Abstract
Item response tree (IRTree) models are widely used in various applications for their ability to differentiate sets of sub-responses from polytomous item response data based on a pre-specified tree structure. Lyu et al. (Psychometrika) article highlighted that item slopes are often lower for later nodes than earlier nodes in IRTree applications. Lyu et al. argued that this phenomenon might signal the presence of item-specific factors across nodes. In this commentary, I present a different perspective that conditional dependencies in IRTree data could explain the phenomenon more generally. I illustrate my point with an empirical example, utilizing the latent space item response model that visualizes conditional dependencies in IRTree data. I conclude the commentary with a discussion on the potential of exploring conditional dependencies in IRTree data that goes beyond identifying the sources of conditional dependencies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Böckenholt, U., & Meiser, T. (2017). Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 70, 159–181.
Culpepper, S. (2014). If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again: Applications of sequential IRT models to cognitive assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 38, 632–644.
De Boeck, P., & Wilson, M. (2004). Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach. New York: Springer.
Debeer, D., Janssen, R., & Boeck, P. (2017). Modeling skipped and not-reached items using IRTrees. Journal of Educational Measurement, 54, 333–363.
Jeon, M., & De Boeck, P. (2016). A generalized item response tree model for psychological assessments. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1070–1085.
Jeon, M., De Boeck, P., & van der Linden, W. (2017). Modeling answer change behavior: An application of a generalized item response tree model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 42, 467–490.
Jeon, M., Jin, I. H., Schweinberger, M., & Baugh, S. (2021). Mapping unobserved item-respondent interactions: A latent space item response model with interaction map. Psychometrika, 86, 378–403.
Lyu, W., Bolt, D. M., & Westby, S. (2023). Exploring the effects of item specific factors in sequential and IRTree models. Psychometrika (In press).
Vansteelandt, K. (2000). Formal models for contextualized personality psychology. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Data Availablity
The data used in this paper are available from the FLIRT R package which can be freely obtained from https://sites.google.com/site/arbormj/sofware/flirt?authuser=0.
Conflict of interest:
The author has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jeon, M. Commentary: Explore Conditional Dependencies in Item Response Tree Data. Psychometrika 88, 803–808 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-023-09915-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-023-09915-8