Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Accessing biological control genetic resources and sharing benefits resulting from their utilization

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the adoption of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 1992, the sovereign rights of states over their natural resources were explicitly recognized and the authority of national governments to determine access to genetic resources confirmed. The CBD had a major impact on the global exchange of genetic resources, including genetic resources for food and agriculture. At national level, the CBD triggered the development of access and benefit-sharing (ABS) measures through which governments aim to enforce national sovereignty over genetic resources with the aim to partake in the benefits derived from the use of these resources. At global level, the CBD triggered multiple normative initiatives, including the adoption of an international instrument on plant genetic resources and the development of a Protocol to the CBD. The history of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, established in 1983 by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), is paradigmatic for the historical transition from “common heritage” to “national sovereignty” over biological diversity, including genetic resources. This article briefly recapitulates key milestones in the development of ABS policies and measures. The article identifies some of the difficulties ABS measures may create for relevant stakeholders, in particular the biological control sector and explores options for this sector to cope with the new reality of the Nagoya Protocol and the diversity of national ABS measures. It is of pivotal importance that national governments when developing and implementing ABS measures take into account the distinctive needs and features of the food and agriculture sector, including those of the biological control sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Access and benefit-sharing clearing-house (2023). https://absch.cbd.int/. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Barratt BIP, Mason PG, Cock MJW, Klapwijk J, van Lenteren JC, Brodeur J, Hoelmer KA, Heimpel GE (2017) Access and benefit sharing: best practices for the use and exchange of invertebrate biological control agents. In: Mason PG, Gillespie DR, Vincent C (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on biological control of arthropods. Langkawi, Malaysia 11–15 September 2017, CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 71–74. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/epdf/10.1079/9781786394118.0000. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Buitenhuis R, Cock MJW, Colmenarez YC, De Clercq P, Edgington S, Gadaleta P, Gwynn R, Heimpel G, Hill M, Hinz HL, Hoddle MS, Jäkel T, Klapwijk JN, Leung K, Mc Kay F, Messelink, GJ, Silvestri L, Smith D, Sosa A, Wäckers FL, Cabrera Walsh G, Wyckhuys KAG, Zaviezo T (2023) Sustainable use and conservation of microbial and invertebrate biological control agents and microbial biostimulants. Background study paper No. 71. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/cc3571en/cc3571en.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Cock MJW, van Lenteren JC, Brodeur J, Barratt BIP, Bigler F, Bolckmans K, Cônsoli FL, Haas F, Mason PG, Parra JRP (2009) The use and exchange of biological control agents for food and agriculture. Background study paper No. 47. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/ak569e/ak569e.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Cock MJW, van Lenteren JC, Brodeur J, Barratt BIP, Bigler F, Bolckmans K, Fernando L, Cônsoli FL, Haas F, Mason PG, Parra JRP (2010) Do new access and benefit sharing procedures under the Convention on Biological Diversity threaten the future of biological control? BioControl 55:199–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2021) Guidance document on the scope of application and core obligations of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilisation in the Union (2021/C 13/01). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2021.013.01.0001.01.ENG. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (2022a) Specialized international access and benefit-sharing instruments in the context of article 4, paragraph 4, of the Nagoya Protocol. CBD/NP/MOP/DEC/4/11 . https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/np-mop-04/np-mop-04-dec-11-en.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (2022b) Digital sequence information on genetic resources. CBD/COP/DEC/15/9. https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-15/cop-15-dec-09-en.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (1992) United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1760, p. 79. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201760/v1760.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Davis, K, Borisenko A (2017) Introduction to access and benefit-sharing and the Nagoya Protocol: what DNA barcoding researchers need to know. Sofia. https://ab.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=22579. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (2022) Regulations: the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing (ABS). https://www.gov.uk/guidance/abs. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • FAO (1983a) International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources. Annex to Resolution 8/83 https://www.fao.org/3/x5563E/X5563e0a.htm#Resolution8. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • FAO (1983b) International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources. Resolution 8/83 https://www.fao.org/3/x5563E/X5563e0a.htm#Resolution8. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • FAO (1989a) Resolution 4/89 Agreed interpretation of the International Undertaking. Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/x5588E/x5588e06.htm#Resolution4. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • FAO (1983c) Establishment of a commission on plant genetic resources. Resolution 9/83 Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/x5563E/X5563e0a.htm#Resolution9. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • FAO (1989b) Resolution 5/89 Farmers’ Rights. Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/x5588E/x5588e06.htm#Resolution5. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • FAO (1991) Resolution 3/91 Annex 3 to the International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources. Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/x5587E/x5587e06.htm#Resolution3. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • FAO (2001) International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 2400, p. 303. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%202400/v2400.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • FAO (2019) ABS Elements: elements to facilitate domestic implementation of access and benefit-sharing for different subsectors of genetic resources for food and agriculture—with explanatory notes. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/ca5088en/ca5088en.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • FAO (2022) Report of the ninth session of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. IT/GB-9/22/Report. https://www.fao.org/3/nk642en/nk642en.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Greiber T, Peña Moreno S, Åhrén M, Nieto Carrasco J, Chege Kamau E, Cabrera Medaglia J, Oliva MJ, Perron-Welch F (2012) An explanatory guide to the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit-sharing. IUCN, Gland. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/EPLP-083.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Halabi, SF (2023) Access and benefit sharing in a pandemic treaty and future international public health agreements. In: Lawson C, Rourke M, Humphries F (eds) Access and benefit sharing of genetic resources, information and traditional knowledge, pp 37–49

  • Humphries F, Laird S, Wynberg R, Morrison C, Lawson, C, Kolesnikova A (2021) Survey of access and benefit-sharing country measures accommodating the distinctive features of genetic resources for food and agriculture and associated traditional knowledge. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb6525en. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Martyniuk E, Haska A (2021) Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in livestock sector: what have we learnt so far? Animals. 11(8):2354

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mason PG, Cock MJW, Barratt BIP, Klapwijk JN, van Lenteren JC, Brodeur J, Hoelmer KA, Heimpel GE (2018) Best practices for the use and exchange of invertebrate biological control genetic resources relevant for food and agriculture. BioControl 63:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason PG, Barratt BIP, Mc Kay F, Klapwijk JN, Silvestri LC, Hill M, Hinz HL, Sheppard A, Brodeur J, Vitorino MC, Weyl P, Hoelmer KA (2023a) Impact of access and benefit sharing implementation on biological control genetic resources. BioControl, in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10176-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason PG, Mc Kay F, Silvestri L, Hill M, Weyl P, Hinz HL, Brodeur J, Vitorino MD, Barrat BIP (2023b) International agreement for the use and exchange of biological control genetic resources: a practical proposal. BioControl, in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10177-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michiels F, Feiter U, Paquin-Jaloux S, Jungmann D, Braun A, Sayoc MAP, Armengol R, Wyss M, David B (2022) Facing the harsh reality of access and benefit sharing (ABS) legislation: an industry perspective. Sustainability 14:277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann D, Borisenko AV, Coddington JA, Häuser CL, Butler CR, Casino A, Vogel JC, Haszprunar G, Giere P (2018) Global biodiversity research tied up by juridical interpretations of access and benefit sharing. Org Divers Evol 18:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 3008, p.3 https://treaties.un.org/doc/source/docs/UNEP_CBD_COP_DEC_X_1-E.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Silvestri L, Sosa A, Kay F, Vitorino M, Hill M, Zachariades C, Hight S, Weyl P, Smith D, Djeddour D, Mason P (2020) Implementation of access and benefit-sharing measures has consequences for classical biological control of weeds. BioControl 65:125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D, da Silva M, Jackson J, Lyal C (2017) Explanation of the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing and its implication for microbiology. Microbiology 163:289–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D, Hinz H, Mulema J, Weyl P, Ryan MJ (2018) Biological control and the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing—a case of effective due diligence. Biocontrol Sci Technol 28:914–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2002) Report of the world summit on sustainable development. A/CONF.199/20. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/478154?ln=en. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • van Lenteren JC (2021) Will the “Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing” put an end to biological control? In: Hendrichs J, Pereira R, Vreysen MJB (eds) Area-wide integrated pest management: development and field application. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 655–667

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waage J (2007) The sustainable management of biodiversity for biological control in food and agriculture: status and needs. Background study paper No. 38. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/k0150e/k0150e.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  • Winter G, Kamau EC (2022) Cases and questions in application of ABS Regimes. In: Kamau EC (eds) Global transformations in the use of biodiversity for research and development. Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice, vol 95. Springer, Cham, pp 637–650

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Secretariat of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153, Rome, Italy

    Dan Leskien

Authors
  1. Dan Leskien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Leskien.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The author has no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. The author certifies that he has no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The author declares that he is an employee of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The authors has no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Peter Mason.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leskien, D. Accessing biological control genetic resources and sharing benefits resulting from their utilization. BioControl 68, 225–233 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10193-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-023-10193-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation