Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of University Teachers Regarding Plagiarism in Bangladesh

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to assess the level of knowledge, attitude and practice of university teachers regarding plagiarism in Bangladesh. An online questionnaire consisted of 20 knowledge questions, 23 attitude items, and 18 practice questions was created using Google Forms. The link to the questionnaire was sent via email to university teachers. The total correct answers for knowledge and practice questions, and the total attitude score were converted to percentile scores and categorized accordingly as poor (< mean – 1 SD), average (mean ± 1 SD), and good (> mean + 1 SD). Bivariate analyses were conducted to compare the total knowledge, attitude and practice scores based on demographic and academic variables. Multiple linear regressions were used to identify the association between knowledge, attitude and practice scores, and other covariates. The findings revealed an average level of knowledge, attitude and practice regarding plagiarism among the majority of university teachers. The knowledge, attitude and practice scores were significantly higher for teachers who attended academic writing workshops compared to those who did not attend such events. Demographic and academic variables did not impact knowledge and attitude scores. However, the number of papers published in the last two years and their indexing in Web of Science (WoS) or Scopus significantly impacted attitude and knowledge scores. The multiple regression analyses showed that the practice score was significantly associated with age, highest education, and knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The dataset for this study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Alawad, A. A., Bettaieb, D. M., & Malek, R. B. (2018). Plagiarism: The main reasons for its widespread use amongst students theoritical framework behind students’ plagiarism. International Journal of Current Research, 10(2), 65235–65239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amida, A., Appianing, J., & Marafa, Y. A. (2022). Testing the predictors of college students’ attitudes toward plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09401-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashikuzzaman, A., Hasan, N., Hossain, U., Ali, E., & Begum, D. (2018). Avoid plagiarism, promote higher education: Does the situation demand for the social marketing approach at Rajshahi University? Paper presented at 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 2–4 July, Palma, Spain.

  • Bedeian, A. G., Taylor, S. G., & Miller, A. N. (2010). Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(4), 715–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilic-Zulle, L., Azman, J., Frkovic, V., & Petrovecki, M. (2008). Is there an effective approach to deterring students from plagiarizing? Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(1), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9037-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009). Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use? Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(3), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, C., & Aşık, Ö. (2019). Global perspectives on academic integrity, In J. Hoffman, P. Blessinger and M. Makhanya (Eds.), Strategies for fostering inclusive classrooms in higher education: International perspectives on equity and inclusion, 16, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2055-364120190000016003

  • Das, N. (2018). Intentional or unintentional, it is never alright to plagiarize: A note on how indian universities are advised to handle plagiarism. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 9(1), 56–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W., & Hoover, G. (2006). Plagiarism in the economics profession: A survey. Challenge, 49(5), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.2753/0577-5132490506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazilatfar, A. M., Elhambakhsh, S. E., & Allami, H. (2018). An investigation of the effects of citation instruction to avoid plagiarism in EFL academic writing assignments. Sage open, 8(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018769958.

  • Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitman, E., & Litewka, S. (2011). International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 29(1), 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B., & Bedi, A. (2012). The fox in the hen house: A critical examination of plagiarism among members of the academy of management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2010.0084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (2001). Forget about policing plagiarism: Just teach. The Chronicle, 11(16), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibegbulam, I. J., & Eze, J. U. (2015). Knowledge, perception and attitude of nigerian students to plagiarism: A case study. IFLA Journal, 41(2), 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, H., Emmerton, L., & McKauge, L. (2013). Academic integrity and plagiarism: A review of the influences and risk situations for health students. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.687362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juyal, D., Thawani, V., & Thaledi, S. (2015). Rise of academic plagiarism in India: Reasons, solutions and resolution. Lung India, 32(5), 542–543. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.164151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamruzzaman, M. (2022). Copyright violations, plagiarism affect Bangladesh’s higher education quality. Anadolu Agency, 1 January, Retrieved November 21, 2022, from https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/copyright-violations-plagiarism-affect-bangladesh-s-higher-education-quality/2462759

  • Kayaoğlu, M. N., Erbay, Ş., Flitner, C., & Saltaş, D. (2016). Examining students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A cross-cultural study at tertiary level. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 682–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khairnar, M. R., Wadgave, U., Shah, S. J., Shah, S., Jain, V. M., & Kumbhar, S. (2019). Survey on attitude of dental professionals about plagiarism in Maharashtra, India. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 10(1), 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P. M., Priya, N. S., Musalaiah, S. V. V. S., & Nagasree, M. (2014). Knowing and avoiding plagiarism during scientific writing. Annals of Medical & Health Sciences Research, 4(9), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.141957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, H. J., Wan, G., & Lu, E. Y. (2008). Digital cheating and plagiarism in schools. Theory into Practice, 47(3), 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansoor, F., Ameen, K., & Arshad, A. (2022). An exploratory study of university librarians’ perceptions on causes and deterrents of plagiarism: A pakistani perspective. Global Knowledge Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2022-0074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, A. R., & Mavrinac, M. (2020). Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of plagiarism as reported by participants completing the AuthorAID MOOC on Research writing. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(2), 1067–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00198-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, R. S., Ali, M. M., Zafar, M., & Shaikh, A. (2019). Knowledge and attitude towards plagiarism: A comparative study of students from medical and non-medical fields. Journal of Global Health Reports, 3, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29392/joghr.3.e2019067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plagiarize, v. Merriam Webster Dictionary, & Retrieved (2022). August 8, 2022, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plagiarize

  • Mostofa, S. M., Tabassum, M., & Ahmed, S. M. Z. (2021). Researchers’ awareness about plagiarism and impact of plagiarism detection tools – does awareness effect the actions towards preventing plagiarism? Digital Library Perspectives, 37(3), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukasa, J., Stokes, L., & Mukona, D. M. (2023). Academic dishonesty by students of bioethics at a tertiary institution in Australia: An exploratory study. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 19, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00124-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, C. (2010). The complete guide to referencing and avoiding plagiarism. Open University Press.

  • Nzekwe-Excel, C. (2014). Academic writing workshops: Impact of attendance on performance. Journal of Academic Writing, 4(1), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plagiarism, n. Oxford English Dictionary, & Retrieved (2022). August 8, 2022, from, https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/144939

  • Palmer, A. (2021). Investigating staff views on plagiarism in transnational higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. J. (2014). Ethics for the information age. Pearson.

  • Ramzan, M., Munir, M. A., Siddique, N., & Asif, M. (2012). Awareness about plagiarism amongst university students in Pakistan. Higher Education, 64, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadruddin, M. M. (2021). Exploring the causes of plagiarism among post graduate research students– A phenomenological case study approach. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8(2), 296–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selemani, A., Chawinga, W. D., & Dube, G. (2018). Why do postgraduate students commit plagiarism? An empirical study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shashikiran, N. D. (2014). Plagiarism and academic integrity. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 32(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Y., & Hu, G. (2021). Chinese graduate students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A mixed-methods study. Accountability in Research, 28(4), 197–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H. P., & Guram, N. (2014). Knowledge and attitude of dental professionals of North India toward plagiarism. North American Journal of Medical Science, 6(1), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šprajc, P., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., Trivan, D., & Jereb, E. (2017). Reasons for plagiarism in higher education. Organizacija, 50(1), 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, X., & Hu, G. (2020). What do academics know and do about plagiarism? An interview study with chinese university teachers of English. Ethics & Behavior, 30(6), 459–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesmin, S., & Ahmed, S. M. Z. (2020). Early career academics’ understanding of library language: A study in a university setting in Bangladesh. Global Knowledge Memory and Communication, 69(3), 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yesmin, S., & Ahmed, S. M. Z. (2022). Students’ understanding of referencing conventions and terminological denotations associated with the ethical use of information. International Information & Library Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2022.2100235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Centennial Research Grant, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study design, questionnaire development and data collection. Mohammad Sharif Ul Islam wrote the introduction section of the study, providing a clear overview of the research topic, its significance and objectives. Md. Roknuzzaman reviewed the literature, conducted an in-depth analysis of relevant sources, and added references. S.M. Zabed Ahmed led the data analysis and generated meaningful insights. All authors actively participated in manuscript preparation and provided feedback on earlier versions. The submitted manuscript has been read and approved by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.M. Zabed Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, S., Roknuzzaman, M. & Sharif Ul Islam, M. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of University Teachers Regarding Plagiarism in Bangladesh. J Acad Ethics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09483-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09483-7

Keywords

Navigation