Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T09:30:35.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The visual diplomacy of cancer treatments: the mediatic legacy of the Curies in the early transnational fight against cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2023

Beatriz Medori*
Affiliation:
Centro Interuniversitá rio de Historia das Ciências e da Tecnologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Corresponding author: Beatriz Medori, Email: beatrizmedori@gmail.com

Abstract

This paper analyses the role played by members of the Curie family in the visual diplomacy of cancer treatments. This relationship started in 1921, when Marie Curie travelled to the US, accompanied by her two daughters, Ève and Irène, to receive a gram of radium at the White House from President Warren Harding. In the years that followed, Ève Curie, as the biographer and natural heir of radium discoverers Marie and Pierre Curie, continued to contribute to the visual diplomacy of cancer campaigning. Two events will be analysed through an interdisciplinary lens, merging history of science and visual-diplomacy studies, to show how the legacy of the Curies played out in the international consolidation of pre-war transnational alliances in the fight against cancer. One involves the picture of the chargé d'affaires of the France Republic, Jules Henry, receiving the biography authored by Ève, Madame Curie, at the French embassy in Washington. The other concerns the photograph of Ève visiting the Portuguese Oncology Institute (IPO) in 1940, which was immediately reproduced in the Institute's bulletin in order to raise awareness of cancer prevention strategies, and also captured in film as a propaganda tool for the Estado Novo regime (1933–74).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of British Society for the History of Science

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Eve Curie’, Boletim do Instituto Português de Oncologia (1940) 7(1), pp. 1–3, 1.

2 ‘Eve Curie’, op. cit. (1).

3 See R.M.P. Costa, Luta Contra o Cancro e Oncologia em Portugal, Lisbon: Edições Afrontamento, 2012; Saraiva, Tiago, ‘Radiações, Cancro e Ditadura: O Instituto Português de Oncologia e o Governo das Elites’, in Saraiva, Tiago and Macedo, Marta (eds.), Capital Científica: Práticas da Ciência em Lisboa e a História Contemporânea de Portugal, Lisbon: ICS Press, 2019, pp. 325–47Google Scholar.

4 Saraiva, op. cit. (3).

5 See Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jönsson, Christer and Hall, Martin, ‘Communication: an essential aspect of diplomacy’, International Studies Perspectives (2003) 4, pp. 195210CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pamment, James, ‘The mediatization of diplomacy’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy (2014) 9, pp. 253–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; John Leach, ‘The role of science communication in international diplomacy’, in Lloyd S. Davis and Robert G. Patman (eds.), Science Diplomacy: New Day or False Dawn?, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2014, pp. 155–69; Graham, S.E., ‘Emotion and public diplomacy: dispositions in international communications, dialogue, and persuasion’, International Studies Review (2014) 16, pp. 522–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cornut, Jérémie, ‘Diplomacy, agency, and the logic of improvisation and virtuosity in practice’, European Journal of International Relations (2017) 24(3), pp. 712–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Constantinou, C.M., ‘Visual diplomacy: reflections on diplomatic spectacle and cinematic thinking’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy (2018) 13, pp. 387409CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 See John Nye, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs, 2004; Mattern, J.B., ‘Why “soft power” isn't so soft: representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies (2005) 33(3), pp. 583612CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 ‘Mme. Curie plans to end all cancers’, New York Times, 12 May 1921, p. 25.

8 E.H. Wirtén, Making Marie Curie: Intellectual Property and Celebrity Culture in an Age of Information, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015; Julie des Jardins, The Madame Curie Complex: The Hidden History of Women in Science, New York: Feminist Press, 2010.

9 Pigeard, N.M., ‘Les impacts des erreurs courantes dans les biographies de Marie Curie’, Velsalius (2019) 25(1), pp. 5867Google Scholar; Pigeard, ‘Marie Curie et les femmes de son laboratoire’, in Dominique Bréchemier and Nicole Laval-Turpin (eds.), Femmes de sciences quelles conquêtes? Quelle reconnaissance?, Paris: L'Harmattan, 2018, pp. 109–24.

10 Rentetzi, Maria, ‘The U.S. radium industry: industrial in-house research and the commercialization of science’, Minerva (2008) 46, pp. 437–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Roqué, Xavier, ‘Marie curie and the radium industry: a preliminary sketch’, History and Technology: An International Journal (2008) 13(4), pp. 267–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Boudia, Soraya, ‘The Curie laboratory radioactivity and metrology’, History and Technology (1997) 13, pp. 249–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 See Pinault, Michel, ‘The Joliot-Curies: science, politics, networks’, History and Technology: An International Journal (1997) 13(4), pp. 307–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shelley Emling, Marie Curie and Her Daughters: The Private Lives of Science's First Family, New York: Macmillan, 2012.

12 In fact, the IPO's medical ‘propaganda’ appropriated the ASCC's campaigns, adapted and translated to Portuguese on a regular basis, particularly in the IPO's bulletin, since 1928, the year when representatives of both institutions met at Stockholm's II International Congress of Radiology. With regard to the relations between the IPO and the ASCC, the grounds that sustained this relationship are still under investigation. For instance, the Rockefeller Foundation, supportive of the ASCC's cause, funded the IPO's project in the interwar period too. Moreover, this discussion is part of a larger ongoing research that aims at exploring the surprising US influence in Portugal during the authoritarian and conservative regime of the Estado Novo, and in a period that precedes the historically acclaimed US hegemony in Europe (and in Portugal): the aftermath of the Second World War culminating in the Cold War.

13 Susan Quinn, Marie Curie: A Life, Lexington, MA: Plunkett Lake Press, 2011, p. 1158.

14 Jardins, op. cit. (8), p. 27.

15 Marie Meloney, ‘The greatest woman in the world’, The Delineator (1921) 98(3), pp. 15–16.

16 Wirtén, op. cit. (8), p. 179.

17 Wirtén, op. cit. (8), p. 182.

18 Meloney, ‘That millions shall not die!’, The Delineator (1921) 98(3), p. 1.

19 Chapman Catt, ‘Helping Madame Curie to help the world’, Woman Citizen (1921) 5(41), p. 2.

20 Catt, op. cit. (19), p. 2.

21 Jardins, op. cit. (8), p. 37.

22 Eve Curie, Madame Curie, New York: Doubleday, Doran & Company, inc., 1939, p. 759.

23 ‘Mme. Curie plans to end all cancers’, op. cit. (7).

24 ‘Mme. Curie plans to end all cancers’, op. cit. (7).

25 ‘Mme. Curie plans to end all cancers’, op. cit. (7).

26 Curie, op. cit. (22), p. 767.

27 Curie, op. cit. (22), p. 767.

28 See Maria Rentetzi, ‘With strings attached: gift-giving to the International Atomic Energy Agency and US foreign policy’, Endeavour (2021) 45, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2021.100754; Carrie Anderson, ‘Material mediators: Johan Maurits, textiles, and the art of diplomatic exchange’, Journal of Early Modern History (2016) 20, pp. 63–85, p. 3.

29 Wirtén, op. cit. (8), pp. 167–246.

30 The American Society for the Control of Cancer: Its Objects and Methods and Some of the Visible Results of Its Work, New York: American Society for the Control of Cancer, 1925.

31 David Cantor, The Reward of Courage (1921), Bethesda: National Library of Medicine, 2013, pp. 2–3.

32 ‘MME. CURIE’, Campaign Notes of the American Society for the Control of Cancer (1921) 3(6), p. 4.

33 ‘MME. CURIE’, op. cit. (32).

34 ‘MME. CURIE’, op. cit. (32).

35 Rentetzi, op. cit. (10), p. 459.

36 See also Xavier Roqué, ‘Displacing radioactivity’, in B. Joerges and T. Shinn (eds.), Instrumentation between Science, State and Industry, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001, pp. 49–65, 61.

37 ‘The story of radium’, New York Times, 15 May 1921.

38 ‘MME. CURIE’, op. cit. (32).

39 ‘MME. CURIE’, op. cit. (32). With regard to the medical use of radium and the advance of nuclear physics in Europe with the support of the Rockefeller Foundation see Finn Aaserud, Redirecting Science: Niels Bohr, Philanthropy, and the Rise of Nuclear Physics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990; John L. Heilbron and Robert W. Seidel, Lawrence and His Laboratory: A History of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, vol. 1, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.

40 ‘Mme. Curie warns of perils in radium’, New York Times, 31 October 1929.

41 ‘Mme Curie warns of perils in radium’, op. cit. (40).

42 Curie, op. cit. (22), p. 894.

43 ‘Mme. Curie is dead’, New York Times, 5 July 1934.

44 ‘Mme. Curie is dead’, op. cit. (43).

45 Curie, op. cit. (22), p. 878.

46 ‘Women honor Mme. Curie’, New York Times, 12 January 1938.

47 ‘Jules Henry ready to return to Paris’, New York Times, 29 March 1938.

48 Lisa Alaimo, Lori Chambers and Antony Puddephatt, ‘Images of Marie Curie: how reputational entrepreneurs shape iconic identities’, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society (2018) 4, pp. 8–21, 16.

49 ‘Women honor Mme. Curie’, op. cit. (46).

50 J.T. Patterson, The Dread Disease: Cancer and Modern American Culture, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989, pp. 114–36.

51 Patterson, op. cit. (50), pp. 123–6.

52 Aligning with historian Roger Griffin's concept of ‘rooted modernism’, merging fascism's obsession with tradition with its willingness to use and display modernist visual culture, as well as modern forms of science and technology. Griffin, Roger, ‘Building the visible immortality of the nation: the centrality of “rooted modernism” to the third Reich's architectural new order’, Fascism (2018) 7, pp. 944CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 ‘Inconsciência ou ignorância?’, Boletim do Instituto Português de Oncologia (1934) 1(9), p. 5.

54 ‘Raios X fonte de vida e de morte’, Boletim do Instituto Português de Oncologia (1938) 5(8–9), pp. 8–10.

55 ‘A semana internacional contra o cancro’, Boletim do Instituto Português de Oncologia (1938) 5(11), pp. 7–8.

56 Manifesto da Semana Internacional de Luta contra o Cancro de 1938 da União Internacional de Luta Contra o Cancro, enviado pelo Presidente da Comissão Directora do Instituto Português de Oncologia ao Ministério da Educação Nacional, Arquivo da Direcção Geral dos Serviços de Espectáculos 1929–1974, Lisbon, Arquivo Nacional da Torre do Tombo (ANTT).

57 ‘Dia Curie’, Diário de Lisboa, 22 November 1938.

58 ‘A semana internacional contra o cancro’, Boletim do Instituto Português de Oncologia (1938) 5(11), p. 8.

59 Romance of Radium, retrieved from www.youtube.com/watch?v=724Do_WYGsA, (accessed 5 March 2021).

60 From the early 1930s to the 1950s, Portuguese (film) production companies were in contact with Hollywood producers and distributors, such as Metro–Goldwyn–Mayer, Paramount and Fox, which progressively established their offices in Portugal. See Metro–Goldwyn–Mayer (1928–62), Paramount (1928–62), Fox (1954–62), lists of films (1928–80), all in Arquivo da Direcção Geral dos Serviços de Espectáculos (1929–74), ANTT. An analysis of the Portuguese film magazine Cinéfilo (1928–39) shows that American film culture was widely present in Portugal, with a special focus on Hollywood. Likewise, US films were also used in an educational context in Portugal, under the direction and support of the Estado Novo's Ministry of National Education: Mocidade Portuguesa (1937–68) and Junta Nacional de Educação (1937–68), Correspondência (1929–69), Arquivo da Direcção Geral dos Serviços de Espectáculos (1929–74), ANTT.

61 ‘Vênus Loira’, Cinéfilo, 23 September 1933, p. 8.

62 ‘Eva Curie’, Diário de Lisboa, 8 January 1940.

63 ‘Eva Curie’, Diário de Lisboa, 10 January 1940.

64 ‘Eva Curie em Lisboa’, Diário de Lisboa, 9 January 1940.

65 ‘Eve Curie’, op. cit. (1), p. 1.

66 Saraiva, op. cit. (3), pp. 325–47.

67 Saraiva, op. cit. (3), pp. 325–47.

68 Saraiva, op. cit. (3), pp. 325–47.

69 ‘Eve Curie’, op. cit. (1), p. 3.

70 Ève arrived in Lisbon on board the SudExpress train on 8 January 1940 (‘Eva Curie’, Diário de Lisboa, 8 January 1940); the day after, she visited the IPO and then headed to New York City on the liner Vulcania on 10 January 1940 (‘Eve Curie outlines French wives’ job’, New York Times, 19 January 1940). On the use of media to advertise Portugal's stance see Sampaio, Sofia, ‘Jornal Português: Revista Mensal de Actualidades 1938–1951’, Análise Social (2016) 219 LI (2), pp. 467–72Google Scholar; Lisboa, Ricardo Vieira, ‘A representação do cinema no Jornal Português: da capital das vedetas à agenda de António Lopes Ribeiro’, Aniki (2016) 3(2), pp. 280302Google Scholar.

71 Also in the same newsreel featuring Ève is the episode of Hollywood actor Robert Montgomery, coming from the United States, through Lisbon, on his way to London.

72 See Fernanda Rollo, Portugal e o Plano Marshall: Da rejeição à solicitação da ajuda financeira norte-americana (1947–1952), Lisbon: Editorial Estampa, 1994; Fernando Rosas, Portugal entre a paz e a guerra (1939–1945), Estudo do impacte da II Guerra Mundial na economia e na sociedade portuguesas, Lisbon: Editorial Estampa, 1990; Nunes, João Paulo Avelãs, ‘Portugal, Espanha, o volfrâmio e os beligerantes durante e após a Segunda Guerra Mundial’, Revista Portuguesa de História (1999) 2(33), pp. 211–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cardoso, Débora, ‘A “neutralidade colaborante” e a propaganda em Portugal durante a Segunda Guerra Mundial’, Revista de História da Sociedade e da Cultura (2017) 17, pp. 355–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 ‘FRANCE: women at work’, Time, 12 February 1940.

74 ‘Eve Curie, voyage à Lisbonne 1940’, Archive Institute Curie, Musée Curie, Paris.

75 ‘Eva Curie falará sobre a mulher francesa e a guerra’, Diário de Lisboa, 22 April 1940.

76 ‘Eve Curie e Charles Rist passaram por Lisboa e seguiram para Paris’, Diário de Lisboa, 2 May 1940.

77 Mitchell, W.J.T., What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar.