, A., Kairullayev, Y. et al. Household debt service ratio in a developing economy: borrower-based analytical tools and macroprudential policy overview in Kazakhstan. J Bank Regul 25, 58–72 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-023-00218-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-023-00218-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation