skip to main content
research-article

Effect of Subthreshold Electrotactile Stimulation on the Perception of Electrovibration

Published:20 September 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Electrovibration is used in touch enabled devices to render different textures. Tactile sub-modal stimuli can enhance texture perception when presented along with electrovibration stimuli. Perception of texture depends on the threshold of electrovibration. In the current study, we have conducted a psychophysical experiment on 13 participants to investigate the effect of introducing a subthreshold electrotactile stimulus (SES) to the perception of electrovibration. Interaction of tactile sub-modal stimuli causes masking of a stimulus in the presence of another stimulus. This study explored the occurrence of tactile masking of electrovibration by electrotactile stimulus. The results indicate the reduction of electrovibration threshold by 12.46% and 6.75% when the electrotactile stimulus was at 90% and 80% of its perception threshold, respectively. This method was tested over a wide range of frequencies from 20 Hz to 320 Hz in the tuning curve, and the variation in percentage reduction with frequency is reported. Another experiment was conducted to measure the perception of combined stimuli on the Likert scale. The results showed that the perception was more inclined towards the electrovibration at 80% of SES and was indifferent at 90% of SES. The reduction in the threshold of electrovibration reveals that the effect of tactile masking by electrotactile stimulus was not prevalent under subthreshold conditions. This study provides significant insights into developing a texture rendering algorithm based on tactile sub-modal stimuli in the future.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Balasubramanian Jagan K., Ray Rahul Kumar, and Manivannan Muniyandi. 2022. Effect of subthreshold vibration on the perception of electrovibration. In Haptic and Audio Interaction Design: 11th International Workshop, HAID 2022, London, UK, August 25–26, 2022, Proceedings. Springer, 3747.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Basdogan Cagatay, Giraud Frederic, Levesque Vincent, and Choi Seungmoon. 2020. A review of surface haptics: Enabling tactile effects on touch surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 13, 3 (2020), 450470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Bau Olivier, Poupyrev Ivan, Israr Ali, and Harrison Chris. 2010. TeslaTouch: Electrovibration for touch surfaces. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 283292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] Jr. Stanley J. Bolanowski, Gescheider George A., Verrillo Ronald T., and Checkosky Christin M.. 1988. Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84, 5 (1988), 16801694.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Butikofer Rudolf and Lawrence Peter D.. 1978. Electrocutaneous nerve stimulation-I: Model and experiment. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering6 (1978), 526531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Chen Yixin, Qiu Wenying, Wang Xiaohao, and Zhang Min. 2019. Tactile rendering of fabric textures based on texture recognition. In 2019 IEEE The 2nd International Conference on Micro/Nano Sensors for AI, Healthcare, and Robotics (NSENS’19). 8791. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Chubb Erik C., Colgate J. Edward, and Peshkin Michael A.. 2009. ShiverPaD: A device capable of controlling shear force on a bare finger. In World Haptics 2009-Third Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. IEEE, 1823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Chubb Erik C., Colgate J. Edward, and Peshkin Michael A.. 2010. ShiverPaD: A glass haptic surface that produces shear force on a bare finger. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 3, 3 (2010), 189198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Colgate J. Edward and Peshkin Michael A.. 2017. Touch Interface Device having an Electrostatic Multitouch Surface and Method for Controlling the Device. US Patent 9,733,746.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Collins J. J., Chow Carson C., and Imhoff Thomas T.. 1995. Stochastic resonance without tuning. Nature 376, 6537 (1995), 236238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Dai Xiaowei, Colgate J. Edward, and Peshkin Michael A.. 2012. LateralPaD: A surface-haptic device that produces lateral forces on a bare finger. In 2012 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS’12). IEEE, 714.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Dideriksen Jakob, Markovic Marko, Lemling Sabrina, Farina Dario, and Dosen Strahinja. 2021. Electrotactile and vibrotactile feedback enable similar performance in psychometric tests and closed-loop control. IEEE Transactions on Haptics (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Gescheider G. A., Santoro K. E., Makous James C., and Bolanowski S. J.. 1995. Vibrotactile forward masking: Effects of the amplitude and duration of the masking stimulus. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98, 6 (1995), 31883194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Gescheider George A., Bolanowski Stanley J., Pope Jennifer V., and Verrillo Ronald T.. 2002. A four-channel analysis of the tactile sensitivity of the fingertip: Frequency selectivity, spatial summation, and temporal summation. Somatosensory & Motor Research 19, 2 (2002), 114124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Gescheider George A., Wright John H., and Verrillo Ronald T.. 2010. Information-processing Channels in the Tactile Sensory System: A Psychophysical and Physiological Analysis. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Giraud Frédéric, Amberg Michel, and Lemaire-Semail Betty. 2013. Merging two tactile stimulation principles: Electrovibration and squeeze film effect. In 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC’13). IEEE, 199203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Guo Xingwei, Zhang Yuru, Wang Dangxiao, Lu Lei, Jiao Jian, and Xu Weiliang. 2019. The effect of applied normal force on the electrovibration. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 12, 4 (2019), 571580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. [18] Heß Markus and Popov Valentin L.. 2019. Voltage-induced friction with application to electrovibration. Lubricants 7, 12 (2019), 102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Iggo Ainsley. 1974. Cutaneous receptors. In The Peripheral Nervous System. Springer, 347404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] İşleyen Aykut, Vardar Yasemin, and Basdogan Cagatay. 2019. Tactile roughness perception of virtual gratings by electrovibration. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 13, 3 (2019), 562570.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Jamalzadeh Milad, Basdogan Cagatay, and Güçlü Burak. 2020. Effect of remote masking on tactile perception of electrovibration. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 14, 1 (2020), 132142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Jones Lynette A. and Tan Hong Z.. 2012. Application of psychophysical techniques to haptic research. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 6, 3 (2012), 268284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Kaczmarek Kurt A., Nammi Krishnakant, Agarwal Abhishek K., Tyler Mitchell E., Haase Steven J., and Beebe David J.. 2006. Polarity effect in electrovibration for tactile display. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 53, 10 (2006), 20472054.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Kaczmarek Kurt A., Webster John G., Rita Paul Bach-y, and Tompkins Willis J.. 1991. Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 38, 1 (1991), 116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Kajimoto Hiroyuki. 2011. Electrotactile display with real-time impedance feedback using pulse width modulation. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 5, 2 (2011), 184188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Kalia Yogeshvar N. and Guy Richard H.. 1995. The electrical characteristics of human skin in vivo. Pharmaceutical Research 12, 11 (1995), 16051613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Kang Jeonggoo, Kim Heewon, Choi Seungmoon, Kim Ki-Duk, and Ryu Jeha. 2016. Investigation on low voltage operation of electrovibration display. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 10, 3 (2016), 371381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. [28] Kim Heewon, Kang Jeonggoo, Kim Ki-Duk, Lim Kyoung-Moon, and Ryu Jeha. 2015. Method for providing electrovibration with uniform intensity. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 8, 4 (2015), 492496.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. [29] Kitamura Norihide, Chim J., and Miki Norihisa. 2015. Electrotactile display using microfabricated micro-needle array. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 25, 2 (2015), 025016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Komurasaki Seiya, Kajimoto Hiroyuki, and Ishizuka Hiroki. 2019. Fundamental perceptual characterization of an integrated tactile display with electrovibration and electrical stimuli. Micromachines 10, 5 (2019), 301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Loomis Jack M. and Lederman Susan J.. 1986. Tactual perception. Handbook of Perception and Human Performances 2, 2 (1986), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [32] Kumar V. Madhan, Sadanand Venkatraman, and Manivannan M.. 2021. Computational model of a Pacinian corpuscle for hybrid-stimuli: Spike-rate and threshold characteristics. In Computational Intelligence in Healthcare. Springer, 379396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. [33] McAdams E. T., Jossinet J., Lackermeier A., and Risacher F.. 1996. Factors affecting electrode-gel-skin interface impedance in electrical impedance tomography. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 34, 6 (1996), 397408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] McGee Steven. 2018. Chapter 62 - examination of the sensory system. In Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis (Fourth Edition), McGee Steven (Ed.). Elsevier, Philadelphia, 569–582.e3. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Mullenbach Joe, Johnson Dan, Colgate J. Edward, and Peshkin Michael A.. 2012. ActivePaD surface haptic device. In 2012 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS’12). IEEE, 407414.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. [36] Mullenbach Joe, Shultz Craig, Piper Anne Marie, Peshkin Michael, and Colgate J. Edward. 2013. Surface haptic interactions with a TPad tablet. In Proceedings of the Adjunct Publication of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. [37] Mullenbach Joe, Shultz Craig, Piper A. Marie, Peshkin Michael, and Colgate J. Edward. 2013. TPad Fire: Surface haptic tablet. Proc. of HAID (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Nakamura Taku and Yamamoto Akio. 2016. A multi-user surface visuo-haptic display using electrostatic friction modulation and capacitive-type position sensing. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 9, 3 (2016), 311322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Osgouei Reza Haghighi. 2020. Electrostatic friction displays to enhance touchscreen experience. In Modern Applications of Electrostatics and Dielectrics. IntechOpen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. [40] Ray Rahul Kumar and Manivannan M.. 2021. Spatial summation of electro-tactile displays at subthreshold. In International Conference on Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies. Springer, 463470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. [41] Ray Rahul Kumar and Manivannan M.. 2022. Reduction of electrotactile perception threshold using background thermal stimulation. In Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V, Ahram Tareq and Taiar Redha (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 331338. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. [42] Ray Rahul Kumar, Patel Payal, and Manivannan M.. 2021. Reduction of electrotactile perception threshold using subthreshold vibrotactile stimuli. Displays (2021), 102056.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Rollman Gary B. and Harris Georgina. 1987. The detectability, discriminability, and perceived magnitude of painful electrical shock. Perception & Psychophysics 42, 3 (1987), 257268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Shultz Craig D., Peshkin Michael A., and Colgate J. Edward. 2018. On the electrical characterization of electroadhesive displays and the prominent interfacial gap impedance associated with sliding fingertips. In 2018 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS’18). IEEE, 151157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. [45] Sirin Omer, Barrea Allan, Lefèvre Philippe, Thonnard Jean-Louis, and Basdogan Cagatay. 2019. Fingerpad contact evolution under electrovibration. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 16, 156 (2019), 20190166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. [46] Strong Robert M. and Troxel Donald E.. 1970. An electrotactile display. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems 11, 1 (1970), 7279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. [47] Vardar Yasemin. 2020. Tactile Perception by Electrovibration. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. [48] Vardar Yasemin, Güçlü Burak, and Basdogan Cagatay. 2017. Effect of waveform on tactile perception by electrovibration displayed on touch screens. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 10, 4 (2017), 488499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. [49] Vardar Yasemin, Güçlü Burak, and Basdogan Cagatay. 2018. Tactile masking by electrovibration. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 11, 4 (2018), 623635.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. [50] Vasudevan Madhan Kumar, Ray Rahul Kumar, and Muniyandi Manivannan. 2020. Computational model of a Pacinian corpuscle for an electrical stimulus: Spike-rate and threshold characteristics. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, 203213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. [51] Vezzoli Eric, Messaoud Wael Ben, Amberg Michel, Giraud Frédéric, Lemaire-Semail Betty, and Bueno Marie-Ange. 2015. Physical and perceptual independence of ultrasonic vibration and electrovibration for friction modulation. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 8, 2 (2015), 235239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. [52] Vodlak Teja, Vidrih Zlatko, Vezzoli Eric, Lemaire-Semail Betty, and Peric Djordje. 2016. Multi-physics modelling and experimental validation of electrovibration based haptic devices. Biotribology 8 (2016), 1225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. [53] Withana Anusha, Groeger Daniel, and Steimle Jürgen. 2018. Tacttoo: A thin and feel-through tattoo for on-skin tactile output. In The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 365378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. [54] Yamamoto Akio, Nagasawa Shuichi, Yamamoto Hiroaki, and Higuchi Toshiro. 2006. Electrostatic tactile display with thin film slider and its application to tactile telepresentation systems. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 2 (2006), 168177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Effect of Subthreshold Electrotactile Stimulation on the Perception of Electrovibration

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
        ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 20, Issue 3
        July 2023
        58 pages
        ISSN:1544-3558
        EISSN:1544-3965
        DOI:10.1145/3624973
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 September 2023
        • Online AM: 29 May 2023
        • Accepted: 30 April 2023
        • Revised: 5 April 2023
        • Received: 23 June 2022
        Published in tap Volume 20, Issue 3

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)259
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text