Skip to main content
Log in

Fragmented QRS as a predictor of hypertensive crisis in patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension: 4-year follow-up data

Fragmentierter QRS-Komplex als Prädiktor einer hypertensiven Krise bei Patienten mit neu diagnostizierter essenzieller Hypertonie: 4‑Jahres-Follow-up-Daten

  • Original articles
  • Published:
Herz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hypertensive crisis (HC) is a life-threatening condition in patients with hypertension (HT). However, there is no electrocardiography (ECG) marker that can predict which hypertensive patient may develop HC. The fragmented QRS (fQRS) complex is an important prognostic marker in ECG that might be predict cardiovascular events and mortality. Our study aimed to investigate whether fQRS can predict the development of HC in patients with HT, within 4 years of follow-up.

Methods

Newly diagnosed patients with essential HT were recruited for the study from an outpatient clinic. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of HC: HC (+) and HC (−). During follow-up, the relationship between fQRS and HC was evaluated.

Results

The study group included 504 patients with newly diagnosed HT. During the follow-up period, HC occurred in 98 of the patients. In 57 (11.30%) patients, fQRS was observed on ECG; fQRS was detected in the ECG of 19 (19.38%) of the HC (+) patients (p = 0.008). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that fQRS (p < 0.001) was as independent predictor for HC development. Kaplan–Meier analysis further demonstrated that the presence of fQRS affects the development of hypertensive urgency in hypertensive patients (log-rank p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In patients with newly diagnosed HT, the presence of fQRS was found to be an independent predictor of HC.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die hypertensive Krise (HC) stellt eine lebensbedrohende Situation bei Patienten mit Hypertonie (HT) dar. Jedoch gibt es keine Elektrokardiogramm(EKG)-Marker, anhand derer die Vorhersage möglich ist, welcher Patient möglicherweise eine HC entwickelt. Der fragmentierte QRS-Komplex (fQRS) ist ein wichtiger prognostischer Marker im EKG, mit dem sich ggf. kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse und Mortalität vorhersagen lassen. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es zu untersuchen, ob sich anhand des fQRS die Entwicklung einer HC bei Patienten mit HT innerhalb eines 4‑Jahres-Follow-up vorhersagen lässt.

Methoden

Für die Studie wurden Patienten mit neu diagnostizierter essenzieller Hypertonie aus einer Ambulanz rekrutiert. Je nach Vorliegen einer HC wurden die Patienten in 2 Gruppen unterteilt: HC(+) und HC(−). Während des Follow-up wurde der Zusammenhang zwischen fQRS und HC untersucht.

Ergebnisse

Zur Studiengruppe gehörten 504 Patienten mit neu diagnostizierter HT. Während der Follow-up-Phase trat bei 98 der Patienten eine HC auf. Bei 57 (11,30 %) Patienten wurde ein fQRS im EKG festgestellt; dabei zeigte sich ein fQRS im EKG von 19 (19,38 %) der HC(+)-Patienten (p = 0,008). Die multivariate logistische Regressionsanalyse ergab, dass fQRS (p < 0,001) ein unabhängiger Prädiktor für das Auftreten einer HC war. Außerdem zeigte die Kaplan-Meier-Analyse, dass das Bestehen eines fQRS sich auf die Entstehung einer Situation mit hypertensiver Dringlichkeit bei Hypertoniepatienten auswirkt (log-rank-p < 0,001).

Schlussfolgerung

Bei Patienten mit neu diagnostizierter HT stellte sich das Vorliegen eines fQRS als unabhängiger Prädiktor einer HC heraus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W et al (2018) 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 39:3021–3104. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodriguez MA, Kumar SK, De Caro M (2010) Hypertensive crisis. Cardiol Rev 8:102–107. https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181c307b7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Von den Born BH, Lip GYH, Brguljan-Hitij J et al (2018) ESC Council on hypertension position document on the management of hypertensive emergencies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 5:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basaran Y, Tigen K, Karaahmet T et al (2011) Fragmented QRS complexes are associated with cardiac fibrosis and significant intraventricular systolic dyssynchrony in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients with a narrow QRS interval. Echocardiography 28:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01242.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bozbeyoğlu E, Yıldırımtürk Ö, Yazıcı S et al (2016) Fragmented QRS on admission electrocardiography predicts long-term mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 21:352–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Das MK, Michael MA, Suradi H et al (2009) Usefulness of fragmented QRS on a 12-lead electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndrome for predicting mortality. Am J Cardiol 104:1631–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gulsen K, Ince O, Kum G, Ozkalayci F, Sahin I, Okuyan E (2019) Could fragmented QRS predict mortality in aortic stenosis patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement? Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 24:e12618. https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Acikgoz E, Yaman B, Acikgoz SK, Topal S, Tavil Y, Boyaci NB (2015) Fragmented QRS can predict severity of aortic stenosis. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 20:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Das MK, Khan B, Jacob S, Kumar A, Mahenthiran J (2006) Significance of a fragmented QRS complex versus a Q wave in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 113:2495–2501. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tomek J, Bub G (2017) Hypertension-induced remodelling: on the interactions of cardiac risk factors. J Physiol 595:4027–4036. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP273043

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schillaci G, Battista F, Pucci G (2012) A review of the role of electrocardiography in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension. J Electrocardiol 45:617–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.08.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pierin AMG, Flórido CF, Santos JD (2019) Hypertensive crisis: clinical characteristics of patients with hypertensive urgency, emergency and pseudocrisis at a public emergency department. Einstein 17:eAO4685. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4685

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Varounis C, Katsi V, Nihoyannopoulos P, Lekakis J, Tousoulis D (2017) Cardiovascular hypertensive crisis: recent evidence and review of the literature. Front Cardiovasc Med 3:51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2016.00051

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Das MK, Suradi H, Maskoun W et al (2008) Fragmented wide QRS on a 12-lead ECG: a sign of myocardial scar and poor prognosis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 1:258–268. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.107.763284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marume K, Noguchi T, Kamakura T et al (2021) Prognostic impact of multiple fragmented QRS on cardiac events in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Europace 5:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jain R, Singh R, Yamini S, Das MK (2014) Fragmented ECG as a risk marker in cardiovascular diseases. Curr Cardiol Rev 10:277–286. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403x10666140514103451

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Femenía F, Arce M, Van Grieken J et al (2013) Fragmented QRS as a predictor of arrhythmic events in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 38:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-013-9829-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Das MK, Saha C, El Masry H et al (2007) Fragmented QRS on a 12-lead ECG: a predictor of mortality and cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart Rhythm 4:1385–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.06.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanjanahattakij N, Rattanawong P, Riangwiwat T et al (2018) Fragmented QRS and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 23:e12567. https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12567

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chan JSK, Zhou J, Lee S et al (2021) Fragmented QRS is independently predictive of long-term adverse clinical outcomes in asian patients hospitalized for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study. Front Cardiovasc Med 8:738417. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.738417

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emine Altuntas MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

E. Altuntas and S. Cetın declare that they have no competing interests.

For this article no studies with human participants or animals were performed by any of the authors. All studies mentioned were in accordance with the ethical standards indicated in each case.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altuntas, E., Cetın, S. Fragmented QRS as a predictor of hypertensive crisis in patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension: 4-year follow-up data. Herz 48, 474–479 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-023-05194-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-023-05194-2

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation