Skip to main content
Log in

3D gravity anomaly inversion based on LinkNet

  • Gravity Exploration Methods
  • Published:
Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gravity anomaly inversion is a technique used to estimate underground density distribution using gravity data. This paper proposes a new three-dimensional (3D) gravity anomaly inversion method based on the LinkNet network. Compared with two-dimensional gravity anomaly inversion, 3D gravity anomaly inversion can determine the density distribution of the entire region below the observation surface. Additionally, compared with traditional methods, the neural network method does not require the selection of initial parameters, and several predictive models can be quickly sought during the prediction stage. The Tversky loss was used to improve the inversion accuracy of the boundary. By comparing the inversion of the fully convolutional network, UNet network, and LinkNet network proposed in this paper on simulated data, it was observed that the model reconstruction error obtained using the LinkNet network had the best fitting effect with gravity data, which were 0.3526 and 0.0521. The results reveal that this method can achieve accurate inversion. Using the San Nicolas deposit in Mexico as an example, the proposed method and the improved preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm were compared to further illustrate the effectiveness of the algorithm. The results reveal that the position and shape trends of the geological body attained using the proposed approach are in good agreement with the drilling data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altini, N., Prencipe, B., and Brunetti, A. et al, 2020, A tversky loss-based convolutional neural network for liver vessels segmentation: 16th International Conference on Intelligent Computing Theories and Application, 2–5 Octomber, Bari, Italy, 12463, 342–354.

  • Anderson, N., Essa, K., and Elhussein, M., 2020, A comparison study using particle swarm optimization inversion algorithm for gravity anomaly interpretation due to a 2d vertical fault structure: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 179, 104120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger, O., and Chouteau, M., 2001, Constraints in 3D gravity inversion: Geophysical Prospecting, 49(2), 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaurasia, A., and Culurciello, E., 2017, Linknet: Exploiting encoder representations for efficient semantic segmentation: IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing, 10–13 December, St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 1–4.

  • Chen, X., Du, Y., and Liu, Z., 2018, Inversion of density interfaces using the pseudo-backpropagation neural network method: Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175(12), 4427–4447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J., Li Y., Jessell M. W., et al., 2021, 3D geological structure inversion from Noddy-generated magnetic data using deep learning methods: Computers and Geosciences, 149(7), 104701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, W., Zhu, Z., and Lu, G., 2012, 3-D gravity inversion for physical properties using BP network: Progress in Geophysics, 27(2), 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht-Nielsen, R., 1992, Theory of the backpropagation neural network: Neural Networks for Perception, Academic Press, 65–93.

  • He S., Cai H., Liu S., Xie J., Hu X., 2021, Recovering 3D basement relief using gravity data through convolutional neural networks: Journal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth, 126(10), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, W. J., Von Frese, R.R.B., and Von Frese, R., 2013, Gravity and magnetic exploration: Principles, practices, and applications: Cambridge University Press.

  • Huang, R., Liu, S., Qi, R., and Zhang, Y.J., 2021, Deep learning 3D sparse inversion of gravity data: Journal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth, 126(11), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioffe, S., and Szegedy, C., 2015, Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift: 32th International Conference on Machine Learning, 6–11 July, Lile, France, 1, 448–456.

  • Lelièvre, P.G., Oldenburg, D.W., and Williams, N.C., 2009, Integrating geological and geophysical data through advanced constrained inversions: Exploration Geophysics, 40(4), 334–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelièvre, P.G., Farquharson, C.G., and Hurich C.A., 2012, Joint inversion of seismic travel times and gravity data on unstructured grids with application to mineral exploration: Geophysics, 77(1), K1–K15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z.L., Yao, C.L., and Zheng, Y.M., 2019, 3D inversion of gravity data using Lp-norm sparse optimization: Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 62(10), 3699–3709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., Oldenburg, D., Chen, J., Li, Y., and Routh, P., 2001, Cost-effectiveness of geophysical inversions in mineral exploration: Applications at San Nicolas: The Leading Edge. 20(12), 1351–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K., and Biswas, A., 2021, Modeling and uncertainty estimation of gravity anomaly over 2D fault using very fast simulated annealing global optimization: Acta Geophysica, 69(5), 1735–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaie, M., 2019, 3d non-smooth inversion of gravity data by zero-order minimum entropy stabilizing functional: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 294, 106275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezatofighi, H., Tsoi, N., Gwak, J., Sadeghian, A., Reid, I., and Savarese, S., 2019, Generalized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 15–20 June, Long Beach, USA, 658–666.

  • Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T., 2015, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation: 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 5–9 Octomber, Munich, Germany, 9351, 234–241.

  • Schmidhuber, J., 2015, Deep learning in neural networks: An overview: Neural Networks, 61, 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelhamer, E., Long, J., and Darrell, T., 2017, Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39, 640–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, R., Yadav, R., and Gupta, L., 2020, Prelu and edge-aware filter-based image denoiser using convolutional neural network: IET Image Processing, 14, 3869–3879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toushmalani, R., and Saibi, H., 2015, 3D gravity inversion using Tikhonov regularization: Acta Geophysical, 63(4), 1044–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varatharajan, R., Vasanth, K., and Gunasekaran, M., 2018, An adaptive decision based kriging interpolation algorithm for the removal of high density salt and pepper noise in images: Computers & Electrical Engineering, 70, 447–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitale, A., and Fedi, M., 2020, Self-constrained inversion of potential fields through a 3D depth weighting: Geophysics, 85(6), G143–G156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Wang, Z., and Zhu, Y., 2020, Appliction of gravity-seismic inversion in petroleum resources evaluation of the Labudalin basin: Geology and Resources, 29(2), 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T.H., Huang, D.N., and Ma, G. Q., 2017, Improved preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm and application in 3D inversion of gravity-gradiometry data: Applied Geophysics, 14(2), 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., 2020, Hybrid gravity gradient inversion-ant colony optimization algorithm for motion planning of mobile robots: International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 14(4), 137–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.F., Zhang, Y. J., Fu, L. H., and Li, H. W., 2021, Three-dimensional gravity inversion based on 3D U-Net++: Applied Geophysics, 18(4), 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q., Hu, X., Liu, S., et al., 2021, 3D Gravity inversion based on deep convolution neural networks. IEEE Geosciences and Remote Sensing Letters, 1–5.

  • Zhang L., Zhang G., Liu Y., et al., 2022, Deep Learning for 3-D inversion of gravity data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R., Li, T., and Zhou, S., 2019, Joint MT and gravity inversion using structural constraints: A case study from the Linjiang copper mining area, Jilin, China: Minerals, 9(7), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation for Outstanding Young Scholars (Grant No. 42122025).

All authors are grateful to the reviewers and editors for offering valuable suggestions on this paper and also are thankful to the Geophysical Inversion Facility of the University of British Colombia (UBC-GIF) for providing the field data (https://zenodo.org/record/4089070). This work is supported by the National Science Foundation for Outstanding Young Scholars (Grant No. 42122025).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Qi.

Additional information

Houpu Li received a Ph.D. degree from the Naval University of Engineering in 2010. He is a professor of Electrical Engineering at the Naval University of Engineering. His current research mainly includes marine geodesy and geophysics.

Rui Qi received a Ph.D. degree from the Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics of China University of Geosciences in 2018. He is an associate professor at the Department of Basic Courses of the Geophysics and Geomatics of China University of Geosciences. His research interests include blind source separation, gravity inversion, and compressed sensing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, HP., Qi, R., Hu, JX. et al. 3D gravity anomaly inversion based on LinkNet. Appl. Geophys. 20, 36–50 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-023-1020-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-023-1020-4

Keywords

Navigation