Skip to main content
Log in

Detailed seismic risk analysis of electrical substation equipment using a reliability based approach

  • Technical Papers
  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a risk analysis framework for substation structures based on reliability methods. Even though several risk assessment approaches have been developed for buildings, detailed risk analysis procedures for infrastructure components have been lacking in prior studies. The proposed framework is showcased by its application to a system of interconnected structures at a power substation in Tehran. Finite element models of structures are developed and validated in accordance with previous experiments. The uncertainties in the material, mass, and geometric properties of structures are described by random variables that are input to the finite element model. An artificial ground motion model is employed to comprehensively consider uncertainty in ground motion. Monte Carlo sampling is subsequently conducted on the library of probabilistic models. The analysis resulted in the loss distribution in the life cycle of structures. Additionally, the loss associated with six earthquake scenarios having specific magnitudes and return periods is computed. The application provides insight into the most vulnerable equipment in the considered system. Furthermore, introduced risk measures can guide stakeholders to make risk-based decisions to optimize design or prioritize a retrofit of infrastructure components under conditions of uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghababaei M and Mahsuli M (2018), “Detailed Seismic Risk Analysis of Buildings Using Structural Reliability Methods,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 53(April 2017): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2018.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessandri S, Giannini R, Paolacci F, Amoretti M and Freddo A (2015), “Seismic Retrofitting of an HV Circuit Breaker Using Base Isolation with Wire Ropes, Part 2: Shaking-Table Test Validation,” Engineering Structures, 98: 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessandri S, Giannini R, Paolacci F and Malena M (2015), “Seismic Retrofitting of an HV Circuit Breaker Using Base Isolation with Wire Ropes, Part 1: Preliminary Tests and Analyses,” Engineering Structures, 98: 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri D, Tubaldi E, De Angelis M, Patelli E and Dall’Asta A (2018), “Reliability-Based Optimal Design of Nonlinear Viscous Dampers for the Seismic Protection of Structural Systems,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(2): 963–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansal A, Akinc A, Cultrera G, Erdik M, Pessina V, Tönük G and Ameri G (2009), “Loss Estimation in Istanbul Based on Deterministic Earthquake Scenarios of the Marmara Sea Region (Turkey),” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(4): 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostolakis G, Qu B, Ecemis N and Dogruel S (2007), “Field Reconnaissance of the 2007 Niigata-Chuetsu Oki Earthquake,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 6(4): 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE-7 (2017), Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, USA. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784414248

  • ATC-1 (1985), Earthquake Damage Evaluation for California, Redwood City, California, Applied Technology Council, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo J, Guerreiro L, Bento R, Lopes M and Proença J (2010), “Seismic Vulnerability of Lifelines in the Greater Lisbon Area,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(1): 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagen B, Huang D and Fattal K (2019), “Enhanced Probabilistic Approach for Substation Reliability Assessment,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 13(12): 2488–2495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghmisheh AG and Estekanchi HE (2019), “Effects of Rigid Bus Conductors on Seismic Fragility of Electrical Substation Equipment,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 125: 105733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghmisheh AG and Estekanchi HE (2021), “Quantifying Seismic Response Uncertainty of Electrical Substation Structures Using Endurance Time Method,” Structures, 30: 838–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghmisheh AG and Mahsuli M (2021), “Seismic Performance and Fragility Analysis of Power Distribution Concrete Poles,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 150: 106909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baghmisheh GA and Estekanchi HE (2020), “Influence of Dynamic Interaction Between Interconnected Electrical Substation Equipment on Seismic Response,” Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering.https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2020.171843.1784

  • Bai W, Dai J, Zhou H, Yang Y and Ning X (2017), “Experimental and Analytical Studies on Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers for Seismic Protection of Porcelain Electrical Equipment,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16(4): 803–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai W, Moustafa MA and Dai JW (2019), “Seismic Fragilities of High-Voltage Substation Disconnect Switches,” Earthquake Spectra, 35(4): 1559–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayari MA, Shabakhty N and Abadi EIZ (2022), “Analyzing Uncertainties Involved in Estimating Collapse Risk with and Without Considering Uncertainty Probability Distribution Parameters,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 21(1): 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo P and Amendola G (2021), “Optimal DCFP Bearing Properties and Seismic Performance Assessment in Nondimensional Form for Isolated Bridges,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 50(9): 2442–2461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo P, Amendola G and Palazzo B (2017a), “Seismic Fragility and Reliability of Structures Isolated by Friction Pendulum Devices: Seismic Reliability-Based Design (SRBD),” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 46(3): 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo P, Mancini G and Palazzo B (2018a), “Seismic Reliability-Based Robustness Assessment of Three-Dimensional Reinforced Concrete Systems Equipped with Single-Concave Sliding Devices,” Engineering Structures, 163: 373–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo P, Palazzo B, Alfano G and Palumbo MF (2018b), “Seismic Reliability-Based Ductility Demand for Hardening and Softening Structures Isolated by Friction Pendulum Bearings,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 25(11): e2256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo P, Palazzo B and della Vecchia P (2016), “Life-Cycle Cost and Seismic Reliability Analysis of 3D Systems Equipped with FPS for Different Isolation Degrees,” Engineering Structures, 125: 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo P, Palazzo B and Ferrentino T (2017b), “Seismic Reliability-Based Ductility Demand Evaluation for Inelastic Base-Isolated Structures with Friction Pendulum Devices,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46(8): 1245–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA and Krawinkler H (2000), “Progress and Challenges in Seismic Performance Assessment,” PEER Center News 3, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ayala D and Ansal A (2012), “Non-Linear Push Over Assessment of Heritage Buildings in Istanbul to Define Seismic Risk,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 10(1): 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A and Ang AHS (1977), “A Fault-Rupture Model for Seismic Risk Analysis,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 67(4): 1173–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A and Zhang Y (1999), “Space-Variant Finite Element Reliability Analysis,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 168(1–4): 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2003), Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology: Earthquake Model, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 58-1 (2012), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings (Volume 1-Methodology), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filiatrault AKS (2000), “Seismic Interaction of Interconnected Electrical Substation Equipment,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(10): 1140–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-1401(10)04009-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholipour Y, Bozorgnia Y, Rahnama M and Berberian MSJ (2008), “Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, Phase I-Greater Tehran Regions,” Final Report, Iran.

  • Gino D, Castaldo P, Giordano L and Mancini G (2021), “Model Uncertainty in Non-Linear Numerical Analyses of Slender Reinforced Concrete Members,” Structural Concrete, 22(2): 845–870. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202000600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gökçe T, Yüksel E and Orakdöğen E (2019), “Seismic Performance Enhancement of High-Voltage Post Insulators by a Polyurethane Spring Isolation Device,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17(3): 1739–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haukaas T (2008), “Unified Reliability and Design Optimization for Earthquake Engineering,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 23(4): 471–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J and Li J (2004), “Seismic Reliability Analysis of Large Electric Power Systems,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 3(1): 51–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEEE Standard 693 (2005), IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Design of Substations, Revision of IEEE 693–1985 & 1997, USA.

  • Jahangiri V and Shakib H (2020), “Reliability-Based Seismic Evaluation of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Earthquake-Induced Transient Ground Motions,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(8): 3603–3627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaigirdar MA (2005), “Seismic Fragility and Risk Analysis of Electric Power Substations,” PhD Thesis, McGill University, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalvati AH and Hosseini M (2009), “Seismic Performance of Electrical Substations’ Equipments in Bam Earthquake (Iran 2003),” In TCLEE 2009: Lifeline Earthquake Engineering in a Multihazard Environment, pp. 1–8.

  • Kitayama S and Constantinou MC (2019), “Probabilistic Seismic Performance Assessment of Seismically Isolated Buildings Designed by the Procedures of ASCE/SEI 7 and Other Enhanced Criteria,” Engineering Structures, 179: 566–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kongar I, Esposito S and Giovinazzi S (2017), “Post-Earthquake Assessment and Management for Infrastructure Systems: Learning from the Canterbury (New Zealand) and L’Aquila (Italy) Earthquakes,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(2): 589–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Phoon KK, Prakoso WA and Hirany A (2007), “Reliability-Based Design of Foundations for Transmission Line Structures,” In Electrical Transmission Line and Substation Structures: Structural Reliability in a Changing World, pp. 184–194.

  • Kwasinski A, Eidinger J, Tang A and Tudo-Bornarel C (2014), “Performance of Electric Power Systems in the 2010–2011 Christchurch, New Zealand, Earthquake Sequence,” Earthquake Spectra, 30(1): 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Wang T and Shang Q (2019), “Probability-Based Seismic Reliability Assessment Method for Substation Systems,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 48(3): 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Tsang HH, Cheng Y and Lu Z (2017), “Effects of Sheds and Cemented Joints on Seismic Modelling of Cylindrical Porcelain Electrical Equipment in Substations,” Earthquakes and Structures, 12(1): 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahsuli M and Haukaas T (2012), “Computer Program for Multimodel Reliability and Optimization Analysis,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 27(1): 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahsuli M and Haukaas T (2013a), “Seismic Risk Analysis with Reliability Methods, part I: Models,” Structural Safety, 42: 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahsuli M and Haukaas T (2013b), “Seismic Risk Analysis with Reliability Methods, part II: Methods,” Structural Safety, 42: 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahsuli, M, Rahimi H and Bakhshi A (2018), “Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis of Iran Using Reliability Methods,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 17: 1117–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (2004), Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna F, Fenves G and Filippou FC MS (2000), Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees), PEERC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moehle J and Deierlein GG (2004), “A Framework Methodology for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering,” In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 679, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Mohammadi RK, Nikfar F and Akrami V (2012), “Estimation of Required Slack for Conductors Connecting Substation Equipment Subjected to Earthquake,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 27(2): 709–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi RK and Tehrani AP (2014), “An Investigation on Seismic Behavior of Three Interconnected Pieces of Substation Equipment,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 29(4): 1613–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadpour SHM (2017), “Experimental System Identification of a 63kV Substation Post Insulator and Developing Its Fragility Curves by Dynamic Fnite Element Analyses,” Earthquake Spectra, 33(3): 1149–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohsenian V, Hajirasouliha I and Filizadeh R (2021), “Seismic Reliability Analysis of Steel Moment-Resisting Frames Retrofitted by Vertical Link Elements Using Combined Series–Parallel System Approach,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(2): 831–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narjabadifam P, Hoseinpour R, Noori M and Altabey W (2021), “Practical Seismic Resilience Evaluation and Crisis Management Planning Through GIS-Based Vulnerability Assessment of Buildings,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20(1): 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanci M (2019), “Fuzzy Rule Based Seismic Risk Assessment of One-Story Precast Industrial Buildings,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 18(3): 631–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolacci F, Giannini R, Alessandri S and De Felice G (2014), “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a High Voltage Disconnect Switch,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 67: 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papagiannopoulos GA, Hatzigeorgiou GD and Beskos DE (2012), “An Assessment of Seismic Hazard and Risk in the Islands of Cephalonia and Ithaca, Greece,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 32(1): 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaeian S and Der Kiureghian A (2012), “Simulation of Orthogonal Horizontal Ground Motion Components for Specified Earthquake and Site Characteristics,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(2): 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang Q, Guo X, Li Q, Xu Z, Xie L, Liu C, et al. (2020), “A Benchmark City for Seismic Resilience Assessment,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 19(4): 811–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudret B and Der Kiureghian A (2002), “Comparison of Finite Element Reliability Methods,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 17(4): 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takada S, Bastami M, Kuwata Y and Javanbarg MB (2004), “Performance of Electric Power Systems During the Bam Earthquake and Its Fragility Analyses,” Memoirs of Construction Engineering Research Institute, 46: 152–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhirov S, Fenves G and Fujisaki E (2004), “Seismic Qualification and Fragility Testing of Line Break 550-kV Disconnect Switches,” Report 2004/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang SC, Liu TJ and Hong HP (2017), “Reliability of Tower and Tower-Line Systems Under Spatiotemporally Varying Wind or Earthquake Loads,” 143(10): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001835

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang TY, Moehle J, Stojadinovic B and Der Kiureghian A (2009), “Seismic Performance Evaluation of Facilities: Methodology and Implementation,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 135(10): 1146–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Xie Q, He C and Xue S (2021), “Numerical Investigation of the Seismic Response of a UHV Composite Bypass Switch Retrofitted with Wire Rope Isolators,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20(1): 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zareei SA, Hosseini M and Ghafory-Ashtiany M (2017), “Evaluation of Power Substation Equipment Seismic Vulnerability by Multivariate Fragility Analysis: A Case Study on a 420 kV Circuit Breaker,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92: 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng HD, Fan J and Long XH (2017), “Analysis of the Seismic Collapse of a High-Rise Power Transmission Tower Structure,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 134: 180–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X and Li H (2022), “Life-Cycle Failure Probability Analysis of Deteriorated RC Bridges Under Multiple Hazards of Earthquakes and Strong Winds,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 21(3): 811–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Ghahremani Baghmisheh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baghmisheh, A.G., Khodaei, M., Abadi, A.Z.F. et al. Detailed seismic risk analysis of electrical substation equipment using a reliability based approach. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 22, 495–511 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2180-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2180-1

Keywords

Navigation