Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A soil matrix capacity index to predict mineral-associated but not particulate organic carbon across a range of climate and soil pH

  • Biogeochemistry Letters
  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding controls on soil organic carbon (SOC) will be crucial to managing soils for climate change mitigation and food security. Climate exerts an overarching influence on SOC, affecting both carbon (C) inputs to soil and soil physicochemical properties participating in C retention. To test our hypothesis that climate, C inputs, and soil properties would differently affect particulate organic carbon (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC), we sampled 16 agricultural sites (n = 124 plots) in the United States, ranging in climate (mean annual precipitation (MAP)—potential evapotranspiration (PET; MAP-PET)), soil pH (5.8–7.9), and soil texture (silt + clay = 13–96%). As MAP-PET increased, soils increased in oxalate-extractable iron (FeO) and aluminum (AlO), decreased in exchangeable calcium (Caex) and magnesium (Mgex), and received greater C inputs. Soil physicochemical properties did not strongly predict POC, confirming the relative independence of this SOC fraction from the soil matrix. In contrast, MAOC was well predicted by combining AlO + [1/2]FeO with Caex + Mgex in a ‘matrix capacity index’, which performed better than individual soil physicochemical properties across all pH levels (r > 0.79). Structural equation modeling indicated a similar total effect of MAP-PET on MAOC and POC, which was mediated by total C inputs and the matrix capacity index for MAOC but not POC. Our results emphasize the need to separately conceptualize controls on MAOC and POC and justify the use of a unified soil matrix capacity index for predicting soil MAOC storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Colorado State University Soil, Water & Plant Testing Laboratory, Cotrufo Soil Innovation Laboratory members, and Jim Ippolito for technical support. Thanks to Matt Liebman and Ilsa Kantola for contributing crop yield data and to Tom Moorman, Michael Thompson, Ala Khaleel, Paul Jasa, Harold van Es, and Michael H. Davis for site access and sampling. Five anonymous reviewers offered feedback that improved the manuscript. Funding for this project was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Postdoctoral Fellowship to A. E. King (Award 2020-67034-31762). Soils from Kellogg Biological Station were provided with support from the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (Award DE-SC0018409), by the National Science Foundation Long-term Ecological Research Program (DEB 1832042) at the Kellogg Biological Station, and by Michigan State University AgBioResearch.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture, 2020-67034-31762, Alison King, Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, DE-SC0018409, Directorate for Biological Sciences, DEB 1832042

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison E. King.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Co-author M. Francesca Cotrufo is co-founder of Cquester Analytics, which offers soil fractionation for service. The other authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Stephen D. Sebestyen

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 995 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

King, A.E., Amsili, J.P., Córdova, S.C. et al. A soil matrix capacity index to predict mineral-associated but not particulate organic carbon across a range of climate and soil pH. Biogeochemistry 165, 1–14 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01066-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01066-3

Keywords

Navigation