Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social Workers Putting into Practice the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

  • Published:
Journal of Human Rights and Social Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For social work with adults with mild intellectual disabilities, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) provides a framework for putting the principles of social justice and human rights into practice. This article focuses on social workers’ knowledge, values, and skills, which may contribute to the protection of the rights of adults with mild intellectual disabilities. A scoping review found no documented effective competencies for realizing human rights and social inclusion for adults with mild intellectual disabilities. As a result, a narrative review was conducted focusing on codes of ethics and competency profiles in the USA, UK, and Netherlands. The codes of ethics were found to align with the values of social justice, human dignity, integrity, competence/expertise, and relationship building. Differences between the codes of ethics and competency profiles were found in the human rights underpinning and weight given to advocacy, racism, dimensions of justice, and intersectionality. Six clusters of competencies were identified as aligning with CRPD aspirations: assessment, engagement, advancement, empowerment, intervention, and professionalism. We conclude that with regard to skills and knowledge, social work is profiled as a human rights profession in the USA and UK more explicitly than in NL. Regardless of the codes of ethics and competency profiles, convincing evidence that performing the competencies contributes to human rights realization is lacking. Further investigation of social work knowledge and skills that may be effective in the protection and promotion of human rights is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Anastasiou, D., & Kauffman, J. M. (2013). The social model of disability: Dichotomy between impairment and disability. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(4), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., & Philips, J. (2012). Disability and Universal Human Rights: Legal, ethical, and conceptual implications of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Utrecht: Netherlands Institute of Human Rights (SIM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Androff, D. (2016). Practicing rights. Human rights-based approaches to social work practice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8

  • Banks, S. (2012). Ethics and values in social work (4th ed.). Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beernink-Wissink, J. (2015). Floreren. Zoektocht naar een goed leven voor mensen met een ernstig verstandelijke beperking en ernstige gedragsproblemen. Delft: Uitgeverij Eburon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, C. R. (2013). The idea of human rights. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beroepsvereniging van professionals in sociaal werker. (2021). Beroepscode voor professionals in sociaal werk. Utrecht: BPSW.

  • Bielefeldt, H. (2009). Zum Innovationspotenzial der UN-Behindertenrechts-konvention. Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte.

  • Bigby, C. (2012). Social inclusion and people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour: A systematic review. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 37(4), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2012.721878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigby, C., Anderson, S., & Cameron, N. (2018). Identifying conceptualizations and theories of change embedded in interventions to facilitate community participation for people with intellectual disability: A scoping review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigby, C., & Frawley, P. (2010). Social work practice and intellectual disability. Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biholar, R. (2014). Challenging the barriers to real equality: Transformative equality. Parliamentarians for the Americas (ParlAmericas), June 24–25, 2014, 1–8.

  • British Association of Social Workers. (2015). BASW human rights policy. BASW.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Association of Social Workers. (2018). Professional capabilities framework: Social worker. BASW.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Association of Social Workers. (2019). Capabilities statement for social workers working with adults with learning disability. BASW.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Association of Social Workers. (2021). The BASW code of ethics for social work. BASW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catala, A. (2020). Metaepistemic injustice and intellectual disability: A pluralist account of epistemic agency. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 23(5), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10120-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobigo, V., Brown, R., Lachapelle, Y., Lysaght, R., Martin, L., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Stuart, H., & Fulford, C. (2016). Social inclusion: A proposed framework to inform policy and service outcomes evaluation. Inclusion, 4(4), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-4.4

  • Cobigo, V., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Lysaght, R., & Martin, L. (2012). Shifting our conceptualization of social inclusion. Stigma Research and Action, 2(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.5463/sra.v1i3.45

  • College voor de Rechten van de Mens. (2020). Jaarlijkse rapportage over de naleving van het VN‐verdrag handicap in Nederland. Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://publicaties.mensenrechten.nl/publicatie/5fc877581e0fec037359c660

  • Cooper, S. A., McConnachie, A., Allan, L. M., Melville, C., Smiley, E., & Morrison, J. (2011). Neighbourhood deprivation, health inequalities and service access by adults with intellectual disabilities: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council on Social Work Education. (2022). Educational policy and accreditation standards for baccalaureate and master’s social work programs. Council on Social Work Education. Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://www.cswe.org/getmedia/94471c42-13b8-493b-9041-b30f48533d64/2022-EPAS.pdf

  • Council on Social Work Education. (2023). Committee on human rights. Retrieved 3 May 2023, from https://www.cswe.org/about-cswe/governance/governance-groups/commission-on-global-social-work-education/committee-on-human-rights

  • Degener, T. (2016). Disability in a human rights context. Laws, 5(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5030035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degener, T., & Begg, A. (2017). From invisible citizens to agents of change: A short history of the struggle for the recognition of the rights of persons with disabilities at the United Nations. In V. della Fina, R. Cera, & G. Palmisano (Eds.), The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (pp. 1–40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43790-3

  • Frezzo, M. (2017). The sociology of human rights: An introduction. Polity Press.

  • Goldschmidt, J. (2012). Shifting the burden of proof: How the CRPD is transforming our understanding of discrimination, intersectionality, and priorities. In J. Anderson, & J. Philips (Eds.), Disability and universal human rights: Legal, ethical, and conceptual implications of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (pp. 51–71). Netherlands Institute of Human Rights.

  • Goldschmidt, J. E. (2017). New perspectives on equality: Towards transformative justice through the disability convention? Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 35(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2017.1286131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2005). Empowerment, self-advocacy and resilience. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629505059267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graumann, S. (2012). Resolving the tension between equality and difference: Towards a new understanding of discrimination. In J. Anderson, & J. Philips (Eds.), Disability and universal human rights: Legal, ethical, and conceptual implications of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (pp. 85–99). Netherlands Institute of Human Rights.

  • Gregg, B. (2012). Human rights as social construction. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (2013). On human rights. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnacke, C., & Graumann, S. (2012). Core principles of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: An overview. In J. Anderson, & J. Philips (Eds.), Disability and universal human rights: Legal, ethical, and conceptual implications of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (pp. 31–51). Netherlands Institute of Human Rights.

  • Hermans, K., Raeymaeckers, P., Roose, R., & Vandekinderen, C. (2019). Sociaal werk. Mensenrechten in praktijk. LannooCampus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Lefebvre, C., & Scherer, R. (2007). Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2007(2), MR000001. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000001.pub2

  • Ife, J. (2009). Human rights from below. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M. (2001). Human rights as politics and idolatry. Princeton University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/IGNHRA-2

  • Inclusion International. (2020). Excluded from the excluded: People with intellectual disabilities in (and out of) official development assistance. Retrieved June 8, 2023, from https://s38312.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/Excluded-from-the-Excluded_new.pdf

  • International Federation of Social Work. (2010). People with disabilities. https://www.ifsw.org/people-with-disabilities/

  • International Federation of Social Work. (2014). Global definition of social work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/

  • International Federation of Social Work. (2018). Global social work statement of ethical principles. Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://www.ifsw.org/global-social-work-statement-of-ethical-principles

  • Joanna Briggs Institute. (2015). The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual: 2015 edition / supplement. The Joanna Briggs Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knevel, J., & Wilken, J. P. (2015). Inclusie, (on)gewoon doen! Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOO-SW. (2017). Landelijk Opleidingsdocument Sociaal Werk. Retrieved 3 May 2023, from https://www.vereniginghogescholen.nl/system/profiles/documents/000/000/212/original/Landelijk_opleidingsdocument_Sociaal_Werk_-_downloadversie.pdf?1494439200

  • MacQuarrie, A., & Laurin-Bowie, C. (2014). Our lives, our voices: People with intellectual disabilities and their families. In M. Sabatello, & M. Schulze (Eds.), Human rights and disability advocacy (pp. 25–45). University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Mantell, A. (2013). Skills for social work practice. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittler, P. (2003). Meeting the needs of people with intellectual disability: International perspectives. In S. Herr, L. O. Gostin, & H. H. Koh (Eds.), The Human rights of persons with intellectual disabilities: Different but equal (pp. 25–49). Oxford University Press.

  • Mouffe, C. (2004). Pluralism, dissensus and democratic citizenship. Education and the good society (pp. 42–53). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523449_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Code of Ethics. Ethical Principles https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English

  • Nussbaum, M. (2007). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press.

  • Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2012). The new politics of disablement. Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orend, B. (2002). Human rights. Concept and context. Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmars-Marx, T., Thomése, F., & Meininger, H. (2017). Social inclusion in the neighbourhood and the professional role identity of group home staff members: Views and experiences of staff regarding neighbourhood social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. Society Health & Vulnerability, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20021518.2017.1395676

  • Peterson, J., Pearce, P. F., Ferguson, L. A., & Langford, C. A. (2017). Understanding scoping reviews. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 29(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, G. (2009). Bringing the UN Convention on rights for persons with disabilities to life in Ireland. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00578.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, E. (2011). Human rights in social work: An essential basis. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486831.2011.595070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynaert, D., Kemmeren, C., Knevel, J., Lochtenberg, M., Plovie, E., & Tirions, M. (2023). Sociaal werk als mensenrechtenberoep. Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatello, M., & Schulze, M. (2014). Human rights and disability advocacy. University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Schalock, R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: What we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00558.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, A. (2021). Gouden Verbindingen. Kennis ervaren, herkennen en erkennen. Universiteit voor Humanistiek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, M. (2015). Mensen met een Verstandelijke Beperking: Verheldering concepten en handelingsmogelijkheden in Wmo. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Zorg aan Mensen met Verstandelijke Beperkingen, 41(3), 244–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, M. I. M., Kröber, H. R., Th., & Verdonschot, M. M. L. (2013). Armoede bij mensen met beperkingen. Resultaten van onderzoek naar oorzaken, gevolgen voor inclusie, preventie en benodigde ondersteuning. Dordrecht, Utrecht: Kalliope Consult, Inclusie.nu, Vilans: Nieuwegein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simplican, S. C., Leader, G., Kosciulek, J., & Leahy, M. (2015). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of social networks and community participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staub-Bernasconi, S. (2011). Human rights and their relevance for social work as theory and practice. In L.M. Healy & R.J. Link (Eds.) Handbook of international social work: Human rights, development, and the global profession (pp. 30–36). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333619.003.0005

  • Staub-Bernasconi, S. (2016). Social work and human rights—Linking two traditions of human rights in social work. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 1(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-016-0005-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. A., & Lord, J. (2010). Monitoring the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Innovations, lost opportunities, and future potential. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(3), 689–728. Retrieved May 3, 2023, from https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1101/

  • Thompson, N. (2020). Anti-discriminatory practice: Equality, diversity and social justice. Red Globe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. Retrieved from May 3, 2023, from https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf

  • United Nations. (2016). Leaving no one behind. The imperative of inclusive development. Report on the World Social Situation 2016. Retrieved May 3, 2023, from https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/2016/full-report.pdf

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2016). General comment No. 4, Article 24: Right to inclusive education. Retrieved May 3, 2023, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-4-article-24-right-inclusive

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Van der Klink, M. R., & Hendriks, M. (2002). Competenties: Van complicaties tot compromis. Over schuifjes en begrenzers. Onderwijsraad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Regenmortel, T. (2009). Empowerment als uitdagend kader voor sociale inclusie en moderne zorg. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.18352/jsi.186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Weele, E. (2012). The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities in the context of human rights law. In J. Anderson, & J. Philips (Eds.), Disability and universal human rights: Legal, ethical, and conceptual implications of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (pp. 9–31). Netherlands Institute of Human Rights.

  • Veldboer, L. (2019). Sociaal werk: niet politiseren maar laveren. Tijdschrift Voor Sociale Vraagstukken. https://www.socialevraagstukken.nl/take-back-the-balance/

  • Verdugo, M. A., Navas, P., Gómez, L. E., & Schalock, R. L. (2012). The concept of quality of life and its role in enhancing human rights in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(11), 1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01585.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VGN. (2015). (SG)LVB Competentieprofiel voor beroepskrachten in de gehandicaptenzorg die begeleiding en behandeling bieden aan mensen met een lichte verstandelijke beperking met ernstige gedragsproblemen. Retrieved 3 May 2023, from https://www.vgn.nl/documenten/competentieprofiel-sglvb

  • VGN. (2019). Beroepscompetentieprofiel voor beroepskrachten met een hogere functie (niveau D) in het primaire proces van de gehandicaptenzorg D. Retrieved 3 May 2023, from https://www.vgn.nl/documenten/competentieprofiel-d

  • Wilken, J. P., & Knevel, J. (2016). Werken aan inclusie. Lessen uit zeven proeftuinen. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor de Zorg Aan Mensen Met Een Verstandelijke Beperking, 42(3), 182–195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research is funded by a PhD scholarship offered by Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Centre for Social Innovation, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Jeroen Knevel & Jean Pierre Wilken

  2. Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

    Jeroen Knevel

  3. Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia

    Jean Pierre Wilken

  4. Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy

    Jean Pierre Wilken

  5. University of Humanistic Studies in Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Alice Schippers

Authors
  1. Jeroen Knevel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean Pierre Wilken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alice Schippers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeroen Knevel.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knevel, J., Wilken, J.P. & Schippers, A. Social Workers Putting into Practice the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. J. Hum. Rights Soc. Work 8, 302–315 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-023-00255-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-023-00255-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation