Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the determinants of banking stability in the MENA region: what role for economic and financial freedom?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Banking Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to investigate the effects of economic freedom and financial freedom on bank stability in 12 Middle-East and North Africa region countries during the period 2005–2020. Using an empirical approach based on the System Generalized Method of Moments, our results reveal that economic freedom, financial freedom, investment freedom and business freedom increase bank stability. A high degree of economic freedom promotes innovation and entrepreneurship and, hence, leads to economic growth and better banking stability. In contrary, we confirm that monetary freedom negatively affects bank stability. The same result was confirmed for the two sub-samples of Middle Eastern countries and North African countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Graph 1

Source: Author based on Thomson Reuters and Heritage Foundation databases

Graph 2

Source: Author based on Thomson Reuters and Heritage Foundation databases

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Datasets used in this paper are available in the Bankscope, Thomson-Reuters, and World Bank Indicators databases.

Notes

  1. A natural logarithm transformation of the Z-score is very useful for a skewed and higher value.

  2. Heritage Foundation Definition.

  3. The measure of economic freedom is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, and a country's overall score is determined by taking the average of the 12 economic freedoms sub-indicators.

  4. Heritage Foundation Definition.

  5. Based on the definition of Heritage foundation, a high score closes to 100 reflects negligible government interference. A score of 50 indicates the existence of considerable government interference in the provision of credit and significant restrictions on the ability of financial institutions to offer financial services. A low score below 50 implies the existence of repressive policies with strong or extensive government control over central banking and credit allocation.

Abbreviations

BS:

Business freedom

BSTAB:

Bank stability

EF:

Economic freedom

FATF:

Financial action task force

FF:

Financial freedom

GDP:

Gross domestic product

IF:

Investment freedom

ME:

Middle-East

MENA:

Middle-East and North-Africa

MF:

Monetary freedom

NA:

North Africa

NIM:

Net interest margin

PSTR:

Panel smooth threshold regression

WGI:

World governance indicators

References

  1. Adusei, M. 2015. The impact of bank size and funding risk on bank stability. Cogent Economics and Finance. 3(1): 1111489–111

  2. Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58(2): 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arellano, M., and O. Bover. 1995. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68: 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asteriou, D., K. Pilbeam, and I. Tomuleasa. 2016. The impact of economic freedom, business regulation and corruption on bank profitability and bank stability: Evidence from Europe. London: City Research Online, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Asteriou, D., K. Pilbeam, and L. Tomuleasa. 2021. The impact of corruption, economic freedom, regulation and transparency on bank profitability and bank stability: Evidence from the Eurozone area. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 184: 150–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ben Lahoeul, B., Taleb, L., Koˇcišová, K., and Y. Ben Zaied. 2022a. The threshold effects of income diversification on bank stability: an efficiency perspective based on a dynamic network slacks-based measure model. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04503-4

  7. Ben Lahouel, B., L. Taleb, and M. Kossai. 2022. Nonlinearities between bank stability and income diversification: A dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach. Expert Systems with Applications 207: 117776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87: 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chortareas, G.E., C. Girardone, and A. Ventouri. 2013. Financial freedom and bank efficiency: Evidence from the European union. Journal of Banking and Finance 37: 1223–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Claessens, S., and L. Laeven. 2004. What drives bank competition? Some international evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 36(3): 563–583.

  11. Djebali, N., and Zaghdoudi, K. 2020. Testing the governance-performance relationship for the Tunisian banks: A GMM in system analysis. Financial Innovation Journal.

  12. Djebali, N., and Zaghdoudi, K. 2020. Threshold effects of liquidity risk and credit risk on bank stability in the MENA region. Journal of Policy Modeling. 42(5): 1049–1063.

  13. English, M., and S. Wassim. 1994. Investigating the interest rate impact of changing secret bank deposits laws: Switzerland. Journal of Banking and Finance 18: 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghenimi, A., C. Hasna, and A. Mohamed. 2017. The effects of liquidity risk and credit risk on bank stability: Evidence from the MENA region. Borsa Istanbul Review 17: 238–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghosh, S. 2016. Does economic freedom matter for risk-taking? Evidence from MENA banks. Review of Behavioral Finance 8: 114–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hakimi. A., Boussaada, R., and H. Hamdi. 2020. The interactional relationships between credit risk, liquidity risk and bank profitability in MENA region. Global Business Review 23(3)

  17. Hakimi, A., R. Boussaada, and M. Karmani. 2020. Is the relationship between corruption, government stability and non-performing loans non-linear? A threshold analysis for the MENA region. International Journal of Finance and Economics 27: 4383–4398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Köhler, M. 2015. Which banks are more risky? The impact of business models on bank stability. Journal of Financial Stability. 16: 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumankoma, S., Abor, J., Anthony, Q., and M. Amidu. 2018. Freedom, competition and bank profitability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. 26(4): 462–481.

  20. Kumankoma, S., Abor, J., and Q. Anthony. 2020. Economic freedom, competition and bank stability in Sub- Saharan Africa. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

  21. Laeven, L., Ratnovski, L., and H. Tong. 2014. Bank size and systemic risk: Some international evidence. International Monetary Fund, Mimeo.

  22. Mavrakana, Christina, and Psillaki, Maria. 2019. Do economic freedom and board structure matter for bank stability and bank performance? Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

  23. Mirzaei, A.., Moore, T., and G. Liu. 2013. Does market structure matter on banks, profitability and stability? Emerging vs. advanced economies. Journal of Banking and Finance.

  24. Shahin, Wassim. 1996. Could financial liberalization ignore informal finance: A commentary. Savings and Development, pp. 105–116.

  25. Sufian, F., and M.S. Habibullah. 2010. Does economic freedom foster banks’ performance? Panel evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics. 6(2): 77–91.

  26. Uddin, M., H. Tofael, A. Aklima, and Z. Rabaya. 2021. Do the diversification of income and assets spur bank profitability in Bangladesh? A dynamic panel data analysis. Journal of Management 19: 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uhde, A., and U. Heimeshoff. 2009. Consolidation in banking and financial stability in Europe: Empirical evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance 33: 1299–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

NA (Not Applicable).

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DN is the only and first author, she presented all the full paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nesrine Djebali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This manuscript has not been published elsewhere in part or in entirety and is not under consideration by another journal. All study participants provided informed consent, and the study design was approved by the appropriate ethics review board. I have read and understood your journal’s policies, and I believe that neither the manuscript nor the study violates any of these.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table

Table 8 Variables Description.

8.

Appendix 2

See Table 9.

Table 9 Correlation matrix

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djebali, N. Assessing the determinants of banking stability in the MENA region: what role for economic and financial freedom?. J Bank Regul (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-023-00220-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-023-00220-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation