The COVID-19 pandemic has placed a significant strain on the healthcare system worldwide since it began in 2019 in China. Due to the severity of the SARS-CoV‑2 infection at the beginning of the pandemic and the reports of overloading of the healthcare systems in neighboring European countries such as Italy, there was a significant focus on maintaining sufficient intensive care capacity to care for the feared large number of patients who might require intensive care. This focus on critical care in the initial waves of the pandemic created the impression that only a few hospitals would care for the vast majority of SARS-CoV-2 patients in Germany.

To guarantee adequate capacities for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 patients who needed hospital care in Rhineland-Palatinate, the government of Rhineland-Palatinate obliged all hospitals that were part of the 2019–2025 Hospital Plan and were registered and listed in the Registry of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI Registry) to provide intensive care beds with ventilation to the extent necessary in each case, but at least 20% of their respective capacities, and the treatment capacities of normal care on isolation wards to the extent necessary in each case, including the staff necessary for the care and treatment of patients with COVID-19 disease at all times (in § 17 of the 18th Corona Control Ordinance Rhineland-Palatinate: 18th CoBeLVO of 20 March 2021; [1]). This order focused not only on intensive care capacities but also on COVID-19 care on normal wards, paying attention to the overall burden of the disease for inpatient care.

Consequently, the aim of our analysis was to examine the participation of hospitals of different levels of care in Rhineland-Palatinate in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

The Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (IHF, Institute for Heart Attack Research) initiated the COVID-19 Registry for Rhineland-Palatine in April 2020 with the support of the Ministry of Social Affairs, Labor, Health and Demography (MSAGD) and from May 2021 with the support of the Ministry of Science and Health (MWG; [2]). Part of this prospective registry was the documentation of the number of patients hospitalized for the treatment of SARS-CoV‑2 infections and the occupancy rates in the intensive care units, which were also queried by the German DIVI registry. In addition to the latter, the occupancy rates on normal care wards in all hospitals in Rhineland-Palatinate had to be reported through daily mandatory queries from 8 April 2020 to 31 March 2023, in order to provide a better picture of the real pandemic burden on the healthcare system beyond the focus on intensive care capacities only [3, 4].

All hospitals included in the 2019–2025 Hospital Plan of Rhineland-Palatinate participated in the data acquisition over the full period of the COVID-19 pandemic (Fig. 1). In the 2019–2025 Hospital Plan, all hospitals were assigned to four different levels of care: (a) primary care hospitals, (b) standard care hospitals, (c) specialty care hospitals, and (d) maximal care hospitals. A list with the assignment of all hospitals in Rhineland-Palatinate to the four levels of care is provides as electronic supplementary material. We documented the occupancies of intensive care units and normal wards for the four different levels of care in Rhineland-Palatinate throughout the entire COVID-19 pandemic.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Supply areas and hospitals according to the 2019–2025 Hospital Plan of the Federal State of Rhineland-Palatinate

Results

Volume of SARS-CoV-2 patients hospitalized in Rhineland-Palatinate

During the entire COVID-19 pandemic with a total of nine waves between April 2020 and March 2023, different numbers of SARS-CoV-2 patients required inpatient treatment in Rhineland-Palatinate. Figure 2 shows the daily number of hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 patients differentiating between intensive and normal care required. At the peak of the first pandemic wave, only 394 patients received inpatient treatment, whereas in the second pandemic wave in December 2020 a maximum of 1151 patients were hospitalized for SARS-CoV‑2 infections. In the course of the pandemic, multiple waves exceeded these numbers, with the highest number of patients by far being hospitalized during wave 7 in October 2022 (Table 1). During the pandemic the number of patients requiring intensive care decreased, whereas the number of patients requiring normal care on isolation wards increased over time. The number of patients on normal wards exceeded the number in intensive care units by two- to fourfold at the beginning of the pandemic, and by eight- to 15-fold at the end of the pandemic with milder courses of the infections due to mutation shifts of the virus as well as to the improved vaccination status of the patients.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Daily updated number of SARS-CoV-2 patients in Rhineland-Palatinate treated as inpatients in intensive care units (red) and in normal care units (blue). Vertical lines and numbers mark the peaks of SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic waves 1–9

Table 1 Absolute numbers of SARS-CoV‑2 inpatients at the peaks of the nine COVID-19 pandemic waves in Rhineland-Palatinate in total, for intensive care units, and for normal wards. The number of patients on normal wards by far exceeded the number of patients in intensive care units in all the pandemic waves

SARS-CoV-2 treatment by hospitals of different levels of care

All 114 hospitals were involved in the care of SARS-CoV‑2 inpatients in Rhineland-Palatinate throughout the entire COVID-19 pandemic (Fig. 3). Hospitals of all care levels—primary care, standard care, specialty care, and maximal care—participated equally in the management of SARS-CoV-2 patients (Fig. 4). The 46 standard care hospitals (49% of all hospitals) together with the seven maximal care hospitals (6% of all hospitals) managed approximately 60% of all SARS-CoV-2 patients requiring intensive care throughout all of the waves of the pandemic (Table 2). This is due to the fact that, in absolute numbers, standard care and maximal care hospitals had the most operable intensive care beds available in Rhineland-Palatinate throughout the COVID pandemic. The involvement of hospitals in the intensive care of SARS-CoV-2 patients should be considered in relation to the actual operable intensive care beds. Primary care hospitals provided intensive care on average in 18.4%, standard care hospitals in 31.6%, specialty care hospitals in 21.5%, and maximal care hospitals in 28.5% of their actual operable intensive care beds during all the pandemic waves. Up to 60% of SARS-CoV-2 patients requiring in-hospital care on normal isolation wards were treated in primary care and standard care hospitals (Table 2). In Rhineland-Palatinate all hospitals at different levels of care participated proportionally in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and fulfilled the expected provision of at least 20% of the available intensive care capacities for the SARS-CoV-2 patients in Rhineland-Palatinate (Table 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Number of SARS-CoV‑2 inpatients differentiated by hospital (each hospital represented by a different color). Vertical lines and numbers mark the peaks of SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic waves 1–9

Fig. 4
figure 4

Number of SARS-CoV‑2 inpatients by level of care: primary care hospitals, standard care hospitals, specialty care hospitals, maximal care hospitals

Table 2 Absolute numbers of patients and percent of the overall SARS-CoV-2 patient population according to the different levels of care in Rhineland-Palatinate in total, for intensive care units, and for normal wards (non-ICU)
Table 3 Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 patients requiring intensive care among hospitals of different levels of care in Rhineland-Palatinate in relation to the actual available and operable intensive care beds documented by daily queries (data for the peak dates of each pandemic wave)

Discussion

Due to the scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, the participation of all hospitals was necessary for the care of SARS-CoV-2 patients. Shortly before the COVID-19-pandemic, which started in China in December 2019, the Bertelsmann Foundation published a report on the future design of the hospital landscape in the Federal Republic of Germany. It suggested a significant reduction in the number of hospitals in Germany [5]. Since this publication, the proposal of restructuring the hospital care system in Germany and the closure of approximately 50% of German hospitals has been hotly debated. Particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic period, it was repeatedly reported in the media that mainly large hospitals would bear the main burden of caring for hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 patients in Germany. In view of the fear of shortages of intensive care capacities during the pandemic, the Bertelsmann Foundation stated that their proposal should not include a reduction in intensive care beds.

The Scientific Institute of the German healthcare provider AOK (WidO = Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK [Allgemeine Ortskrankenkassen]) reported on the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany and its impact on the country’s federal healthcare system [6]. In 2020, 24% of hospitals had treated 66% of all hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV‑2 infections [7]. This analysis included SARS-CoV-2 patients who were insured by the AOK only. It described the dominance of large hospitals in the care of inpatients with SARS-CoV‑2, which did not apply to Rhineland-Palatinate, however. All hospitals in Rhineland-Palatinate participated proportionally in the care of the large number of SARS-CoV-2 patients during the entire COVID-19 pandemic between April 2020 and March 2023.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 Registry of Rhineland-Palatinate provided an important prospective database for real-time monitoring of the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and the allocation of healthcare capacities for the best possible management of SARS-CoV-2 patients requiring hospital care. It was used as an important central instrument by the Ministry for Science and Healthcare (MWG) in Rhineland-Palatinate in order to provide the basis for creating networking structures and stringent planning of the COVID-19 crisis.