Skip to main content
Log in

Role of dampers on the seismic performance of pin-supported wall-frame structures

  • Technical Papers
  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pin-supported (PS) walls have been proven effective in avoiding weak story failure of frame structures by increasing the height-wise continuous stiffness and producing uniform distribution of story drifts. However, little attention has been given to the floor velocity or acceleration responses of PS wall-frame structures, which predominate the seismic damage of various nonstructural components that are critical to the immediate occupancy and quick recovery of buildings. This paper presents a numerical evaluation of the floor velocity and acceleration responses of PS wall-frame structures, highlighting the effects of different types of dampers accompanying the PS walls. The results show that the PS walls alone significantly increase the peak floor velocity (PFV) and peak floor acceleration (PFA) responses. PS wall-frame structures with either steel or viscoelastic (VE) dampers are much less effective in reducing the PFV or PFA responses than they are in reducing the peak inter-story drift ratio (PIDR). The impact of this behavior is demonstrated by a seismic fragility analysis that incorporates demand parameters combining the maximum PIDR, average PFV and PFA. The results show that the use of VE dampers rather than hysteretic dampers results in better protection of nonstructural components in PS wall-frame structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ancheta TD, Darragh RB, Stewart JP, Silva WJ, Chiou BS, Wooddell KE, Graves RW, Kottke AR, Boore DM, Kishida T and DonahueJL (2013), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Reserch Center, US.

  • Aslani H (2005), Probabilistic Earthquake Loss Estimation and Loss Disaggregation in Buildings, Stanford University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astroza R, Conte JP, Restrepo JI, Ebrahimian H, and Hutchinson T (2021), “Seismic Response Analysis and Modal Identification of a Full-Scale Five-Story Base-Isolated Building Tested on the NEES@ UCSD Shake Table,” Engineering Structures, 238: 112087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badillo-Almaraz H, Whittaker AS, Reinhorn AM (2007), “Seismic Fragility of Suspended Ceiling Systems,” Earthquake Spectra, 23(1): 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker JW (2007), “Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis,” Bull Seismol Soc Am 2007, 97: 1486–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbagallo F, Bosco M, Ghersi A, Marino EM, and Rossi PP (2018), “Seismic Retrofitting of Eccentrically Braced Frames by Rocking Walls and Viscous Dampers,” In Key Engineering Materials, 763: 1105–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimellaro GP and Reinhorn AM (2011), “Multidimensional Performance Limit State for Hazard Fragility Functions,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 137(1): 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal RP, Pourali A, Tasligedik AS, Yeow T, Baird A, MacRae G, Pampanin S and Palermo A (2016), “Seismic Performance of Non-Structural Components and Contents in Buildings: An Overview of NZ Research,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 15(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Sarno L, Magliulo G, D’Angela D and Cosenza E (2019), “Experimental Assessment of the Seismic Performance of Hospital Cabinets Using Shake Table Testing,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 48(1): 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong B, Sause R and Ricles JM (2016), “Seismic Response and Performance of a Steel MRF Building with Nonlinear Viscous Dampers Under DBE and MCE,” J Struct Eng, 142(6): 04016023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du YF and Wu DY (2014), “Performance Analysis of Light Energy Dissipative Rocking Frame Designed on the Basis of Stiffness Demand,” China Civil Engineering Journal, 47(1): 24–35. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 461 (2007), Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA E-74 (2011), Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage: A Practical Guide, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA P-58 (2012), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Volume 1 Methodology, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filiatrault A and Sullivan T (2014), “Performance-Based Seismic Design of Nonstructural Building Components: The Next Frontier of Earthquake Engineering,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 13(1): 17–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GB 50010–2010 (2010), Code for Design of Concrete Structures, National Standards of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing: China Ministry of Construction. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorian CE and Grigorian M (2016), “Performance Control and Efficient Design of Rocking-Wall Moment Frames,” J. Structural Engineering, ASCE, 142: 04015139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorian M, Moghadam AS and Mohammadi H (2017), “Advances in Rocking Core-Moment Frame Analysis,” Bull. Earthquake Eng, 15(12): 5551–5577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JSCA (2001), The Guide to Safe Buildings JSCA Performance-Based Seismic Design, Japan Structural Consultants Association. (in Japanese)

  • JSSI (2013), Manual for Design and Construction of Passive-Controlled Structures, 3rd ed, Tokyo: The Japan Society of Seismic Isolation. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinidis D and Makris N (2010), “Experimental and Analytical Studies on the Response of 1/4-Scale Models of Freestanding Laboratory Equipment Subjected to Strong Earthquake Shaking,” Bull. Earthquake Eng, 8(6): 1457–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai JW and Mahin SA (2015), “Strongback System: A Way to Reduce Damage Concentration in Steel-Braced Frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(9): 04014223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna F (2011), “OpenSees: A Framework for Earthquake Engineering Simulation,” Computer Science and Eng., 13(4): 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima M, Ogawa K and Inoue K (2002), “Generic Frame Model for Simulation of Earthquake Responses Analysis,” Earthquake Eng. and Structural Dynamics, 31(3): 671–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagao T, Kagano H and Hamaguchi K (2012), “Full-Scale Shaking Table Test on Furnitures Subjected to Long Period Earthquake Motions,” 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.

  • Pan P, Wu S, Wang H and Nie X (2018), “Seismic Performance Evaluation of an Infilled Rocking Wall Frame Structure Through Quasi-Static Cyclic Testing,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(2): 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panian L, Bucci N and Janhunen B (2015), “BRBM Frames: an Improved Approach to Seismic-Resistant Design Using Buckling-Restrained Braces,” Proc. 2nd ATS and SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures, San Francisco, December 10–12, pp. 632–643.

  • Pollino M, Slovenec D, Qu B and Mosqueda G (2017), “Seismic Rehabilitation of Concentrically Braced Frames Using Stiff Rocking Cores,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 143(9): 04017080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujols JCG (2013), Experimental Study of Target Demands to Minimize Seismic Induced Content Disruption, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qu Z, Gong T, Li QQ and Wang T (2019), “Evaluation of the Fishbone Model in Simulating the Seismic Response of Multistory Reinforced Concrete Moment-Resisting Frames,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 18(2): 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu Z, Gong T, Wang X, Li Q and Wang T (2020), “Stiffness and Strength Demands for Pin-Supported Walls in Reinforced-Concrete Moment Frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 146(9): 04020181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu Z, Sakata H, Midorikawa S and Wada A (2015), “Lessons from the Behavior of a Monitored 11-Story Building During the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake for Robustness Against Design Uncertainties,” Earthquake Spectra, 31(3): 1471–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu Z, Wada A, Motoyui S, Sakata H and Kishiki S (2012), “Pin-Supported Walls for Enhancing the Seismic Performance of Building Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(14): 2075–2091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi PP (2007), “A Design Procedure for Tied Braced Frames,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36: 2227–2248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEAOC (1996), Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary, Seismology Committee Structural Engineers Association of California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoica P and Moses RL (2005), Spectral Analysis of Signals, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soroushian S, Zaghi AE, Maragakis M, Echevarria A, Tian Y and Filiatrault A (2015), “Analytical Seismic Fragility Analyses of Fire Sprinkler Piping Systems with Threaded Joints,” Earthquake Spectra, 31(2): 1125–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taghavi S and Miranda MM (2003), Response Assessment of Nonstructural Building Elements, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi T, Chen X and Matsui R (2015), “Seismic Performance of Controlled Spine Frames with Energy-Dissipating Members,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 114: 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay R, Chen L and Tirca L (2014), “Enhancing the Seismic Performance of Multi-Storey Buildings with a Modular Tied Braced Frame System with Added Energy Dissipating Devices,” International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 3(1): 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay R and Merzouq S (2004), “Dual Buckling Restrained Braced Steel Frames for Enhanced Seismic Response,” Proc. Passive Control Symposium, Yokohama, November, 15–16: 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D and Cornell CA (2002), “Incremental Dynamic Analysis,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3): 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden K and Tomlinson GR (2001), Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification, and Modelling, Institute of Physics Publishing: Philadelphia, PA, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wada A, Qu Z, Ito H, Motoyui S, Sakata H and Kasai K (2010), “Seismic Retrofit Using Rocking Walls and Steel Dampers,” In Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures, pp. 1010–1021.

  • Wu DY and Lu XL (2015), “Structural Performance Evaluation of a New Energy-Dissipation and Light-Weight Rocking Frame by Numerical Analysis and Experiment,” Proc. 10th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Sydney, November, 191: 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie XX, Qu Z, Fu HR and Zhang LX (2021), “Effect of Prior In-Plane Damage on the Out-of-Plane Behavior of Masonry Infill Walls,” Engineering Structures, 226(2021): 111380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51878629).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhe Qu.

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51878629

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Qu, Z. & Gong, T. Role of dampers on the seismic performance of pin-supported wall-frame structures. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 22, 453–467 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-022-2092-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-022-2092-5

Keywords

Navigation