Abstract
Augmenting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions into paddy production efficiency measurements suggests possible GHG reduction through optimal utilization of input resources. For this, the study aims to identify the resource use efficiency of the paddy farmers and the level of overused inputs. Based on the findings, the study adopted three new technologies and identified their impact on crop productivity and economic return with the help of a technology verification trial. The study collected primary data from 153 farmers through a face-to-face questionnaire for resource use efficiency estimation. A slack-based Data Envelopment Analysis (SBM-DEA) model was used to measure the efficiency score (with and without considering GHG emissions as undesirable output) and the level of overused inputs. The resulting mean efficiency score (considering the undesirable outputs) of 0.63 indicates that smallholder paddy growers were eco-inefficient with space to improve input use like the seed, diesel, electricity, and nitrogen fertilizer (N-fertilizer). To optimize input use, minimize GHG emission, and improve paddy yield, three technologies (high-yielding seed variety, systemic rice intensification (SRI), and SPAD-based N management) were adopted and tested through a technology verification trial. Results indicate that adopting three technologies produced 6.12 tons ha−1 of paddy compared to 4.22 tons ha−1 paddy through farmers’ conventional practices. Hence, developing participatory research among agricultural experts and farmers can bring sustainable agricultural development.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Notes
The resource use efficiency defined as the ratio of dry matter generated to nutrients consumed is the inverse of nutrient concentration in plant tissue (Chapin, 1980). Fundamentally, resource use efficiency refers to increasing agricultural outputs while utilising less nutrients, water, land, energy, capital, and labor.
A group of people, departments, or divisions within an organization that collaboratively decides how to allocate resources and produce something is known as a decision-making unit (DMU). The fundamental analytical units in DEA are known as DMUs, and they are made up of decision-makers, decision inputs, and decision outputs.
References
Abbhishek, K., Swain, D. K., Dey, S., Singh, A., Kuttippurath, J., Chander, G., & Kumar, K. A. (2022). Nutrient management may reduce global warming potential of rice cultivation in subtropical India. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRSUST.2022.100169
Alemzero, D. A., Sun, H., Mohsin, M., Iqbal, N., Nadeem, M., & Vo, X. V. (2021). Assessing energy security in Africa based on multi-dimensional approach of principal composite analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(2), 2158–2171. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-10554-0/TABLES/6
Ali, M. A. (2005). Productivity and resource use efficiency of rice as affected by crop establishment and N management. Ph.D. Dissertation, UPLB, Philippines, pp. 1–82.
Banaeian, N., Omid, M., & Ahmadi, H. (2012). Greenhouse strawberry production in Iran, efficient or inefficient in energy. Energy Efficiency, 5(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12053-011-9133-7/FIGURES/2
Barison, J., & Uphoff, N. (2011). Rice yield and its relation to root growth and nutrient-use efficiency under SRI and conventional cultivation: An evaluation in Madagascar. Paddy and Water Environment, 9(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10333-010-0229-Z/TABLES/7
Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2016). A directional distance approach applied to higher education: An analysis of teaching-related output efficiency. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 87(2), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/APCE.12091
Bich Tho, L. C., & Umetsu, C. (2022). Sustainable farming techniques and farm size for rice smallholders in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta: A slack-based technical efficiency approach. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 326, 107775. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGEE.2021.107775
Bundy, L. G., & Andraski, T. W. (2004). Diagnostic tests for site-specific nitrogen recommendations for winter wheat. Agronomy Journal, 96(3), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.2134/AGRONJ2004.0608
Carlsson-Kanyama, A., & González, A. D. (2009). Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.3945/AJCN.2009.26736AA
Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1998). Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98(2), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022637501082
Chandio, A. A., & Yuansheng, J. (2018). Determinants of adoption of improved rice varieties in northern Sindh, Pakistan. Rice Science, 25(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSCI.2017.10.003
Chapin, F. S. (1980). The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11(1), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001313
Chauhan, N. S., Mohapatra, P. K. J., & Pandey, K. P. (2006). Improving energy productivity in paddy production through benchmarking—An application of data envelopment analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 47(9–10), 1063–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2005.07.004
Chen, K., Łyskowski, A., Jaremko, Ł, & Jaremko, M. (2021). Genetic and molecular factors determining grain weight in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2021.605799/BIBTEX
Cobanoglu, F. (2013). Measuring the technical efficiency of cotton farms in Turkey using stochastic frontier and data envelopment analysis. Outlook on Agriculture, 42(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.5367/OA.2013.0127
Chaudhary, V. P., Singh, K. K., Pratibha, G., Bhattacharyya, R., Shamim, M., Srinivas, I., et al. (2017). Energy conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation under different production systems in rice cultivation. Energy, 130, 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2017.04.131.
Dalal, R. C., Wang, W., Robertson, G. P., & Parton, W. J. (2003). Nitrous oxide emission from Australian agricultural lands and mitigation options: A review. Soil Research, 41(2), 165–195. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR02064
Dyer, J. A., & Desjardins, R. L. (2003). Simulated farm fieldwork, energy consumption and related greenhouse gas emissions in Canada. Biosystems Engineering, 85(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00072-2
Fang, Y., Li, J., & Wang, M. (2012). Development policy for non-grid-connected wind power in China: An analysis based on institutional change. Energy Policy, 45, 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2012.02.043
FAOSTAT. (2019). Online Statistical Service Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 717 http://www.fao.org/faostat/en
Farooq, M., Siddique, K. H. M., Rehman, H., Aziz, T., Lee, D.-J., & Wahid, A. (2011). Rice direct seeding: Experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil and Tillage Research, 111(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.10.008
Flückiger, Y., & Vassiliev, A. (2007). Efficiency in microfinance institutions: An application of data envelopment analysis to MFIs in Peru. In B. Balkenhol (Ed.), Microfinance and public policy (1st ed., pp. 89–110). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230300026_6
Gasso, V., Oudshoorn, F. W., Sørensen, C. A. G., & Pedersen, H. H. (2014). An environmental life cycle assessment of controlled traffic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production, 73, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.10.044
Government of India. (2011). Faster, sustainable and more inclusive growth: An approach to the 12th five year plan (Draft) planning commission. New Delhi: Government of India.
Government of India. (2020). Agricultural statistics at a glance. Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare Directorate of Economics and Statistics.
Goyal, S. K., & Berg, E. (2003). Supply response and input demand on paddy farms in Haryana, India—A panel data analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.297948
GRiSP (Global Rice Science Partnership). (2013). Rice almanac (4th ed., pp. 1–283). International Rice Research Institute.
Gupta, K., Kumar, R., Baruah, K. K., Hazarika, S., Karmakar, S., & Bordoloi, N. (2021). Greenhouse gas emission from rice fields: A review from Indian context. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(24), 30551–30572. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-13935-1/TABLES/10
Hossain, M. K., Kamil, A. A., Baten, M. A., & Mustafa, A. (2012). Stochastic frontier approach and data envelopment analysis to total factor productivity and efficiency measurement of Bangladeshi rice. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e46081. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0046081
Houshyar, E., Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki, M., & Azadi, H. (2017). Impacts of technological change on energy use efficiency and GHG mitigation of pomegranate: Application of dynamic data envelopment analysis models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.06.152
Huang, M., Zou, Y., Jiang, P., Xia, B., Feng, Y., Cheng, Z., & Mo, Y. (2011). Yield component differences between direct-seeded and transplanted super hybrid rice. Plant Production Science, 14(4), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.14.331
Hussain, F., Bronson, K. F., Yadvinder, S., Singh, B., & Peng, S. (2000). Use of chlorophyll meter sufficiency indices for nitrogen management of irrigated rice in Asia. Agronomy Journal, 92(5), 875–879. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.925875x
Hussain, S., Peng, S., Fahad, S., Khaliq, A., Huang, J., Cui, K., & Nie, L. (2015). Rice management interventions to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(5), 3342–3360. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-014-3760-4/TABLES/4
Ingram, J. (2020). Nutrition security is more than food security. Nature Food, 1(1), 2–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-019-0002-4
Jin, J., & McKelvey, M. (2019). Building a sectoral innovation system for new energy vehicles in Hangzhou, China: Insights from evolutionary economics and strategic niche management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.03.118
Kashyap, D., & Agarwal, T. (2021). Carbon footprint and water footprint of rice and wheat production in Punjab, India. Agricultural Systems, 186, 102959. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGSY.2020.102959
Khonje, M., Manda, J., Alene, A. D., & Kassie, M. (2015). Analysis of adoption and impacts of improved maize varieties in eastern Zambia. World Development, 66(695), 706–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.008
Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., & Mousazadeh, H. (2013). Reduction of CO2 emission by improving energy use efficiency of greenhouse cucumber production using DEA approach. Energy, 55, 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2013.04.021
Khoshnevisan, B., Shariati, H. M., Rafiee, S., & Mousazadeh, H. (2014). Comparison of energy consumption and GHG emissions of open field and greenhouse strawberry production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2013.08.098
Korsaeth, A., Jacobsen, A. Z., Roer, A.-G., Henriksen, T. M., Sonesson, U., Bonesmo, H., Skjelvåg, A. O., & Strømman, A. H. (2012). Environmental life cycle assessment of cereal and bread production in Norway. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science, 62(4), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2013.783619
Koutsouris, A. (2018). Role of extension in agricultural technology transfer: A critical review. Innovation, Technology and Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7_16/COVER
Kuosmanen, T., & Kortelainen, M. (2005). Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247846
Kwon, H. B., & Lee, J. (2015). Two-stage production modeling of large U.S. banks: A DEA-neural network approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(19), 6758–6766. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2015.04.062
Lal, R. (2004). Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International, 30(7), 981–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2004.03.005
Latruffe, L., Balcombe, K., Davidova, S., & Zawalinska, K. (2006). Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland. Applied Economics, 36(12), 1255–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000176793
Linquist, B. A., Adviento-Borbe, M. A., Pittelkow, C. M., van Kessel, C., & van Groenigen, K. J. (2012). Fertilizer management practices and greenhouse gas emissions from rice systems: A quantitative review and analysis. Field Crops Research, 135, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.06.007
Malana, N. M., & Malano, H. M. (2006). Benchmarking productive efficiency of selected wheat areas in Pakistan and India using data envelopment analysis. Irrigation and Drainage, 55(4), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/IRD.264
Masuda, K. (2016). Measuring eco-efficiency of wheat production in Japan: A combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.03.090
Mehmood, A., Tanveer, A., Javed, M. M., Nadeem, M. A., Naeem, M., & Abbas, T. (2018). Estimation of economic threshold level of alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.) to Tackle Grain quality and yield losses in rice. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 64(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1340643
Metzidakis, I., Martinez-Vilela, A., Castro Nieto, G., & Basso, B. (2008). Intensive olive orchards on sloping land: Good water and pest management are essential. Journal of Environmental Management, 89(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2007.04.028
Mobtaker, H. G., Akram, A., Keyhani, A., & Mohammadi, A. (2012). Optimization of energy required for alfalfa production using data envelopment analysis approach. Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(2), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2012.02.001
Mobtaker, H. G., Keyhani, A., Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., & Akram, A. (2010). Sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for barley production in Hamedan Province of Iran. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 137(3–4), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGEE.2010.03.011
Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., Dalgaard, T., Knudsen, M. T., Keyhani, A., Mousavi-Avval, S. H., & Hermansen, J. E. (2013). Potential greenhouse gas emission reductions in soybean farming: A combined use of Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.05.019
Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S. S., Mousavi Avval, S. H., & Rafiee, H. (2011). Energy efficiency improvement and input cost saving in kiwifruit production using Data Envelopment Analysis approach. Renewable Energy, 36(9), 2573–2579. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2010.10.036
Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., & Tabatabaeefar, A. (2012). Assessing the technical efficiency of energy use in different barberry production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 27, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.01.014
Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., & Mohammadi, A. (2011). Optimization of energy consumption for soybean production using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach. Applied Energy, 88(11), 3765–3772. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2011.04.021
Muthayya, S., Sugimoto, J. D., Montgomery, S., & Maberly, G. F. (2014). An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1324(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/NYAS.12540
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Abdi, R., Rafiee, S., & Mobtaker, H. G. (2014). Optimization of energy required and greenhouse gas emissions analysis for orange producers using data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.08.019
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S. S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., & Chau wing, K. (2017). Energy consumption enhancement and environmental life cycle assessment in paddy production using optimization techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 571–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.06.071
Nemecek, T., von Richthofen, J. S., Dubois, G., Casta, P., Charles, R., & Pahl, H. (2008). Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations. European Journal of Agronomy, 28(3), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJA.2007.11.004
Nghiem, H. S., Coelli, T., & Rao, P. (2007). The efficiency of microfinance in Vietnam: Evidence from NGO schemes in the north and the central regions. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability: Annual Review, 2(5), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1884/1832-2077/CGP/v02i05/54258
Pathak, H., Bhatia, A., Prasad, S., Singh, S., Kumar, S., Jain, M. C., & Kumar, U. (2002). Emission of nitrous-oxide from rice-wheat systems of indo-gangetic plains of India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 77(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015823919405/METRICS
Pellegrini, P., & Fernández, R. J. (2018). Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(10), 2335–2340. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1717072115/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.201717072SI.PDF
Peng, S., Cassman, K. G., & Kropff, M. J. (1995). Relationship between leaf photosynthesis and nitrogen content of field-grown rice in tropics. Crop Science, 35(6), 1627–1630. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500060018x
Phadnis, S. S., & Kulshrestha, M. (2012). Evaluation of irrigation efficiencies for water users’ associations in a major irrigation project in India by DEA. Benchmarking, 19(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771211224536/FULL/PDF
Ponni Priya, J., Veeraputhiran, R., Ganesaraja, V., Pandiselvi, T., & Pandian, B. J. (2010). Comparative study of system of rice intensification and conventional method of rice cultivation in Madurai district of Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(1), 186–188.
Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C., & Foley, J. A. (2013). Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66428. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0066428
Rees, R. M., Roelcke, M., Li, S. X., Wang, X. Q., Li, S. Q., Stockdale, E. A., McTaggart, I. P., Smith, K. A., & Richter, J. (1996). The effect of fertilizer placement on nitrogen uptake and yield of wheat and maize in Chinese loess soils. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 47(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01985721/METRICS
Sandhu, N., & Kumar, A. (2017). Bridging the rice yield gaps under drought: QTLs, genes, and their use in breeding programs. Agronomy, 7(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7020027
Sengupta, J. K. (1987). Production frontier estimation to measure efficiency: A critical evaluation in light of data envelopment analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 8(2), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/MDE.4090080203
Shanmugam, K. R., & Venkataramani, A. (2006). Technical efficiency in agricultural production and its determinants: An exploratory study at the district level. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2), 169–184.
Singh, S., Kaur, P., Sachdeva, J., & Bhardwaj, S. (2017). Profitability analysis of major crops in Punjab: Some evidence from cost of cultivation survey data. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 13(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.5958/2322-0430.2017.00010.5
Soni, P., Sinha, R., & Perret, S. R. (2018). Energy use and efficiency in selected rice-based cropping systems of the Middle-Indo Gangetic Plains in India. Energy Reports, 4, 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2018.09.001
Sun, H., Pofoura, A. K., Adjei Mensah, I., Li, L., & Mohsin, M. (2020). The role of environmental entrepreneurship for sustainable development: Evidence from 35 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Science of the Total Environment, 741, 140132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140132
Takundwa, R., Jowett, S., McLeod, H., & Peñaloza-Ramos, M. C. (2017). The effects of environmental factors on the efficiency of clinical commissioning groups in England: A Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Medical Systems, 41(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10916-017-0740-5/TABLES/5
Thakur, A. K., & Uphoff, N. T. (2017). How the system of rice intensification can contribute to climate-smart agriculture. Agronomy Journal, 109(4), 1163–1182. https://doi.org/10.2134/AGRONJ2016.03.0162
Theodoridis, A., Ragkos, A., Roustemis, D., Galanopoulos, K., Abas, Z., & Sinapis, E. (2012). Assessing technical efficiency of Chios sheep farms with data envelopment analysis. Small Ruminant Research, 107(2–3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.05.011
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
Vázquez-Rowe, I., Villanueva-Rey, P., Iribarren, D., Teresa Moreira, M., & Feijoo, G. (2012). Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis of grape production for vinification in the Rías Baixas appellation (NW Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production, 27, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2011.12.039
Woods, J., Williams, A., Hughes, J. K., Black, M., & Murphy, R. (2010). Energy and the food system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society b: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2991–3006. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTB.2010.0172
Weller, S., Janz, B., Jörg, L., Kraus, D., Racela, H. S. U., Wassmann, R., et al. (2016). Greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential of traditional and diversified tropical rice rotation systems. Global Change Biology, 22(1), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/GCB.13099.
Xiong, D., Chen, J., Yu, T., Gao, W., Ling, X., Li, Y., Peng, S., & Huang, J. (2015). SPAD-based leaf nitrogen estimation is impacted by environmental factors and crop leaf characteristics. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 13389. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13389
Yang, C. C. (2014). Evaluating the performance of banking under risk regulations: A slacks-based Data Envelopment Analysis assessment framework. Expert Systems, 31(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/EXSY.12020
Yousaf, M., Li, J., Lu, J., Ren, T., Cong, R., Fahad, S., & Li, X. (2017). Effects of fertilization on crop production and nutrient-supplying capacity under rice-oilseed rape rotation system. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01412-0
Zahra, N., Hafeez, M. B., Nawaz, A., & Farooq, M. (2022). Rice production systems and grain quality. Journal of Cereal Science, 105, 103463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2022.103463
Zhang, H., Hou, D., Peng, X., Ma, B., Shao, S., Jing, W., Gu, J., Liu, L., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Yang, J. (2019). Optimizing integrative cultivation management improves grain quality while increasing yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 18(12), 2716–2731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62836-4
Zhang, K., Yuan, Z., Yang, T., Lu, Z., Cao, Q., Tian, Y., Zhu, Y., Cao, W., & Liu, X. (2020). Chlorophyll meter–based nitrogen fertilizer optimization algorithm and nitrogen nutrition index for in-season fertilization of paddy rice. Agronomy Journal, 112(1), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20036
Zhao, C., Chen, M., Li, X., Dai, Q., Xu, K., Guo, B., Hu, Y., Wang, W., & Huo, Z. (2021). Effects of soil types and irrigation modes on rice root morphophysiological traits and grain quality. Agronomy, 11(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010120
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was availed for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dey, S., Abbhishek, K. & Swain, D.K. Resource Use Efficiency Estimation and Technology Verification Trial for Sustainable Improvement in Paddy Production: An Action-Based Research. Int. J. Plant Prod. 17, 337–352 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-023-00243-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-023-00243-6