Skip to main content
Log in

Associations Among Experiential Avoidance, Positive Affect, and Reward Responsivity

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiential Avoidance has been conceptualized as an unwillingness to sustain engagement with unwanted negatively valenced internal states and has been strongly associated with a range of psychological symptoms. However, it remains unclear whether and how experiential avoidance may be associated with the experience of positive affect/anhedonia. Anhedonia has been associated with impairments in reward system functioning (e.g., anticipatory and consummatory reward responsivity). Initial research suggests that experiential avoidance may diminish hedonic responses to experienced rewards, perhaps leading to global decrements in positive affect. This study investigated associations between experiential avoidance, positive affect, anhedonia, and reward responsiveness using a baseline questionnaire packet and a one-week experience sampling paradigm. 157 undergraduate students completed baseline questionnaires assessing trait experiential avoidance, depression, anxiety, positive affect (PA), negative affect (NA), and anhedonic symptoms. Participants then completed experience sampling questionnaires assessing anticipatory (RRA) and consummatory (RRC) reward responsivity, NA, PA, and state experiential avoidance. Trait experiential avoidance predicted increased levels of NA, decreased levels of PA, and decreased RRA and RRC across the week. Increases in state experiential avoidance were associated with increases in NA as well as decreases in PA and RRC throughout the week. Findings demonstrate significant associations between experiential avoidance and both NA and PA, supporting experiential avoidance as a potential construct of clinical significance for disorders marked by low PA. Results also generally support a relationship between experiential avoidance and reward responsivity, specifically with RRC. Future research is needed to examine the mechanisms through which these associations occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data is available upon reasonable request.

Code Availability

Availability from the authors upon request.

Notes

  1. Cut off scores are used to index the severity of symptoms using each subscale (DASS-21 depression: 0–9 normal, 10–13 mild, 14–20 moderate, 21–27 severe, and 28 + extremely severe; DASS-21 anxiety: 0–7 normal, 8–9 mild, 10–14 moderate, 15–19 severe, and 20 + extremely severe; DASS-21 stress: 0–14 normal, 15–18 mild, 19–25 moderate, 26–33 severe, and 34 + extremely severe; Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995).

References

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive funds, grants, or other support for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica S. Fields.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Emmanuel College’s Institutional Review Board. All procedures were performed in accordance with the principles of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.

Consent to Participate

Consent was obtained from all participants for their participation in this study.

Consent for Publication

All authors agree to the publication of this article in the Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fields, J.S., Wieman, S.T., MacDonald, H.Z. et al. Associations Among Experiential Avoidance, Positive Affect, and Reward Responsivity. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 45, 628–639 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-023-10072-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-023-10072-6

Keywords

Navigation