Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological quality, rarity and risk assessment of the wildlife habitats at the Meighan watershed in central Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Meighan watershed habitats, located in central Iran (Markazi Province), have undergone considerable changes in recent years. Landsat satellite images of the year 2020 were used to produce digital land use maps for the present study. Ecological quality, rarity and risk assessment analyses were performed using the Sub-Watershed-scale Ecosystem Service Modeler according to the InVEST (SWESMI) toolkit, HQR and HRA models. The images were classified into three classes including Agriculture, Rangeland, and Human-made (industrial-residential regions) impacts. The results indicated that there are three important habitats in the Meighan watershed: mountains, plains, and wetlands. Human-made changes, agriculture, and road developments were among the biggest threats and most devastating stressors in the Meighan watershed. There was an increased cumulative risk in the plain habitat of the Kharahrod (31.44%), Amanabad (27.75%) and Sarogh (26.87%) sub-watersheds. A decreased cumulative risk was identified in the mountain habitat of the Kheirabad (7.62%) sub-watershed in the Haftad-Gholleh National Park, and wetland habitat of the Meighan (4.30%) sub-watersheds. The plain habitat (with high cumulative consequence) and the wetland habitat (with high accumulative exposure) are at the highest risk from Human-made activities. Stressors related to roads and agriculture-livestock were the main stressors in the mountain habitat and wetland habitat, respectively, whereas both stressors were considerably high in the plain habitat. Due to being located in a protected area, the Kheirabad sub-watershed was found to have suitable quality and rarity compared to other sub-watersheds in central Iran. The results highlight the significance of land conservation and protected areas in maintaining the habitat quality and reducing the risks associated with habitat degradation and biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

(modified from Zhang et al. 2022a)

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Ansari A (2009) Monitoring ecosystems and natural habitats of Markazi province identification of degraded and vulnerable habitats. J Iran DOE 47:22–32 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari A (2018) Recognition and evaluation of the environmental status of Meighan Wetland and planning for a sustainable development. Environ Res 9(17):29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari A, Golabi MH (2019a) Using Ecosystem Service Modeler (ESM) for ecological quality, rarity and risk assessment of the wild goat habitat, in the Haftad-Gholleh protected area. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 7:346–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari A, Golabi MH (2019) Prediction of spatial land use changes based on LCM in a GIS environment for desert Wetlands—a case study, Meighan Wetland Iran. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 7:64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari A, Sadough MB, Esfandabad BS (2008) Ecological investigation of the common Crane Grus grus in Mighan Wetland, Markazi Province, Central Iran. Podoces 3(1/2):73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Arekhi S (2015) Prediction of spatial land use changes based on LCM in a GIS environment a case study of Sarabeleh (Ilam), Iran. Iranian J For Range Prot Res 12(1):1–19 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrouzi-Rad B, Hamidian N, Shariati S (1997) The community of birds in west & south west of Markazi Province. Mohit-e-Zist (Environ) 4:22–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Caviedes J, Ibarra JT (2017) Influence of anthropogenic disturbances on stand structural complexity in Andean temperate forests: implications for managing key habitat for biodiversity. PLOS One 12(1):e0169450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Qiao F, Jiang L (2016) Effects of land use pattern on regional scale habitat quality based on InVEST model: a case study in Beijing. Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekin 52:553–562

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks KR, Burdett CL, Theobald DM, King SRB, Marco MD, Rondininig C, Boitanig L (2017) Quantification of habitat fragmentation reveals extinction risk in terrestrial mammals. PANAS 29(114):7635–7640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS (2016) The relevance and resilience of protected areas in the Anthropocene. Anthropocene 13:46–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakos V, Quinlan A, Baggio JA, Bennett E, Bodin Ö, BurnSilver S (2015) Principle 2–manage connectivity. In: Biggs R, Schlüter OM, Schoon ML (eds) Principles for building resilience: sustaining ecosystem services in socioecological systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 80–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DOE Markazi (2020) Report of census on the population of mammals in the Haftad-Gholleh protected area. http://markazi.doe.ir/Portal/(in Persian)

  • Eastman RJ (2015) TerrSet Tutorial. Production of Clark University, www.clarklabs.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manag, 603–610

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2009) Irrigation in the Middle East Region in Figures— AQUASTAT Survey. 2008 Water Report 34:2. https://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0936e/i0936e00.htmy

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16(3):265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves RA, Williamson MA, Belote RT, Brandt JS (2019) Quantifying the contribution of conservation easements to large-landscape conservation. Biol Conserv 232:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulbin S, Kirilenko AP, Kharel G, Zhang X (2019) Wetland loss impact on long term flood risks in a closed watershed. Environ Sci Policy 94:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habibzadeh N, Ashrafzadeh M (2018) Habitat suitability and connectivity for an endangered brown bear population in the iranian Caucasus. Wildl Res 45(7):602–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall LS, Krausman PR, Morrison ML (1997) The habitat concept and aplea for standard terminology. Wildl Soc Bull 25:171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillard EM, Nielsen CK, Groninger JW (2017) Swamp rabbits as indicators of wildlife habitat quality in bottomland hardwood forest ecosystems. Ecol Indic 79:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini G, Shams sfandabab B, Alizadeh shabani A (2016) Habitat suitability evaluation for Persian Gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa) in Haftad-Gholleh protected area, Markazi province in central Iran. J Nat Environ 6(69):965–979 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Houet T, Loveland TR, Hubert-Moy L, Gaucherel C, Napton D, Barnes CA et al (2010) Exploring subtle land use and land cover changes: a framework for future landscape studies. Landscape Ecol 25(2):249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaafari S, Alizadeh Shabani A, Danehkar A, Nazarisamani A, Plexida S (2017) Application of landscape metrics for assessment of land use/ land cover (lulc) changes in varjin protected area, iran. Environ Eng Manag J 16:2813–2821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kheirkhah Ghehi N, MalekMohammadi B, Jafari H (2020) Integrating habitat risk assessment and connectivity analysis in ranking habitat patches for conservation in protected areas. J Nat Conserv 56:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolahi M (2014) Protected areas management and environmental sociology in Iran. Book/Scholars' Press. 236 https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2792.2249

  • Leslie P, McCabe JT (2013) Response diversity and resilience in social-ecological systems. Curr Anthropol 54(2):114–143. https://doi.org/10.1086/669563

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Duo L, Zhang M et al (2022) Habitat quality assessment of mining cities based on InVEST model-a case study of Yanshan County, Jiangxi Province. Int J Coal Sci Technol 9:28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-022-00498-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liira J, Sepp T, Parrest O (2007) The forest structure and ecosystem quality in conditions of anthropogenic disturbance along productivity gradient. For Ecol Manage 250:34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2013) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: an ecological and conservation synthesis. Island Press, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu RZ, Zhang K, Zhang ZJ, Borthwick AGL (2018) Watershed-Scale Environmental Risk Assessment of Accidental Water Pollution: the case of Laoguan River, China. J Environ Inf 31(2):87–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malekmohammadi B, Rahimi Blouchi L (2014) Ecological risk assessment of wetland ecosystems using Multi Criteria decision making and Geographic Information System. Ecol Ind 41:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian A, Ghafoori R, Moazeni A (2014) A review of Basic data, challenges and threat factors to the Wetland of Meyghan. Environ Sci 13(4):59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra BP, Tripathi OP, Tripathi RS, Pandey HN (2004) Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on plant diversity and community structure of a sacred grove in Meghalaya, northeast India. Biodivers Conserv 13:421–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office International des Epizooties (OIE) and IUCN (2014) Wildlife Disease Risk Analysis. OIE, Paris, 24 pp. Published in association with the IUCN and the Species Survival Commission

  • Poniatowski D, Stuhldreher G, Löffler F, Fartmann T (2018) Patch occupancy of grassland specialists: habitat quality matters more than habitat connectivity. Biol Conserv 225:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhind SM (2009) Anthropogenic pollutants: a threat to ecosystem sustainability? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364(1534):3391–3401. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rudebusch J, Hughes BB, Boyer KE, Hines E (2020) Assessing anthropogenic risk to sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) for reintroduction into San Francisco Bay. PeerJ 8:e10241

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saadati S, Motevallian SS, Rheinheimer DE, Najafi H (2013) Indicators for Sustainable Management of Wetland Ecosystems Using a DPSIR Approach: A Case Study in Iran. In proceeding of: 6th International Perspective on Water Resources & the Environment conference (IPWE 2013), At Izmir, Turkey

  • Sabater S, Elosegi A, Ludwig R (2019) Chapter 1-defining multiple stressor implications. In: Sabater S, Elosegi A, Ludwig R (eds) Multiple stressors in river ecosystems. Elsevier, UK, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari F (2022) Identifying anthropogenic and natural causes of wildfires by maximum entropy method-based ignition susceptibility distribution models. J For Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01502-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvage S, Sanchez-Perez J-M, Vervier P, Naiman R-J, Alexandre H, Bernard-Jannin L, Bouletreau S, Delmotte S, Julien F, Peyrard D, Sun X, Gerino M (2018) Modelling the role of riverbed compartments in the regulation of water quality as an ecological service. Ecol Eng 118:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirpke U, Ebner M (2022) Exposure to global change pressures and potential impacts on ecosystem services of mountain lakes in the european Alps. J Environ Manage 318:115606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schirpke U, Kohler M, Leitinger G, Fontana V, Tasser E, Tappeiner U (2017) Future impacts of changing land-use and climate on ecosystem services of mountain grassland and their resilience. Ecosyst Serv 26:79–94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Segan DB, Murray KA, Watson JE (2016) A global assessment of current and future biodiversity vulnerability to habitat loss–climate change interactions. Global Ecol Conserv 5:12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao C, Guan Y, Chu C, Shi R, Ju M, Shi J (2014) Trends analysis of ecological environment security based on DPSIR MODEL IN THE Coastal zone: a survey study in Tianjin, China. Int J Environ Res 8(3):765–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Svarstad H, Kjerulf Petersen L, Rothman D, Sieple H, Wätzold F (2008) Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR. Land Use Policy 25:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MC et al (2016) Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: key findings and future challenges. Landsc Ecol 31:219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt KH, Griffin R, Guerry AD, Ruckelshaus M, Fogarty M, Arkema KK (2017) Habitat risk assessment for regional ocean planning in the US Northeast and Mid-Atlantic. PLOS One 12(12):e0188776

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Baopeng X, Wenqian T, Degang Z (2021) Ecosystem services assessment, trade-off, and bundles in the Yellow River Basin, China”. Diversity. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13070308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao J, Sanchez-Perez JM, Sauvage S, Teissier S, Attard E, Lauga B, Duran R, Julien F, Bernard-Jannin L, Ramburn H, Gerino M (2017) Biodiversity and ecosystem purification service in an alluvial wetland. Ecol Eng 103:359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuana Y, Zenga G, Lianga J, Li X, Li Z (2014). Effects of landscape structure, habitat and human disturbance on birds: A case study in East Dongting Lake wetland. Ecol Eng 67:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.012

  • Zhang Y, Zhang C, Zhang X, Wang X, Liu T, Li Z, Lin Q, Jing Z, Wang X, Huang Q et al (2022a) Habitat quality assessment and ecological risks prediction: an analysis in the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal (Suzhou Section). Water 14:2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14172602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Miao C, Zhu J et al (2022b) The impact of landslides on chemical and microbial properties of soil in a temperate secondary forest ecosystem. J For Res 33:1913–1923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01466-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Li H (2022) Spatial–temporal evolution characteristics of land use and habitat quality in Shandong Province, China. Sci Rep 12:15422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19493-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Huang C, Liu QS, Liu GH (2015) Changes of coastal zone landscape spatial patterns and ecological quality in Liaoning province from 2000 to 2010. Resour Sci 37:1962–1972

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All personnel and the General Directorates of Environment Markazi Province and Arak University who have collaborated with the authors in the recent study are appreciated.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Arak University, 38156-8- 8349, Arak, Iran

    Amir Ansari

  2. Department of Medicinal Plants, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Arak University, 38156- 8-8349, Arak, Iran

    Mansour Ghorbanpour

  3. UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia

    Khalil Kariman

Authors
  1. Amir Ansari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mansour Ghorbanpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khalil Kariman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AA performed the experiment and wrote manuscript; MG and KK contributed to statistical analyses and revised the manuscript critically. Authors read and approved the final manuscript version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amir Ansari or Mansour Ghorbanpour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This research material is the authors original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere. Also, the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.

Consent to participate

All authors have been personally and actively involved in the substantial work leading to the manuscript and will take public responsibility for its content.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to submit the manuscript in its current form for consideration and possible publication in Wetlands Ecology and Management.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 81.7 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ansari, A., Ghorbanpour, M. & Kariman, K. Ecological quality, rarity and risk assessment of the wildlife habitats at the Meighan watershed in central Iran. Wetlands Ecol Manage 31, 565–582 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-023-09935-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-023-09935-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation