Skip to main content
Log in

Algebrodynamics: Super-Conservative Collective Dynamics on a “Unique Worldline” and the Hubble Law

  • Published:
Gravitation and Cosmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the properties of roots of a polynomial system of equations which define a set of identical point particles located on a Unique Worldline (UW), in the spirit of the Wheeler–Feynman’s old conception. As a consequence of Vieta’s formulas, a great number of conservation laws are fulfilled for collective algebraic dynamics on the UW. These, besides the canonical ones, include the laws with higher derivatives and those containing multiparticle correlation terms as well. On the other hand, such a “super-conservative” dynamics turns out to be manifestly Lorentz invariant and quite nontrivial. At great values of “cosmic time” \(t\), the roots-particles demonstrate universal recession (resembling that in the Milne’s cosmology and simulating “expansion” of the Universe), for which the Hubble’s law holds true, with the Hubble parameter inversely proportional to \(t\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. see also the works by E.C.G. Stueckelberg [4, 5].

  2. “… why all electrons have the same charge and mass?” – “Because they are all the same electron!” [9].

  3. It results after elimination of the other two components \(y,z\) from (1).

  4. It follows from (2) that for any pair of complex conjugate roots the mass of the corresponding C-particle should be twice as large as for R-particles.

  5. A manifestly Lorentz-invariant form of the conservation laws can be presented, see, e.g., [8].

  6. We may ignore, in the incidence relation (9), the frequently used factor \(i\).

  7. A worldline located on \(\mathbb{C}\mathbf{M}\), a complex generalization of \(\mathbf{M}\), generates an NSFC with nonzero torsion, a familiar example of which being represented by the Kerr congruence.

  8. Remarkably, in the previous papers [6, 8] we considered the UW construction based on (1) as a nonrelativistic one, with \(t\) playing the role of absolute Newtonian time.

  9. In the procedure, the ratio of spinor components \(G\) transforms according to a linear-fractional law.

References

  1. R. P. Feynman, Science 153 (3737), 699 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. P. Feynman, QED: the Strange Theory of Light and Matter (Princeton Univ. Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 76, 749 (1949).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 588 (1941).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta 15, 23 (1942).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. V. V. Kassandrov and I. Sh. Khasanov, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46, 175206 (2014); arXiv: 1211.7002.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. V. V. Kassandrov, I. Sh. Khasanov, and N. V. Markova, Bulletin Peoples’ Friend. Univ. Russia: Math. Inform. Phys. 2, 169 (2014); arXiv: 1402.6158.

  8. V. V. Kassandrov, I. Sh. Khasanov, and N. V. Markova, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48, 395204 (2015); arXiv: 1501.01606.

  9. R. P. Feynman, Nobel Lecture (December 11, 1965).

  10. A. Chala, V. V. Kassandrov, and N. V. Markova, Grav. Cosmol. 25, 383 (2019); arXiv: 2104.12490.

  11. V. V. Kassandrov, Algebraic Structure of Space-Time and the Algebrodynamics (Moscow: Peoples’ Friend. Univ. Press, 1992) [in Russian].

  12. V. V. Kassandrov, Grav. Cosmol. 1, 216 (1995); arXiv: gr-qc/0007027.

  13. V. V. Kassandrov, Acta Applic. Math. 50, 197 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. A. Milne, Relativity, Gravitation and World-Structure (Oxford Univ. Press, 1935).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. E. A. Milne, Kinematic Relativity (Oxford Univ. Press, 1948).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. V. V. Kassandrov, Vestn. Russian Peoples’ Friend. Univ.: Physics 8(1), 34 (2000) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. V. Kassandrov, Hypercomplex Numbers in Geom. and Phys. 1 (1), 89 (2004); arXiv: hep-th/0312278.

  18. V. V. Kassandrov, Phys. Atom. Nuclei 72, 813 (2009); arXiv: 0907.5425.

  19. V. V. Kassandrov, in Has the Last Word been Said on Classical Electrodynamics? (Ed. A. Chuby-kalo et al., Rinton Press, 2004), p. 42. arXiv: physics/0308045.

  20. R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors and Space-Time. Spinor and Twistor Methods in Space-Time Geometry, vol. 2 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. E. A. Kalinina and A.Yu. Uteshev, Theory of Elimination (SPb. Univ. Press, 2002) [in Russian].

  22. H. Goldstein, P. P. Charles, and L. S. John, Classical Mechanics (NY: Addison Wesley, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. I. Sh. Khasanov, PhD Thesis (Moscow: Peoples’ Friend. Univ. Russia, 2015).

  24. O. I. Chashina and Z. K. Silagadze, Universe 1, 307 (2015); arXiv: 1409.1708.

  25. A. Benoit-Lévy and G. Chardin, Astron. Astrophys. 537, A78 (2012); arXiv: 1110.3054

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Chardin, Y. Dubois, G. Manfredi, B. Miller, and C. Stahl, Astron. Astrophys. 652, A91 (2021); arXiv: 2102.08834.

Download references

Funding

V.K. acknowledges support from Project no. FSSF-2023-0003.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. V. Kassandrov or Ildus Sh. Khasanov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kassandrov, V.V., Khasanov, I.S. Algebrodynamics: Super-Conservative Collective Dynamics on a “Unique Worldline” and the Hubble Law. Gravit. Cosmol. 29, 50–56 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289323010048

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289323010048

Navigation