Abstract
Digital technology has posed a challenge to the conventional way in which scientific knowledge was disseminated and validated within the scientific system. Scientific knowledge has interfered into the mass media system through online platforms and social media networks. This tendency tremendously expanded after the Covid-19 pandemic, which challenged scientific community around the world to search for more effective ways of communicating scientific evidence. Meanwhile, recent studies show that trust towards science has globally increased since the pandemic. Moreover, it is a key driving force behind people’s attitudes and has predictable impact on their pandemic-related behavior. Despite the widespread dissemination of scientific knowledge, it is often misrepresented, oversimplified, or distorted. People trust science globally, yet scientific knowledge is disseminated through the widely-used yet least trusted medium of social media.
This paper aims to analyze the interconnection between scientific and mass media systems and its effects on communicating scientific knowledge on social media. For this purpose, the logic of digital media platforms is explored, and Luhman’s system theory is viewed as an essential theoretical background for the analyses of the spread and exposure of scientific knowledge across social media. Theoretical analyses, along with secondary data analysis of recent global studies on news consumption and trust towards the media and science, are used to analyze the structural coupling of the mass media and scientific systems. The author concludes that it is essential to interconnect scientific and mass media systems, taking into account trust towards the medium, message, and source.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
(a statement on how any datasets used can be accessed)
This declaration is not applicable.
Change history
02 September 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-023-09661-z
References
Ahlers D (2006) News consumption and the new electronic media. Harv Int J Press/Politics 11(1):29–52
Algan Y, Cohen D, Davoine E, Foucault M, Stantcheva S (2021) Trust in scientists in times of pandemic: Panel evidence from 12 countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108576118. Accessed 24 January 2023
Aral S (2020) The hype machine: how social media disrupts our elections, our economy, and our health-and how we must adapt. New York, Currency
Attwell K, Lake J, Sneddon J, Gerrans P, Blyth C, Lee J (2021) Converting the maybes: crucial for a successful COVID-19 vaccination strategy. PLoS One 2021 Jan 20(1):e0245907. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245907
Baughan A et al (2022) “I Don’t Even Remember What I Read”: How Design Influences Dissociation on Social Media. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3501899. Accessed 24 January 2023
Bicchieri C et al (2021) In science we (should) trust: expectations and compliance across nine countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE 16:e0252892. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252892
Buturoiu DR, Corbu N, Boțan M (2022) Profiles of News Consumption in a High-Choice Media Environment: Evidence from Romania, Media Literacy and Academic Research | Vol. 5, No. 1, April 2022
Carey J (2009) Communication as culture: essays on media and society. Routledge, New York
Carr CT, Hayes RA (2015) Social media: defining, developing, and Divining. Atl J Communication 23(1):46–65
Chadwick A (2013) The Hybrid Media System: politics and power. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cinelli M, Brugnoli E, Schmidt AL, Zollo F, Quattrociocchi W, Scala A (2020) Selective exposure shapes the Facebook news diet. PLoS ONE 15(3):e0229129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229129
Dahlgren P (2018) Media, Knowledge and Trust: the deepening Epistemic Crisis of Democracy. Javnost - The Public. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418819
Dhanani LY, Franz B (2020) The role of News Consumption and Trust in Public Health. Leadership in shaping COVID-19 knowledge and prejudice. Front Psychol 11:560828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560828
Dohle S, Wingen T, Schreiber M (2020) Acceptance and adoption of protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of trust in politics and trust in science. Soc. Psychol. Bull 2020 Dec 23;15(4):1. doi: https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.4315
Edelman Trust Barometer (2023) https://www.edelman.com/trust/2023/trust-barometer. Accessed 24 January 2023
Edelman Trust Barometer (2022) 2022 Edelman Trust Barometer FINAL_Jan25.Pdf. Accessed 24 January 2023
Fenton N (2009) New media, old news: Journalism and democracy in the digital age. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Flynn DJ, Nyhan B, Reifler J (2017) The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Adv Political Psychol 38:127–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394
Galtung J, Ruge MH (1965) The structure of Foreign News: the presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four norwegian newspapers. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104
A Global Study on Information Literacy: Understanding generational behaviors and concerns around false and misleading information online (2022) https://www.poynter.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/A-Global-Study-on-Information-Literacy-1.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2023
Greene CM, Murphy G (2021) Quantifying the effects of fake news on behavior: evidence from a study of COVID-19 misinformation. J Exp Psychol Appl 2021 Jun 10:1. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000371
Han H (2022) Trust in the scientific research community predicts intent to comply with COVID-19 prevention measures: an analysis of a large-scale international survey dataset. Epidemiol Infect 150:e36–e31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268822000255
Harcup T, O’Neill D (2017) What is News? Journalism Stud 18(12):1470–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193
Hromatko ITM, Vranic A (2021) Trust in science, perceived vulnerability to disease, and adherence to pharmacological and non-pharmacological COVID-19 recommendations. Front Psychol 2021 Apr 30:12:664554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664554
Huber B, Barnidge M, Zúñiga H, Liu J (2019) Fostering public trust in science: the role of social media. Public Underst Sci 2019 28(7):759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097
Johnson NF et al (2020) The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views. Nature 582:230–233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2281-1
Levy R (2021) Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment. American Economic Review 2021, 111(3): 831–870. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191777
Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek SJ, de Graaf K, Larson HJ (2021) Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav 2021 Mar 05;5(3):337–348. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1
Luhmann N (1992) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. suhrkamp taschenbuch Wissenschaft, Frankfurt am Main
Luhmann N (1995) Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Luhmann N (2000) The reality of mass media. (Translated by Kathleen Cross) Stanford University Press
McSpadden K (2015) You Now Have a Shorter Attention Span Than a Goldfish. https://time.com/3858309/attention-spans-goldfish/. Accessed 24 January 2023
Moran K (2020) How people read online: new and old findings. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-people-read-online/. Accessed 24 January 2023
Mousoulidou M, Christodoulou A, Argyrides M, Siakalli M, Constantinou L (2022) Trust in Science and COVID-19. Encyclopedia, 2022, 2, 602–616. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2010040
Newman N et al (2022) Digital News Report 2021, 10th edition. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2022. Accessed 24 January 2023
Ostertag S (2019) News as Relational Social Practice: A Theoretical Framework. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336568580_News_as_Relational_Social_Practice_A_Theoretical_Framework. Accessed 24 January 2023
Palczewski M (2018) The term news-its concept and definition in Anglo-Saxon tradition. A review and classification attempt. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326211686_MAREK_PALCZEWSKI_The_term_news-its_concept_and_definition_in_Anglo-Saxon_tradition_A_review_and_classification_attempt. Accessed 24 January 2023
Park RE (1940) News as a form of knowledge: a chapter in the sociology of knowledge. Am J Sociol 45(5):669–686
Pew Research Center (2022) Trust in America: Do Americans trust the news media? https://www.pewresearch.org/2022/01/05/trust-in-america-do-americans-trust-the-news-media/. Accessed 24 January 2023
Plohl N, Musil B (2021) Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: the critical role of trust in science. Psychol Health Med 26:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988
Schultz I (2007) THE JOURNALISTIC GUT FEELING. Journalistic doxa, news habitus and orthodox news values. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780701275507
Sunstein C (2001) Echo Chambers: Bush v. Gore, Impeachment, and Beyond. Princeton University Press
Tanzer M, Campbell C, Saunders R, Luyten P, Booker T, Fonagy P (2021) Acquiring knowledge: epistemic trust in the age of fake news. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/g2b6k
Tewksbury D (2006) What do Americans really want to know? Tracking the behavior of News readers on the internet. J Communication 53(4):694–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02918.x
Welcome Global Monitor : COVID-19. https://wellcome.org/reports/wellcome-global-monitor-covid-19/2020. Accessed 24 January 2023
Funding
(details of any funding received)
This declaration is not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the work on this manuscript was done by one author named in the manusscript file-Anahit Hakobyan.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical Approval (applicable for both human and/ or animal studies. Ethical committees, Internal Review Boards and guidelines followed must be named. When applicable, additional headings with statements on consent to participate and consent to publish are also required)
This declaration is not applicable.
Competing interests (always applicable and includes interests of a financial or personal nature)
This declaration is not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hakobyan, A. Communicating Scientific Knowledge as News on Social Media: Analyses in Frames of Luhmann’s System Theory. Syst Pract Action Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-023-09659-7
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-023-09659-7