No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Where neoliberalism and neoconservatism meet: the inception and reception of a Model Music Curriculum for English Schools
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2023
Abstract
Neoliberalism and neoconservatism are two political ideologies that currently shape state directives for education in many countries. In this article, I describe the confluence of neoliberal and neoconservative ideologies that led to the introduction, by the English state department for education, of a Model Music Curriculum for schools. I describe how neoliberalism has transformed the music education ‘ecology’ in England and created an environment that was receptive to the introduction of a curriculum on neoconservative principles. I consider the current position of progressive music education and why it seems unable to mount a sufficiently persuasive challenge. I make a case for the importance of analysis that explicitly focuses on political ideologies and their present-day rhetoric and discourses. Finally, I point to the general early years sector in England as an illustration for how to respond to state interventions in curriculum that might be emulated by the music education sector.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
APPLE, M.W. (2001). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
APPLE, M. (2004). Creating Difference: Neo-Liberalism, Neo-Conservatism and the Politics of Educational Reform. Educational Policy, 18
(1), 12–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APPLE, M. (2006). Understanding and interrupting neoliberalism and neoconservatism in education. Pedagogies, 1(1), 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BALL, S. (2021). The Education Debate: Fourth Edition. Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BALL, S. & JUNEMANN, C. (2012). Networks, New Governance and Education. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
BERNSTEIN, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Roman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
CROUCH, C. (2016). The Knowledge Corrupters: Hidden Consequences of the Financial Takeover of Public Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
DfE (Department for Education) (2021). Model Music Curriculum: Key Stages 1-3. Non-statutory guidance for the national curriculum in England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/ (Accessed 1st November 2021)Google Scholar
DREZNER, D. (2017). The Ideas Industry: How pessimists, partisans and plutocrats are transforming the marketplace of ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FINNEY, J., PHILPOTT, C. & SPRUCE, G. (Eds) (2020). Creative and Critical Projects in Classroom Music: Fifty years of Sound and Silence. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GIBB, N. (2015a). How E.D. Hirsch Came to Shape UK Government Policy. In Simons, J. and Porter, N. (Eds) Knowledge and the Curriculum: A Collection of Essays to Accompany E. D. Hirsch’s Lecture at Policy Exchange, (pp. 12–20). London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
GIBB, N. (2015b). Speech: Nick Gibb speaks at the Music Education Expo. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches (accessed 30th October, 2021).Google Scholar
GIBB, N. (2019). Forget Spotify: I want every child to leave primary school able to read music. Red Box on the Times.co.uk, published on 11 January 2019.Google Scholar
GIROUX, H.A. (2004). The Terror of Neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the Eclipse of Democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
GIROUX, H.A. (2008). Against the Terror of Neoliberalism: Politics Beyond the Age of Greed. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
GIROUX, H.A. (2021). Race, Politics, and Pandemic Pedagogy: Education in a time of crisis. London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HESS, J. (2021). Resisting the ‘Us’ versus ‘Them’ Dichotomy through Music Education. The imperative of living in the ‘Anti-’. In Kallio, A.A. (Ed). Difference and Division in Music Education (pp. 56–75). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
HIRSCH, E.D. (1996). The Schools We Need and Why We Don’t Have Them. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
HIRSCH, E. D. (2006). The Knowledge Deficit: Closing the Shocking Education Gap for American Children. Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
LEPISTÖ, A. (2021). The Rise of Common-Sense Conservatism: The American Right and the Reinvention of the Scottish Enlightenment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LI, T. M. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
MULLER, J. & YOUNG, M. (2019). Knowledge, power and powerful knowledge re-visited. Curriculum Journal 30(2), 196–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROSS, W. & GIBSON, R. (2007). Neo-liberalism and Education Reform. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
SANDEL, M. (2020). The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
SLAČÁLEK, O. (2021). The horrifying right to one’s own Context: Seven rules of culture warfare. Downloaded from eurozine.com (https://www.eurozine.com/the-horrifying-right-to-onesown-context/, 26th October 2021)Google Scholar
WATSON, S. (2021). New Right 2.0: Teacher populism on social media in England. British Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOODFORD, P. (2019). Music Education in an Age of Virtuality and Post-Truth. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
YANDELL, J. (2017). Culture, Knowledge and Power: What the Conservatives have Learnt from E.D. Hirsch, Changing English, 24(3), 246–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar