Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:16:41.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of L2 English on choice perception, interpretation, and preference for L1 Arabic speakers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

Lama AboHamed ,
Bassil Mashaqba Open the ORCID record for Bassil Mashaqba [Opens in a new window]  and
Nisreen Al-Khawaldeh
Lama AboHamed
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
Bassil Mashaqba*
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
Nisreen Al-Khawaldeh
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
*
Corresponding author: Bassil Mashaqba; Email: b_mashaqba@hu.edu.jo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article compares risk tolerance of native Arabic speakers under two language contexts: their first language (L1 Arabic) and their foreign language (L2 English). We aim to evaluate whether thinking in a foreign language actually reduces the negative effects of cognitive biases, such as loss aversion and mental accounting, on financial decision-making. Toward this aim, we conducted two experiments in which the risk tolerance levels of 144 participants were evaluated across four different types of decision-making problems: the Asian disease problem, the financial crisis problem, the discount problem, and the ticket/money lost problem. In study 1, we adopted Keysar et al.’s (2012, Psychological Science, 23, 661–668) experiment to test the effect of L2 on framing effects associated with loss aversion, and in Study 2, we adopted Costa et al.’s (2014, Cognition, 130, 236–254) experiment to test the effect of L2 on framing effects associated with mental accounting biases. We found that individuals were risk-averse for gains and risk-seeking for losses when presented with choices in their L1, but were almost unaffected by framing manipulation under the L2 condition. When it came to mental accounting, however, framing effects were nearly absent in both L1 and L2 conditions. In our investigation, we examined various potential factors that could explain the foreign language effect on decision-making. The primary factor that appears to account for this linguistic phenomenon is the heightened cognitive and emotional distance experienced when using an L2.

Keywords

decision-makingframing effectsemotionslinguistic code
Type
Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2023 , pp. 834 - 853
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkhammash, R., Asiri, Y. A., Alqarni, I. R., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2023). Can language influence health decisions? The role of foreign language and grammatical structure. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52, 957–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09918-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrade, G. (2022). Moral foreign language effect on responses to the trolley dilemma amongst native speakers of Arabic. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 22(3–4), 338–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, G. (2023). Arabic speakers offer more utilitarian responses when thinking about the trolley dilemma in English. Current Psychology, 42, 6933–6935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01976-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, C., & Wright, W. E. (2017). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (6th ed.). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Barabadi, E., Rahmani Tabar, M., & Booth, J. R. (2021). The relation of language context and religiosity to trilemma judgments. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(6), 583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beekes, R. S. (2011). Comparative Indo-European linguistics: An introduction. John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Białek, M., & Fugelsang, J. (2019). No evidence for decreased foreign language effect in highly proficient and acculturated bilinguals: A commentary on Čavar and Tytus (2018). Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(8), 679–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (2014). Social cognition: How individuals construct social reality. Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodig, E., Toivo, W., & Scheepers, C. (2020). Investigating the foreign language effect as a mitigating influence on the ‘optimality bias’ in moral judgements. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 4(2), 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, S. (2019). The auditory foreign-language effect of moral decision making in highly proficient bilinguals. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(10), 865–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, S. (2021). The interplay between emotion and modality in the foreign-language effect on moral decision making. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(2), 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2015). Emotionality differences between a native and foreign language: Implications for everyday life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 214–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T., Dollaghan, C., Needleman, H., & Janosky, J. (1997). Reducing bias in language assessment: Processing-dependent measures. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 40(3), 519–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, Y. L., Gu, X., Ng, J. C. K., & Tse, C. S. (2016). Effects of dilemma type, language, and emotion arousal on utilitarian vs deontological choice to moral dilemmas in Chinese–English bilinguals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(1), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Circi, R., Gatti, D., Russo, V., & Vecchi, T. (2021). The foreign language effect on decision-making: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(4), 1131–1141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., Foucart, A., Arnon, I., Aparici, M., & Apesteguia, J. (2014). Piensa” twice: On the foreign language effect in decision making. Cognition, 130(2), 236–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., Vives, M. L., & Corey, J. D. (2017). On language processing shaping decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 146–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Freitas, J., Sarkissian, H., Newman, G. E., Grossmann, I., De Brigard, F., Luco, A., & Knobe, J. (2018). Consistent belief in a good true self in misanthropes and three interdependent cultures. Cognitive Science, 42, 134–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, A., & Graber, E. M. (2012). Over-the-counter acne treatments: a review. The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, 5(5), 32–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Del Maschio, N., Crespi, F., Peressotti, F., Abutalebi, J., & Sulpizio, S. (2022). Decision-making depends on language: A meta-analysis of the foreign language effect. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(4), 617–630. https://doi:10.1017/S1366728921001012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Lago, M., & Matute, H. (2019). Thinking in a foreign language reduces the causality bias. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(1), 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dylman, A. S., & Champoux-Larsson, M. F. (2020). It’s (not) all Greek to me: Boundaries of the foreign language effect. Cognition, 196, 104148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104148CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. S. B. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, R., Corretjer, O., & Webb, K. (2019). Benefits of foreign language learning and bilingualism: An analysis of published empirical research 2012–2019. Foreign Language Annals, 52(4), 699–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freckelton, I. (2012). Death by homeopathy: issues for civil, criminal and coronial law and for health service policy. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(3), 454–478.Google ScholarPubMed
Gao, S., Zika, O., Rogers, R. D., & Thierry, G. (2015). Second language feedback abolishes the “hot hand” effect during even-probability gambling. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(15), 5983–5989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2015). The foreign language effect on moral judgment: The role of emotions and norms. PloS One, 10(7), e0131529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2016). Foreign language affects the contribution of intentions and outcomes to moral judgment. Cognition, 154, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, B., & Zwiebel, J. (2018). The hot-hand fallacy: Cognitive mistakes or equilibrium adjustments? Evidence from major league baseball. Management Science, 64(11), 5315–5348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. D. (2009). Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. (2004). Fixed effects and bias due to the incidental parameters problem in the Tobit model. Econometric Reviews, 23(2), 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guba, M. N., Mashaqba, B., Huneety, A., & AlHajEid, O. (2021). Attitudes toward Jordanian Arabic-Accented English among native and non-native speakers of English. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 18(2), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.18.2.9-29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjichristidis, C., Geipel, J., & Savadori, L. (2015). The effect of foreign language in judgments of risk and benefit: The role of affect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(2), 117–129.Google ScholarPubMed
Hayakawa, S., & Keysar, B. (2018). Using a foreign language reduces mental imagery. Cognition, 173, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayakawa, S., Tannenbaum, D., Costa, A., Corey, J. D., & Keysar, B. (2017). Thinking more or feeling less? Explaining the foreign-language effect on moral judgment. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1387–1397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, E. L., Simons, D. J., & Barr, D. J. (2021). The trajectory of truth: A longitudinal study of the illusory truth effect. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2004). Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In Models of a man: Essays in memory of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 411–432). The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. In Holyoak, K. & Morrison, B. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 267—293). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition, 7, 409–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201–210). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Griskevicius, V., Becker, D. V., & Schaller, M. (2010). Goal-driven cognition and functional behavior: The fundamental-motives framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 63–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S. L., & An, S. G. (2012). The foreign-language effect: Thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23(6), 661–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korn, C. W., Ries, J., Schalk, L., Oganian, Y., & Saalbach, H. (2018). A hard-to-read font reduces the framing effect in a large sample. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 696–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melnikoff, D. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2018). The mythical number two. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(4), 280–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miozzo, M., Navarrete, E., Ongis, M., Mello, E., Girotto, V., & Peressotti, F. (2020). Foreign language effect in decision-making: How foreign is it? Cognition, 199, 104245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadarevic, L., Plier, S., Thielmann, I., & Darancó, S. (2018). Foreign language reduces the longevity of the repetition-based truth effect. Acta Psychologica, 191, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oganian, Y., Korn, C. W., & Heekeren, H. R. (2016). Language switching—But not foreign language use per se—reduces the framing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(1), 140–147.Google Scholar
Osman, M. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 988–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavlenko, A. (2012). Affective processing in bilingual speakers: Disembodied cognition? International Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 405–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sezer, O., Zhang, T., Gino, F., & Bazerman, M. H. (2016). Overcoming the outcome bias: Making intentions matter. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheikh, N. A., & Titone, D. (2016). The embodiment of emotional words in a second language: An eye-movement study. Cognition and Emotion, 30(3), 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, H. I., & Kim, J. (2017). Foreign language effect and psychological distance. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), 1339–1352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloman, S. (2014). Two systems of reasoning: An update. In Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 69–79). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2004). Balance in psychological research: The dual process perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 357–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183–206.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185, 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hugten, J., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2018). The foreign language effect on the self-serving bias: A field experiment in the high school classroom. PloS One, 13(2), e0192143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vives, M. L., Aparici, M., & Costa, A. (2018). The limits of the foreign language effect on decision-making: The case of the outcome bias and the representativeness heuristic. PloS One, 13(9), e0203528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vives, M. L., Costumero, V., Ávila, C., & Costa, A. (2021). Foreign language processing undermines affect labeling. Affective Science, 2(2), 199–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winskel, H., Ratitamkul, T., Brambley, V., Nagarachinda, T., & Tiencharoen, S. (2016). Decision-making and the framing effect in a foreign and native language. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar