Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electronic Research Notebooks in the Educational Setting: A Scoping Review

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electronic research notebooks (ERNs) are used under a variety of names: electronic laboratory notebooks, digital laboratory notebooks, electronic field notebooks, and electronic engineering logbooks, to name a few. ERNs are common in industry and increasingly common in academia. This scoping review explores the literature describing the various uses and application of ERNs in an educational and teaching context. Using a common search string and eight indices and databases—Scopus, Web of Science, Engineering Village, ERIC, PubMed, LISTA, Scifinder-n, and ASEE—the study identified 38 articles that describe educational and teaching uses of ERNs. The types of ERNs used, the fields in which they were used, and the educational level of their use are explored. Furthermore, the scoping review discusses common advantages and disadvantages of ERNs with respect to paper notebooks as identified by the literature and highlights issues of equity and access that ERNs implicate. Finally, directions for future studies and actions are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. This is a repository of conference proceedings and not a true subscription database.

  2. The ProQuest platform was used for this search.

  3. Web of Science was not used in the updated searches due to the cancellation of the database from our institutional subscription.

  4. Homepage: rayyan.ai.

References

  • Aoyagi, D. (2018). No-cost implementation of electronic lab notebooks in an intro engineering design course. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/106/papers/22024/view

  • Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, C. (2018). Work in progress: Assessment of Google Docs and Drive for enhanced communication and data dissemination in a unit operations laboratory. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/106/papers/22308/view

  • Bird, C. L., Willoughby, C., Frey, J. G. et al. (2013). Laboratory notebooks in the digital era: The role of ELNs in record keeping for chemistry and other sciences. Chemical Society Reviews, 42(20), 8157–8175. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60122f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanni, M. (2020). Project tools. Performing the Anthropocene. https://libguides.asu.edu/c.php?g=1071758&p=7809455

  • Bork, S. J., & Mondisa, J. L. (2022). Engineering graduate students’ mental health: A scoping literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(3), 665–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, P. A., & Rushing, J. H. (2016). Using engineering design notebooks to evaluate student understanding of physics concepts in a design challenge. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/64/papers/16886/view

  • Brennan, L., Brewster, L., Lunn, J., Egboko, F., Stres, D. P., Patel, P., Isba, R. et al. (2023). How do hospitals address health inequalities experienced by children and young people: A grey literature scoping review protocol. British Medical Journal Open, 13(4), e071682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromfield Lee, D. (2018). Implementation and student perceptions on Google docs as an electronic laboratory notebook in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(7), 1102–1111. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas, M. (2014). An implementation of electronic laboratory notebooks (ELN) using a learning management system platform in an undergraduate experimental engineering course. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/32/papers/9040/view

  • Carnegie Mellon University Libraries. (2020). Documenting Workflows for Humanities Data in protocols.io. Carnegie Mellon University Libraries. https://library.cmu.edu/about/news/2020-08/documenting-workflows-humanities-data-protocolsio

  • Chandna, K., Vine, M. M., Snelling, S. J., Harris, R., Smylie, J., Manson, H. et al. (2019). Principles, approaches, and methods for evaluation in Indigenous contexts: A grey literature scoping review. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34(1), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colabroy, K., & Bell, J. K. (2019). Lab eNotebooks. In T. J. Bussey, K. L. Cortes, & R. C. Austin (Eds.), Biochemistry education: From theory to practice (pp. 173–195). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1337.ch008

  • Cole, A., Napier, T., & Marcum, B. (2015). Generation Z: Facts and fictions. In T. Napier (Ed.), Not just where to click: Teaching students how to think about information (pp. 107-137). American Library Association.

  • Coles, S. J., & Mapp, L. K. (2016). Conducting reflective, hands-on research with advanced characterization instruments: A high-level undergraduate practical exploring solid-state polymorphism. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, N. J., Robbins, P. T., Lodge, J. M., Shannon, I., Hawwash, K. I. M. et al. (2017). Recommendations for electronic laboratory notebooks in undergraduate engineering faculty: A student-led case study. Retrieved October 15, 2021 from https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/HEFI/Electronic-Laboratory-Notebooks-Case-Study.pdf

  • Cross, M., & Feinauer, D. M. (2021). Integrating the iPad into the engineering classroom. In 128th American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. https://peer.asee.org/38381

  • Delaney, M. F. (1987). Using “electronic laboratory notebook” software in the instrumental analysis course. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(1), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed064p29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewi, C., Pahriah, P., Purmadi, A. et al. (2021). The urgency of digital literacy for generation Z students in chemistry learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 88–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dood, A. J., Johnson, L. M., Shorb, J. M. et al. (2018). Electronic laboratory notebooks allow for modifications in a general, organic, and biochemistry chemistry laboratory to increase authenticity of the student experience. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(11), 1922–1928. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunie, M. (2017). The importance of research data management: The value of electronic laboratory notebooks in the management of data integrity and data availability. Information Services & Use, 37(3), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eblen-Zayas, M. (2015). Comparing electronic and traditional lab notebooks in the advanced lab. In 2015 BFT Proceedings. https://advlabs.aapt.org/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=13799&DocID=4219

  • Ghannam, R. (2020). Do you call that a lab notebook? IEEE Potentials, 39(5), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPOT.2020.2968798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghannam, R., Hussain, S., Fan, H., Conde Gonzalez, M. A. et al. (2021). Supporting team based learning using electronic laboratory notebooks: Perspectives from transnational students. IEEE Access, 9, 43241–43252. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3065611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, N. A. (2020). Using e-notebooks to explore biochemistry with an agricultural lens. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48, 667–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grijalva-Borja, N., Espinosa, V., Quinteros, S., Salguero, A. et al. (2020). Analysis of the perception of university students about the use of Microsoft OneNote as an electronic laboratory notebook in response to non-face-to-face education in pandemic times. In G. Rodriguez Morales, et al. (Eds.), Information and communication technologies, 8th conference, TICEC 2020, Guayaquil, Ecuador, November 25–27, 2020, proceedings (pp.150–162). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62833-8_13

  • Hall, M. L., & Vardar-Ulu, D. (2014). An inquiry-based biochemistry laboratory structure emphasizing competency in the scientific process: A guided approach with an electronic notebook format. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, C. J., Meyer, J., Towns, M. H. et al. (2020). Assessing student learning in a rapidly changing environment: Laboratories and exams. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3110–3113. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hii, K. K., Rzepa, H. S., Smith, E. H. et al. (2015). Asymmetric epoxidation: A twinned laboratory and molecular modeling experiment for upper-level organic chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(8), 1385–1389. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500398e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, S. S., Bonniwell, J. L., Carl, J. D. et al. (2018). A review of electronic engineering logbooks throughout the electrical engineering curriculum. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/106/papers/21867/view

  • Jaggars, S. S., Motz, B. A., Rivera, M. D., Heckler, A., Quick, J. D., Hance, E. A., Karwisch, C. et al. (2021). The digital divide among college students: Lessons learned from the COVID-19 emergency transition. Midwestern Higher Education Compact. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED611284.pdf

  • Johnston, J., Kant, S., Gysbers, V., Hancock, D., Denyer, G. et al. (2013). Using an eportfolio system as an electronic laboratory notebook in undergraduate biochemistry and molecular biology practical classes. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajfez, R. L., Keckemety, K. M., Kross, M. J. et al. (2016). Electronic notebooks to document the engineering design process: From platform to impact. The ASEE Computers in Education (CoED) Journal, 7(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23929

  • Khulwa, C. A., & Luthfia, A. (2023). Generation Z students’ digital literacy on online learning readiness. In 2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) (pp. 360–364). IEEE.

  • Kuczenski, J. A., & Araj, E. S. (2016). A comparison of paper vs. electronic (portfolio) notebooks for engineering design projects. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/64/papers/16827/download

  • Kumon, R. E. (2022). Teaching an advanced undergraduate acoustics laboratory without a laboratory: Course developments enabling teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 152(9), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0011808

  • LeBard, R. J., Hibbert, D., Quinnell, R. et al. (2017). Practice in digital research spaces to engage students with eScience. Teaching Science, 63(1), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magid, A. (2018). Is it worth it? Implementation of electronic lab notebook software among the STEM community at an American university in the UAE. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/106/papers/23165/view

  • Miller, J. (2020). Using an ELN for humanities. LabArchives. https://www.labarchives.com/2020/05/21/using-an-eln-for-humanities/

  • Okon, M. D., & Nocera, T. M. (2017a). Electronic lab notebooks impact biomedical engineering students’ quality of documentation and technical communication. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/78/papers/20019/view

  • Okon, M. D., & Nocera, T. M. (2017b). The student educational experience with electronic laboratory notebooks (work in progress). American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://peer.asee.org/27729

  • Okon, M. D., & Nocera, T. M. (2018). Work in progress: Teaching effective teamwork skills in biomedical engineering laboratory courses. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://peer.asee.org/29988

  • Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., Elmagarmid, A. et al. (2016). Rayyan — A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(210). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

  • Puccinelli, J. P., & Nimunkar, A. J. (2014). An experience with electronic laboratory notebooks in real-world, client-based BME design courses. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/32/papers/9589/view

  • Puccinelli, T. J., & Murphy, J. (2015). Bringing technology to the First Year Design Experience through the use of Electronic Design Notebooks. American Society of Engineering Education. Retrieved October 15, 2021, from https://strategy.asee.org/23632.pdf

  • Riley, E. M., Hattaway, H. Z., Felse, P. A. et al. (2017). Implementation and use of cloud-based electronic lab notebook in a bioprocess engineering teaching laboratory. Journal of Biological Engineering, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-017-0083-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, F., Bakker, C., Kelly, J., Kocher, M., Lafferty, M. et al. (2018). Support for electronic lab notebooks at top American research universities. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 7(2), e1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senger, K., & Nordmo, I. (2021). Using digital field notebooks in geoscientific learning in polar environments. Journal of Geoscience Education, 69(2), 166–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltau, S. R. (2020). Student and instructor perceptions of using electronic laboratory notebooks in Microsoft OneDrive to enhance communication skills and career readiness in chemistry laboratory courses. In Integrating Professional Skills into Undergraduate Chemistry Curricula (pp. 259–279). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2020-1365.ch015

  • Van Duzor, M. W., & Rienstra-Kiracofe, J. C. (2019). The next generation digital learning environment for chemistry. In T. Gupta & R. E. Belford (Eds.), Technology integration in chemistry education and research (TICER) (pp. 247–267). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1318.ch016

  • Van Dyke, A. R., & Smith-Carpenter, J. (2017). Bring your own device: A digital notebook for undergraduate biochemistry laboratory using a free, cross-platform application. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(5), 656–661. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibel, J. D. (2016). Working toward a paperless undergraduate physical chemistry teaching laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(4), 781–784. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00585

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arizona State University Library, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    Eric Prosser

  2. Robert W. Van Houten Library, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA

    John Kromer

Authors
  1. Eric Prosser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Kromer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mr. Kromer provided the initial idea for the article. Both authors contributed equally to the research, analysis, and writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Prosser.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Statement Regarding Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prosser, E., Kromer, J. Electronic Research Notebooks in the Educational Setting: A Scoping Review. J Sci Educ Technol 32, 697–709 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10065-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10065-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation