No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Fascist Claims to Sovereign Power: Law, Politics and the Romanian Legionary Movement
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 May 2023
Abstract
This article aims to provide the basis for a theoretical framework conceptualising Romanian fascist ideology at work in relation to law and politics, by focusing on the way it operated within the movement's understanding of foundational concepts of state power, sovereignty and justice. In doing so, I investigate the relationship between fascism, understood here as both an ideology and a political movement, and constitutional law in the context of interwar Romania. I ask how the ideology – that is, the doctrinal body of Romanian ultranationalism, as well as political practice – related to core constitutional concepts such as sovereign power and popular sovereignty. Accordingly, I map the nexus between law and politics within the ideology of the Romanian main ultranationalist movement – the Legion of Archangel Michael and its paramilitary branch, the Iron Guard.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
1 Weber, Eugen, ‘Romania’, in Rogger, Hans and Weber, Eugen, eds., The European Right: A Historical Profile (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1965), 501–74Google Scholar.
2 Shapiro, Paul, ‘Prelude to Dictatorship in Romania: The National Christian Party in Power, Dec. 1937–Feb. 1938’, Canadian-American Slavic Studies, 8, 1 (1974), 45–88Google Scholar.
3 Ioanid, Radu, The Sword of the Archangel (Boulder: East European Monographs, 1990)Google Scholar.
4 Ornea, Zigu, The Romanian Extreme Right: The Nineteen Thirties (Boulder: East European Monographs, 1999)Google Scholar.
5 Livezeanu, Irina, Cultural Politics in Greater Romania: Regionalism, Nation Building, and Ethnic Struggle, 1918–1930 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.
6 Haynes, Rebecca, ‘Corneliu Zelea Codreanu: The Romanian “New Man”’, in Haynes, Rebecca and Rady, Martyn, eds., In the Shadow of Hitler: Personalities of the Right in Central and Eastern Europe (London: Tauris, 2011), 169–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Haynes, Rebecca Ann, ‘Reluctant Allies? Iuliu Maniu and Corneliu Zelea Codreanu against King Carol II of Romania’, The Slavonic and East European Review, 85, 1 (2007), 105–34Google Scholar.
8 Iordachi, Constantin, ‘God's Chosen Warriors: Romantic Palingenesis’, in Iordachi, Constantin, ed., Comparative Fascist Studies: New Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2010), 316–57Google Scholar; Iordachi, Constantin, ‘A Continuum of Dictatorships: Hybrid Totalitarian Experiments’, in Pinto, António Costa and Kallis, Aristotle, eds., Rethinking Fascism and Dictatorship in Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), 233–71Google Scholar.
9 Cârstocea, Raul, ‘Breaking the Teeth of Time: Mythical Time and the “Terror of History” in the Rhetoric of the Legionary Movement in Interwar Romania’, Journal of Modern European History, 13, 1 (2015), 79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Clark, Roland, Holy Legionary Youth: Fascist Activism in Interwar Romania (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015)Google Scholar.
11 Ionuț Biliuță, ‘Constructing Fascist Hagiographies: The Genealogy of the Prison Saints Movement in Contemporary Romania’, Contemporary European History, 31, 3 (2021), 435–55.
12 Mihai Stelian Rusu, ‘Domesticating Viragos: The Politics of Womanhood in the Romanian Legionary Movement’, Fascism, 5, 2 (2016), 149–76; Maria Bucur, ‘Romania’, in Kevin Passmore, ed., Women, Gender and Fascism in Europe, 1919–1945 (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2003), 57–78; Anca Diana Axinia, Women and Politics in the Romanian Legionary Movement (Florence: European University Institute, 2022, EUI PhD Thesis, Department of History and Civilization).
13 Mihai Stelian Rusu, ‘The Sacralization of Martyric Death in Romanian Legionary Movement: Self-sacrificial Patriotism, Vicarious Atonement, and Thanatic Nationalism’, Politics, Religion & Ideology, 17, 2–3, (2016), 249–73.
14 Eugen Weber, ‘Men of the Archangel’, Journal of Contemporary History, 1, 1 (1966), 103.
15 The Legion of the Archangel Michael was established as a political party in June 1927. The Iron Guard was founded in Apr. 1930 as a connected and essentially paramilitary organisation which was intended to rally other antisemitic and anticommunist groups regardless of party affiliation. As no other groups joined, there was a level of confusion between the two that subsisted the Iron Guard's legal dissolution in Apr. 1933 and the Legion's ban in Dec. 1933. See Raul Cârstocea, ‘Students Don the Green Shirt: The Roots of Romanian Fascism in the Antisemitic Student Movements of the 1920s’, in Regina Fritz, Grzegorz Rossoliński-Liebe and Jana Starek, eds., Alma Mater Antisemitica. Akademisches Milieu, Juden und Antisemitismus an den Universitäten Europas zwischen 1918 und 1939 (Vienna: New Academic Press, 2016), 39; Clark, Holy Legionary Youth, 99–103.
16 Lucrețiu Pătrășcanu, Sub trei dictaturi (Bucharest: Forum, 1946).
17 Alexandre Tilman-Timon, Les actes constitutionnels en Roumanie de 1938 à 1944 (Bucharest: Imprimeria Cugetarea, 1947).
18 Cosmin Cercel, ‘The “Right” Side of the Law: State of Siege and the Rise of Fascism in Interwar Romania’, Fascism, 2, 2 (2013), 205–32.
19 Cosmin Cercel, ‘The Enemy Within: Criminal Law and Ideology in Interwar Romania’, in Stephen Skinner, ed., Fascism and Criminal Law: History, Theory, Continuity (Oxford: Hart, 2015), 101–26.
20 Cosmin Cercel, ‘The Law of Blood: Totalitarianism, Criminal Law and the Body Politic of World War Two Romania’, in Stephen Skinner, ed., Ideology and Criminal Law: Fascist, National Socialist and Authoritarian Regimes (Oxford: Hart, 2019), 345–68.
21 Christian Joerges and Navraj Singh Ghaleigh, eds., Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions (Oxford: Hart, 2003).
22 David Fraser, Law after Auschwitz: Towards a Jurisprudence of the Holocaust (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2005); David Fraser, ‘Evil Law, Evil Lawyers: From the Justice Case to the Torture Memos’, Jurisprudence, 3, 2 (2012), 391–428.
23 Michael Stolleis, The Law under the Swastika: Studies in Legal History of Nazi Germany (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
24 Stephen Skinner, ‘Fascist by Name, Fascist by Nature? The 1930 Italian Penal Code in Academic Commentary, 1928–1946’, in Skinner, ed., Fascism and Criminal Law, 59–84.
25 Stephen Skinner, ‘Criminal Law and the Use of Force: Ideology and State Power in Fascist Italy and England in the Interwar Period’, in Stephen Skinner, ed., Ideology and Criminal Law: Fascist, National Socialist and Authoritarian Regimes (Oxford: Hart, 2019), 299–320.
26 Simon Lavis, ‘“No One Wants the Taint of an Association with the Crimes of Nazism”: (Sometimes) in Search of the Meaning of Nazi Law’, Holocaust Studies: A Journal of Culture and History, 26, 1 (2020), 108–22.
27 Johann Chapoutot, La loi du sang: Penser et agir en Nazi (Paris: Gallimard, 2020).
28 Hans Kelsen, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992 [1934]), 7–9.
29 Michael Stolleis, ‘Law and Lawyers Preparing the Holocaust’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 1 (2007), 216.
30 Louis Althusser, ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation)’, in Louis Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971), 127.
31 Susan Silbey and Patricia Ewick, The Common Place of Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), 17.
32 Robert Cover, ‘The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative’, Harvard Law Review, 97, 1 (1983), 4.
33 Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), 7.
34 Dan Diner, Cataclysms: A History of the Twentieth Century from Europe's Edge (Madison: Wisconsin University Press, 2008), 33–8.
35 Enzo Traverso, Fire and Blood The European Civil War, 1914–1945 (London: Verso, 2017), 71.
36 Przemyslaw Tacik, A New Philosophy of Modernity and Sovereignty: Towards Radical Historicization (London: Bloomsbury, 2021), 39.
37 ‘Treaty between the Principal Allied and Associated Powers and Roumania’, 9 Dec. 1919, League of Nations Treaty Series, 5 (1921), 335.
38 András Sajó and Renata Uitz, The Constitution of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 13.
39 Erwin Lowenfeld, ‘The Protection of Private Property under the Minorities Protection Treaties’, Transactions of Hugo Grotius Society, 16 (1930), 41, 47–50.
40 ‘Constitution of Romania of 28 Mar. 1923’, Monitorul Oficial (M.Of. hereafter), 282, 29 Mar. 1923.
41 Alexandre-Radu Rădulesco, Le contrôle de la constitutionalité des lois en Roumanie (Paris: Les Presses Modernes, 1935), 65–75.
42 Charles Upson Clark, United Romania (New York: Dodd, Mead and Co, 1932), 173.
43 Between 1916 and 1928 the state of siege had constantly been declared and revoked over the whole territory of the country. However, the border regions continued to stay under this regime until its generalisation in 1933. For instance, the Royal Decree No. 131 of 16 Jan. 1923 (M. Of. No. 231, 26 Jan. 1923) extended the state of siege in Transilvania, whereas the Royal Decree No. 3310 of 5 Oct. 1924 (M. Of. No. 219, 7 Oct. 1924) extended the state of siege in southern Bessarabia. The events of 1926 described below fell under the scope of the government's Order No. 2614 of 6 Aug. 1925 (M. Of. No. 174, 11 Aug. 1925) declaring the state of siege in the county of Putna.
44 Corneliu Pintilescu, ‘The Reverberations of the Oct. 1917 Revolution and the State of Siege in Interwar Romania’, in Gerhard Besier and Katarzyna Stokłosa, eds., 1917 and the Consequences (London: Routledge, 2019), 111–30.
45 Carl Schmitt, Political Theology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985), 13.
46 Clark, Holy Legionary Youth, 24.
47 Royal Decree No. 4209 of 21 Oct. 1920, in M. Of. No. 159, 21 Oct. 1920.
48 Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, Pentru legionari (Sibiu: Totul Pentru Ţară, 1936), 4.
49 Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, Cărticica șefului de cuib (Bucharest: Tipografia C.S.M.C., 1940), 47 [emphasis added].
50 Clark, Holy Legionary Youth, 34–6.
51 Ibid., 42–6.
52 Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 266.
53 Codreanu, Pentru legionari, 28.
54 Clark, Holy Legionary Youth, 50–3.
55 ACNSAS (Archive of the National Council for the Study of the Securitate Archive, ACNSAS hereafter) fond Penal, file no. 110237, Vol. 1, 228–9.
56 ACNSAS, fond Penal, file no. 110237, Vol. 1, 227–80.
57 Ibid., 251.
58 ACNSAS, fond Penal, file no. 110237, Vol. 1, 246.
59 Ibid., 229. For the declarations of the official authorities involved, see 232.
60 Ibid., 252.
61 Ibid., 237.
62 Ibid., 237–8.
63 Ibid., 255.
64 Ibid., 274.
65 Ibid., 271.
66 For the indictment act see ibid., 188–92.
67 Clark, Holy Legionary Youth, 73–4.
68 Weber, ‘Romania’, 544.
69 ACNSAS, fond Penal, file no. 110237, Vol. 1, 209.
70 Ibid., 204.
71 Îndreptar Juridic pentru Legionari (Chișinău: Ziarul România Creștină, 1935).
72 Ibid., i.
73 Ibid.
74 Ibid., 1.
75 Ibid.
76 Ibid., 2–5.
77 Ibid., 9.
78 In relation to this, one should note the impressive list of no less than thirty defenders that Codreanu was able to muster for his trials in 1938 alongside their political affiliations, mostly being members or sympathisers of the Legion. For instance see ACNSAS, fond Penal, file no. 110237, Vol. 3, 120–2.
79 While this stand is not made explicit in Codreanu's writings, it strikes one as similar to a Thomist conception of natural law. See J. Budziszewski, Commentary on Thomas Aquinas's Treatise on Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 347–418.
80 Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 28–30. See also, Codreanu, Pentru legionar, 22.
81 Keith Hitchins, Rumania 1866–1947 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 390.
82 Cosmin Cercel, ‘Mapping the Siege: Law, Crisis and the Antinomies of Liberal Legality’, Romanian Journal of Comparative Law, 2, 1 (2021), 193–225.
83 Article 128 of the Constitution of Romania of 28 Mar. 1923.
84 Joseph S. Roucek, ‘Social Background of Roumanian Politics’, Social Forces, 10, 1 (1932), 423.
85 ACNSAS, fond Penal, file no. 110237, Vol. 1, 307.
86 ACNSAS, fond Penal, file no. 110237, Vol. 6, 195.
87 Ernst Fraenkel, The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1941), 4–7.
88 Codreanu, Pentru legionari, 5.
89 Ibid., 27.
90 Raul Cârstocea, ‘Approaching Generic Fascism from the Margins: On the Uses of “Palingenesis” in the Romanian Context’, in Constantin Iordachi and Aristotle Kallis, eds., Beyond the Fascist Century: Essays in Honour of Roger Griffin (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020), 153–76.
91 See for instance Cuza, A.C., Despre poporație (Bucharest: Independența, 1929), 542–55Google Scholar.
92 Codreanu, Corneliu Zelea, Cuvântare la mesaj (Bucharest: Gh. N. Vlădescu, 1931), 5Google Scholar.
93 Griffin, Roger, The Nature of Fascism (London: Pinter, 1991), 44–5Google Scholar.
94 Iroaie, Petru, ‘Îndreptarea Legii’, Însemnări Sociologice, 4, 4 (1941), 7–15Google Scholar.
95 Negulescu, Paul, Principiile fundamentale ale Constituției din 27 februarie 1938 (Bucharest: Atelierele Zanet Corlățeanu, 1939)Google Scholar; Negulescu, Paul, Curs de drept constituțional roman (Bucharest: Ion I. Borșan, București, 1939)Google Scholar; Negulescu, Paul and Alexianu, Grigore, Tratat de drept public (Bucharest: Casa Școalelor, 1942)Google Scholar.
96 Cișmigiu, Marius, Stat autoritar și stat țărănesc: Elemente de drept autoritar în practica constituțională românească (Bucharest: Tipografia Finanțe și Industrie, 1942)Google Scholar.
97 Iroaie, ‘Îndreptarea’, 13.
98 Codreanu, Pentru legionari, 270.
99 Haynes, Rebecca Ann, ‘Work Camps, Commerce, and the Education of the “New Man” in the Romanian Legionary Movement’, The Historical Journal, 51, 4 (2008), 943CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
100 Ibid., 944.
101 Ibid., 967.
102 Schmitt, Carl, The Nomos of the Earth (New York: Telos Press, 2003), 142Google Scholar.