Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T07:04:05.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatiotemporal evaluation of waning grassland habitats for swamp deer conservation across the human-dominated upper Gangetic Plains, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2023

Shrutarshi Paul Open the ORCID record for Shrutarshi Paul [Opens in a new window] ,
Sohini Saha ,
Parag Nigam ,
Sk Zeeshan Ali ,
Navendu Page ,
Aamer Sohel Khan ,
Mukesh Kumar ,
Bilal Habib ,
Dhananjai Mohan  and
Bivash Pandav
...Show all authors
Shrutarshi Paul*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Sohini Saha
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Parag Nigam
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Sk Zeeshan Ali
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Navendu Page
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Aamer Sohel Khan
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Mukesh Kumar
Affiliation:
Uttar Pradesh Forest Department, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Bilal Habib
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Dhananjai Mohan
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Bivash Pandav
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Samrat Mondol*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
*
Corresponding author: Shrutarshi Paul; Email: shrutarshipaul07@gmail.com; Samrat Mondol; Email: samrat@wii.gov.in
Corresponding author: Shrutarshi Paul; Email: shrutarshipaul07@gmail.com; Samrat Mondol; Email: samrat@wii.gov.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Grassland habitats currently face severe anthropogenic exploitation, thereby affecting the survival of grassland-dependent biodiversity globally. The biodiversity-rich grasslands of India lack quantitative spatiotemporal information on their status. We evaluated the status of upper Gangetic Plains grasslands in 2015 and compared it with those from 1985, 1995 and 2005. On-ground mapping and visual classifications revealed a 57% decline in these grasslands between 1985 (418 km2) and 2015 (178 km2), mostly driven by habitat conversion (74% contribution by cropland). Limited radiotelemetry data from endemic swamp deer indicated a possible grassland-dominated average home range size of 1.02 km2, and these patches were highly preferred (average Ivlev’s index = 0.85) over other land-use classes at both spatial and temporal scales. Camera-trapping within the core habitats suggests the critical use of these patches as fawning/breeding grounds. Habitat suitability analysis indicates only c. 17% of the area along the Ganges is suitable as swamp deer habitat. We recommend the protection of these critical grassland patches to maintain ‘dynamic corridors’, with restoration and other management approaches involving multiple stakeholders to ensure the survival of this critical ecosystem.

Keywords

Grassland-dependent faunahabitat conversionland-use and land-cover changesriverine ecosystemtemporal dynamics
Type
Research Paper
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , September 2023 , pp. 169 - 178
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, K (2007) Ecology and Conservation of Swamp Deer in Terai Grasslands of Uttar Pradesh, India. Aligarh, India: Department of Wildlife Science, Aligarh Muslim University.Google Scholar
Athreya, V, Odden, M, Linnell, JDC, Kishnaswamy, J, Karanth, U (2013) Big cats in our backyards: persistence of large carnivores in a human dominated landscape in India. PLoS ONE 8: e57872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardgett, RD, Bullock, JM, Lavorel, S, Manning, P, Schaffner, U, Ostle, N et al. (2021) Combatting global grassland degradation. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment 2: 720–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdlife International (2013) Report on Indo-Gangetic grasslands [www document]. URL https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/12207158/indo-gangetic-grasslands-pdf-442-kb-birdlife-international Google Scholar
Buskirk, SW, Millspaugh, JJ (2006) Metrics for studies of resource selection. Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 358–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceballos, G, Davidson, A, List, R, Pacheco, J, Manzano-Fischer, P, Santos-Barrera, G et al. (2010) Rapid decline of a grassland system and its ecological and conservation implications. PLoS ONE 5: e8562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duckworth, JW, Kumar, NS, Pokharel, CP, Baral, HS, Timmins, RJ (2015) Rucervus duvaucelii, Barasingha. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. eT4257A22167675 [www document]. URL https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/4257/22167675 Google Scholar
Government of India Planning Commission (2006) Report of the Task Force on Grasslands and Deserts. New Delhi, India: Government of India.Google Scholar
Hazarika, N, Das, AK, Borah, SB (2015) Assessing land-use changes driven by river dynamics in chronically flood affected Upper Brahmaputra plains, India, using RS-GIS techniques. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science 18: 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsing, L (2010) GIS-Modeling of Potential Natural Vegetation (PNV): A Methodological Case Study from South-Central Norway. Master’s thesis. Ås, Norway: Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.Google Scholar
Horne, JS, Garton, EO, Krone, SM, Lewis, JS (2007) Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88: 2354–2363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivlev, V (1961) Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Johnsingh, AJT, Ramesh, K, Qureshi, Q, David, A, Goyal, SP, Rawat, GS et al. (2004) Conservation Status of Tiger and Associated Species in the Terai Arc Landscape, India. RR-04/001, pp viii+110. Dehradun, India: Wildlife Institute of India.Google Scholar
Karanth, KK, Nichols, JD, Karanth, UK, Hines, JE, Christensen, NL (2010) The shrinking ark: patterns of large mammal extinctions in India. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277: 1971–1979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, A, Chatterjee, S, Akbari, H, Bhatti, SS, Dinda, A, Mitra, C et al. (2017) Step-wise land-class elimination approach for extracting mixed-type built-up areas of Kolkata megacity. Geocarto Internationa 34: 504–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, MS, Abbasi, F (2015) How the local community views wildlife conservation: a case of Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7: 6934–6939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, S, Roy, A, Fleischman, F (2022) Grassland conservation and restoration in India: a governance crisis. Restoration Ecology 31: e13858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, SL, Hess, MF, Mosley, BG, Cook, MW, Hernandez, S, Parker, ID et al. (2004) Portable drive-net for capturing urban white-tailed deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32: 1093–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, AJ, Turner, WC, Getz, WM (2013) Home range plus: a space–time characterization of movement over real landscapes. Movement Ecology 1: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C (1977) Status and ecology of the barasingha (Cervus duvauceli branderi) in Kanha National Park (India). Bombay National History Society 74: 60–132.Google Scholar
Midha, N, Mathur, P (2014) Channel characteristics and planform dynamics in the Indian Terai, Sharda river. Environmental Management 53: 120–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mondol, S, Pandav, B, Kumar, M, Paul, S, Saha, S (2019) Assessment of Wildlife Habitats with Special Focus on Swamp Deer in Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh, India. Technical Report-TR No./2019/07, pp. 1–33. Dehradun, India: Wildlife Institute of India.Google Scholar
Niedballa, J, Sollmann, R, Courtiol, A, Wilting, A (2016) camtrapR: an R package for efficient camera trap data management. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7: 1457–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, RM, Sawyer, H, McDonald, TL (2015) Package ‘BBMM’ [www document]. URL https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BBMM/BBMM.pdf Google Scholar
Paul, S, Pandav, B, Mohan, D, Habib, B, Nigam, P, Mondol, S (2018) Current distribution and status of swamp deer Rucervus duvaucelii duvaucelii in the upper Gangetic Plains of north India. Oryx 52: 646–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, S, Sarkar, D, Patil, A, Ghosh, T, Talukdar, G, Kumar, M et al. (2020) Assessment of endemic northern swamp deer (Rucervus duvaucelii duvaucelii) distribution and identification of priority conservation areas through modeling and field surveys across north India. Global Ecology Conservation 24: e01263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, SJ (2017) A Brief Tutorial on Maxent [www document]. URL https://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/Maxent_tutorial2017.pdf Google Scholar
Phillips, SJ, Anderson, RP, Schapire, RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190: 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puig, CJ, Hyman, G, Bolaños, S (2002) Digital Classification vs. Visual Interpretation: A Case Study in Humid Tropical Forests of the Peruvian Amazon. Cali-Palmira, Colombia: International Center for Tropical Agriculture.Google Scholar
Punjabi, GA, Rao, MK (2017) Large herbivore populations outside protected areas in the human-dominated Western Ghats, India. Mammalian Biology 87: 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, F, Du, F (2013) Trajectory data analyses for pedestrian space–time activity study. Journal of Visualized Experiments 72: 50130.Google Scholar
Qureshi, Q, Sawarkar, VB, Rahmani, AR, Mathur, PK (2004) Swamp deer or barasingha (Cervus duvauceli Cuvier, 1823). In: K Sankar, SP Goyal (eds), Ungulates of India. ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas (vol. 7, pp. 181–192). Dehradun, India: Wildlife Institute of India.Google Scholar
Ratnam, J, Bond, WJ, Fensham, RJ, Hoffmann, WA, Archibald, S, Lehmann, C et al. (2011) When is a ‘forest’ a savanna, and why does it matter? Global Ecology and Biogeograph 20: 653–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawat, GS, Adhikari, BS (eds) (2015) Ecology and Management of Grassland Habitats in India. ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife & Protected Areas (vol. 17). Dehradun, India: Wildlife Institute of India.Google Scholar
Registrar General & Census Commissioner of India (2011) Census of India. New Delhi, India: Registrar General & Census Commissioner of India.Google Scholar
Rubio, AV, Castro-Arellano, I, Mills, JN, List, R, Ávila-Flores, R, Suzán, G (2017) Is species richness driving intra- and interspecific interactions and temporal activity overlap of a hantavirus host? An experimental test. PLoS ONE 12: e0188060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sala, OE, Van Vuuren, D, Pereira, HM, Lodge, D, Alder, J, Dobson, A et al. (2005) Biodiversity across scenarios. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being Scenarios 2: 375–408.Google Scholar
Sharma, S, Arunachalam, K, Bhavsar, D, Kala, R (2018) Modeling habitat suitability of Perilla frutescens with MaxEnt in Uttarakhand – a conservation approach. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 10: 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, S, Chandola, S (2006) Swamp deer sighting in Uttaranchal State. Oryx 40: 14.Google Scholar
Srivastava, TK, Singh, P, Verma, RR (2021) Weather Variability Trends in Gangetic Plains of Uttar Pradesh, India: Influence on Cropping Systems and Adaptation Strategies. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Suttie, JM, Reynolds, SG, Batello, C (2005) Grasslands of the World. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Tiwari, AK, Mishra, M, Singh, R, Singh, GS. (2023) Assessment of river channel dynamics and its impact on land use/land cover in the middle Ganga Plain, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 16: 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, RN, Ramachandran, A, Tripathi, V, Badola, R, Hussain, SA (2022) Spatio-temporal habitat assessment of the Gangetic floodplain in the Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary. Ecological Informatics 72: 101851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsarouchi, GM, Mijic, A, Moulds, S, Buytaert, W (2014) Historical and future land-cover changes in the Upper Ganges basin of India. International Journal of Remote Sensing 35: 3150–3176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanak, AT (2019) Wastelands of the mind: the identity crisis of India’s savanna grasslands. In MM Roy, DR Malviya, VK Yadav, T Singh, RP Sah, D Vijay, A Radhakrishna (eds), Sustainable Use of Grassland Resources for Forage Production, Biodiversity and Environmental Protection (pp. 33–34). New Delhi, India: Range Management Society of India.Google Scholar
Vilella, M, Ferrandiz-Rovira, M, Sayol, F (2020) Coexistence of predators in time: effects of season and prey availability on species activity within a Mediterranean carnivore guild. Ecology and Evolution 10: 11408–11422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wildlife Institute of India (2009) Development of Mitigative Measures for Wild Animal Movement across Madhya Ganga Canal Aligned through Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehardun, Uttarakhand WII-EIA Technical Report 35. Dehardun, India: Wildlife Institute of India.Google Scholar
Wilson, MW, Ridlon, AD, Gaynor, KM, Gaines, SD, Stier, AC, Halpern, BS (2020) Ecological impacts of human-induced animal behaviour change. Ecology Letters 23: 1522–1536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Paul et al. supplementary material

Paul et al. supplementary material

Download Paul et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 9.5 MB