Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 12, 2023

Semiotic ladder: the schema of producing meanings in narrative

  • Mohammad Ali Mahmoodi EMAIL logo and Fatemeh Savab
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

A model called the “semiotic ladder,” which consists of “consecutive semiotic squares,” is proposed in this paper, through which the meanings of the deep structure of a narrative can be depicted as fluid and dynamic. It shows the stages of producing meanings in the narrative, from beginning to end. To see this, several narratives in the epic and mythological genres are analyzed in order to discover their abstract and deep structural meanings, and to prove the dynamic nature of meaning in the semiotic ladder. According to the analysis, the process of the semiotic ladder depicts the displacement and fluidity of narrative meanings using consecutive semiotic squares, and this pattern can be applied to and implemented in all narratives. Also, the semiotic ladder allows us to clearly observe the pattern of movement of the narrative subject schema in the path of accomplishing the object.


Corresponding author: Mohammad Ali Mahmoodi, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran, E-mail:

Funding source: Iran National Science Foundation

Award Identifier / Grant number: 98029253

  1. Research funding: Supported by “Iran National Science Foundation (INSF)- Code: 98029253”.

References

Assaf, Dan, Yochai Cohen, Marcel Danesi & Yair Neuman. 2015. Opposition theory and computational semiotics. Sign Systems Studies 43(2/3). 159–172. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2015.43.2-3.01.Search in Google Scholar

Debroy, Bibek. 2017. The Valmiki Ramayana, vol. 3. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Gaiman, Neil. 2017. Norse mythology. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Green, Keith & Jill LeBihan. 2001. Critical theory and practice: A coursebook. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Green, Roger Lancelyn. 2009. Tales of the Greek heroes. London: Puffin Classics.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1987a. De l’imperfection. Paris: Fanlac.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1987b. On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1988. Maupassant: The semiotics of text. Practical exercises (Semiotic Crossroads 1), Paul Perron (trans.). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamin.10.1075/sc.1Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien & Joseph Courtés. 1982. Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien, Paul Ricoeur, Paul Perron & Frank Collins. 1989. On narrativity. New Literary History 20(3). 551–562. https://doi.org/10.2307/469353.Search in Google Scholar

Guiraud, Pierre. 2004. La semiologia. Mexico: Siglo XXI.Search in Google Scholar

Hébert, Louis. 2011. Tools for text and image analysis: An introduction to applied semiotics, Julie Tabler (trans.). https://nicole-everaert-semio.be/PDF/fr/Tools-for-Texts-and-Images.pdf (accessed 1 March 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Herman, Luc & Bart Vervaeck. 2005. Handbook of narrative analysis. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kindt, Tom & Hans-Harald Müller. 2003. What is narratology? Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110202069Search in Google Scholar

Landowski, Eric. 2005. Les interactions risquées. Limoges: Pulim.Search in Google Scholar

Makaryk, Irene. 1993. Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory: Approaches, scholars, terms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442674417Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Bronwen & Felizitas Ringham. 2000. Dictionary of semiotics. London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Mcquillan, Martin. 2002. The narrative reader. London: Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9780203459065Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, Winfried. 1990. Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctv14npk46Search in Google Scholar

Robichaud, Daniel. 2002. Greimas’ semiotics and the analysis of organizational action. In Kecheng Liu, Rodney J. Clarke, Peter B. Anderson & Ronald K. Stamper (eds.), Coordination and communication using signs: Studies in organizational semiotics 2, 129–149. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-1-4615-0803-8_6Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Donna. 1994. World mythology: An anthology of the great myths and epics. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC.Search in Google Scholar

Saidova, Raykhonoy Abduganievna. 2020. Semiotic square and binary opposition. Theoretical & Applied Science 2. 201–205. https://doi.org/10.15863/tas.2020.02.82.37.Search in Google Scholar

de Saussure, Ferdinand. 2011. Course in general linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-05
Accepted: 2023-01-13
Published Online: 2023-05-12
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2021-0142/html
Scroll to top button