Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of bending radius on deformation behavior of H62 brass tubes in a less constrained free bending process

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finite element method and bending experiments were carried out to survey the influence of bending radius on forming quality of H62 brass tubes in free bending process,which are widely used as key components of pipeline system in aerospace, aviation and automotive fields. Different bending radiuses ranged from 45 mm to 100 mm with an interval of 5 mm were employed to survey the forming defects. The results illustrated that both cross-section distortion and wall thickness variations at sections with angles in range of 10–20° and 160–170° were larger than other regions. The severe deformation behaviors usually occurred at the end of the tubes. Moreover, similar to the variation tendency of cross-section distortion, the changing of wall thickness decreases gradually with the increase of bending radius. Furthermore, the positions with the severer forming defects gradually moved towards to two terminals of the tubes with increasing bending radius. The variations of these deformation behaviors were mainly caused by the tangential stress and axial stress which were decomposed by an extra thrust introduced by the bending die. Based on the above force analysis and experimental results, the credible analytical equations were derived to quantify the effect of bending radius on forming precision during the practical bending process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xiao YH, Guo C, Guo XY (2011) Constitutive modeling of hot deformation behavior of H62 brass. Mater Sci Eng A 528(21):6510–6518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hashmi MSJ (2006) Aspects of tube and pipe manufacturing processes: meter to nanometer diameter. J Mater Process Technol 179(1–3):5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guan Y, Pourboghrat F, Barlat F (2006) Finite element modeling of tube hydroforming of polycrystalline aluminum alloy extrusions. Int J Plasticity 22(12):2366–2393

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmetoglu M, Altan T (2000) Tube hydroforming: state-of-the-art and future trends. J Mater Process Technol 98(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhan M, Zhai H, He Y (2012) Springback mechanism and compensation of cryogenic Ti alloy tube after numerically controlled bending. T Nonferr Metal Soc 22:s287–s293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller JE, Kyriakides S, Bastard AH (2001) On bend-stretch forming of aluminum extruded tubes - I: experiments. Int J Mech Sci 43(5):1283–1317

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller JE, Kyriakides S, Corona E (2001) On bend-stretch forming of aluminum extruded tubes—II: analysis. Int J Mech Sci 43(5):1319–1338

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Corona E (2004) A simple analysis for bend-stretch forming of aluminum extrusions. Int J Mech Sci 46(3):433–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xue X, Liao J, Vincze G, Gracio JJ (2015) Modelling of mandrel rotary draw bending for accurate twist springback prediction of an asymmetric thin-walled tube. J Mater Process Technol 216:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shim DS, Kim KP, Lee KY (2016) Double-stage forming using critical pre-bending radius in roll bending of pipe with rectangular cross-section. J Mater Process Technol 236:189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Safari M, Farzin M (2014) A study on laser bending of tailor machined blanks with various irradiating schemes. J Mater Process Technol 214(1):112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yilamu K, Hino R, Hamasaki H, Yoshida F (2010) Air bending and springback of stainless steel clad aluminum sheet. J Mater Process Technol 210(2):272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li H, Yang H, Yan J, Zhan M (2009) Numerical study on deformation behaviors of thin-walled tube NC bending with large diameter and small bending radius. Comput Mater Sci 45(4):921–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li H, Yang H, Zhan M, Kou YL (2010) Deformation behaviors of thin-walled tube in rotary draw bending under push assistant loading conditions. J Mater Process Technol 210(1):143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He Y, Jing Y, Mei Z, Li H, Kou YL (2009) 3D numerical study on wrinkling characteristics in NC bending of aluminum alloy thin-walled tubes with large diameters under multi-die constraints. Comput Mater Sci 45(4):1052–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen J, Daxin E, Zhang J (2013) Effects of process parameters on wrinkling of thin-walled circular tube under rotary draw bending. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 68(5–8):1505–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Qureshi HA (1999) Elastic-plastic analysis of tube bending. Int J Mach Tool Manu 39(1):87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kami A (2011) Prediction of wrinkling in thin-walled tube push-bending process using artificial neural network and finite element method. P I Mech Eng B-J Eng 225(10):1801–1812

    Google Scholar 

  19. Song HW, Xie W, Zhang SH, Jiang W, Lăzărescu L, Banabic D (2021) Granular media filler assisted push bending method of thin-walled tubes with small bending radius. Int J Mech Sci 198:106365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Du B, Zhao CC, Dong GJ et al (2017) FEM-DEM coupling analysis for solid granule medium forming new technology. J Mater Process Technol 249:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen H, Güner A, Khalifa NB, Tekkaya AE (2016) Granular media-based tube press hardening. J Mater Process Technol 228:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen H, Hess S, Haeberle J, Pitikaris S, Born P, Güner A, Sperl M, Tekkaya AE (2016) Enhanced granular medium-based tube and hollow profile press hardening. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 65(1):273–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong GJ, Zhao CC, Peng YX, Li Y (2015) Hot granules medium pressure forming process of AA7075 conical parts. Chin J Mech Eng 28:580–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dong GJ, Bi J, Du B, Zhao CC (2017) Research on AA6061 tubular components prepared by combined technology of heat treatment and internal high pressure forming. J Mater Process Technol 242:126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jianjun WU, Zhang Z (2021) An improved procedure for manufacture of 3D tubes with springback concerned in flexible bending process. Chin J Aeronaut 34(11):267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. He Y, Heng L, Zhang Z, Mei ZHAN, Jing LIU, Guangjun L (2012) Advances and trends on tube bending forming technologies. Chin J Aeronaut 25(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ancellotti S, Fontanari V, Slaghenaufi S, Cortelletti E, Benedetti M (2019) Forming rectangular tubes into complicated 3D shapes by combining three-roll push bending, twisting and rotary draw bending: the role of the fabrication loading history on the mechanical response. Int J Mater Form 12:907–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gantner P, Harrison DK, De Silva AKM, Bauer H (2004) New bending technologies for the automobile manufacturing industry. In: Proceedings of the 34th international MATADOR conference. Springer, London, pp 211–216

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Li P, Wang L, Li M (2016) Flexible-bending of profiles with asymmetric cross-section and elimination of side bending defect. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 87(9–12):2853–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li H, Yang H, Zhang ZY et al (2014) Multiple instability-constrained tube bending limits. J Mater Process Technol 214(2):445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu YX, Liu YL, Yang H et al (2013) Improvement of the accuracy and the computational efficiency of the springback prediction model for the rotary-draw bending of rectangular H96 tube. Int J Mech Sci 66:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Z, Wu J, Zhang S et al (2016) A new iterative method for springback control based on theory analysis and displacement adjustment. Int J Mech Sci 105:330–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Murata M, Kuboki T (2015) CNC tube forming method for manufacturing flexibly and 3-dimensionally bent tubes [M]//60 excellent inventions in metal forming. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 363–368

    Google Scholar 

  34. Guo X, Ma Y, Chen W et al (2018) Simulation and experimental research of the free bending process of a spatial tube. J Mater Process Technol 255:137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li P, Wang L, Li M (2017) Flexible-bending of profiles and tubes of continuous varying radii. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 88(5–8):1669–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gantner P, Bauer H, Harrison DK et al (2005) Free-bending —a new bending technique in the hydroforming process chain. J Mater Process Technol 167(2–3):302–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shimada N, Tomizawa A, Kubota H et al (2014) Development of three-dimensional hot bending and direct quench technology. Procedia Eng 81:2267–2272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chatti S, Hermes M, Tekkaya AE et al (2010) The new TSS bending process: 3D bending of profiles with arbitrary cross-sections. CIRP Ann 59(1):315–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Farina S, Gemignani R, Mentella A et al (2009) In: Tube free bending: a new index for the control of the cross section quality[C]//IX Convegno Associazione Italiana Tecnologia Meccanica AITEM. ITA,. p. 1–6

  40. Liu K, Liu Y, Yang H (2013) Experimental study on the effect of dies on wall thickness distribution in NC bending of thin-walled rectangular 3A21 aluminum alloy tube. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 68(5–8):1867–1874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Goodarzi M, Kuboki T, Murata M (2005) Deformation analysis for the shear bending process of circular tubes. J Mater Process Technol 162:492–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Goodarzi M, Kuboki T, Murata M (2007) Effect of initial thickness on shear bending process of circular tubes. J Mater Process Technol 191(1–3):136–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Goodarzi M, Kuboki T, Murata M (2007) Effect of die corner radius on the formability and dimensional accuracy of tube shear bending. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 35(1–2):66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jiang Z, Mei Z, Yang H, Xu X, Li G (2011) Deformation behavior of medium-strength TA18 high-pressure tubes during NC bending with different bending radii. Chin J Aeronaut 24(5):657–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu KX, Zheng S, Zheng YS, Chen Y, He Y (2017) Plate assembly effect and cross-section distortion of rectangular tube in rotary draw bending. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 90(1–4):177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu K, Liu Y, Yang H (2014) Experimental and FE simulation study on cross-section distortion of rectangular tube under multi-die constraints in rotary draw bending process. Int J Prec Eng Manuf 15(4):633–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xunzhong GUO, Xuan et al (2020) Finite element modelling and experimental investigation of the impact of filling different materials in copper tubes during 3D free bending process. Chin J Aeronaut 167(02):336–344

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wang X, Li F (2015) Analysis of wall thickness variation in the hydro-bending of a double-layered tube. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 81(1–4):67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. E D X, Zhou D J. (2016) Metal tube bending: theory and forming defects analysis. Beijing Institute of Technology Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tang NC (2000) Plastic-deformation analysis in tube bending. Int J Pre Ves Pip 77(12):751–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1937206), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20211568), the Project Funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019 M661826), and the Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and the NUAA Innovation Program for Graduate Education (KYCX19_0181).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yizhou Shen or Jie Tao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, J., Guo, X., Shen, Y. et al. Effect of bending radius on deformation behavior of H62 brass tubes in a less constrained free bending process. Int J Mater Form 16, 50 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01774-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01774-z

Keywords

Navigation