Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: International market risk, monetary policy stance, and corporate financing: China’s economic recovery in the post-pandemic era

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 08 April 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

In the post-pandemic era, the epidemic in China has been effectively controlled and the economy has entered the recovery stage. However, the situation abroad is still complex, which affects the world economy, and the international market is facing great uncertainty. Discussing whether and how an international market risk affects domestic economic recovery is of great significance. We construct an open DSGE model, including market risk shocks and corporate financing constraints. The increase in international market risk is adverse to domestic credit financing and affects enterprise credit demand and bank credit supply. An ultra-loose monetary policy amplifies the negative impact of an international market shock on credit. Using data on listed nonfinancial companies from the first quarter of 2007 to the second quarter of 2019 in China, we confirm the findings in the theoretical part. Finally, this study puts forward some suggestions to prevent international market risk and recover domestic economic vitality smoothly in the post-pandemic era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Enquiries about data availability can be directed to the authors.

Change history

Notes

  1. Data source: Phoenix News.

  2. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. The US unemployment rates for April, May, June, and July 2020 were 14.4%, 13.0%, 11.2%, and 10.5%, respectively, with the highest rate during the 2008 financial crisis at 10.4% in February 2010.

  3. The US federal fiscal deficit for April, May, and June 2020 was $738.02 billion, $398.75 billion, and $864.07 billion, respectively. Data source: Bureau of the Fiscal Service.

  4. Data source: People’s Bank of China.

  5. The concept of all interest rates in the theoretical part of this paper is the concept of gross return, which is equal to the ratio of principal and interest to principal.

  6. The nonperformance loan ratio (hereinafter called the NPL ratio) data of Chinese commercial banks started in 2003. The NPL rate of Chinese commercial banks from 2003 to 2007 exceeded 10% due to the fact that the criteria for the five classification levels were not exactly the same for each Chinese bank before 2007, after which the CBRC issued the “Guidelines on Loan Risk Classification” to refine the classification methodology. Although the NPL ratio of the banking industry kept decreasing from 2003 to 2009: from 17.9% in the fourth quarter of 2003 to 1.58% in the fourth quarter of 2009, the change in loan ratio was too large. From 2010 onwards, the NPL ratio of Chinese commercial banks stabilized at 1.1%–1.5% level. Therefore, the average value of 1.363% of the NPL rate from Q1 2010 to Q4 2018 is used here to estimate the default rate in China.

  7. The magnitude of the autoregressive coefficient only affects the duration of the shock and does not affect the direction of the shock effect. Therefore, it does not affect the conclusion of the theoretical part of the paper.

  8. This \( \phi^{Y} { = }0.25{ 0}{\text{.5}}{ 0}{\text{.75}}\) corresponds to the over-tightening, baseline, and over-loosening cases of monetary policies in the Fig. 1, respectively.

  9. Source: CSMAR database. CICSI is a monthly measure of investor sentiment in the Chinese stock market obtained using six data: fund discount rate, monthly trading volume, number of IPOs, IPO first-day return, number of new investor accounts, and consumer confidence index, weighted by a certain ratio.

  10. Z-score = 1.2 × working capital / total assets + 1.4 × retained earnings / total assets + 3.3 × profit before interest and tax / total assets + 0.6 × total market value of stocks / book value of liabilities + 0.999 × sales revenue/total assets.

References

  • Altunbas Y, Gambacorta L, Marques-Ibanez D (2014) Does monetary policy affect bank risk-taking? Int J Cent Bank 10(1):95–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Avdjiev S, McCauley RN, Shin HS (2015) Breaking Free of the Triple Coincidence in International Finance. Working Paper No. 524

  • Baker M, Stein JC, Wurgler J (2003a) When does the market matter? Stock prices and the investment of equity-dependent firms. Quart J Econ 118(3):969–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker S, Bloom N, Davis S, Terry SJ (2020) COVID-induced Economic Uncertainty. paper available on the link http://www.policyuncertainty.com/media/COVID-Induced%20.pdf

  • Baker M, Stein J, Wurgler J (2003b) When does the market matter? Stock prices and investment of equity-dependent firms. Quart J Econ 118:969–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker M, Wurgler J (2006) Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. J Financ 61(4):1645–1680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke B (1983) Non-monetary effects of the financial crisis in the propagation of the great depression. Am Econ Rev 73(3):257–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O (2009) Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself. Economist January 29

  • Bloom N (2009) The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica 77(3):623–685

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo MD, Duca JV, Koch C (2016) Economic policy uncertainty and the credit channel: aggregate and bank level U.S. evidence over several decades. J Financ Stab 26:90–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi Y and Li X (2019) Beauties of the emperor: An investigation of a Chinese government bailout. J Financ Mark 44(6):42–70

  • Christiano LJ , Motto R , Rostagno M (2016) Risk Shocks. Am Econ Rev 104. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.1.27

  • Coimbra N, Kim D, Rey H (2021) Central bank policy and the concentration of risk: Empirical estimates [J]. J financ econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2021.08.002

  • Delis MD, Kouretas GP (2011) Interest rates and bank risk-taking. J Bank Finance 35(4):840–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong A, Kabir R, Nguyen TT (2008) Capital structure around the world: the roles of firm-and country-specific determinants. J Bank Finance 32(9):1954–1969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux M B, Yu C (2014) International Financial Integration and Crisis Contagion. NBER working paper No. 20526

  • Dewenter KL, Malatesta PH (2001) State-owned and privately owned firm: an empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity. Am Econ Rev 91(1):320–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicks D, Fulghieri P (2019) Uncertainty aversion and systemic risk. J Polit Econ 127(3):1118–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerali A, Neri S, Sessa L, Signoretti F (2010) Credit and Banking in a DSGE Model of the Euro Area [J]. J Money Credit Bank 42(s1):107–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2010.00331

  • Gilchrist S, Mojon B (2018) Credit risk in the euro area. Econ J 128(608):118–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haroon O, Ali M, Khan A et al (2021) Financial market risks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 57(8):2407–2414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson AC, Feng X (2016) The state advances, the private sector retreats? Firm effects of China’s great stimulus programme. Camb J Econ 40(6):1635–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S, Zingales L (1997) Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quart J Econ 112(1):169–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine R (2002) Bank-based or market-based financial systems: which is better. J Financ Intermediation 11(4):398–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JB, Bao Y, Zheng WT (2022) Analyses of some structural properties on a class of hierarchical scale-free networks. Fractals 30(7):2250136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JB, Xie Q, Gu JJ (2023) Statistical analyses of a class of random pentagonal chain networks with respect to several topological properties. J Funct Spaces 2023:1–17

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JB, Zhao BY (2023) Study on environmental efficiency of Anhui province based on SBM-DEA model and fractal theory. Fractals. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23400728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld M (2015) Trilemmas and Trade-offs: Living with Financial Globalisation. BIS Working Papers No. 480

  • Pástor U, Veronesi P (2013) Political uncertainty and risk premia. J Financ Econ 110(3):520–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polk C, Sapienza P (2009) The stock market and corporate investment: a test of catering theory. Rev Financ Studies 22(1):187–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan RG (2006) Has financial made the world riskier? Eur Financ Manag 12(4):499–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey H (2016) The international credit channel and monetary policy autonomy. IMF Econ Rev 64(1):6–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard S (2007) Maintaining low inflation: money, interest rates, and policy stance. J Mon Econ 54(5):1441–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D (1991) Pro-competitive effects of trade reform: Results from a CGE model of Cameroon. Eur Econ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90011-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharif A, Aloui C, Yarovaya L (2020) COVID-19 pandemic, oil prices, stock market, geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty Nexus in the US economy: fresh evidence from the wavelet-based approach. Int Rev Financ Anal 101496:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Syriopoulos T, Makram B, Boubaker A (2015) Stock market volatility spillovers and portfolio hedging: BRICS and the financial crisis. Int Rev Financ Anal 39:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valencia F (2016) Bank capital and uncertainty. J Bank Financ 69(8):S1-S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.06.010

  • Wu J, Li H, Zheng D, Liu X (2020) Economic uncertainty or financial uncertainty? An empirical analysis of bank risk-taking in Asian emerging markets. Financ Res Lett 39:101542

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the 2022 key research topic of Anhui Financial Society: “Research on the Impact of Financial Literacy on the Financial Vulnerability of Urban and Rural Households”; Humanities and Social Science Project of Education Department of Anhui Province of China (SK2021A0276); Scientific Research Project of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (21QN22); Guangdong Society Project Planning (GD22YYJ02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Zhong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-024-01145-7

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, CB., Zhong, Q. RETRACTED ARTICLE: International market risk, monetary policy stance, and corporate financing: China’s economic recovery in the post-pandemic era. J Comb Optim 46, 7 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01072-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01072-z

Keywords

Navigation