Abstract
Spry2 is a molecular modulator of tyrosine kinase receptor signaling pathways that has cancer-type-specific effects. Mammalian Spry2 protein undergoes tyrosine and serine phosphorylation in response to growth factor stimulation. Spry2 expression is distinctly altered in various cancer types. Inhibition of the proteasome functionality results in reduced intracellular Spry2 degradation. Using in vitro and in vivo assays, we show that protein kinase D (PKD) phosphorylates Spry2 at serine 112 and interacts in vivo with the C-terminal half of this protein. Importantly, missense mutation of Ser112 decreases the rate of Spry2 intracellular protein degradation. Either knocking down the expression of all three mammalian PKD isoforms or blocking their kinase activity with a specific inhibitor contributes to the stabilization of Spry2 wild-type protein. Downregulation of CSN3, a component of the COP9/Signalosome that binds PKD, significantly increases the half-life of Spry2 wild-type protein but does not affect the stability of a Spry2 after mutating Ser112 to the non-phosphorylatable residue alanine. Our data demonstrate that both PKD and the COP9/Signalosome play a significant role in control of Spry2 intracellular stability and support the consideration of the PKD/COP9 complex as a potential therapeutic target in tumors where Spry2 expression is reduced.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Sprouty (Spry) was initially identified in Drosophila melanogaster (dSpry) as a modulator of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling during different morphogenetic processes [1]. Four mammalian genes (Spry1–4) that encode protein homologs of dSpry [2] have been identified, with Spry2 ubiquitously expressed in adult tissues [3]. Spry2 overexpression inhibits ERK activation by fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), but not by epidermal growth factor (EGF) [1].
Consistent with these RTK-dependent activities of Spry2, its behavior in cancer shows opposite effects. Thus, we and others have proven that Spry2 displays tumor suppressive effects in breast, prostate, and liver cancers [4], as well as in B-cell diffuse lymphoma [5]. In contrast, in colorectal cancer (CRC), we have reported Spry2 upregulation in high-grade tumors and at the invasion front of low-grade tumors [6], where the levels of Spry2 RNA and protein are higher in colon adenocarcinomas than in the adjacent normal mucosa [7]. In addition, Spry2 triggers increased levels of c-MET and HGF-stimulated phosphorylation of ERK and AKT in HT-29 and LS-174T cells, promoting cell migration and invasion [7]. Moreover, Spry2 is upregulated in K-RAS mutant CRC [8] and in melanoma cells harboring N-RAS or B-RAF mutations [9]. In line with these observations, it has also been shown that Spry2 overexpression in fibroblasts, which provides sustained EGFR signaling, facilitates cell overgrowth and oncogenic transformation [10]. Mechanistically, this cellular behavior usually results from the molecular binding of Spry2 to the ubiquitin-ligase c-Cbl and the endocytic protein CIN85, involved in receptor endocytosis and degradation [11]. ITSN1 and p38MAPK enhance the c-Cbl effects on EGFR, either by disrupting the interaction of Spry2 with c-Cbl [12], or by inducing Spry2 downregulation through activation of the E3 ubiquitin-ligase Siah2 [10], respectively.
Consistent with its role as a docking/scaffold protein, Spry2 does not have an enzymatic activity but its biological function is modulated by direct phosphorylation mediated by tyrosine- and serine/threonine kinases [1], at specific residues that are essential for the function and stability of this protein. Specifically, phosphorylation at Y55 affects FGF-signaling, whereas it has no effect on EGF-stimulated signaling [1]. In contrast, phosphorylation at T75 by the serine/threonine-kinase DYRK1A impairs the inhibitory activity of Spry2 on FGFR-mediated ERK signaling [13], and also prevents the endocytosis-mediated degradation of EGFR during asymmetric neural stem cell division [14]. Mnk1 also phosphorylates Spry2 (at S112 and S121 residues) increasing its stability [15], and is necessary for the capacity of Spry2 to interfere with intracellular trafficking of the activated EGFR at the step of progression from early to late endosomes [16].
Based on protein sequence analysis, herein we have found that the serine 112 of Spry2 constitutes a canonical protein kinase D (PKD) phosphorylation site. Furthermore, our subsequent in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that this residue is indeed phosphorylated by PKD. In addition, we show that inactivating PKD, or blocking the expression of CSN3, a subunit of the highly conserved COP9/Signalosome (CSN) complex [17] with binding affinity to PKD, leads to the stabilization of Spry2.
Results
PKD1 phosphorylates Spry2 at serine 112
Looking for kinases potentially able to act on Spry2, we observed that the serine at position 112 (S112) in this protein is part of an amino acid stretch that matches one of the three consensus phosphorylation sequences for PKD. The established PKD target motif (L/V/I)X(R/K)XX(S/T) [18] corresponds to the sequence “LSRSIS112” within Spry2 (Fig. 1A), and is also contained in Spry1 and Spry3, but not in Spry4 (Fig. 1A).
In order to determine whether PKD was able to phosphorylate Spry2, anti-AU5 immunoprecipitates obtained from lysates of HEK293T cells previously transfected with constructs coding for the full-length form of human Spry2 protein (AU5-Spry2) or AU5-vector (Vector) were used as substrates for in vitro kinase (IVK) assays with PKD1-KD (kinase dead) and PKD1-CA (constitutively active) mutants of PKD1 [19] (Fig. 1B). These two PKD1 mutant forms were expressed in HEK293T cells after transfection of pEFBOS-GFP-PKD1-CA (GFP-PKD-CA) and pEFBOS-GFP-PKD1-KD (GFP-PKD-KD) and immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibodies to be used in the in vitro kinase (IVK) assays. Results showed a clear phosphorylation of Spry2 by PKD1-CA but not by PKD1-KD (Fig. 1B). Consistent with previous reports [19], our assays also detected autophosphorylation of PKD1-CA (Fig. 1B).
Furthermore, in vivo phosphorylation assays with inorganic 32P demonstrated that PKD1-CA elicited the phosphorylation of WT AU5-Spry2 in living HEK293T cells co-transfected with vectors for the ectopic expression of both proteins, but it did not happen with a mutant counterpart AU5-Spry2 S112A, where serine 112 was switched to the non-phosphorylatable residue alanine (Fig. 1C). In these assays, we could also detect the presence of autophosphorylated PKD1-CA in AU5-Spry2 immunoprecipitates, indicative of the association of both molecules. Taken together, all these results support that PKD1 associates with and phosphorylates Spry2 specifically at serine 112.
The C-terminal half of Spry2 mediates its association with PKD in vivo
To ascertain whether Spry2 and PKD co-localize in the same cellular compartment we used immunofluorescence-confocal microscopy to analyze transiently co-transfected HeLa cells overexpressing both AU5-Spry2 WT and PKD1 WT. Our assays identified different areas of cellular co-localization of these proteins (Fig. 2A), further supporting in vivo association between Spry2 and PKD1 within these cells.
In addition, the region of Spry2 involved in association with PKD1 was further identified by co-immunoprecipitation assays. HEK 293 T cells were then transiently transfected with pEFBOS-GFP-PKD1 WT (GFP-PKD) or pEFBOS-GFP (Vector) together with pCEFL-KZ-HA-Spry2 WT (HA-Spry2 WT), or pCEFL-KZ-HA-Spry2-Nt (HA-Spry2-Nter: truncated mutant spanning residues 1–177 of Spry2), or pCEFL-KZ-HA-Spry2-Ct (HA-Spry2-Cter: truncated mutant spanning residues 177–315 of Spry2; Fig. 2B). The corresponding cytoplasmic extracts were incubated with anti-GFP polyclonal rabbit antibody or with unspecific rabbit IgG, and analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-HA monoclonal antibodies (Fig. 2B). These assays showed specific interaction of HA-Spry2 WT full-length protein with GFP-PKD: HA-Spry2 WT co-immunoprecipitates were only visualized in cells overexpressing HA-Spry2 WT + GFP-PKD WT (Fig. 2B), but not in cells carrying HA-Spry2 WT + Vector, nor in cell extracts incubated with nonspecific antibodies. Likewise, we found that, among the truncated Spry2 mutants, just HA-Spry2-Cter bound to GFP-PKD specifically, since this fragment was only co-immunoprecipitated from cells expressing HA-Spry2-Cter + GFP-PKD WT, but not from cells with HA-Spry2-Cter + Vector. By contrast, we did not detect any co-immunoprecipitation between the HA-Spry2-Nter fragment and GFP-PKD (Fig. 2B). All these observations demonstrate that Spry2 and PKD1 associate in vivo, and through the involvement of the carboxyl-terminal half of Spry2.
Mutation of serine 112 by alanine or glutamic acid confers stability to Spry2
To investigate the long-term stability of cellular Spry2 protein and the impact of mutation at serine 112, SW480-ADH cells overexpressing ectopically AU5-Spry2 WT or mutants AU5-Spry2 S112A and S112E were incubated, in absence or presence of cycloheximide (CHX) for up to 8 h, and the decay of each protein was followed over time by immunoblotting using anti-AU5 antibody (Fig. 3A). Quantitation of the signals arising from the WT and mutant AU5-Spry2 samples showed that the substitution of serine at position 112 by alanine (no charge) or glutamic acid (negative charge) significantly increased the levels of the resulting cellular mutant protein (Fig. 3B). The fact that both the Spry2 S112A and Spry2 S112E mutants were more stable than the WT version of Spry2 suggests that this effect does not depend on the difference in electrical charge due to these two amino acids, but might be related to the phosphorylation state of Spry2 WT at serine 112. In addition, glutamic acid negative charge does not seem to be able to mimic the phosphorylation state of serine 112.
PKD activity decreases the stability of WT Spry2 protein but not of Spry2 S112A mutant
To examine whether Spry2 protein stability/homeostasis is affected by PKD, we knocked-down all three PKD isoforms using specific siRNAs in SW480-ADH cells ectopically overexpressing AU5-Spry2 WT or AU5-Spry2 S112A and then tested the level of AU5-Spry2 protein by immunoblotting using specific antibodies (Fig. 4A). Consistent with our previous qRT-PCR analyses (data not shown) of the expression levels of the three members of the PKD family, we detected high levels of PKD2 expression, intermediate levels of PKD3, and very low PKD1 expression (Fig. 4A). Notice that for these experiments we chose to use siRNAs targeting all three PKD isoforms to prevent any potential rebound/feedback overexpression of any isoform as consequence of reduced levels of the others. All three isoforms were effectively silenced under our experimental conditions (Fig. 4A). Cells transfected with control scrambled siRNA or with the pool of PKD-specific siRNAs were incubated in the absence or presence of cycloheximide (CHX) for 4 h and 6 h and levels of AU5-Spry2 protein were then quantitated and compared over time by immunoblotting with anti-AU5 antibody. We observed significantly higher levels of WT Spry2 protein after 6 h of CHX treatment in PKD1/2/3-silenced cells as compared to their corresponding controls transfected with scrambled siRNA (Fig. 4A, B). However, in sharp contrast, no differences were detected among the levels of mutant S112A-Spry2 protein when PKD isoforms were silenced in cell cultures overexpressing this mutant (Fig. 4A, B). These data strongly support the ability of PKD to reduce the intracellular stability of WT Spry2 protein through a mechanism involving, at least in part, the phosphorylation at serine 112. In order to confirm this notion, SW480-ADH cells constitutively overexpressing ectopic WT AU5-Spry2 protein were treated with cycloheximide for 0, 2, 4, and 6 h with or without the addition of the PKD-inhibitor kbNB 142-70 (Fig. 4C). The increased levels of AU5-Spry2 WT protein in the presence of PKD-inhibitor were statistically significant after 4 h and 6 h of treatment with CHX (Fig. 4D), suggesting that Spry2 protein stability is compromised upon PKD phosphorylation. Furthermore, no changes were detected in AU5-Spry2 S112A mutant protein levels regardless of PKD expression status, supporting the mechanistic relevance of the phosphorylation at serine 112 of Spry2 by PKD in modulation of the half-life of this protein (Fig. 4B).
CSN3 knockdown increases WT Spry2 stability without altering Spry2 S112A mutant
PKD is described to associate with the COP9/Signalosome complex by interacting with the COP9 subunit CSN3 [20]. The COP9/Signalosome (CSN) complex is a conserved protein complex carrying isopeptidase activity that controls eukaryotic protein stability through the UPS (Ubiquitin-Proteasome system) by regulating the functionality of the cullin-RING ligase (CRL) families of ubiquitin E3 complexes [17].
In order to discern whether Spry2 protein stability could be modulated by the CSN complex, we knocked-down the CSN3 expression (using specific siRNAs) in SW480-ADH cells that ectopically overexpress AU5-Spry2 WT or the mutant AU5-Spry2 S112A (Fig. 5). Transfection of these cell lines with a pool of four specific siRNAs covering a portion of the human CSN3 coding sequence resulted in significant decrease of endogenous CSN3 expression as compared to the cells transfected with control, scrambled siRNA (Fig. 5A). To investigate the long-term stability of Spry2, the same cell lines were incubated in absence or presence of cycloheximide (CHX) for up to 8 h, and the decay of the AU5-Spry2 proteins (WT and S112A mutant) was monitored over time by immunoblotting using an anti-AU5 antibody (Fig. 5A). Quantitation of AU5-Spry2 levels normalized to those of tubulin showed that CSN3 silencing was associated with a significant stabilization and maintenance over time of the intracellular content of AU5-Spry2 WT protein (Fig. 5B). However, as expected, levels of AU5-Spry2 S112A mutant protein remained essentially unchanged upon CSN3 silencing (Fig. 5B). These results indicate that the half-life of Spry2 WT protein increases significantly after CSN3 knockdown and suggest that the CSN complex is also involved in regulating the Spry2 proteins intracellular stability. The above results are also consistent with the relevance of serine 112 for Spry2 protein durability, in concordance with the observed effects of Spry2 phosphorylation by PKD.
Since the CSN complex is able to control protein degradation through the Ubiquitin-Proteasome system (UPS) [21], we next decided to assess whether CSN3-dependent destabilization of Spry2 could be mechanistically related to Spry2 protein processing by the 26S proteasome pathway. To this end, SW480-ADH cells constitutively overexpressing AU5-Spry2 WT, with CSN3 expression knocked-down (using specific siRNAs), were treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 together with CHX for 4–6 h and then Spry2 protein levels were checked by immunoblotting (Fig. 5C). Quantitative analysis of the immunoblot signal indicated that MG132 treatment for 4–6 h, protected Spry2 protein from further degradation in the presence of CHX (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, when CSN3 expression was reduced by specific siRNAs, the relative Spry2 protein levels were stabilized independently of the 26S proteasome functionality (Fig. 5C, D).
Discussion
Spry2 is a regulator of different RTK signaling pathways that has been postulated to modulate the stability (half-life) of a variety of pivotal proteins within those pathways [22]. Thus, Spry2 has been described to act as a scaffold protein bringing different ubiquitin E3 ligases close to their ubiquitination and degradation substrates, such as HIF1α (ubiquitinated by pVHL/associated E3 ligase) [23], the FRS2/FGFR complex and the β-subunit of the interleukin-6 receptor (both ubiquitinated by c-Cbl upon ligand stimulation) [22]. In contrast, binding of Spry2 to c-Cbl and the endocytic protein CIN85 [11] results in sustained EGFR stability [10]. Likewise, Spry2 has also been shown to bind to c-MET blocking its degradation, whereas Spry2 knockdown provokes the c-MET protein degradation [24]. This variant Spry2 behavior, linked to specific stimuli or cell types, seems to depend on its binding to protein phosphatase 2 A (PP2A) [22] and the resulting dephosphorylation of certain residues of the serine-rich motif of Spry2 (in particular serine 115 and 118) [22]. All four mammalian Spry proteins show a strong conservation and high number of residues (mainly serine and some threonine). In particular, the serine-rich motif of Spry2 spanning from position 107 to 132 contains consensus phosphorylation sites for several serine/threonine kinases (such as CK1/2, GSK3, Mnk1/2, and TESK1) [25]. It has been hypothesized that this conserved serine motif could be part of a key hinge region in mammalian Spry proteins, so that dephosphorylation within the motif (for instance, serine 115 and serine 118 of Spry2) would generate the “on” position of the switch and phosphorylation would correspond to the “off” state [22] thus controlling the intracellular stability of the Spry2 protein. As well as Spry2 exerts its effects by direct interaction with other proteins, its own levels can also be affected [22]. Indeed, the regulation of Spry2 protein stability is a complex process, involving the possibility of being poly-ubiquitinated by different E3 ubiquitin ligases for its degradation in the proteasome, such as Cbl [26], Siah2 [27], Nedd4 [25], or pVHL/associated E3 ligase [28].
In a search for cellular protein kinases able to phosphorylate Spry2, here we found that its serine-rich motif contains a consensus phosphorylation sequence for PKD (-(L/V/I)X(R/K)XX(S/T)-[18], “LSRSIS112”), which also appears in Spry1 (LSRSTS112) and only partially in Spry3 (LPQHLS80), but is absent in Spry4. To confirm the functional relevance of this phosphorylation sequence, we demonstrate here that constitutively active PKD is able to phosphorylate WT Spry2 (in vitro and in vivo), but not the mutant protein at serine 112 (Spry2 S112A). In addition, using both confocal microscopy analysis and co-immunoprecipitation assays we have shown that Spry2 and PKD are associated in vivo through the C-terminal half of Spry2. It is worth noticing that serine 112 of Spry2 is also phosphorylated by other kinases besides PKD, such as Mnk1/2 [25] or p38α (Martínez N et al., unpublished results), constituting a phosphorylation hotspot but however, only PKD is able to co-localize and co-immunoprecipitate with Spry2. It was previously described that Spry2 can form a ternary complex with PKCδ and PKD [29]. Although we cannot rule out that such a ternary complex is formed under our experimental conditions, the interaction with PKCδ requires the full-length Spry2 protein [29], whereas a truncated Spry2 mutant lacking the N-terminal half is able to form complexes with PKD1. Our data show that PKD negatively affects the half-life of the Spry2 protein, probably due to its kinase activity. Thus, both downregulation of the endogenous levels of PKD isoforms (using specific siRNAs), as well as treatment of cells with the PKD-inhibitor kbNB 142-70, significantly increased Spry2 WT protein lifetime. Consistently, we also found that the Spry2 S112A mutant protein was significantly more stable than the Spry2 WT version and its durability was not affected after silencing all PKD isoforms. Furthermore, we have also shown that both the S112A and S112E mutant Spry2 proteins are more stable than the WT Spry2, indicating that this effect does not depend on the differences in the electrical charge due to each changed residue, but could likely be related to the phosphorylation state of serine 112 in Spry2 WT.
It was previously reported that Mnk1 phosphorylates serines 112 and 121 of Spry2 [15], leading to increased stability of the Spry2 protein as compared to the non-phosphorylated form. Nevertheless, a subsequent report [25] analyzing the knockdown of endogenous Mnk1 and Mnk2, has proven that the latter isoform, but not Mnk1, is responsible for this dual phosphorylation and, more importantly, that phosphorylation of both serines (112 and 121) is essential for the interaction between Spry2 and Nedd4 (a member of the HECT-domain family E3 ubiquitin-ligase), leading to poly-ubiquitination and decreased stability of Spry2 [25]. PKD isoforms are known to be associated to the COP9-signalosome (CSN) complex [20] via molecular coupling with the CSN3 subunit of COP9 [20] and here we have demonstrated that the Spry2 protein stability was modulated by CSN.
CSN is a highly conserved multiprotein complex that regulates the Ubiquitin-Proteasome system (UPS) pathway in eukaryotes [17]. It encompasses nine subunits (CSN1–9), each one essential for the functionality of the complex and is also produced independently prior to coordinated assembly [17]. In particular, the function of the CSN3 subunit resides in stabilization of the CSN complex [17]. The main role of CSN is to regulate the cullin-RING ligase family of ubiquitin E3 complexes (CRLs) by eliminating Nedd8 from cullins [30]. In addition, CSN also acts as a scaffold platform that recruits several serine/threonine protein kinases (as CK2, AKT, and PKD) to regulate ubiquitination through E3 ubiquitin ligases of the UPS pathway, thus affecting the stability of different cellular proteins [17]. Indeed, PKD binds to CSN3 and modifies the CSN7 subunit [20]. Furthermore, the CSN-associated PKD phosphorylates several signaling proteins that are substrates of the UPS pathway, including c-Jun, p53 [20] or Sos1 [31], with different functional consequences. Specifically, CSN-mediated phosphorylation of p53 leads to its degradation [20], whereas this CSN-associated kinase activity stabilizes c-Jun [20] and Sos1 proteins [31]. Regarding Spry2 and in agreement with the results of reduction of PKD isoform levels, here we found that the stability of the Spry2 WT protein was significantly increased after CSN3 depletion, whereas the half-life of the Spry2 S112A mutant protein was unaffected by CSN3 knockdown. Furthermore, treatment with the 26S proteasome inhibitor MG132 has protected Spry2 WT protein from degradation, indicating that Spry2 destabilization is mechanistically related to its processing through the UPS pathway. However, the levels of Spry2 WT protein stabilized by CSN depletion were unaffected by the aforementioned proteasome inhibitor, supporting a role for CSN in controlling Spry2 protein degradation through the UPS pathway. Taken together, all these observations strongly indicate that the CSN/PKD complex is involved in control of the intracellular homeostasis of the Spry2 protein, although a full unraveling of the specific mechanistic details responsible for this effect remain to be clarified in future research.
Interestingly, our recent studies document that two proteins involved in the regulation of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling pathway, Sos1 (a GEF activator of RAS proteins) and Spry2, appear to undergo opposite modulation of their molecular levels by the CSN/PKD complex. Thus, whereas Sos1 protein is stabilized by CSN/PKD action [31], the CSN/PKD complex induces Spry2 degradation (this report). Overall, our data are consistent with the oncogenic role that has been proposed for both the CSN3 protein and CSN as a whole [32], and support the consideration of the CSN/PKD complex as a relevant potential target in the quest for new therapeutic drugs.
Materials and methods
Cell lines, transfections
Human colon carcinoma SW480-ADH, HEK293T embryonal kidney and HeLa cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Invitrogen, Paisley, United Kingdom) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Invitrogen). SPRY2-wt, SPRY2-S112A, and SPRY2-S112E and Mock cells were generated by stable transfection of SW480-ADH cells with pCEFL-KZ-AU5, pCEFL-KZ-AU5-SPRY2 WT, pCEFL-KZ-AU5-SPRY2 S112A, or pCEFL-KZ-AU5-hSPRY2 S112E plasmids, as described previously [6]. Cell lines were authenticated by the Genomics Service of Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Alberto Sols (IIBM, CSIC-UAM, Madrid, Spain) using the GenePrint® 10 System of Promega (Madison, WI, USA), which allows co-amplification and three-color detection of ten human loci: TH01, TPOX, vWA, Amelogenin, CSF1PO, D16S539, D7S820, D13S317, D21S11, and D5S818. These loci together provide a genetic profile with a random match probability of 1 in 2.92 × 109 and are used for human cell line and tissue authentication and identification and human cell line cross-contamination determination. STRs profiles were compared against cell line databases like ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) and DSMZ (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikrorganismen and Zellkulturen). Cells were tested routinely to ensure there was no mycoplasma contamination (Universal Mycoplasma Detection kit, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA; #30–1012). Transient transfections of HEK293T cells were performed in p100 plates using Jet-Pei (Polyplus-Transfection, Illkirch, France). Twenty-four hours post-transfection, cells were serum-starved by incubation in DMEM supplemented with 0.5% FBS for 18 h. All assays were done 48 h after transfection.
Antibodies and reagents
Monoclonal mouse antibodies against CSN3 and PKD1 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-HA and anti-AU5 monoclonal antibodies from Berkeley Antibody Company (Berkeley, CA); polyclonal rabbit antibodies against PKD2 and PKD3 from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA, USA); polyclonal rabbit antibody against CSN3 was acquired from Abcam (Ab79698-Cambridge, UK); polyclonal rabbit anti-GFP rabbit A6455 from Invitrogen and anti-beta-tubulin monoclonal antibody T4026 was acquired from Sigma–Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). The bound antibodies were detected in some experiments with secondary antibodies conjugated with IRDye680 or IRDye800 and analyzed with an Odyssey Imager system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA), or anti-mouse or anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (1:5000; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) secondary antibodies for visualization using an Enhanced Chemiluminescence Detection Kit (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, USA). Cycloheximide (C1988) and MG132 (M7449) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and the PKD-inhibitor kbNB 142-70 was obtained from Bio-Techne Corporation (Minneapolis, MN, USA). The siRNAs siGENOME SMART pool human Cops3 (M-011494-00), siGENOME SMART pool human Prkd1 (M-005028-02), siGENOME SMART pool human Prkd2 (M-004197-02), siGENOME SMART pool human Prkd3 (M-005029-01), and siGENOME Control pool (D-001206-14) were purchased from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO, USA). Carrier-free Phosphorus-32 radionuclide (314-327TBq/mMole) and [γ32P]-ATP (370 MBq/ml) were purchased from PerkinElmer, Inc. (Boston, MA, USA). Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Secondary Antibody, Texas Red-X (T6391) was purchased from Thermo-Fisher Scientific, and FITC-conjugated anti-AU5 antibody from Covance.
DNA constructs
Full-length cDNA of human Spry2 was obtained by RT-PCR from total RNA of Molt-4 cells using primers designed for the published sequence and providing BglII and NotI sites at the 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively [33]. The amplified product was then subcloned into BglII and NotI sites of pCEFL-KZ-AU5 as described previously [6]. The mutant Spry2 S112A and Spry2 S112E was generated from the above pCEFL-KZ-AU5-Spry2 wild-type (WT) by site-directed PCR-mutagenesis, using specific primers in which serine was substituted for alanine as described previously [6], or glutamic acid, respectively, and subcloned into BglII and NotI sites of pCEFL-KZ-AU5. The N-terminal (Nter-hSpry2) and C-terminal (Cter-hSpry2) portions of Spry2 WT (coding regions 1–531, and 532–945, respectively) were cloned as described previously [33]. The vectors pcDNA3-PKD1 WT, pEFBOS-GFP, pEFBOS-GFP-PKD1 WT, pEFBOS-GFP-PKD1-CA (GFP-PKD-CA), and pEFBOS-GFP-PKD1-KD (GFP-PKD-KD) were used for the ectopic expression of PKD1 and different mutants that had been generated previously [19, 34].
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting
The cells were lysed in buffer containing HEPES 25 mM pH 7.5, 150 nM NaCl, 1% NP40, protease inhibitor cocktail (catalog number P8340) from Sigma–Aldrich and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (HY-K0022) from MCE. Nucleus-free supernatants were incubated with appropriate antibodies as described [33]. Immune-complexes and cell extracts were resolved by SDS-PAGE, before being transferred to nitrocellulose (Immobilon P, Millipore) membranes and visualized by Odyssey Imager system using appropriate antibodies.
RNA interference
In knockdown assays, siRNA duplexes were transfected twice in SW480 cells using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagent (Invitrogen) at 24 h intervals. To knockdown CSN3 and PKD1/2/3 was used siGENOME SMART pool human Cops3 (M-011494-00), siGENOME SMART pool human Prkd1 (M-005028-02), siGENOME SMART pool human Prkd2 (M-004197-02), siGENOME SMART pool human Prkd3 (M-005029-01), respectively, and for siRNA control siGENOME Control pool (D-001206-14).
In vitro kinase assays
In vitro kinase assays were performed as described [19] by immunoprecipitated kinase (GFP-PKD-KD or GFP-PKD-CA) using anti-GFP antibodies with AU5-Spry2 immunoprecipitates in the presence of [γ-32P] ATP. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
In vivo labeling
HEK293T cells transiently transfected with GFP-PKD and AU5-Spry2 WT or AU5-Spry2 S112A for 3 days were serum deprived for 2 h, incubated at 37 °C in phosphate-free DMEM for 4 h, and then metabolically labeled with the same medium containing 200 μCi/ml carrier-free 32Pi for 5 h as we performed previously [19]. At the end of this labeling period, cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-AU5-antibody and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
Confocal microscopy
Transfected cells grown on coverslips were fixed for 15 min with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline at 4 °C. After blocking (5% fetal bovine serum in phosphate-buffered saline for 30 min), cells were incubated with the corresponding primary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature, and immunoreactivity was detected with the suitable fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody before mounting on slides with Mowiol 4–88 (Harland, Co, UK). All confocal images were acquired using an inverted Leica laser confocal microscope SP5 with a ×63 Plan-Apochromatic oil immersion objective and were normalized for each color separately.
Statistical analysis
Data were assessed by the GraphPad Prism 9.3.1 (San Diego, CA, USA). Results were expressed as mean ± SD of the indicated number of experiments. Normality of the data was evaluated and statistical significance was assessed using the t-test for unpaired observations. Immunoblotting results were analyzed using linear correlations between increasing amounts of protein and signal intensity.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Cabrita MA, Christofori G. Sprouty proteins, masterminds of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Angiogenesis. 2008;11:53–62.
de Maximy AA, Nakatake Y, Moncada S, Itoh N, Thiery JP, Bellusci S. Cloning and expression pattern of a mouse homologue of drosophila sprouty in the mouse embryo. Mech Dev. 1999;81:213–6.
Tefft JD, Lee M, Smith S, Leinwand M, Zhao J, Bringas P Jr., et al. Conserved function of mSpry-2, a murine homolog of Drosophila sprouty, which negatively modulates respiratory organogenesis. Curr Biol. 1999;9:219–22.
Masoumi-Moghaddam S, Amini A, Morris DL. The developing story of Sprouty and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2014;33:695–720.
Sanchez A, Setien F, Martinez N, Oliva JL, Herranz M, Fraga MF, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of the ERK inhibitor Spry2 in B-cell diffuse lymphomas. Oncogene. 2008;27:4969–72.
Barbachano A, Fernandez-Barral A, Pereira F, Segura MF, Ordonez-Moran P, Carrillo-de Santa Pau E, et al. SPROUTY-2 represses the epithelial phenotype of colon carcinoma cells via upregulation of ZEB1 mediated by ETS1 and miR-200/miR-150. Oncogene. 2016;35:2991–3003.
Holgren C, Dougherty U, Edwin F, Cerasi D, Taylor I, Fichera A, et al. Sprouty-2 controls c-Met expression and metastatic potential of colon cancer cells: sprouty/c-Met upregulation in human colonic adenocarcinomas. Oncogene. 2010;29:5241–53.
Watanabe T, Kobunai T, Yamamoto Y, Matsuda K, Ishihara S, Nozawa K, et al. Differential gene expression signatures between colorectal cancers with and without KRAS mutations: crosstalk between the KRAS pathway and other signalling pathways. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:1946–54.
Bloethner S, Chen B, Hemminki K, Muller-Berghaus J, Ugurel S, Schadendorf D, et al. Effect of common B-RAF and N-RAS mutations on global gene expression in melanoma cell lines. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1224–32.
Swat A, Dolado I, Rojas JM, Nebreda AR. Cell density-dependent inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling by p38alpha mitogen-activated protein kinase via Sprouty2 downregulation. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:3332–43.
Haglund K, Schmidt MHH, Wong ES, Guy GR, Dikic I. Sprouty2 acts at the Cbl/CIN85 interface to inhibit epidermal growth factor receptor downregulation. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:635–41.
Okur MN, Ooi J, Fong CW, Martinez N, Garcia-Dominguez C, Rojas JM, et al. Intersectin 1 enhances Cbl ubiquitylation of epidermal growth factor receptor through regulation of Sprouty2-Cbl interaction. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:817–25.
Aranda S, Alvarez M, Turro S, Laguna A, de la Luna S. Sprouty2-mediated inhibition of fibroblast growth factor signaling is modulated by the protein kinase DYRK1A. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:5899–911.
Ferron SR, Pozo N, Laguna A, Aranda S, Porlan E, Moreno M, et al. Regulated segregation of kinase Dyrk1A during asymmetric neural stem cell division is critical for EGFR-mediated biased signaling. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:367–79.
DaSilva J, Xu L, Kim HJ, Miller WT, Bar-Sagi D. Regulation of sprouty stability by Mnk1-dependent phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:1898–907.
Kim HJ, Taylor LJ, Bar-Sagi D. Spatial regulation of EGFR signaling by Sprouty2. Curr Biol. 2007;17:455–61.
Dubiel D, Rockel B, Naumann M, Dubiel W. Diversity of COP9 signalosome structures and functional consequences. FEBS Lett. 2015;589:2507–13.
Nishikawa K, Toker A, Johannes FJ, Songyang Z, Cantley LC. Determination of the specific substrate sequence motifs of protein kinase C isozymes. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:952–60.
Iglesias T, Waldron RT, Rozengurt E. Identification of in vivo phosphorylation sites required for protein kinase D activation. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:27662–7.
Uhle S, Medalia O, Waldron R, Dumdey R, Henklein P, Bech-Otschir D, et al. Protein kinase CK2 and protein kinase D are associated with the COP9 signalosome. EMBO J. 2003;22:1302–12.
Wei N, Serino G, Deng XW. The COP9 signalosome: more than a protease. Trends Biochem Sci. 2008;33:592–600.
Guy GR, Jackson RA, Yusoff P, Chow SY. Sprouty proteins: modified modulators, matchmakers or missing links? J Endocrinol. 2009;203:191–202.
Hicks KC, Patel TB. Sprouty2 protein regulates hypoxia-inducible factor-α (HIFα) protein levels and transcription of HIFα-responsive genes. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:16787–801.
Saini M, Verma A, Mathew SJ. SPRY2 is a novel MET interactor that regulates metastatic potential and differentiation in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:237.
Edwin F, Anderson K, Patel TB. HECT domain-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase Nedd4 interacts with and ubiquitinates Sprouty2. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:255–64.
Fong CW, Leong HF, Wong ES, Lim J, Yusoff P, Guy GR. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Sprouty2 enhances its interaction with c-Cbl and is crucial for its function. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:33456–64.
Nadeau RJ, Toher JL, Yang X, Kovalenko D, Friesel R. Regulation of Sprouty2 stability by mammalian Seven-in-Absentia homolog 2. J Cell Biochem 2007;100:151–60.
Anderson K, Nordquist KA, Gao X, Hicks KC, Zhai B, Gygi SP, et al. Regulation of cellular levels of Sprouty2 protein by prolyl hydroxylase domain and von Hippel-Lindau proteins. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:42027–36.
Chow SY, Yu CY, Guy GR. Sprouty2 interacts with protein kinase C delta and disrupts phosphorylation of protein kinase D1. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:19623–36.
Lingaraju GM, Bunker RD, Cavadini S, Hess D, Hassiepen U, Renatus M, et al. Crystal structure of the human COP9 signalosome. Nature. 2014;512:161–5.
Zarich N, Anta B, Fernandez-Medarde A, Ballester A, de Lucas MP, Camara AB, et al. The CSN3 subunit of the COP9 signalosome interacts with the HD region of Sos1 regulating stability of this GEF protein. Oncogenesis. 2019;8:2.
Li P, Xie L, Gu Y, Li J, Xie J. Roles of multifunctional COP9 signalosome complex in cell fate and implications for drug discovery. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232:1246–53.
Martinez N, Garcia-Dominguez CA, Domingo B, Oliva JL, Zarich N, Sanchez A, et al. Sprouty2 binds Grb2 at two different proline-rich regions, and the mechanism of ERK inhibition is independent of this interaction. Cell Signal. 2007;19:2277–85.
Matthews SA, Iglesias T, Rozengurt E, Cantrell D. Spatial and temporal regulation of protein kinase D (PKD). EMBO J. 2000;19:2935–45.
Funding
JMR-C received grant support from MINECO-FEDER (SAF2016-78852-R), AESI-ISCIII (PI20CIII/00029) and Spanish Association against Cancer (AECC, CGB14143035THOM). ES group was supported by grants from ISCIII-MCUI (FIS PI19/00934), JCyL (SA264P18-UIC 076), Areces Foundation (CIVP19A5942), Solorzano-Barruso Foundation (FS/32–2020) and by ISCIII-CIBERONC (group CB16/12/00352). Funding to AM group was provided by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (PID2019-104867RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033) and by ISCIII-CIBERONC (group CB16/12/00273). TI was supported by grant PID2020-115218RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF A way of making Europe” and by ISCIII-CIBERNED. RB received grant support from AESI-ISCIII (PI20CIII/00019). Finally, DP-J and MY groups were supported by grants 1.012.022 (to DP-J), 1.010.929 and 1.400.002 (both to MY) from Fundación Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (FUAX). All research co-financed by FEDER funds.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NM: She conceived the original idea and did the initial experiments about the phosphorylation of Spry2 by PKD in vitro and in vivo; TG: She carried out the experiments on confocal microscopy, binding assays and in silico analysis; MPdL: She contributed to analytical calculations and confocal microscopy, numerical and statistical simulations, designed the primers for qPCR and contributed to the final version of the manuscript; ABC: She performed experiments regarding the stability of Spry2 with cycloheximide, immunoassays and co-immunoprecipitation assays; ABallester and TI: They carried out the experimental part concerning the in vivo phosphorylation of Spry2 by PKD and also, in the case of TI, discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.; BA,TL-B and JO: They contributed in preparation of the samples, mutants constructions and carried out some experiments on Spry2 stability; AF-M and ES: They participated in the experiments on the CSN pathway and also, in the case of ES, discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript; DP-J, VC and MY: They contributed to protein–protein interaction assays, data analysis and also, in the case of DP-J, to the art-work of the figures; ABarbáchano and AM: They developed human cell lines stably transfected with the different versions of Spry2 and also, in the case of AM, discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript; AM-C and RB: They performed proteomic and in silico analysis; JLO: He was involved in the initial assays of in vitro phosphorylation of Spry2 by PKD, and discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript; NZ: She supervised the project and collaborations, planned and carried out the experiments and interpretation of the results and contributed to the writing of the manuscript; JMR-C: He assumed leadership responsibility for the planning and execution of the research activity, as well as the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Martínez, N., Gragera, T., de Lucas, M.P. et al. PKD phosphorylation and COP9/Signalosome modulate intracellular Spry2 protein stability. Oncogenesis 12, 20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-023-00465-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-023-00465-3